What's the Difference Between Amazon FSx and Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP?
Compare Amazon FSx and Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP side by side — features, pricing, and ideal use cases to help you choose the right product.
Compare side-by-side
|
Comparisons
|
Amazon FSx
|
Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP
|
|---|---|---|
|
Category
|
Storage, File Storage |
Storage, Enterprise File Storage |
|
Description
|
Fully managed file storage built on popular file systems — Windows File Server, Lustre, NetApp ONTAP, and OpenZFS. |
Fully managed NetApp ONTAP file systems with enterprise features |
|
Best for
|
|
|
|
Key features
|
|
|
|
Pricing model
|
Pay per GB provisioned + throughput |
Pay per GB provisioned + throughput + IOPS |
|
Free tier
|
No |
No |
|
Expert take
|
“FSx for Lustre delivers hundreds of GB/s throughput for HPC and ML training workloads. FSx for Windows is the right choice when workloads need SMB protocol and Active Directory integration. Pick the file system type that matches your protocol and performance needs.” |
“Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP provides multi-protocol access (NFS, SMB, iSCSI) with data tiering, cloning, and SnapMirror replication; ideal for migrating NetApp workloads to AWS.” |
|
Product page
|
When to use Amazon FSx or Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP
Use Amazon FSx when:
- Windows file shares
- HPC workloads
- Machine learning
- EDA
- Media processing
Use Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP when:
- Enterprise applications
- VMware workloads
- Database storage
- DevOps environments
Next steps with AWS for Storage
AWS product comparisons
Read about AWS products side-by-side
Did you find what you were looking for today?
Let us know so we can improve the quality of the content on our pages