I use the solution in my company for business transformation, specifically for IT business transformation projects where a customer wants to transfer their legacy applications to the cloud and modernize them using mobile apps. My company takes enterprise-level applications to the cloud.
BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Time saver and helpfull
The best testing software so far.
Jamaliah's honest BrowserStack review
All requirements fulfilled in one place
possible changes to the devices limited
no free mix and match of OS and browser
no notification that you are about to kick someone out of a session
Definitely Best Choice for reviewing the websites
Easily integrated and implemented. I can use it more often without worring about need of real device.
Ensuring Flawless Compatibility Across Devices with BrowserStack
Real device: Helps to check on multiple devices also compatability which is not avilable on emulator.
Time saving: Like all the devices are at one place so no need to coordinate with team matess for devices.
Also access to Vpn so can easily check for multiple location.
The customer support is really nice and helpful.
It is so helpful to test on daily basis and can easily used multiple times.
Easily implement the changes as the console is available for use
And integration of new updates are easily checked on os
By ensuring compatibility across various browsers and devices, you deliver a more polished and functional product to your users.
Eliminating the need for physical devices and streamlining the testing process saves resources and reduces overall development costs.
BrowserStack: Empowering Development with Seamless Testing Solutions
Need more user-friendly.
Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users
What is our primary use case?
What needs improvement?
I haven't seen AI in BrowserStack, making it in an area where improvements are required in the product. Accessibility testing is an area of concern where improvements are required.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using BrowserStack for five years. I am a user of the tool.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Earlier, my company used to use Keynote Device Anywhere and OpenDev. My company moved from our previous products to BrowserStack since a lot of people use it. My company also found BrowserStack to have a lot of advantages over our previous tools.
How was the initial setup?
The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult.
The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses.
What other advice do I have?
I integrated BrowserStack into our company's web and application test workflows because it has plugins that work with browsers and applications, allowing for cross-browser testing.
BrowserStack was really helpful for cross-browser testing in areas involving mobiles, web applications, or tablets. The tool can help with the testing across all applications.
I have not experienced any time-saving feature from the use of the tool.
My company uses the product for real-device testing since it has a bunch of devices in our library. My company has a repository where we do manual testing.
BrowserStack improved the quality of our company's applications.
Improvements I have seen with the testing part revolve around the fact that it is able to do testing at a fast pace. The quality of the product is better since it can go through all the parts of the applications, meaning it can provide high test coverage. The tool is also good in the area of automation. The test coverage is higher, and the time taken during the testing phase is less due to automation.
I have not used the product's integration capabilities since my company doesn't have the option to look at other QA testing tools like Selenium, which can be used for the automation capabilities provided.
The product should offer more support for cross-browser testing, device testing, and testing across multiple devices.
I rate the tool an eight out of ten.