My main use case for IBM Instana Observability is to help with application performance monitoring. It helps me build understanding of my infrastructure use cases by showing which service belongs to which application and which services are dependent on which applications. It helps me get real-time monitoring of my infrastructure. I have used it to monitor IBM Power systems, VMware vSphere environments, and HMC. I have also used it to monitor the AWS cloud platform. It shows me a roadmap and indicates which services depend on other services.
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Real-time observability has improved performance monitoring and simplifies finding root causes
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The best features IBM Instana Observability offers include one-second granularity in that it goes down to specific services. For example, when my application is speaking to my database, it helps show me the particular services of the application and the specific services of the database that it is actually speaking to. It helps me build an observability map to show how traffic is flowing from the application down to the database and shows me each service component that is speaking to each other. Another key feature is its ability to build a live map, and it also shows real-time metrics and traces, the application response time, compute resources, and more.
The real-time metrics and observability map from IBM Instana Observability have helped me in my daily work. When I had to manually push the observability to see if I was trying to send real-time dumps to stress test my compute resource, there was a particular time I was trying to stress test it and it showed me that the particular resource was being affected as a result of the stress. IBM Instana Observability has impacted my organization positively in that it has helped me find out what the issue is in real-time because of its one-second granularity and its ability to identify issues as quickly as possible.
I have seen specific outcomes from IBM Instana Observability, such as help monitoring latency in microservices applications. It has helped me get real-time metrics around latency, IO disk utilization, network utilization, read-writes, bandwidth, and compute resources. It also provides traces for end-to-end request flow.
What needs improvement?
IBM Instana Observability can be improved by providing access to the materials. It is not open-source, and I have to be a partner to get more access to the products.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using IBM Instana Observability for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
IBM Instana Observability is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
IBM Instana Observability's scalability is good in that I can still support more features and more container-based applications. When it started, it was basically more about on-premises services, but now I can use it to monitor container environments. More innovations are coming in every day, so it is scalable and more applications are becoming container-based.
How are customer service and support?
The customer support I experience with IBM Instana Observability is great. IBM support for Instana is responsive and helpful.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I never used a different solution before.
What was our ROI?
I have seen a return on investment with IBM Instana Observability. Time saved is a relevant metric because it helps me identify issues quickly. Rather than having to log into every server to see what is wrong with it, once I have the agent installed in my infrastructure, I just need it on one box. From there I can draw in other servers or my virtualized environment. It provides a single pane of glass from which I can see what is happening with all the servers in my infrastructure, which saves time.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I do not have much experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing. I only worked with the product.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I did not evaluate other options before choosing IBM Instana Observability.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to others looking into using IBM Instana Observability is that it gives real-time and automated visibility into the application and infrastructure. It helps detect issues faster and helps fix them quickly. I rate this product 9 out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Quick data insights enhance troubleshooting and understanding
What is our primary use case?
IBM Instana is mainly used to monitor microservices on platforms like OpenShift and Kubernetes. It helps in observing the dynamic flow of communication between different layers of the application, such as between the database and the first component.
How has it helped my organization?
IBM Instana has enhanced troubleshooting and understanding of application internal communication. It quickly collects data after installing the agent and provides insights into the application's dynamic flow, which aids in identifying issues promptly.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features of IBM Instana are its quick data collection and analytics after installing the agent. It swiftly discovers and collects data, providing quick outputs. The dashboards implemented for different entities are also highly beneficial.
What needs improvement?
One area that requires improvement is related to the automation part, specifically automated actions like sending SMS. This feature needs enhancement.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using IBM Instana for around one to two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
IBM Instana is quite stable, and on a scale of one to ten, I would rate it eight in terms of stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I cannot answer definitively about the scalability of IBM Instana as we have not used it on a large scale. We have mainly used it in small-scale projects.
How are customer service and support?
IBM's technical support is responsive but not entirely satisfactory. The response rate could be better, and as it stands, I would rate the support six out of ten.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We use other vendors alongside IBM, such as Microsoft Azure, due to our trust in IBM’s stability and the quick data outputs it delivers.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is relatively straightforward, and the installation process usually only takes about one day if all prerequisites are in place.
What about the implementation team?
The implementation is conducted with the client's help and sometimes as part of a team without any third-party assistance.
What other advice do I have?
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.