Our common use case for Camunda is working on seeing how we can replace Bonita with it for some projects.

We are trying to replace Bonita, especially because the reporting in Camunda seems to be more developed than Bonita's tools.

The biggest difference between Camunda and Bonita might be that Camunda is simpler and more flexible for setting, though we are at the beginning and need to experiment.

I have to experiment with the performance of Camunda, but not yet in production. I haven't put any solutions in production yet, so perhaps performance is better as we see in documentation.

I have been working with Camunda for six months.

We have to wait to see if Bonita provided us with some features that Camunda does not or if we experience any stability issues.

I have not yet had any downtime that required raising tickets or any integration issues because Camunda does not support some of my tools or data.

I have not contacted the Camunda Technical Support team at any point, though perhaps members of my team have.

For the initial setup, the whole process takes about one day perhaps, two days, as the process is simple and we don't have any difficulties.

We are using the open-source community version, but I don't have an idea about the cost of enterprise edition to make a comparison.

Regarding pricing, we are right now working with the open-source Community version, but I don't have yet an idea about the cost of the enterprise edition.

I can talk about our experience with Camunda. For the moment, we are not using any sort of AI with Camunda at all, but for other technology, we use AI.

I am a co-founder of that enterprise.

I rate Camunda an eight out of ten for the moment because I don't really understand the exact parameters of the scale. It is still in proof of concept, and when it goes into production, I will have more ideas on how it should be done.

We process credit card applications using Camunda.

Camunda's process diagram creation and deployment is very easy. You can model the business processes very easily in Camunda.

The solution's pricing and scalability could be improved. It's very difficult to know how to really scale the solution. It would be nice if information is made available about case studies where people have scaled Camunda to a larger set of requests per second and how they did it. We really struggle to scale up the solution.

I have been using Camunda for one and a half years.

I rate Camunda ten out of ten for stability.

We have a back-end integration. So, no user logs in to Camunda on a day-to-day basis. One or two developers log in to the solution when there is some issue, or some application gets stuck.

I rate Camunda a five or six out of ten for scalability.

I posted some things on Camunda's community channel, and I found the community helpful and nice.

I previously used Apache Activiti. Apache Activiti does not have much community activity, but Camunda's community support is very nice.

It took around a week to deploy Camunda by one or two people.

Camunda is deployed on the cloud in our organization. I would recommend Camunda for low to medium-scale businesses. I would not recommend the solution to high-scale businesses because of the lack of documentation.

Camunda is the right choice for long-running business processes instead of ones that can be finished in a few seconds or minutes.

Overall, I rate Camunda an eight out of ten.