BrowserStack
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
2,698 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Simplifying Multi-Device Testing for Teams
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack offers a very convenient way to test on real devices without the need for any setup. I appreciate the smoothness of the interface and the speed with which I can switch between various browsers and operating system versions. It saves me a great deal of effort and helps keep my testing workflow straightforward and efficient.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes, the loading time is a little longer than I would expect, but this doesn’t take away from the overall excellent experience.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack spares me the effort of setting up and maintaining a personal device lab, as it enables immediate testing on real browsers and various operating system versions. Thanks to this platform, I can detect layout and performance issues early, minimize the time I spend on setup, and achieve a much more reliable and efficient testing workflow.
Excellent Test Tools and Process
What do you like best about the product?
Test Tools & Process – Accessibility & Coverage
What do you dislike about the product?
The performance is an issue, and it's not possible to run this in closed or secured environments
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The platform provides efficient QA coverage, which has helped streamline our testing process. Additionally, we've experienced noticeable cost savings on devices, making it a practical solution for our needs.
Effortless Test Case Writing, Impressive Results
What do you like best about the product?
Writeitng Test cases converting from house to seconds
What do you dislike about the product?
The accuracy of AI-generated results should ideally be 100%. Anything less places an unnecessary burden on the tester.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Writing test cases, maintaining a shared repository, and manually adding data sets are all valuable practices. Combining these methods with AI-generated test cases makes the process even more effective and enjoyable.
Intuitive and Easy to Use—A Pleasure to Work With
What do you like best about the product?
The software is easy to use and feels intuitive. It offers a wide range of functionalities to suit various needs.
What do you dislike about the product?
I can't think of anything i dislike, BrowserStack answers my needs.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The team save time by generating test cases with AI. The test coverage is higher than before.
Effortless QA with BrowserStack's AI Features
What do you like best about the product?
I appreciate BrowserStack for making my test case management tasks more efficient, as it significantly simplifies the generation of test cases. The platform notably eases the QA process, enhancing the overall workflow with its user-friendly approach. I recently discovered the AI agents feature, which I believe holds great potential to boost my productivity further. Moreover, the initial setup of BrowserStack was straightforward and easy, allowing me to begin leveraging its capabilities without unnecessary delays.
What do you dislike about the product?
NA
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for test case management, simplifying the QA process and making it easier to generate test cases. Its AI agents boost my productivity, and it's used for cross-browser testing by my team.
Comprehensive Accessibility Testing with Real Screen Readers and Seamless Workflow
What do you like best about the product?
Real screen readers on real OSes. NVDA/JAWS on Windows, VoiceOver on macOS/iOS, and TalkBack on Android let me verify semantics, focus, and reading order, not just simulate it. Keyboard-first checks that stick. I can validate Tab/Shift+Tab flow, skip links, visible focus, and modals/traps, then share a single session URL with video + console for review. System-level a11y settings. High Contrast Mode, color filters, reduced motion, text scaling/Dynamic Type, and zoom/DPR changes expose contrast and layout issues fast. Built-in tooling workflow. Live DevTools + axe-core/Lighthouse runs inside sessions, I grab the accessibility tree and ARIA hints alongside HAR/console for crisp tickets.
What do you dislike about the product?
Remote SR audio can stutter, making long VoiceOver/NVDA sessions tiring. Limited automation of OS a11y toggles (contrast, motion) across many sessions, manual steps add time.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Catches WCAG regressions pre-merge - Real SR + keyboard + contrast checks reduce “fix after launch” churn and compliance risk. Actionable evidence for devs & auditors, one link with video, axe/lighthouse output, accessibility tree, and HAR shortens MTTR and documents due diligence. Inclusive coverage without a lab - wider device/OS matrix (Windows/macOS/iOS/Android) improves usability for keyboard-only and SR users with minimal ops overhead.
Reliable Real Device Testing with Speed and Stability
What do you like best about the product?
