BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
2,631 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Seamless Accessibility Testing Integrated into QA
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack Accessibility makes accessibility testing feel like part of normal QA, not a separate audit that happens once a year. Running accessibility checks directly on real browsers helps catch issues that behave differently across Chrome, Safari, and Firefox. I like how issues are grouped by severity, which helps prioritize what genuinely blocks users versus what can be improved later. The Website Scanner is useful for coverage, it surfaces patterns across pages, not just isolated issues. Reports explain why something is an accessibility issue, which helps developers understand the impact instead of treating it as noise.
What do you dislike about the product?
Automated scans still miss interaction-heavy issues like complex keyboard navigation or screen-reader flow. The same issue repeated across multiple pages can inflate reports if not reviewed carefully.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Removes the dependency on late-stage accessibility audits by shifting checks earlier in development. Helps QA teams catch accessibility regressions during routine testing cycles. Gives teams visibility into accessibility debt instead of discovering it post-release. Creates a shared reference point for QA, developers, and designers when discussing accessibility issues. Reduces risk of compliance failures by making accessibility testing repeatable and measurable. Saves time during releases by avoiding last-minute accessibility firefighting.
Essential Tool for Mobile Debugging Success
What do you like best about the product?
Browserstack was instrumental in helping us debug issues that our platform encountered on mobile devices. Since we relied on webviews for mobile, diagnosing API failures would have been much more difficult without Browserstack.
Another feature I really liked is it solves the need of having physical devices for testers, making testing possible across various device types and models.
Another feature I really liked is it solves the need of having physical devices for testers, making testing possible across various device types and models.
What do you dislike about the product?
When testing wallet payments such as Google Pay and Apple Pay, I found that they were not supported through BrowserStack. This is because setting up a Google or Apple account is required before testing these wallets. I believe that if there were a way to mock social accounts, it might have made this feature possible.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
This tool has been very helpful for mobile device testing, especially since it allows us to review logs and inspect API failures. Being able to access this information makes troubleshooting much easier.
User-Friendly and Perfect for Non-Technical Users
What do you like best about the product?
I think it's user friendly and good for non-technical user
What do you dislike about the product?
I think it's quite expensive sdgwgwgvevwev
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
You can start creating automated tests in minutes. no scripting or Selenium/WebDriver knowledge needed
Excellent Dual Testing for Mobile and Web
What do you like best about the product?
I really like the two sides of the software test mobile and web
What do you dislike about the product?
you need to pay for each tool that would you will use for testing
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
i test so many websites and some apps in the mobile tool that i was very grateful using this software is easy to use and it has a option for download a model for not have lag when you are using a phone or broswer.
Effortless Testing on Any Device, Room for UI Improvement
What do you like best about the product?
What I like about BrowserStack is the ability to access mobile devices without having to actually use my physical testing mobile devices. I can also record my screen and take screenshots when I need to.
What do you dislike about the product?
I believe that the list of the builds could be organized a little bit better. Usually, when I open my UI, that section of the screen is not very wide.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for user acceptance testing. I like accessing mobile devices without using physical ones and can record my screen and take screenshots when needed.
Effortless Device Testing with Exceptional Performance
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for testing new features and releases of our mobile app on various Android and iOS devices. I appreciate that it allows us to quickly test new versions on a number of different devices. One of the things I like most is how easy it is to use. The devices on BrowserStack perform well, unlike our previous solution. The initial setup was also a breeze; we just selected our devices and got started. I have no complaints and would definitely recommend BrowserStack.
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing really
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack lets us quickly test new app versions across multiple devices, saving time compared to our previous slower solution.
Seamless Cross-Device Testing with Outstanding Support
What do you like best about the product?
What I like about BrowserStack is its wide coverage of real devices and browsers, which helps ensure product quality across environments.
The live testing and debugging capabilities save significant time during test execution.
It supports both manual and automated testing, making it flexible for different project needs.
