My main use case for Arista Edge Threat Management NG Firewall is as a perimeter firewall.
I use it as a perimeter firewall by protecting internet traffic, specifically user to internet traffic.
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
My main use case for Arista Edge Threat Management NG Firewall is as a perimeter firewall.
I use it as a perimeter firewall by protecting internet traffic, specifically user to internet traffic.
The best features Arista Edge Threat Management NG Firewall offers are its ability to push a lot of traffic along with bandwidth management and traffic policy.
Bandwidth management and traffic policy help my organization by keeping our internet subscription low.
Arista Edge Threat Management NG Firewall has positively impacted my organization by reducing botnet attacks.
Immediately after I installed the firewall, it stopped a few botnet attacks.
Arista Edge Threat Management NG Firewall can be improved, particularly the user interface, which is not very good, and also the logs, which are not very good.
I have been using Arista Edge Threat Management NG Firewall for two years.
Arista Edge Threat Management NG Firewall is stable in my environment.
I have not used Arista Edge Threat Management NG Firewall for many users, but it is handling the users adequately.
I have not interacted with customer support for Arista Edge Threat Management NG Firewall.
Before choosing Arista Edge Threat Management NG Firewall, I evaluated other options including Sophos and Check Point.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the setup was fairly simple.
I see a return on investment as I save money from internet access.
I chose Arista Edge Threat Management NG Firewall over Check Point primarily because of the price.
My advice to others looking into using Arista Edge Threat Management NG Firewall is that it is effective and accomplishes its purpose. I would rate this product a 7 out of 10.
I use the solution in my company and I know that it is a software firewall and not a hardware firewall.
I did not find the product's features to be the most valuable since I feel that its most beneficial point stems from its cheap price range, which satisfied our company's goals in areas like VPN connectivity, virus protection, and cybersecurity.
The product has a lot to improve in the area of policy implementation. If our company wants to give a separate policy to a particular client, user or system, it is very difficult to manage it. There is no categorization in the web filter option. If you want to search for a particular content to be blocked in the web filter, the search option is not there. You have to manually choose the option in the tool and then check it.
I have been using Arista Edge Threat Management NG Firewall for a year.
I have never experienced any downtime while using the solution.
The product can support our organization's growth plans.
The product is meant for small and large businesses.
Our company does not require technical support.
The product's initial setup phase is easy.
The solution can be deployed in a maximum of an hour.
The product helps users save costs. I have saved around 30,000, which is around 540 USD, with the tool's help.
I consider it an averagely-priced tool. Adding additional features does not cost extra. My small company pays around 80,000 to use the tool every year.
Compared to the other products in the market, my company chose to work with Arista Edge Threat Management NG Firewall since it is a software-based firewall. My company is currently searching the market for other options against Arista Edge Threat Management NG Firewall. Arista Edge Threat Management NG Firewall is easier to manage than Fortinet.
The product offers DPI capability. My company does not use the DPI capabilities.
I recommend the tool to those who plan to use it.
I rate the tool a seven out of ten.
The organization I worked for used the product due to the rising issue of cyber security.
Phish Blocker is a valuable feature.
We had to do a lot of in-built purchases. The documentation is not clear. We have to do a lot of research to implement the product.
I used the solution for a few months.
The tool was quite stable.
The tool worked perfectly.
The initial setup was easy. We had to deploy it on our VM. Then, we configured the rules and deployed them in the production environment.
The tool is quite cheap. It is free, but we had to purchase the in-built tools. It cost us about $90.
It is a great tool, but we had to do a lot of research. We must understand it to implement it. We had to do a lot of work for two months to understand the firewall. We took another three weeks to implement the rules. It took us a lot of time. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.