Conga CLM
CongaReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
506 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Experience on CONGA uitlization
What do you like best about the product?
Installation and Configuration of this product is really quick. That is the best thing I would say.
What do you dislike about the product?
Configuring clauses using bullets. Also If we have footer for all pages which are interconnected and if we have a section break in between with some conditional paragraph, if this paragraph doesn't show up as condition is not satisfied, then for all the pages footer is going away.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Issues we are facing with X-Author for word while configuring templates.
Conga CLM: Simplifying Contract Creation, Execution, and Management
What do you like best about the product?
Here are a few **newer (or increasingly noticeable) things about Conga CLM that I like**, especially compared to how CLM tools used to feel:
* **Improved contract authoring experience**
The clause library and template management feel more structured and reusable, making it easier to standardize language while still allowing flexibility where needed.
* **Better automation across the contract lifecycle**
More steps—request intake, approvals, versioning, and execution—can now be automated end to end, reducing manual handoffs and email-driven processes.
* **Stronger Salesforce alignment**
The tighter integration with Salesforce objects (Accounts, Opportunities, custom objects) makes contracts more contextual and easier to track alongside deals.
* **Enhanced visibility and reporting**
Contract status, bottlenecks, and key milestones (like expirations and renewals) are easier to surface, which helps with proactive contract management.
* **Clause and obligation control**
The ability to manage fallback clauses, conditional language, and obligations improves compliance and reduces legal risk.
* **Scalability beyond legal teams**
CLM is increasingly usable by sales, procurement, and operations—not just legal—without sacrificing governance.
Overall, what I like most is that Conga CLM is moving from being just a **contract repository** to a more complete **contract lifecycle platform** that supports speed, compliance, and visibility at the same time.
* **Improved contract authoring experience**
The clause library and template management feel more structured and reusable, making it easier to standardize language while still allowing flexibility where needed.
* **Better automation across the contract lifecycle**
More steps—request intake, approvals, versioning, and execution—can now be automated end to end, reducing manual handoffs and email-driven processes.
* **Stronger Salesforce alignment**
The tighter integration with Salesforce objects (Accounts, Opportunities, custom objects) makes contracts more contextual and easier to track alongside deals.
* **Enhanced visibility and reporting**
Contract status, bottlenecks, and key milestones (like expirations and renewals) are easier to surface, which helps with proactive contract management.
* **Clause and obligation control**
The ability to manage fallback clauses, conditional language, and obligations improves compliance and reduces legal risk.
* **Scalability beyond legal teams**
CLM is increasingly usable by sales, procurement, and operations—not just legal—without sacrificing governance.
Overall, what I like most is that Conga CLM is moving from being just a **contract repository** to a more complete **contract lifecycle platform** that supports speed, compliance, and visibility at the same time.
What do you dislike about the product?
Yes—while **Conga CLM** is solid, there are a few areas where it can improve to make the experience even better:
**• Usability & user experience**
Some screens and workflows can feel clunky or unintuitive, especially for non-legal users. Improved UI and clearer navigation would help adoption across teams.
**• Onboarding & training**
Given its capabilities, better in-product guidance, tutorials, and contextual help could reduce the learning curve for admins and business users.
**• Workflow flexibility**
More dynamic and easily configurable workflows (without heavy admin support) would let teams tailor approval and review paths faster.
**• Reporting & dashboards**
While contract reporting exists, richer, more customizable dashboards and analytics—in line with modern BI experiences—would help teams spot trends and risks faster.
**• Template & clause management**
Even though libraries exist, more intelligent suggestion tools or easier reuse/search features would help authors find the right language quickly.
**• Performance at scale**
For very high volumes of contracts or large orgs, performance can lag—optimizations here would help speed up contract creation and search.
**• Integration ecosystem**
Expanding prebuilt integrations with more third-party systems (eSignature alternatives, CLM data in BI tools, ERP/finance) could reduce the need for custom builds.
In short, Conga CLM could improve by becoming **more intuitive, easier to customize, and more performance-optimized**—especially for users outside legal who interact with contracts daily.
**• Usability & user experience**
Some screens and workflows can feel clunky or unintuitive, especially for non-legal users. Improved UI and clearer navigation would help adoption across teams.
