BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
2,627 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Quick Results but Pricing Could Be Better
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack primarily for testing, and I've found it to be incredibly valuable in automating our testing scenarios. The platform excels in delivering quick results, which is essential for keeping up with our fast-paced workflow. This efficiency improvement has been a standout feature, as it streamlines our testing process and saves valuable time. Additionally, integrating it with React has been smooth, complementing our existing development stack well.
What do you dislike about the product?
I think the pricing is an issue. Additionally, while we've experienced improvements in efficiency, this aspect also poses some challenges.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to automate testing scenarios quickly, improving our team's efficiency significantly.
Essential for Pre-Launch Testing and Bug Prevention
What do you like best about the product?
Chrome 3PC/ITP readiness sweeps. We run a cookie matrix (first-party only, partitioned, SameSite=Lax) across Chrome/Safari in Live/Automate to catch auth and cross-subdomain bugs before launch, no local hacks. DST/locale “calendar chaos” runs. One pass sets devices to DST-switch dates and non-Gregorian locales to flush out date math, invoice due-date, and countdown bugs that unit tests miss. Install/uninstall sanity for mobile. App Live lets us validate clean-install vs upgrade paths (cold cache, SW/asset refresh), uncovering stale WebView assets and versioned deep-links.
What do you dislike about the product?
No first-class device reservations for release hour; popular Safari/macOS queues still bite.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Prevents “day-one” auth failures: Cookie/ITP sweeps catch SSO fall-throughs early, avoiding hotfix Fridays. Stops calendar/localization bugs: DST/locale matrices reveal off-by-one and formatting issues before customers do. De-risks mobile upgrades: Clean-install vs upgrade checks surface cached asset and link-routing regressions, cutting MTTR on app releases.
Effortless Real-Device Testing with Powerful Debugging Tools
What do you like best about the product?
I drag an APK/IPA, jump into a real Pixel/iPhone in ~60 seconds, and capture video + screenshots + logcat/syslog from one session URL, perfect for Jira. True “real-world” toggles. I can flip device language (including RTL), time zone, geolocation, and 3G/4G/offline profiles to surface auth, deep-link, and caching bugs that emulators miss. WebView + native in one view. Seeing JS console next to native logs pinpoints whether a failure is app code or web content, cutting triage time.
What do you dislike about the product?
Entitlement hiccups on some IPAs (universal links, push) make first-time setup fiddly.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Reproducible, ticket-ready bugs and one link holds video, device/OS, and logs, no “can’t reproduce” loops. Coverage without a device cart with real iOS/Android versions expose layout/gesture/localization issues early. Faster PR unblocks - Quick sanity passes on feature branches behind VPN catch issues in minutes, not days.
Essential Accessibility Testing with Real Device Validation
What do you like best about the product?
True screen-reader validation on real devices. In App Live I enable TalkBack (Android) and VoiceOver (iOS) to verify focus order, rotor actions, hints/labels, and custom controls, no simulation guesses. Shift-left checks in CI. On App Automate we run Espresso Accessibility Checks and XCTest a11y assertions to fail builds on missing labels, tiny hit targets, dynamic type clipping, and contrast snapshots before manual passes.
What do you dislike about the product?
OS settings at scale are manual. System toggles like Dynamic Type, Reduce Motion, and High-Contrast can’t always be scripted reliably across big device grids.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Catches real-world a11y bugs early, Focus traps, unlabeled icons, motion sensitivity, and text scaling regressions surface pre-merge, not in production.
Repro you can trust, Video + logs + device details end “can’t reproduce” loops and satisfy compliance reviews.
Repro you can trust, Video + logs + device details end “can’t reproduce” loops and satisfy compliance reviews.
Simplifying Multi-Device Testing for Teams
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack offers a very convenient way to test on real devices without the need for any setup. I appreciate the smoothness of the interface and the speed with which I can switch between various browsers and operating system versions. It saves me a great deal of effort and helps keep my testing workflow straightforward and efficient.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes, the loading time is a little longer than I would expect, but this doesn’t take away from the overall excellent experience.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack spares me the effort of setting up and maintaining a personal device lab, as it enables immediate testing on real browsers and various operating system versions. Thanks to this platform, I can detect layout and performance issues early, minimize the time I spend on setup, and achieve a much more reliable and efficient testing workflow.
Excellent Test Tools and Process
What do you like best about the product?
Test Tools & Process – Accessibility & Coverage
What do you dislike about the product?
The performance is an issue, and it's not possible to run this in closed or secured environments
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The platform provides efficient QA coverage, which has helped streamline our testing process. Additionally, we've experienced noticeable cost savings on devices, making it a practical solution for our needs.
Effortless Test Case Writing, Impressive Results
What do you like best about the product?
Writeitng Test cases converting from house to seconds
What do you dislike about the product?
The accuracy of AI-generated results should ideally be 100%. Anything less places an unnecessary burden on the tester.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Writing test cases, maintaining a shared repository, and manually adding data sets are all valuable practices. Combining these methods with AI-generated test cases makes the process even more effective and enjoyable.
Intuitive and Easy to Use—A Pleasure to Work With
What do you like best about the product?
The software is easy to use and feels intuitive. It offers a wide range of functionalities to suit various needs.
What do you dislike about the product?
I can't think of anything i dislike, BrowserStack answers my needs.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The team save time by generating test cases with AI. The test coverage is higher than before.
Effortless QA with BrowserStack's AI Features
What do you like best about the product?
I appreciate BrowserStack for making my test case management tasks more efficient, as it significantly simplifies the generation of test cases. The platform notably eases the QA process, enhancing the overall workflow with its user-friendly approach. I recently discovered the AI agents feature, which I believe holds great potential to boost my productivity further. Moreover, the initial setup of BrowserStack was straightforward and easy, allowing me to begin leveraging its capabilities without unnecessary delays.
What do you dislike about the product?
NA
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for test case management, simplifying the QA process and making it easier to generate test cases. Its AI agents boost my productivity, and it's used for cross-browser testing by my team.
Comprehensive Accessibility Testing with Real Screen Readers and Seamless Workflow
What do you like best about the product?
Real screen readers on real OSes. NVDA/JAWS on Windows, VoiceOver on macOS/iOS, and TalkBack on Android let me verify semantics, focus, and reading order, not just simulate it. Keyboard-first checks that stick. I can validate Tab/Shift+Tab flow, skip links, visible focus, and modals/traps, then share a single session URL with video + console for review. System-level a11y settings. High Contrast Mode, color filters, reduced motion, text scaling/Dynamic Type, and zoom/DPR changes expose contrast and layout issues fast. Built-in tooling workflow. Live DevTools + axe-core/Lighthouse runs inside sessions, I grab the accessibility tree and ARIA hints alongside HAR/console for crisp tickets.
What do you dislike about the product?
Remote SR audio can stutter, making long VoiceOver/NVDA sessions tiring. Limited automation of OS a11y toggles (contrast, motion) across many sessions, manual steps add time.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Catches WCAG regressions pre-merge - Real SR + keyboard + contrast checks reduce “fix after launch” churn and compliance risk. Actionable evidence for devs & auditors, one link with video, axe/lighthouse output, accessibility tree, and HAR shortens MTTR and documents due diligence. Inclusive coverage without a lab - wider device/OS matrix (Windows/macOS/iOS/Android) improves usability for keyboard-only and SR users with minimal ops overhead.
showing 161 - 170