BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
2,631 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Outstanding Experience from Start to Finish
What do you like best about the product?
Real device testing offers broad coverage, straightforward integration, and a setup process that is free of complications.
What do you dislike about the product?
It can be costly at times, and I have noticed occasional performance lags. Additionally, the options for offline testing are somewhat limited.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
This solution addresses device and browser fragmentation, accelerates testing processes, lowers infrastructure expenses, and enhances overall app quality.
Seamless Test Management and Effortless Jira Integration
What do you like best about the product?
i like the test management tools that browserStack offers. it's easy to use and also easy to integrate with your Jira instance.
It was also a good experience with their team who made sure we have all we need to make the right decision on what tool we need.
It was also a good experience with their team who made sure we have all we need to make the right decision on what tool we need.
What do you dislike about the product?
I would say i did not like that LCA is not available for per user basis.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack is providing us a solution for test management . and that also in a good cost . it helped us save about 50% in cost. and the AI Test feature also helps our team a lot during QA process
Boosts Productivity with Extensive Device Coverage and Seamless Integrations
What do you like best about the product?
The biggest advantage of BrowserStack is the wide range of real devices and browsers it offers. Being able to quickly test across different OS versions, browsers, and mobile devices without maintaining physical hardware is a huge productivity boost. The Live testing experience is smooth, device responsiveness is good, and session startup times are generally fast.
I also appreciate the integrations with popular tools like Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, and CI/CD pipelines, which makes it easy to plug BrowserStack into existing workflows. Debugging tools like console logs, screenshots, video recordings, and network logs are very helpful when investigating failures.
I also appreciate the integrations with popular tools like Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, and CI/CD pipelines, which makes it easy to plug BrowserStack into existing workflows. Debugging tools like console logs, screenshots, video recordings, and network logs are very helpful when investigating failures.
What do you dislike about the product?
Pricing can feel a bit high, especially for smaller teams or individual developers, and concurrency limits sometimes become a bottleneck when multiple people are testing at the same time. Occasionally, certain devices may feel slightly slower or unavailable during peak hours. The UI, while functional, could be more intuitive in a few areas, particularly when managing sessions or switching between devices.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack works really well for regression testing, cross-browser compatibility checks, and validating fixes on real mobile devices before release. It has helped catch browser-specific issues early and reduced production bugs, which ultimately saves time and effort for the team.
Effortless Cross-Browser Testing with Seamless Automation Integration
What do you like best about the product?
What I like best about BrowserStack is its ability to provide fast and reliable access to a wide range of real devices and browsers without any infrastructure or maintenance overhead. It makes cross-browser and cross-device testing simple and accurate, closely reflecting real user conditions. The smooth integration with automation tools like Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, and CI/CD pipelines, along with built-in debugging features such as logs, screenshots, and video recordings, helps teams identify and fix issues quickly, making the overall testing process efficient and dependable.
What do you dislike about the product?
One thing I dislike about BrowserStack is that it can sometimes feel slow or laggy, especially during peak usage hours or when running tests on older devices. The pricing can also be on the higher side for small teams or individual users. Additionally, occasional flaky sessions or unexpected disconnects during live testing can interrupt the workflow, and debugging network- or device-specific issues may still require some local reproduction.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the problem of testing applications across multiple browsers, devices, and operating systems without the need to maintain costly and complex in-house device labs. It benefits me by saving time and effort, enabling quick and reliable cross-browser and real-device testing from anywhere, and helping catch compatibility issues early. This improves product quality, speeds up release cycles through automation and CI/CD integration, and gives confidence that the application will work well for real users across different environments.
Effortless Automation Experience
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about BrowserStack is the option to work on multiple mobile devices concurrently. This significantly simplifies cross-device testing and helps identify issues quickly and easily.
What do you dislike about the product?
Occasional performance lag and higher pricing are areas where BrowserStack could improve.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the difficulty of validating applications across diverse browsers and mobile devices without managing physical infrastructure. It benefits me by enabling parallel testing, faster bug detection, and confidence that the application performs consistently for all users.
Reliable Cross-Browser Testing with Real Devices and Easy Automation
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack’s biggest strength is access to a wide range of real browsers and real devices, which makes cross-browser and cross-device testing much more reliable than emulators. It’s easy to start manual testing, and the platform supports popular automation frameworks, helping QA teams validate UI and functionality across environments with minimal setup.
What do you dislike about the product?
Performance can be inconsistent at times, especially during peak usage, with noticeable lag on some devices. Automation debugging could be improved, as logs and error details are not always sufficient to quickly identify failures. Pricing is also relatively high, which may be challenging for smaller QA teams.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the challenge of testing applications across multiple browsers, devices, and OS versions without maintaining physical hardware. This improves test coverage, helps identify production issues earlier, and saves time and infrastructure costs while supporting both manual and automated testing workflows.
All-in-One Solution That Saves Time Effortlessly
What do you like best about the product?
It saves a lot of time because I don’t need to set up multiple browsers or devices locally. Everything is available in one place.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes the sessions feel a bit slow, especially when using real mobile devices.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solves the problem of testing across multiple browsers and devices without maintaining local setups, which saves a lot of time.
User-Friendly with Real Device Performance Hiccups
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack to test our mobile applications and run our mobile automated scripts. I like having the option to use multiple models of iOS and Android devices, especially real devices, not just simulators. What I like most about BrowserStack is its ease of use and the integration for automation.
What do you dislike about the product?
I dread using the real device feature, cause it's very laggy to use.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to test our mobile applications and run automated scripts, offering multiple device models, real and simulated, with ease of use and automation integration.
Real devices, Real experience and Real results
What do you like best about the product?
Wide Range of Real devices plus amazing testing tools that come with BrowserStack.
What do you dislike about the product?
Cost is a little bit high particularly if your team is big and you use more and more products.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
By using BrowserStack we eliminate the need of buying physical devices which our customers use to access our websites.
Streamlined Mobile Testing on Multiple Devices
What do you like best about the product?
I like that BrowserStack allows me to test my suites on multiple devices, all from one platform. It's great to have access to different Android and iOS mobile devices for running and testing my cases. The platform supports both manual and automation testing, which I find very useful. I also found the initial setup to be good and easy.
What do you dislike about the product?
I don't like that BrowserStack does not give complete use of AI. We can't debug and write any code to enhance our tests. I need some AI-generated features, like a copilot.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to run test suites on multiple devices, both Android and iOS, which streamlines my testing process across different platforms.
showing 101 - 110