**• Onboarding & training**
Given its capabilities, better in-product guidance, tutorials, and contextual help could reduce the learning curve for admins and business users.
**• Workflow flexibility**
More dynamic and easily configurable workflows (without heavy admin support) would let teams tailor approval and review paths faster.
**• Reporting & dashboards**
While contract reporting exists, richer, more customizable dashboards and analytics—in line with modern BI experiences—would help teams spot trends and risks faster.
**• Template & clause management**
Even though libraries exist, more intelligent suggestion tools or easier reuse/search features would help authors find the right language quickly.
**• Performance at scale**
For very high volumes of contracts or large orgs, performance can lag—optimizations here would help speed up contract creation and search.
**• Integration ecosystem**
Expanding prebuilt integrations with more third-party systems (eSignature alternatives, CLM data in BI tools, ERP/finance) could reduce the need for custom builds.
In short, Conga CLM could improve by becoming **more intuitive, easier to customize, and more performance-optimized**—especially for users outside legal who interact with contracts daily.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Conga CLM automates the creation of contracts by using pre-approved templates, clauses, and terms, which are consistent across all contracts. It provides real-time visibility into the contract lifecycle, allowing users to track the status of each contract, identify overdue approvals, and monitor contract performance. Conga CLM automates and streamlines the approval process by setting up customizable workflows and notifications to ensure that contracts are reviewed and approved quickly by the appropriate stakeholders
Conga CLM - revolutionary solution for contract management
What do you like best about the product?
Here are a few **newer (or increasingly noticeable) things about Conga CLM that I like**, especially compared to how CLM tools used to feel:
* **Improved contract authoring experience**
The clause library and template management feel more structured and reusable, making it easier to standardize language while still allowing flexibility where needed.
* **Better automation across the contract lifecycle**
More steps—request intake, approvals, versioning, and execution—can now be automated end to end, reducing manual handoffs and email-driven processes.
* **Stronger Salesforce alignment**
The tighter integration with Salesforce objects (Accounts, Opportunities, custom objects) makes contracts more contextual and easier to track alongside deals.
* **Enhanced visibility and reporting**
Contract status, bottlenecks, and key milestones (like expirations and renewals) are easier to surface, which helps with proactive contract management.
* **Clause and obligation control**
The ability to manage fallback clauses, conditional language, and obligations improves compliance and reduces legal risk.
* **Scalability beyond legal teams**
CLM is increasingly usable by sales, procurement, and operations—not just legal—without sacrificing governance.
Overall, what I like most is that Conga CLM is moving from being just a **contract repository** to a more complete **contract lifecycle platform** that supports speed, compliance, and visibility at the same time.
* **Improved contract authoring experience**
The clause library and template management feel more structured and reusable, making it easier to standardize language while still allowing flexibility where needed.
* **Better automation across the contract lifecycle**
More steps—request intake, approvals, versioning, and execution—can now be automated end to end, reducing manual handoffs and email-driven processes.
* **Stronger Salesforce alignment**
The tighter integration with Salesforce objects (Accounts, Opportunities, custom objects) makes contracts more contextual and easier to track alongside deals.
* **Enhanced visibility and reporting**
Contract status, bottlenecks, and key milestones (like expirations and renewals) are easier to surface, which helps with proactive contract management.
* **Clause and obligation control**
The ability to manage fallback clauses, conditional language, and obligations improves compliance and reduces legal risk.
* **Scalability beyond legal teams**
CLM is increasingly usable by sales, procurement, and operations—not just legal—without sacrificing governance.
Overall, what I like most is that Conga CLM is moving from being just a **contract repository** to a more complete **contract lifecycle platform** that supports speed, compliance, and visibility at the same time.
What do you dislike about the product?
Yes—while **Conga CLM** is solid, there are a few areas where it can improve to make the experience even better:
**• Usability & user experience**
Some screens and workflows can feel clunky or unintuitive, especially for non-legal users. Improved UI and clearer navigation would help adoption across teams.
**• Onboarding & training**
Given its capabilities, better in-product guidance, tutorials, and contextual help could reduce the learning curve for admins and business users.
**• Workflow flexibility**
More dynamic and easily configurable workflows (without heavy admin support) would let teams tailor approval and review paths faster.
