My main use case for SUSE Linux Enterprise is for multiple report generation for the SMS and call details of the different users, where we have different servers in VM and BM.
There are lots of data that gets generated, and I need to export that data and analyze it to provide a stable, secure, and highly available platform for critical workloads across on-premises, cloud, and edge environments.
SUSE Linux Enterprise is getting used in our organization, and various SAP applications are running using SUSE Linux Enterprise in my organization.
A specific example of a project where SUSE Linux Enterprise made a noticeable difference for me is in its design to handle demanding compute and scale needs for workloads such as modeling, simulation, and advanced analytics in a data center environment.
In our daily work, we require simulation to do the exact customer scenario, and we can easily achieve that to find the RCA and determine the permanent solution.
Using SUSE Linux Enterprise makes those things better in daily work.
SUSE Linux Enterprise is built for continuous uptime, and we use features such as the high availability extension to automatically reroute workloads and live patching to apply security patches without a reboot, ensuring crucial applications remain online.
The best features SUSE Linux Enterprise offers include stability and reliability, as it provides a stable and long-term supported platform, which is crucial for mission-critical systems.
The built-in security is outstanding, and the flexibility allows it to adapt to various environments from on-premises servers to cloud deployments.
Additionally, the cost-effectiveness of SUSE Linux Enterprise helps lower total cost of ownership and reduce maintenance costs through features such as live patching.
Live patching has helped my team significantly, as SUSE Linux Enterprise is engineered for predictable, low-latency performance, which is essential for time-sensitive and mission-critical applications.
Its ability to adapt to various environments from on-premises servers to cloud deployments has made our work easier, especially since we use both virtual machines and bare metal for all SUSE Linux Enterprise-based servers.
Whenever we transfer them to the cloud, SUSE Linux Enterprise's support for multiple architectures simplifies migration.
One feature that stands out and made a particular difference in my organization is Zypper, the command-line package manager, which we use in SUSE Linux Enterprise for its speed and efficiency.
That aspect is quite interesting for me and beneficial for my organization.
Since we started using SUSE Linux Enterprise, we have noticed positive changes in my organization, particularly in terms of providing a reliable, secure, and cost-effective enterprise platform.
It has lowered the total cost of ownership and boosted operational efficiency, with a significant reduction of up to 30% in the last financial year.
The reliability and business continuity are excellent, and SUSE Linux Enterprise is renowned for its stability, with features such as high availability, clustering, and kernel live patching that fix security issues without rebooting, significantly reducing unplanned downtime.
I don't see any major improvements needed for SUSE Linux Enterprise currently, but the marketing and community awareness of SUSE Linux Enterprise could be enhanced.
The Open Build Service needs to highlight its extensive software library and make it easier for new users to discover.
Additionally, improving the accessibility of the documentation could enhance the user experience for both new and experienced users, alongside reducing marketing friction by consolidating support under a single service level agreement to simplify management, especially in mixed Linux environments.
Better marketing can raise awareness for SUSE Linux Enterprise, particularly for the Open Build Service, which has a large software repository that many potential users are currently unaware of.
I have been using SUSE Linux Enterprise for around four years.
The 30% reduction in total cost of ownership was achieved mainly due to SUSE Linux Enterprise's stability, high availability, clustering, and kernel live patching.
We have many servers in VM and BM, and using live patching to apply security fixes without needing to reboot those customer nodes has saved us a lot of money.
Customers initially did not want to reboot any node to avoid impacting ongoing traffic, so being able to fix security without rebooting was a significant challenge we overcame, and it improved our workload management, resulting in achieving 10 to 15% extra revenue from SUSE Linux Enterprise's scalability and high availability.
My organization has purchased SUSE Linux Enterprise through the AWS Marketplace.
Most of the necessary improvements for SUSE Linux Enterprise have been discussed.
My advice for others looking into using SUSE Linux Enterprise is to consider switching from whatever they are currently using to SUSE Linux Enterprise.
That way, they can clearly see the benefits and challenges involved.
I don't see significant issues arising from switching; I recommend making a trial for a few months, and once testing is complete, they can switch to production.
I have mentioned enough regarding SUSE Linux Enterprise.
My overall review rating for SUSE Linux Enterprise is 9.
