BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
3,127 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Easy Navigation & Sentiment Insights, But Analytics and Data Confidence Need Work
What do you like best about the product?
Easy to use and helps our team speed up testing/catch issues
What do you dislike about the product?
The cost, it's expensive for us and there is a lack of flexibility to obtain more parallel tests for app
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Testing - including automation and using emulators on our apps.
Effortless Cross-Browser Testing with Real Devices
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for cross-browser testing and debugging web applications, and it's essential for ensuring compatibility. One of the main problems it solves for me is the difficulty of testing on multiple browsers and devices. What I like most is the convenience and time it saves. I can test across multiple environments in minutes without worrying about setup. The access to real devices is a big plus, and overall the platform feels reliable and easy to use. Setting it up was very easy, and everything was pretty intuitive from the beginning. I also use it together with testing tools like Selenium and Cypress, and sometimes integrate it into my CI/CD workflow, which helps automate testing across different browsers and devices more efficiently.
What do you dislike about the product?
Occasionally, the platform can feel slightly slow when loading certain environments, and it may take a bit of time to switch between devices. It would also be great to see more flexible pricing options, especially for smaller teams. That said, these are relatively minor compared to the overall value it provides.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for cross-browser testing, helping me check compatibility and catch issues early. It saves time and costs on managing environments manually, quickly tests on real devices, and integrates well with automation tools like Selenium and CI/CD workflows.
Efficient Mobile App Testing Across Real Devices
What do you like best about the product?
I appreciate the ease of use of BrowserStack. It saves me time by running different devices in parallel. It's especially helpful for testing on real devices with different screen sizes, particularly for Android where certain OS versions can cause a different experience.
What do you dislike about the product?
Works quite well for my use case. However, additional logging enabled like network API calls and such would be beneficial.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for testing on real devices, accommodating different screen sizes and Android versions. It runs parallel tests on devices, saving time, and is easy to use. It works well but could improve with more logging features.
Insightful Testing with Setup Challenges
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for testing and alerts, especially in our development environment to catch bugs before shipping to production. I appreciate the alerts that signal us if our environment is broken. It helps us detect flakiness in our tests and if any of our end-to-end testing is failing. I like how it gives us good insights into our tests and helps us drill down on what's failing. The feature of having videos recorded and screenshots available is particularly helpful for debugging failing tests.
What do you dislike about the product?
It wasn't intuitive to set up. I think there were multiple product lines that confused me, so I had to run through several docs before it got up and running. I think the CI/CD docs could be improved. The initial setup wasn't super easy; it took me a few working days to get it up and running.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for testing and alerts, which helps us catch bugs before production. It detects test flakiness and failing end-to-end tests. I appreciate the insights, video recordings, and screenshots that aid in debugging failing tests.
Streamlines Security Testing with Ease
What do you like best about the product?
I like how BrowserStack allows me to have two devices in one window, which means I don't have to shut down one device to boot another. This is especially helpful for testing applications using both Android and iOS environments together. The ability to re-route traffic from virtualized instances to my local network is great because the traffic generated through apps can be routed to a proxy. This helps in intercepting traffic and understanding what goes through the network. I also appreciate the API access. Additionally, the initial setup was very easy, just 3-clicks away.
What do you dislike about the product?
Having rooted devices in the environment would definitely help me stick around with BrowserStack. Having access to devices for dynamic instrumentation and reading data within memory.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves virtualization and logistics challenges, allowing testing on Android and iOS simultaneously without rebooting. It enables routing app traffic to proxies for traffic interception, enhancing my understanding of network activities.
Flexible Multi-OS Testing, but New Device Setup Can Be Tricky
What do you like best about the product?
The ease of using multiple operating systems and device combinations.
What do you dislike about the product?
Since the devices are emulated, it can sometimes be a pain to setup a new testing device.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It allows our distributed teams to test across many devices and operating systems, without the need for each team member to have multiple physical devices. Browserstack also helps us with access to the latest devices, which would otherwise be difficult to procure.
Powerful Cross-Device Testing and CI/CD Integration, but Cost and Latency Can Bite
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack is highly valued for providing extensive access to a vast array of real mobile devices and desktop browsers, enabling accurate cross-browser and cross-device testing without the overhead of maintaining physical labs. Its cloud-based nature offers unparalleled convenience and scalability, allowing teams to run tests concurrently and integrate seamlessly with existing CI/CD pipelines and testing frameworks, ultimately accelerating release cycles and improving software quality.
What do you dislike about the product?
BrowserStack can include its cost, which might be prohibitive for smaller teams or projects with limited budgets, and occasional performance latency when interacting with remote devices, depending on internet connection quality.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
primarily solves the critical problem of web and mobile application compatibility testing across a fragmented ecosystem. It addresses the challenge developers face in ensuring their software works flawlessly across hundreds of different real devices, operating systems, and browser versions without requiring them to purchase, set up, and maintain an expensive, ever-evolving physical device lab.
Easy to Use with Broad Device and Framework Support
What do you like best about the product?
Ease of use
Support for many test automation framework
Wide range of device/os support and availability
Recordings to replay to analyse the issue
Support for many test automation framework
Wide range of device/os support and availability
Recordings to replay to analyse the issue
What do you dislike about the product?
Slower test execution time
Higher license cost
Higher license cost
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Mobile devices availability to test the functionality of the business applications
BrowserStack Makes Device/OS Bug Reproduction Easy
What do you like best about the product?
I primarily use BrowserStack in a bug-fixing manner. The sheer number of devices out there makes it impossible to cover all of them. That BrowserStack allows me to match the device and OS for a raised issue makes troubleshooting easier to recreate the issue.
What do you dislike about the product?
I wish that it was easier to visit the same page when I am testing across multiple browsers. I am sure this might just be how I use BrowserStack but I am having to paste the URL into the browser each time and it's a slight pain when added up over time.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Troubleshooting bugs. The number of available devices means that I can recreate specific browser conditions that bugs are raised in.
Cohesive with Great Integrations and AI
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack has built quite a good ecosystem. What I especially like are the integrations, the AI capabilities, and the overall UI/UX design, which together make the experience feel cohesive and easy to use.
What do you dislike about the product?
The main downsides I’ve noticed with BrowserStack are performance and pricing. On top of that, support can be very slow, and it often takes a long time to reach a resolution.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Cross-browser testing across multiple mobile devices is what we’re benefiting from most with BrowserStack at the moment. I’m also keen to explore the AI capabilities and see where they can add value for us.
showing 101 - 110