Parallel testing significantly reduces execution time and improves overall efficiency.
Overall, it makes testing faster, cleaner, and closer to real user scenarios.
BrowserStack’s customer support is prompt, knowledgeable, and effective in resolving issues quickly.The support team provides clear guidance and follows up until the issue is resolved.
It’s simple, intuitive, and gets the job done without any hassle.
The live testing and debugging capabilities save significant time during test execution.
It supports both manual and automated testing, making it flexible for different project needs.
Parallel testing significantly reduces execution time and improves overall efficiency.
Overall, it makes testing faster, cleaner, and closer to real user scenarios.
BrowserStack’s customer support is prompt, knowledgeable, and effective in resolving issues quickly.The support team provides clear guidance and follows up until the issue is resolved.
It’s simple, intuitive, and gets the job done without any hassle.
What do you dislike about the product?
The only thing I disliked about BrowserStack is:
1.Performance can occasionally be slower during peak usage hours.
2.Pricing can be on the higher side for small teams or individual users.
Occasional performance latency and limited customization compared to physical devices, though overall benefits outweigh these limitations.
1.Performance can occasionally be slower during peak usage hours.
2.Pricing can be on the higher side for small teams or individual users.
Occasional performance latency and limited customization compared to physical devices, though overall benefits outweigh these limitations.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
As a QA in Syndigo, BrowserStack enables reliable cross-browser and cross-device testing on real environments, which is critical in my role as the primary QA for the team at Syndigo. It helps identify defects early, supports GxP-compliant releases, and reduces setup overhead so I can focus on test coverage and quality ownership.
It reduces setup and maintenance overhead, allowing me to focus on test coverage, quality risk assessment, and proactive collaboration with developers and Product Owners.
It reduces setup and maintenance overhead, allowing me to focus on test coverage, quality risk assessment, and proactive collaboration with developers and Product Owners.
Effortless Cross-Device Testing with User-Friendly Features
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack provides various features which helps in testing a software efficiently, it becomes easy to test on different devices even to integrate and test on local, it reduces time of checking in physical device also the availability os device reduces. This is being used in daily tasks, also it helps to work from remotely. It provides location change, resolutions, latest versions and many more features. It is user friendly to use, to implement just add the link on which to test and select device which reduces time of understanding. It has a good customer support, ready to help at anytime.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes it has perfomance issue, it lags while using different devices which reduces the real device experience and becomes difficult to undertsand. In some places it is high cost with respect to small teams.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack offers a platform for software testing across wide range of devices and browsers, which helps reduce cost associated with purchasing of real devices. It can automate testing tasks and provide a proper process execution.
Comprehensive Testing with Seamless Setup
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack mostly for testing browser responsiveness and viewing how web pages or mobile apps look on different devices. It resolves responsive issues and saves us from the cost of buying multiple devices for testing. I like that BrowserStack has more features beyond responsive testing; even though I haven't fully used them, I've noticed their availability. It excels in cross-browser and cross-device testing, providing stable connections which are helpful for manual testing. Additionally, the initial setup is straightforward and quick, and the responsive testing is better compared to other tools we've tried.
What do you dislike about the product?
I experience occasional slowness and lag with BrowserStack. The session time limits can be a bit restrictive. I also feel that the documentation could be better for understanding the features and how to use them.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps with responsive testing on various devices, saving the cost of buying multiple devices. It's great for manual testing with stable connections and offers features beyond responsive checks.
Crucial for Cross-Browser Testing, Needs Faster Mobile Experience
What do you like best about the product?
I like using BrowserStack for testing different devices and browsers. Mobile testing in Chrome and Firefox helps me test all the desired features efficiently.
What do you dislike about the product?
I find the mobile testing takes time to load and keeps refreshing. iOS mobile testing sometimes gets an error when opening, and when we upload the files in each browser, it takes time to upload. The initial setup was a little bit difficult.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for testing different devices and browsers, which helps with cross-browser testing.
showing 11 - 20