BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
3,279 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Easy Cross-Browser and Device Testing for Global Teams
What do you like best about the product?
Many of my team members are distributed globally, and they need to test across a range of devices and browsers. BrowserStack offers an easy-to-use interface that lets us access different browser and device combinations without any major upfront cost.
What do you dislike about the product?
At the moment, there’s nothing I dislike about BrowserStack.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It’s a one-stop solution for all our testing needs across different devices and browsers, and it’s especially well suited for a distributed team.
Simplifies Cross-Browser Testing with Robust Features
What do you like best about the product?
I like how BrowserStack makes cross-browser and cross-environment testing easy without needing to maintain our own infrastructure. It provides quick access to a wide range of browsers, operating systems, and device configurations, allowing us to validate our application behavior efficiently across multiple environments. I appreciate how well it integrates with our automation workflow, especially running Playwright-based end-to-end tests, helping us detect compatibility issues early in the development cycle. The debugging feature with logs, screenshots, and session recordings is really helpful for quickly identifying the root cause of failures. The tunneling capability is invaluable for testing local or staging environments not publicly accessible. Furthermore, integrating BrowserStack with Percy for visual regression testing allows us to catch unintended UI changes and maintain consistent design across releases. Overall, BrowserStack significantly simplifies cross-browser testing, improves the reliability of our testing process, and saves time by eliminating the need to manually manage multiple test environments.
What do you dislike about the product?
While BrowserStack is very helpful overall, there are a few areas where improvements could make the experience even better. Occasionally, test sessions can be a bit slow to start, especially when running multiple automated tests in parallel. This can slightly increase the overall execution time of our test suites. Another area that could be improved is the debugging experience for failed automation runs. While BrowserStack does provide logs, screenshots, and recordings, sometimes it takes a bit of time to navigate through the information to quickly identify the root cause of a failure. There are also times when certain browser or device environments may feel slightly slower compared to running tests locally. Improving performance and reducing latency during live debugging sessions would make the workflow smoother. Additionally, clearer insights or analytics around test failures and performance trends could help teams diagnose issues faster. Enhancements in reporting and easier ways to analyze failures across multiple runs would make the platform even more powerful for larger automation suites.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack streamlines our cross-browser testing by providing instant access to various environments, simplifying the testing process. It helps detect browser-specific issues early, ensures consistent user behavior across platforms, and allows secure testing of local builds with its tunneling feature.
Essential for Cross-Platform Testing, Needs Improved Peak Time Performance
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for testing our front-end web applications, both in web and mobile views. I appreciate its availability of different web browser - OS combinations and the wide variety of devices on the cloud device farm, which really helps validate our applications effectively. I like the availability of different web and mobile devices for use at all times. Newer features like Percy and accessibility testing tools are a great addition to our team's test coverage. Percy helps us identify visual issues (UX issues) on our application by comparing with stable reference images, reducing the effort needed to identify such issues manually. It was simple and straightforward to set up; I logged in to the platform and started using the devices/browsers right away.
What do you dislike about the product?
I see connection time out errors during peak usage hours. The overall experience also feels slower at that time. Some devices are also unavailable during those hours. These issues could be improved.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for cross platform, multi-browser testing. It offers various web browser-OS combinations and a wide variety of devices in the cloud, helping us validate applications effectively. Features like Percy and accessibility testing reduce manual effort by highlighting visual issues and ensuring our sites meet standards.
Great Test Execution Videos, But Confusing Sections and a Steep UI for Newcomers
What do you like best about the product?
Being able to launch automated tests on a device and have a detailed summary of the execution with the video.
What do you dislike about the product?
The names of the different sections are really not clear, I mistake them A LOT.
The UI is really not easy to understand as a newcomer or infrequent user.
The navigation on the phone when using it "manually" is kina slow and laggy
The UI is really not easy to understand as a newcomer or infrequent user.
The navigation on the phone when using it "manually" is kina slow and laggy
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We are able to test our app on a big range of device.
Low-Code Automation I Love
What do you like best about the product?
Low code automation is the best tool in browser stack
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing specifically, but certain limitations like login logout issue in Browser stack w low code automation app was frustrating
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Using BrowserStack LCA, our team is able to achieve maximum coverage in the least amount of time, with minimal effort required for test case development.
Great for Presenting Cross-Device Journeys in BrowserStack
What do you like best about the product?
1) The range of devices and browsers available for testing. The journey is user friendly, simple and system works fast.
2) Accessibility scanning, easy to use was fast and I can test across browsers and devices this has been our main go to with European accessibility act and American disability acts coming in.
2) Accessibility scanning, easy to use was fast and I can test across browsers and devices this has been our main go to with European accessibility act and American disability acts coming in.
What do you dislike about the product?
1) I can't open in one go with two different browsers and devices on BrowserStack, for example - there are times I want to open apple and google (or Apple v Samsung) side by side to test the journey especially when presenting to stakeholders the journey.
2) As a new(ish) user who is only using Browserstack for a limited use case, I would like a tooltip or AI tool that will help me show in the tool the other uses I can use this system for.
2) As a new(ish) user who is only using Browserstack for a limited use case, I would like a tooltip or AI tool that will help me show in the tool the other uses I can use this system for.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The main problems Browser Stack is solving as mentioned before was around accessibility scanning and UAT across browsers/devices
BrowserStack Makes Cross-Browser Testing Fast, Reliable, and Effortless
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about BrowserStack is how easy it makes testing across different browsers and devices without needing to manage physical devices. It saves a lot of time and helps quickly identify issues that only appear on specific environments. The platform is reliable, easy to use, and fits well into everyday development and QA workflows.
What do you dislike about the product?
One thing I dislike about BrowserStack is that sometimes the sessions can feel a bit slow or laggy, especially when working with real devices. Also, there is less support for older devices so for an app developer its hard sometime to test. Also debugging through the remote environment can occasionally be less smooth compared to testing locally.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the challenge of testing applications across multiple browsers, operating systems, and real devices without needing to maintain that infrastructure locally. This benefits me by saving time, reducing setup effort, and making it much easier to catch compatibility issues early in the development and testing process, Also I have besin using it from last 4 months and its helps us a lot for my apps to test on different devices and catch early bugs
Efficient Cross-Device Testing, Needs Improved Load Times
What do you like best about the product?
I like that BrowserStack significantly reduces testing time as I can use a single interface to test multiple devices. The user interface is pretty intuitive and there is a wide range of options to choose from.
What do you dislike about the product?
Loading of apps is not the most reliable. Sometimes it takes a long time for apps to load, especially on Android devices that aren't flagship-grade.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to test my app on different devices and OS versions, which helps me find bugs specific to them. It significantly reduces testing time by allowing testing on multiple devices through a single interface.
Brilliant, Effective, and Easy to Use
What do you like best about the product?
Brilliant effective and easy to use at all times!
What do you dislike about the product?
All good! nothing I can think of to say here.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Helping us improve the number of leads and sales by improved UX.
Clean, Familiar UI with Handy Test Case Organization
What do you like best about the product?
The UI is clean and familiar. It has nice features to short and organize test cases. This will be a good interface with our mobile product testing.
What do you dislike about the product?
AI seems clunky and over reaching. I did not find clean reporting on the testing as we are doing it. Importing of test cases was a little more time consuming than expected. I was hopping for better integration with Jira.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Using the AI to create test cases was nice. Great work with our mobile testing on BS.
showing 571 - 580