BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
3,127 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Strong Testing Portfolio with Percy, but Room to Grow
What do you like best about the product?
product portfolio in Testing vertical like Percy
What do you dislike about the product?
Testing solutions are often generic. It is more effective to use specific or built-in frameworks tailored to the industry, such as a CRM suite framework.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
For content validation on the front-end website, we use Percy, which makes it easier to validate content for quick production releases.
Easy Cross-Browser Testing with Real Devices and 4-at-Once Multidevice Support
What do you like best about the product?
It has real devices , we mostly use for cross browser and platform testing and the switching between devices is really easy also we the feature where 4 devices can be used at the same time is quite time saving .
What do you dislike about the product?
It scroll action in the device is either very fast or very slow even if we try to adjust the scroll behaviour.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Since it has multiple browser and devices option saves lot of testing time
Powerful Test Run Management and Analytics—With or Without Browserstack SDK
What do you like best about the product?
I really like the test run management and analytics it offers, whether or not I integrate the Browserstack SDK. I also appreciate the quick turnaround time from both vendor and client support.
What do you dislike about the product?
Browserstack sometimes doesn’t show test runs or the interactive debugging mode. This is probably due to latency, possibly because the SDK isn’t integrated. Overall, though, that’s mostly the only issue we face as a team.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
As a test automation team, we needed a plug-and-play test run analytics dashboard, which is exactly what BrowserStack offers. It’s easy to use and secure for our internal systems.
Extensive Device Coverage with Minor Bugs
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack to test sites, HTML5 creatives, and other things related to HTML behavior on devices. I like that there are so many different devices to choose from, as well as a variety of browsers and browser versions available. It's super helpful and all of that works well with VPN too. The initial setup was very easy, and we had an account manager to assist us.
What do you dislike about the product?
The network console is often buggy and does not capture events sometimes. It would also oftentimes get disconnected.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to test sites and HTML5 creatives, ensuring accurate behavior on real devices, especially mobile. It helps bypass bot-traffic blocks, providing a reliable testing environment compared to emulators.
Fast, reliable cross-browser and device testing.
What do you like best about the product?
I love that BrowserStack gives instant access to real devices and browsers. No need to set up a device lab or fiddle with emulators. It’s super reliable for catching UI bugs and browser-specific issues, and the interface makes switching between devices and OS versions really smooth. It saves me a ton of time and makes testing much less stressful.
What do you dislike about the product?
Honestly, I don’t have major complaints. It works really well for my testing needs. Sometimes sessions can feel a bit slow, but overall it’s very reliable and smooth.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It lets you quickly test on real devices and browsers without managing hardware, helping catch bugs faster and saving a lot of time.
Streamlined Testing with Parallel Execution
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for mobile and web-based cross-browser application testing. It eliminates the need for maintaining real devices and enables real device testing across multiple browser and OS versions. It helps me identify UI and cross-browser issues and supports parallel automation testing, which reduces execution time. I really like the cross-browser testing, parallel execution, and file upload mechanism. The parallel execution feature significantly reduces our testing time. Cross-browser testing helps us validate device functionality across multiple browsers and identify issues. The file upload helps in testing real scenarios like image or screenshot uploads. I also appreciate that BrowserStack integrates well with our CI/CD pipeline in Azure and allows us to maintain the test suite and execution in one place, providing better integration to see test results, execution, and reports.
What do you dislike about the product?
The file upload mechanism can sometimes be inconsistent with unsupported errors, and it does not support all file types. The max size is just 15MB, which can be increased. There are session timeout and disconnection scenarios.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack eliminates the need for maintaining real devices, enables real device testing across various browsers and OS versions, and supports parallel automation testing to reduce execution time. It helps identify UI and cross-browser issues effectively.
Essential Browser Testing Solution
What do you like best about the product?
I like the most about BrowserStack is when you can change the location. It helps me a lot with websites that are not accessible on Google, and it relates to accepting the business model of the websites. The initial setup of BrowserStack was easy, which was convenient.
What do you dislike about the product?
none
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps me access websites not accessible on Google and lets me validate their business model by changing the location.
Easy Cross-Browser Testing and API Integration, But Limited Availability for Ubuntu
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack is useful for me for web-based applications because I can create a simple script just by entering the URL in the appropriate section and selecting a browser such as Chrome, Firefox, or Safari. It’s also easy to install and to integrate with the API. Overall, I think it’s a good use of AI.
What do you dislike about the product?
As an Ubuntu user, I noticed it’s currently available only for Mac and Windows, which is disappointing to me.becuase of that i switched to window
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
if i'm talikng about problem solving, it just save time as we can create script for web based application and run it according to module wise.
BrowserStack Makes Cross-Device Testing Fast with Parallel Runs and Broad Browser Support
What do you like best about the product?
The most amazing feature of BrowserStack is that it lets users access and use almost any mobile device without physically owning it. It also includes the latest devices, which makes it easy to stay up to date while testing. Another big advantage is the ability to test on multiple mobile devices at the same time (in parallel), which saves a lot of time. Almost all the browsers available in the market are supported on BrowserStack as well.
BrowserStack also supports automation testing for both mobile and web platforms. We can integrate TestFlight with BrowserStack for build generation, and I find this to be a very useful feature. For iOS devices, users can also simulate offline scenarios, which helps when validating app behavior under different network conditions.
And BrowserStack is super easy to use, even junior QAs can use it easily.
BrowserStack also supports automation testing for both mobile and web platforms. We can integrate TestFlight with BrowserStack for build generation, and I find this to be a very useful feature. For iOS devices, users can also simulate offline scenarios, which helps when validating app behavior under different network conditions.
And BrowserStack is super easy to use, even junior QAs can use it easily.
What do you dislike about the product?
A few things I dislike about BrowserStack are that, at times, it takes a long time to load mobile devices, which makes testing feel very slow. For Android devices, offline simulation still isn’t possible. As a user, I should be able to toggle mobile device settings and temporarily access the phone storage. Also, during peak hours, devices aren’t available. Finally, automation takes a lot of time as well, and it really should be faster.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The biggest problem BrowserStack solves is giving us access to mobile devices without having to own them physically. Multiple users on the same team can work in BrowserStack (mobile devices and browsers) at the same time, which makes collaboration much easier. With the TestFlight integration, iOS build generation has become very fast and straightforward. Overall, automation testing has also become much easier with BrowserStack.
Reliable Testing on Real Devices, Worth the Investment
What do you like best about the product?
its like very easy to use, and no need to use real devices for testing for both Cross-browser testing and multiple mobile devise application testing. And it is very easy to use no need local setup we can connect by remotely to many different devices with different Android versions. quick response from the customer support. its very easy for the small implementations which we wanted . And i have using frequently since from past 2 months without any major issue. and it can connect smoothly with existing different devices.
What do you dislike about the product?
some times few Samsung devices getting struck in between the testing phase. few mobile devices are not supporting for Playstore.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Browserstack tehnical team is very supportive in many ways like we wanted file uploads upto 100MB size, but initially it was max supports upto 50MB only. but based on my requirement they have increase the size from 50MB to 100MB.
showing 251 - 260