**• Reporting & dashboards**
While contract reporting exists, richer, more customizable dashboards and analytics—in line with modern BI experiences—would help teams spot trends and risks faster.
**• Template & clause management**
Even though libraries exist, more intelligent suggestion tools or easier reuse/search features would help authors find the right language quickly.
**• Performance at scale**
For very high volumes of contracts or large orgs, performance can lag—optimizations here would help speed up contract creation and search.
**• Integration ecosystem**
Expanding prebuilt integrations with more third-party systems (eSignature alternatives, CLM data in BI tools, ERP/finance) could reduce the need for custom builds.
In short, Conga CLM could improve by becoming **more intuitive, easier to customize, and more performance-optimized**—especially for users outside legal who interact with contracts daily.
**• Usability & user experience**
Some screens and workflows can feel clunky or unintuitive, especially for non-legal users. Improved UI and clearer navigation would help adoption across teams.
**• Onboarding & training**
Given its capabilities, better in-product guidance, tutorials, and contextual help could reduce the learning curve for admins and business users.
**• Workflow flexibility**
More dynamic and easily configurable workflows (without heavy admin support) would let teams tailor approval and review paths faster.
**• Reporting & dashboards**
While contract reporting exists, richer, more customizable dashboards and analytics—in line with modern BI experiences—would help teams spot trends and risks faster.
**• Template & clause management**
Even though libraries exist, more intelligent suggestion tools or easier reuse/search features would help authors find the right language quickly.
**• Performance at scale**
For very high volumes of contracts or large orgs, performance can lag—optimizations here would help speed up contract creation and search.
**• Integration ecosystem**
Expanding prebuilt integrations with more third-party systems (eSignature alternatives, CLM data in BI tools, ERP/finance) could reduce the need for custom builds.
In short, Conga CLM could improve by becoming **more intuitive, easier to customize, and more performance-optimized**—especially for users outside legal who interact with contracts daily.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Conga CLM (Contract Lifecycle Management) addresses a variety of challenges organizations face when managing contracts, improving efficiency, reducing risks, and ensuring compliance.
New CLM Implementation In Progress to Replace Bad Processes and Unhappy Internal Customers
What do you like best about the product?
Inclusive of all our needs, and straight forward to learn and implement quickly.
What do you dislike about the product?
There is nothing that stands out at the moment, and we will keep eye on this as we continue to implement and scale.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Bad business processes requiring a lot of manual interventions and re-traininig.
Efficient contract management
What do you like best about the product?
Tracking approvals, eliminates email exchanges, integration with DocuSign, reporting and event alerts.
What do you dislike about the product?
More transparency from product leaders on timeline of new products
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
All contract requests are streamlined and maintained in one centralized platform.
Conga Contracts has all the functionality of a traditional CLM.
What do you like best about the product?
Workflow, contract families, configurable by admins.
What do you dislike about the product?
Interface a bit klunky - have to scroll and click quite a bit.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
All contracts in one place, approval workflows, renewals and reporting.
Great people and product
What do you like best about the product?
The many use cases we are able to use Conga Contracts for is a important and we continue to want to leverage its capabilities. The ability to configure the system for our business cases on our own or with support is impressive.
What do you dislike about the product?
I'd like to see some features, like Projects, work the same as Request or Approvals. Also the ability to make mass or bulk changes to Users would be helpful.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Visibility and accountability
Connecting my Contracts
What do you like best about the product?
We live how configurable Conga Contracts is. It helps us address many of the needs of our teams across the enterprise proactively.
What do you dislike about the product?
I wish flows were easier to set up and logic captured could be easily extracted.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Conga Contracts has provided a way for us to address management of several areas managed within our Legal department.
Conga Contracts Review
What do you like best about the product?
I love the reporting feature. It makes presenting information and data to business groups easy and efficient.
What do you dislike about the product?
I dislike the portlet configuration on the dashboard.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Conga Contracrs is helping capture CLM data and storing our contracts.
We are excited to move to CLM - Enterprise
What do you like best about the product?
Contract Flow Process can be simple or complex.
What do you dislike about the product?
Profile Rules Functionality needs work to improve.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
They are developing Conga CLM for Web
showing 121 - 130