Has improved performance with faster response times and helps identify dependencies through AI insights
What is our primary use case?
I am working on Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services currently.
As a consultant, I provide services to companies and clients using Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services.
The scalability of Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is good. I can increase its size as and when required, and if any modifications are needed, it is easily adaptable. Monitoring is required but minimal, and there is a reduction in error rate.
What is most valuable?
The valuable features include ease of use and quick response time with Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services. The performance and response time are notably faster.
Previously we had Informatica PowerCenter on mainframe systems, but we have migrated everything to cloud systems. For cloud, we use Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, which gives us better access, faster access, and improved performance.
Information about pricing and licensing of Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is restricted to top-level management and project managers.
I have not used advanced data governance features inside Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services yet.
The system typically takes five to 10 minutes to respond.
What needs improvement?
Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services has a good user interface. However, when it comes to technical errors, we have to go through the logs. Error analysis becomes difficult as finding the exact location of the error in the logs is challenging. The log records could be better organized.
It is difficult for me to provide metrics regarding time saved or productivity gains using Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services features at this time.
For how long have I used the solution?
I could not provide information regarding IICS's robust automation features for error-free data processing.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I have a meeting now regarding Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I am working on Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services currently.
We access Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services via AWS. My company purchased it because we have projects for hundreds of people.
I could not evaluate other options or vendors before choosing Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services.
How are customer service and support?
AI plays a significant role in optimizing our data workflows in Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services. It helps us fix errors, make modifications, and check dependencies. Since we are not aware of all dependencies once a project is deployed, AI assists us in identifying where changes will affect the system.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We are dealing with billions of records of data. Quick responses matter significantly so we can fix any critical issues as soon as possible using Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services.
How was the initial setup?
I do not have much information regarding the initial setup of Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services.
What about the implementation team?
I could not evaluate other options or vendors before choosing Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Maintenance and retrieval of records with Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is easy. Time to retrieval is efficient, and we can access it from anywhere without requiring a particular mainframe location. It has good backup capabilities, allowing retrieval of accidentally deleted records through cloud backup servers.
I have minimal knowledge about its impact on the data integration process.
While there is a governance tool in Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, I have not had the opportunity to work with it.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
There is a governance tool in Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, but I have not had the opportunity to work with it.
What other advice do I have?
I have minimal knowledge about the impact on data integration process.
It is difficult to provide metrics regarding time saved or productivity gains using Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services features.
Information about pricing and licensing of Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is restricted to top-level management and project managers.
AI plays a significant role in optimizing data workflows in Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services. It helps fix errors, make modifications, and check dependencies. Once a project is deployed, AI helps identify where changes will affect the system.
On a scale of 1-10, I rate Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services an 8.5.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Have built an enterprise-level cloud data pipeline with reliable governance and integration
What is our primary use case?
My use case is basically on the client side, in the energy sector in the US, specifically with Duke Energy, who are using AWS for the Data Lake portion.
What is most valuable?
People use Informatica Enterprise Data Lake because we can create the whole journey from data migration projects from the legacy system to AWS and to the Lake architecture, covering the entire journey from the source to the landing zone, then to the curated zone, and finally consumed by both downstream and upstream applications.
The main benefit of Informatica Enterprise Data Lake is that it allows you to use different types of data types, including blobs and storage; all types of data—structured, unstructured, and semi-structured—can exist in the Data Lake architecture, making it robust for retrieving data based on your filtration needs.
Its value is actually governed by the client, who combined with our company and AWS, so we all work together to use the workspace and all these things for Informatica Enterprise Data Lake.
What needs improvement?
Improvement depends upon how we can faster showcase our data in our reports, whether in Power BI, Tableau, or other formats. Improving the speed of data showcasing and filtration would be better, and though we can customize these aspects in Informatica Enterprise Data Lake, there's still room for enhancement.
One area for improvement could be in the integration part, making it smarter and having a plug-and-play approach, allowing users to retrieve data without needing to write the codes or manage the libraries and functions.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Informatica Enterprise Data Lake for more than two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of Informatica Enterprise Data Lake rates at nine out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The ability to scale rates at nine out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
I am satisfied with the response time and quality of the technical support.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Data integration works effectively with AWS, including governance, as we run data governance tools from Collibra.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup for Informatica Enterprise Data Lake is a combination of both simple and complex elements.
What about the implementation team?
While the machine learning features are available, I am not using these features. My focus is on the legacy system model to the modern model in the Studio, understanding the data flow and the data lineage, and how we can visualize our data with minimal changes, with models in the relational database.
What was our ROI?
Informatica Enterprise Data Lake is both time-saving and cost-saving to use.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Informatica Enterprise Data Lake's cost is higher, but it provides good value for the price. It comes at a reasonable price, which I would rate at eight out of ten.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Some IBM tools can be seen as competitors, but from my perspective, Informatica Enterprise Data Lake is the best tool. I only work with Informatica Enterprise Data Lake and do not have real experience with IBM.
What other advice do I have?
I am now combining Snowflake and Informatica Enterprise Data Lake at the enterprise level. Data quality check is important, and Informatica Enterprise Data Lake will be the best tool for data quality checks. I have experience with data discovery, though I am not currently using it. The solution is cloud-based, mostly on AWS cloud. The technical support rates at eight out of ten. Based on my experience, I give Informatica Enterprise Data Lake a final rating of nine out of ten and recommend it to other users.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Good tool, especially if you're using cloud services and an S3 bucket
What is our primary use case?
The main purpose of this tool is for file transfers related to our Python server.
How has it helped my organization?
The data integration and synchronization features in IICS improve the data handling processes.
I haven't had the chance to explore all the features in-depth since we've only been using them for a couple of months.
What is most valuable?
I appreciate that it's a cloud-based solution. With a good internet connection, it works smoothly.
It also offers multiple features.
What needs improvement?
There's definitely room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness.
One example is that you can't search for jobs directly by file name. You can only search by job name. So, if you want to find a job that works with a specific file, you have to go through each job individually to find the right one.
So, I'd like to see a faster search, one where I can search directly by file name.
Moreover, the support team could improve by adding things like file transfer status updates. Also, if someone modifies a job and then leaves the company, that shouldn't disrupt the job for active users. It would be better if the job continued to run smoothly regardless of who modified it.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using it for seven to eight months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a pretty stable product.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scaling is easy. It's not overly complex. In our team, we have around 10 to 12 people using it. Additionally, there's a separate IT team dedicated to IICS with over 50 people. Other private projects likely use IICS as well.
How are customer service and support?
We sometimes face challenges when implementing new features. In those cases, we contacted support, and they've been very helpful.
wWe're happy with the support team.
How was the initial setup?
It is a cloud service. We use AWS and Azure Cloud. I'm not fully sure about the installation details, but I know we use AWS and potentially other cloud features as well.
What other advice do I have?
If you have experience with similar tools or a general understanding of IT concepts, it's easier to grasp. Learning the features takes time, but with an IT background, you should be able to figure out the basics.
We all encounter challenges sometimes and need to learn new things. Overall, it's not overly difficult or overly simple. It's manageable if you have the right mindset.
It's definitely a good tool, especially if you're using cloud services and an S3 bucket. It has many features to simplify your work and make your life easy. It's not overly difficult to learn, but proper training is essential to understand and make the most of all the features.
Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)