Red Hat OpenShift Service on AWS
Red Hat | 4.17Linux/Unix, Other 4.17 - 64-bit Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Lifesaver container orchestration
What do you like best about the product?
Openshift UI is very very useful, It's very user-friendly anyone can deploy webapps and APIs without any prior Kubernetes experience.
What do you dislike about the product?
There aren't anything which I really didn't like.
Only thing I don't is It's very expensive.
Only thing I don't is It's very expensive.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We're saving alot of our time which we earlier was spending in managing Kubernetes clusters and application configuration management.
- Leave a Comment |
- Mark review as helpful
In house container platform provided by RedHat
What do you like best about the product?
I like the OpenShift UI, which we can use to monitor the PODS; it also provides a browser-based terminal. You can configure the number of pods that you want, and you can scale the number up or down based on your need. It's easy to use tool. Before to Openshift all the work down was manual and we had to do most of things manually. Whe we started using OpenShift most of the things like deployment and all was automated. It's a easy one time configuration that you need have.
What do you dislike about the product?
When you have several microservices, then creating an Image for each microservice is costly in OpenShift. We should have a single image that should be reusable to deploy multiple microservices. Maybe that's possible; it's yet to be implemented.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The most important feature that we are using automated deployment based on our need. It's easy to scale up or scale down the application pod. And in case your application is down due to some reason, OpenShift itself is capable of bringing up new instance.
Great experience with Red hat
What do you like best about the product?
Red hat platform helps in minimising operating costs
What do you dislike about the product?
Take more time to configure and needs some documentations for configuring with ease
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It benefits in cost reduction and less maintenance
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Highly recommend to use it
Openshift Container Platform Review
What do you like best about the product?
It's flexibility and enablement for DevOps and development wide collaboration.
What do you dislike about the product?
Relatively small community. No native support for agent's other than Jenkins and hard to debug logs comparing with PCF(Pivotal Cloud Foundry)
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Acceleration of application deployment and self service based provisioning
Fabulous
What do you like best about the product?
user friendly easy to patch and well connected
What do you dislike about the product?
Paid subscriptions every time to download any packages
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
alot to need to explore first before making or taking any decisions
I have learnt a lot. And this new technology very amazing and recommend to achieve the goal.
What do you like best about the product?
Multiple application run on single os and Hardware. But logically isolated.
What do you dislike about the product?
There is nothing do dislike. But need to enhance the capability day by day to this dynamic environment.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Hosted Jenkins and CentOS ooenssl service in single OS.
Best Container management platform.
What do you like best about the product?
The features I love are:
1. Deploying containers across various frameworks and language is very easy.
2. Easy to scale up and down the Container resources based on their usage and consumption.
3. Helps to track dependencies and reduces user efforts.
4. Easy to manage the container architecture, provisioning containers and performing health management checks all at a single click.
1. Deploying containers across various frameworks and language is very easy.
2. Easy to scale up and down the Container resources based on their usage and consumption.
3. Helps to track dependencies and reduces user efforts.
4. Easy to manage the container architecture, provisioning containers and performing health management checks all at a single click.
What do you dislike about the product?
Only thing I dislike is the Product Support offered by the team. I hope that could be improved a bit.
Also, there is no proper way to manage and view the logs which heavily increases our load.
Also, there is no proper way to manage and view the logs which heavily increases our load.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Mostly solving problems related to Deploying, managing and monitoring Containers.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
I suggest to learn and implement OpenShift Container Platform if you are new to Containers as it is easy, robust and secure than other container orchestration platforms.
Awesome experience with RedHat openshift
What do you like best about the product?
Deployments are easy, as it includes both runtime container as well as rest Api, web interface to deploy and manage containers
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing as such in particular. However there is a bit of learning curve , documentation can be improved
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Deployments
A very stable platform and easy to use from administration perspective, user friendly dashboard
What do you like best about the product?
Easy to administer and easy navigation in gui
What do you dislike about the product?
Changing architecture will be difficult for new learners
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Easy for dev teams to deploy their containers and test very fast as they spin up fast.
running containerized workloads doesn't get any easier
What do you like best about the product?
What I like best about OpenShift is in its simplicity. From installing a cluster to deploying your workloads, it is just so easy, and everything is so seamless, which is just not possible with kubernetes. With OpenShift, you get out-of-the-box monitoring and logging solutions like elk and Prometheus - grafana, which take away the overhead of you setting up monitoring and logging yourself. Once the installation completes, you don't have to worry about configuring networking. It's all taken care of by OpenShift. And since it also comes with Redhat support, getting answers to your questions or problems becomes very easy.
What do you dislike about the product?
Since this is a subscription-based product, teams with a limited budget can have some challenges, and they have to go with Kubernetes. Other than that, I don't see a drawback of OpenhShift. You may have to be a little patient with RedHat cases someties, but thats it. Since I have experience with both platforms, OpenShift and Kubernetes and some with PCF as well, I can easily vouch and say that if budget is not and issue for you go with OpenhShift. It's the best Platform-as-as-Service right now in the market.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The problem I am solving now is to move some monoliths or legacy applications to a distributed architecture which would increase scalability significantly. With the applications we have already moved to OpenShift, we have noticed a significant increase in service availability. With autoscaling configured for our applications, we don't even have to look at the load on the application. We know that the service will scale with the requirement.
Another benefit we are enjoying is operators. Once you deploy an operator, you will notice how significantly it will reduce human intervention requirements in an application's lifecycle.
Another benefit we are enjoying is operators. Once you deploy an operator, you will notice how significantly it will reduce human intervention requirements in an application's lifecycle.
showing 171 - 180