My main use case for Netskope is for SWG and reverse proxy.
We have used Netskope for forward proxy to protect from different malicious websites, malicious links, and malicious files so that we can secure our environment.
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
My main use case for Netskope is for SWG and reverse proxy.
We have used Netskope for forward proxy to protect from different malicious websites, malicious links, and malicious files so that we can secure our environment.
Netskope has positively impacted our organization by securing all our systems, and the response time is also less, with a high catch rate for any incident.
The best features that Netskope offers in my experience include SSC for secure services, CASB which helps to protect from different attacks, SWG feature, cloud firewall, SDPN which helps to create an instant connection, and remote browser isolation which isolates uncategorized and risky websites.
Compared to Checkpoint as SaaS, the catch rate of Netskope was very high and the system consumption rate such as RAM, ROM, and memory consumption for Netskope was less compared to Checkpoint SaaS. Netskope has positively impacted our organization by securing all our systems, and the response time is also less, with a high catch rate for any incident.
Netskope's pricing is very high compared to other vendors, and compared to Zscaler, Netskope has less capability.
In my last company, I have used Netskope for around one year.
We encountered some challenges during the configuration process, but the Netskope support team helped us cope with all the challenges.
Netskope is stable, but sometimes it can cause some errors.
Netskope is scalable.
The customer support experience was moderate. When asking critical questions, we did not receive responses on time, but for general queries, we received timely responses.
I would rate the customer support a six on a scale of one to ten.
Neutral
I did not use a different solution before Netskope.
The initial setup with Netskope was straightforward.
I have seen a return on investment with Netskope as we saved a lot of time by catching all the threats and thoroughly understanding the cases.
I did not evaluate other options before choosing Netskope.
There was an incident where a user was attempting to access a malicious website. The user's attempt caused a download of malicious software in the system, but because of Netskope, we were able to track all the logs and block that particular malware at the network level.
I cannot give an exact rate for how quickly Netskope detects and blocks threats because that rate changes every day.
Netskope is deployed in our organization as a hybrid cloud. We are using AWS as part of our hybrid cloud setup. We purchased Netskope through channels and other vendors, not through the AWS Marketplace.
The deployment of Netskope in our environment was medium scale. Billing depends on how you are using Netskope, and according to my experience, it should be discussed with sales people. Questions regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing should be directed to higher management as I do not have visibility into these aspects.
If your company has a quite complex or normal setup, you can use Netskope as it is the best solution for catch rate and return on investment.
I rate Netskope eight out of ten because some complex issues are not diagnosed properly and responded to correctly by their support team, plus there are sometimes issues in the product.
My main use cases for Netskope are to provide a secure way for remote access and eliminating traditional VPN, and also to protect the web navigation for the users.
The most helpful features in Netskope are the data loss prevention module, the anti-malware module, and the integration that it has with Information Rights Management from Microsoft.
It has better categorization and more granular features regarding web protection, as it allows me to control HTTP methods. I can publish WhatsApp web for my users as read-only, for example. Other providers cannot; they are only on and off, and do not have the granularity for a website to be read-only.
That comes with a downside, which is that they need to regularly update their controls to support those features in those websites.
In terms of improvements, the possibility to export the dashboards or the data directly to Power BI would be better. The solution has its own data, but you don't get much customization that perhaps you would be able to if you were somehow able to extract the data from an API call and load it into a Power BI dashboard.
I have been working with that tool for three years.
If I were to describe Netskope support, I would say it is above average; it is very good. It's not yet excellent, however, it's very good.
It takes some time to get help as they always try to start from the beginning. There are several steps until I get a qualified, specialized technician. Most of the time, we are fairly IT savvy, so most of the issues we can resolve for ourselves, and when we open a ticket, it's something really complicated, yet we always face level one technicians that try to accomplish the same things that we already did. In those cases, we lose time until we get level two or level three support that helps us go into the situation better.
Positive
That's a tricky question regarding the pricing of Netskope. It's quite expensive. That said, if I compare that we did with other solutions, it's somehow justified.
I don't know about Netskope providing any sort of AI features at this time. We haven't gone in that way yet, and I'm not aware. Our company's decision is that we're not going there yet.
I would rate Netskope an eight out of ten.
I use Netskope for cloud-based security within our organization's multi-cloud environments. It helps with ease of deployment and configuration, enabling us to manage security policies and integrate them with other solutions like identity providers.
Netskope has allowed us to effectively configure security policies and manage them across our environment while providing a secure and efficient solution.
