Sign in Agent Mode
Categories
Your Saved List Become a Channel Partner Sell in AWS Marketplace Amazon Web Services Home Help

Reviews from AWS customer

2 AWS reviews

External reviews

63 reviews
from and

External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.


4-star reviews ( Show all reviews )

    Raj kuruhuri

Cloud governance has improved and teams optimize costs with automated real-time visibility

  • December 04, 2025
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

Hyperglance provides us a great and visible intuitive agentless, self-hosted dashboard which also provides us real-time visibility into the cloud resources we have, making it very easy for our users whether they are technical or non-technical. Hyperglance also provides us interactive diagrams and filterable inventory which allows our teams to quickly search and analyze. The teams can export the cloud data, reducing the complexity of managing multi-cloud environments.

Our main use case is to manage the resources across AWS, GCP, and Kubernetes. We manage and visualize the boards using Hyperglance and optimize the cost of the cloud by reducing waste through using the lean model.

What is most valuable?

Hyperglance features help in codeless automation, which means we can fix common issues and optimize resources without doing any coding.

Hyperglance has positively impacted our organization by helping us with agentless and self-hosted deployments, which has saved 38% time for deployments that we used to do manually. The automated process has saved us time and money as we cut resources. In the metrics we have tracked, we have saved 22% in costs.

The time and cost savings from Hyperglance have allowed our team to focus on other projects and improved our workflow. Hyperglance has helped us save on cost, improve efficiency, and reduce manual work while enabling real-time compliance checks with very good features. We have saved a lot of time and resources by reducing the manual work which the new team needs to do. Now the team is occupied in other work and they are more productive, providing us more user stories in the organization.

What needs improvement?

The learning curve can be a challenge for new users, which is something that can be improved. Apart from that, everything else is really good.

For how long have I used the solution?

In my organization, we have been using Hyperglance for the last three and a half years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Hyperglance is definitely stable, and we have not faced any kind of downtime, challenges, or bugs.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability of Hyperglance is definitely good, as it allows you to add resources—2,000, 3,000, 5,000, 10,000—depending on the licensing and billing model we use. It is a scalable product that can handle as many users as you want.

How are customer service and support?

The customer support experience I had was very good; I had an interaction with the customer support last month, and the agent was professional and prompt, solving our problem within 25 minutes.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Negative

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before Hyperglance, we did not use any other solution; this is the first time we are using this service, and prior to that, there was nothing we used.

How was the initial setup?

My experience with the configuration process was very good; our technical team was able to configure it quickly within three days, and there were no reported outages or problems that we faced with that.

What was our ROI?

I have seen a return on investment with Hyperglance, as time was saved by 79% and money was saved by 22%.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The metering and billing experience with Hyperglance is really good because it provides us with a pay-as-you-go model. The number of resources we needed depends upon that which is a great thing, providing us with a great ROI on the amount invested. The initial setup was really good with no extra or hidden costs involved.

My experience with Hyperglance's licensing and setup cost was really good; they were able to renew the licenses very well. As soon as we paid, it was renewed without any further delay. Since it is a pay-as-you-go model, we can choose how much we want at a time, which is a great aspect.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did evaluate other options before choosing Hyperglance, including Turbonomic by IBM, Flexera Cloud Management Service, AWS Cost Explorer and Budgets, and Azure Cost Management. Out of those, we found Hyperglance to be exceptionally good, which is why we chose it.

What other advice do I have?

The security features and automated recommendations in Hyperglance have helped us significantly. Six months back, there was a security breach happening on the server. Hyperglance alerted us in real time through the inbuilt monitoring alert on the rule which we set. We were able to implement advanced security and prevented the attack, saving us a lot of time and money.

Hyperglance integrates well with other AWS services I use. The integration is positive, as it can easily integrate with other services across all cloud providers. It can help in exporting reports to external tools such as Excel and ensures that the data is safe, handling multiple cloud environments, and it can integrate with multiple tools as well. The integration is very good, and I am happy with that.

My advice for anyone looking into using Hyperglance is that if you are looking for a dedicated product depending on cloud complexity and automation requirements that can support multi-cloud environments, you should definitely go for it, as the billing experience and metering experience are really good. Hyperglance charges you for what you use, not what you do not use, which is the main thing to consider when choosing Hyperglance. I would give a rating of 10 to the customer service.


showing 1 - 1