BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
2,629 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Sometimes buggy and convoluted
What do you like best about the product?
Reporting is great and satisfactory and avaialblity of devices
What do you dislike about the product?
UI is sometimes confusing and hard to get exact data
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Number of real devices
Great tool for testing
What do you like best about the product?
Since Browserstack offer both App Automate and Observability feature it is very easy to visualise our test execution in Oberservability. It provides all sort of tags in the tests which you execute manually or with the help of automation.
We can identifynew errors, unique error very quickly when we execute our test in Browserstack with the help of Observability.
We can identifynew errors, unique error very quickly when we execute our test in Browserstack with the help of Observability.
What do you dislike about the product?
Browserstack only list execution result in the Observalibilty as Build wise, I think they should have offer feature to list them test suite wise for better management and monitoring.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Browserstack is used for execution of automation suites of mobile app and website in our organisation. We are also using its Test Management tool for managing test cases and suite in some our projects in our organisation
BrowserStack and Percy application
What do you like best about the product?
dashboards is vey user friendly with lots of features and ease of use is very good
What do you dislike about the product?
implementation is not very easy, need to improve customer support
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
continous testing of mobile apps, monitoring envs
Test your apps 10x faster
What do you like best about the product?
We are getting automated quality checks for the deployment of our application across all browsers or devices with the help of Quality Gate.
After execution of any automation report we can directly report the error or create tickets from the session history of that particular test case execution. There we already get in built integrations with other project management tools.
After execution of any automation report we can directly report the error or create tickets from the session history of that particular test case execution. There we already get in built integrations with other project management tools.
What do you dislike about the product?
When you revisit any of your execution history it takes time to load the recording of your execution. Some times you'll get error in loading that recording after waiting for mins.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack is helping us a lot to segregate our issues from automation runs. We are getting a overview of our application performance and stability. It automatically marks the tests apart from pass or fail such as flaky, New Failures, Performance Anamoly etc.
BrowserStack make it really easy for testing whether it is manual or automated.
What do you like best about the product?
As a developer, it really helped me for testing the features and cover all the use cases. It cover a wide range of browsers and operating system which enhances the user experience. It works well with Jenkins and makes the automation testing really smooth.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes it becomes slow when we test on real devices. Local testing feature is sometimes slow and gets delayed due to session time outs. Also, It is expensive for a comparatively small group of developers.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helped me and my team for performing both manual and automation testing while covering wide range of test cases in a comparatively short amount of time. It enhanced our performance and product quality as well.
Good software, can enhance a test suite
What do you like best about the product?
Azure Devops integration, makes it easier to organise test run recordings. Before I've recorded test execution with other tools and released them as an artifact, but the BS integration is cleaner
What do you dislike about the product?
It is another tool in my test suite, and I don't really like to use it outside of pipelines. You can't really debug easily with it. I also am finding it hard to get used to the new UI changes. Its a huge change and seems a but unintuitive - its become harder to use.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Allowing us to provide developers with test recordings for if a bug is captured
Amazing Tool for Automation Testing
What do you like best about the product?
Integration of automated cases does not require any sort of changes in the existing written code.
It supports parallel runs which saves a lot of time in executing automated suite.
We can update the status of Automated Executed test manually as well in case their is discrepancy in test result.
It supports parallel runs which saves a lot of time in executing automated suite.
We can update the status of Automated Executed test manually as well in case their is discrepancy in test result.
What do you dislike about the product?
Execution of parallel tests can be improved.
Session dashboard can be improved with keeping test suites in a track.
Session dashboard can be improved with keeping test suites in a track.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I am just using BrowserStack for the execution of our Automation Suite and reporting and monitoring of the same with the help of BrowserStack. Here we get a lot of option for reporting and monitoring which makes it easier for other teams in our org to understand the stability of product.
Helped in Automation Testing
What do you like best about the product?
We get best reporting and analytics of our automated test run under App Automate. We can integrate reporting of daily run with slack and other notification tools for better monitoring of our test cases and products.
Apart from the App Automate, we have Automate feature here only to automate our web UI cases more perfectly.
Apart from the App Automate, we have Automate feature here only to automate our web UI cases more perfectly.
What do you dislike about the product?
I do not have any dislike about BrowserStack in the features which I am using.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We have integrated BrowserStack in our Automation Suite along with this we have also implemented Slack alerting in the suite. This helps us to send alerts in the slack in real time. We are not using any other tool for reporting as we find BrowserStack's reporting is far better than other tools.
Testing is a lot quicker
What do you like best about the product?
Very fast and only uses real devices. It also has public url so there is no need to have an account for you to share a link to the test results
What do you dislike about the product?
Does not have a uploaded builds management, i.e. I cannot delete, name or download builds that were uploaded either manually or automatically by other tools.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Parallel execution and lots of debugging tools
Browser stack is fast and good testing tool
What do you like best about the product?
It improves the productivity of soft testers during the testing phase of web applications. It allows the testing of websites on desktop browsers. It supports cross-browser compatibility. It is very easy to use. Easily integrated.
What do you dislike about the product?
Service support could be better. It is a heavy-budget application. It should include AI test case generation feature.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It provides an automation testing framework where testing can be automated. It supports cross browser compatability.
showing 581 - 590