BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
3,279 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Effortless Setup, Real Device Testing Rocks!
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack to test across devices; it solves the problem of browser incompatibility. The feature I enjoy most is the Real device cloud, which lets me test how mobile interfaces interact with my ASP.NET Core APIs on actual iOS and Android devices without maintaining a physical device lab. The initial setup process was way easy and stress-free.
What do you dislike about the product?
Just the occasional latency and cost of course 🙂. If the scaling on the infrastructure can be worked on to make it less sluggish and buggy and the price is a little bit not pocket friendly.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to test across devices, solving browser incompatibility. The Real Device Cloud helps test mobile interfaces with ASP.NET Core APIs on real devices without maintaining a physical lab.
Relatively Easy-to-Use Tools That Deliver
What do you like best about the product?
Relatively easy to use the tools offered.
What do you dislike about the product?
Price. Too expensive. Nickel and dimed on everything. Also, support is a bit slow at times.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Allows use to test on mobile easily since there's a device farm. Also, the new a11y testing looks promising since you usually can't find open source tools on mobile a11y testing.
Effortless Web Automation Across Browsers
What do you like best about the product?
I like using BrowserStack for web automation across different browsers, browser versions, and operating systems. My experience with BrowserStack is good, particularly appreciating the geolocation-based testing feature. It's really useful as it allows me to simulate tests from different geographies by setting the capability, which is very valuable for my testing needs. I also found the initial setup very easy.
What do you dislike about the product?
nothing as such
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for web automation across different browsers, versions, and OS. It solves geo-location testing challenges by allowing us to simulate tests from various geographies easily.
Easy, Seamless Recording with a User-Friendly Interface and Fast Test Case Creation
What do you like best about the product?
The recordings can be done easily, the interface is very user friendly and seamless. The test cases can be recorded quickly. We can use cloud services as well.
What do you dislike about the product?
Time tracking is not there, for processes which involves slowness tracking, expected data fetching time, browserstack is unable to cater those requirements. Sometimes the application is working but works slow due to incorrectly deployment method. This needs human intervention. Also, the complex cases where output varies , user is unable to automate the same.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Browserstack is enabling me to test generic cases which are BAU and not involve much change in behaviour every time it is executed. I can easily save lot of time depending on the complexity and duration of operation.
Effortlessly Tests Locations and Devices
What do you like best about the product?
I like the ability to use different devices and GPS locations with BrowserStack. It's great for testing location-specific problems or bugs without having to visit the site. The initial setup was very easy, as I got an email invitation and it worked on the first occasion when signing in.
What do you dislike about the product?
onboarding could be better to teach the software
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for testing navigation applications, tackling location-specific issues by simulating routes without physically visiting sites. It solves GPS-related testing challenges and offers device and geographic flexibility.
Great Interface and Seamless Switching Between Automation and Test Management
What do you like best about the product?
The interface is great and the aility to switch between automation and test case management
What do you dislike about the product?
There is a ramp up time for a team to learn how to use it
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
AI and the Low code automation and the ability to create automation scripts from hand written test cases
App Automate’s Interactive Sessions Save Tons of Debugging Time
What do you like best about the product?
The best part about BrowserStack, in my experience, is the interactive session in App Automate. It’s very useful and can sometimes save a lot of debugging time.
What do you dislike about the product?
One thing I dislike about BrowserStack in general is the new dashboard. I don’t find it very visually striking, and in some places the text overlaps with itself. Overall, it feels much less easy to use compared to the old dashboard.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The main problem BrowserStack solves for me is access to multiple virtual devices with App Live. We sometimes run into device-specific issues in the app, so being able to test it across multiple devices helps me identify and fix those problems.
Efficient Mobile Testing with Multi-Device Support
What do you like best about the product?
I find it really beneficial that BrowserStack supports multiple types of devices. I appreciate that we can run our UI test cases on cloud devices, and it's convenient that we can set and run tests on multiple device types at the same time.
What do you dislike about the product?
I want to have more AI feature.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to run our UI test cases on cloud devices and test on multiple device types at the same time.
Essential for Cross-Device Testing, Lacks Some Automation
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack mainly for mobile device testing, and it provides us with brilliant test coverage across a full and broad range of mobile devices. I really appreciate the capability to test on iOS devices with our website UI, as the Safari browser can render page elements differently compared to Chromium-based browsers. This allows us to catch those issues much earlier and avoid defects in production systems. Not having access to iOS browsers or devices in our dev and test team is challenging, but BrowserStack reduces the need to purchase these devices. They have all the latest devices, so we don't have to worry about the purchase cost and maintaining older devices to ensure backward compatibility. Setting up BrowserStack was also straightforward, with no problems at all.
What do you dislike about the product?
It would be good if it was possible to run automated test scenarios across a number of devices and have a detailed report response. Also being able to automate a visual comparison between the ideal design and the rendered view.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for comprehensive mobile device testing; it gives us great test coverage and helps us spot iOS-specific rendering issues early. It also eliminates the cost of buying and maintaining iOS devices for testing.
Saves Time on Test Cases, but Pricing Can Be Tough for Small Teams
What do you like best about the product?
It saves me a lot of time when I’m creating test cases, and it also makes it easier to connect to bug-tracking tools.
What do you dislike about the product?
When it comes to pricing, I feel that for smaller teams it isn’t really affordable.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I’m using BrowserStack for my test plans and test case management. It also helps me a lot when I need to do accessibility testing.
showing 561 - 570