I love the instant access to real devices that BrowserStack provides, making testing much more efficient. The overall stability and speed of sessions are impressive, allowing for faster feedback loops, which greatly enhances our testing process and productivity. I appreciate the broader and more reliable access to real devices, which was a significant factor in deciding to switch to BrowserStack. The initial setup was very quick, making the onboarding process smooth and hassle-free. I find it particularly beneficial that BrowserStack integrates well with CI and CD platforms like GitHub Actions, complementing our existing workflow seamlessly.
What do you dislike about the product?
I experience occasional device availability delays, which can disrupt my testing workflow and hinder productivity.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for testing websites and apps on real devices, which solves device availability issues and accelerates feedback loops with stable and fast sessions.
Great Testing Tools and Integrations, but Device Load Times and Pricing Need Work
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack lets us test on real browsers and real devices without buying anything ourselves. The Automate platform works great with our Selenium and Playwright tests. Also running tests in parallel saves a lot of build time. Percy is also helpful for catching small visual issues. The integrations with GitHub and Jenkins fit right into our CI pipeline. We were able to debug live sessions with built-in tools.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes the real devices take a few seconds to load, especially during heavy traffic hours. The pricing is a bit high when scaling large automation suites.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack gives us experience across browsers and devices, something we could never recreate with physical hardware. It helps us catch cross-browser issues early and speeds up code shipping. Our testing team is more consistent and less dependent on local setups. Overall we ship faster than before.
A Developer's Dream for Real Device Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I love using BrowserStack due to its capability to provide real hardware for testing, which includes both websites and mobile applications, eliminating the need for simulated environments. This functionality allows me to develop and debug effectively without maintaining a collection of different physical devices. The seamless ability to switch between different browsers like Chrome and Edge within the same window is incredibly convenient and time-saving. I also appreciate the feature that allows me to change the location and IP address, which is essential for troubleshooting geo-restrictions and understanding how regulations like the Great Firewall of China might affect accessibility. BrowserStack’s instant device-switching feature is excellent, as it saves both my time and budget by negating the need to purchase various physical devices for testing. I can instantly switch from testing on something like an iPhone 17 Pro to an iPhone 15 to recognize any issues related to device specifications such as screen size or layout. The option to change IP and location greatly helps me in viewing the content the same way my target audience would, which includes accessing regional content and dealing with any geo-restricted material. Furthermore, the initial setup of BrowserStack was remarkably easy, with web development, iOS app debugging, and multiple devices functioning flawlessly and efficiently, akin to having a phone farm, which allows me to test on a range of real physical hardwares.
What do you dislike about the product?
The pricing of BrowserStack is almost out of my budget, especially now that I am no longer a student and don't have access to the GitHub developer pack. There is a growing complexity of offerings on the site, which can feel overwhelming for newcomers and young tech students, even though it might be beneficial for seasoned developers. Additionally, the integrations can be hard to understand, as a student developer I had little interest in automation and integration with JIRA. My primary focus was on ensuring my apps work and look good across different devices and browsers.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps me to test apps and websites on various devices without needing physical hardware, saving money and accessing a real environment, not a simulation. It enables instant device switching and location changes, helping address geo-restrictions and ensuring compatibility across devices.
Effortless Mobile Test Automation
What do you like best about the product?
I find BrowserStack incredibly easy to use and user-friendly, which makes my testing process much more efficient and pleasant. It's very straightforward and easy to integrate with our customized frameworks, particularly for running automation scripts on both iOS and Android. BrowserStack's flexibility is a game-changer for us, far surpassing our previous tool, Silk Mobile, by offering more adaptability. I also value the detailed reports it provides, which include insights into different aliases. Additionally, the integration capabilities, such as with Bitf AI and the seamless SDK integration, make the setup process very simple, presenting BrowserStack as a go-to solution that feels like a single-step tool. Furthermore, working with the BrowserStack team has been supportive, enhancing our overall experience with the product.
What do you dislike about the product?
Expecting BrowerStack to come with more integrated zero coding, no coding with the help of ai
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to easily run automation scripts on both iOS and Android, streamline mobile application testing, and customize testing processes efficiently. It provides user-friendly experiences and detailed reports, enhancing the flexibility and integration capabilities for my testing needs.
showing 251 - 260