Netskope is highly effective for Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with its inbuilt DLP capabilities. It protects data in the cloud, on the web, and in emails. The threat protection capabilities are beneficial, especially in reducing the load on email traffic by preventing phishing emails and providing malware protection from advanced threats. The easy deployment and configuration of the security policies make it a valuable solution.
A bit of latency is observed in some of the applications. In future updates, I would like to see improvements in latency, as well as enhancements in advanced threat protections. Specifically, the use of AI/ML for anomaly detection and dealing with signatureless advanced threats would be beneficial.
I have been using Netskope for almost a year.
I would rate the stability of Netskope around eight out of ten.
Netskope is highly scalable and has supported our organization's growth without any challenges.
I haven't encountered any major challenges with Netskope's technical support.
Neutral
I previously worked with Zscaler, but I switched to Netskope due to an organizational change.
The initial setup was smooth and easy. The installation and configuration were seamless, making it straightforward to deploy.
The implementation was a distributed deployment with teams from different regions taking part. So, I can't provide an exact number of people involved.
In terms of cost savings, the solution is effective and comes at a lower cost compared to competitors like Zscaler.
Netskope is cost-effective compared to similar solutions like Zscaler.
I have evaluated both Zscaler and Netskope, and found that both are leading solutions.
I would rate the overall solution eight out of ten. Netskope is easy to deploy, with effective proxy solutions. It plays a critical role in cloud security, especially regarding the SASE framework and zero trust principles.
The solution is useful for remote workflow access.
Netskope’s CASB provides good visibility of the applications being used. We can use Shadow IT based on the traffic. DLP and CASB are valuable features. The tool provides extensive DLP features. We can create any level of policies and protect our data on-premise or cloud. The tool integrates with all the components very well.
The threat protection features must be improved. Other competitors on the market, like McAfee and Fortinet, provide threat protection features across all the modules.
I have been using the solution for two and a half years.
I rate the stability an eight out of ten.
The tool’s scalability is good. I rate the scalability an eight out of ten. The product is suitable for small and medium-sized businesses.
The support is good, but not up to the mark.
Neutral
The product is very easy to deploy. We have to install an agent on the machines through the distribution systems. It is the only dependency. Apart from that, we don't have any internal components on-premises at the user end. Everything is cloud-driven. I rate the ease of setup a ten out of ten. Netskope has its own cloud. We deploy the tool on-premises and on AWS. The product can be deployed for a user within a few minutes. It will take longer to deploy the tool for the whole organization.
The solution provides a very good return on investment. I rate the ROI a ten out of ten.
The pricing is very flexible. I rate the pricing a three out of ten.
Netskope is better than Zscaler.
We are users and partners of the solution. I will recommend the solution to others. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.
We use the solution to track role-based access control. We have many business-critical applications, particularly task-based applications, on the cloud.
Netskope provides audit trends for all accesses via KSP and the identification of Shadow IT.
Today, buying a server or hosting an application is very easy. Anyone can buy an instance by paying on AWS or Google. Due to this, there are many applications within the organization that IT is not even aware of because someone in business might have bought one without IT's knowledge. The perspectives of these two groups are very different, and that's the issue.
The solution’s cost is not user-friendly. If you buy the full version, it is costly.
I have been using Netskope as a customer for two or three years.
The product is stable.
3500 end users are using this solution.
I rate the solution’s scalability an eight out of ten.
We switched to Netskope since it comes with the Secure Web Gateway package.
The initial setup is simple and takes a couple of weeks to complete. The deployment requires eight people to complete.
I rate the setup a seven on a scale of ten.
We evaluated Forcepoint, Digital Guardian, and Symantec for testing.
Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
We use the product for cloud application access.
The product's integration with VMware Workspace ONE could be improved. Additionally, they could add endpoint security features similar to Trend Micro.
We have been using the platform for 18 months.
I rate the platform's stability an eight out of ten.
It is a very scalable tool.
The technical support team takes too long to reply for different time zones. We have to give them all the information from the beginning per their protocol every time.
Neutral
It is a SaaS-based solution and is deployed on the cloud. It is very fast to deploy. We took three months to complete as we had to make many changes to the previous version. I rate the process a seven out of ten.
The product's price is average. We are receiving a competitive offer from Trend Micro Apex One. So, we are evaluating it.
We are evaluating Trend Micro Apex One.
I advise others to make an inventory of all the cloud apps. They should ensure all the shadow IT instances are included in their policies.
I rate the platform an eight out of ten.