BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
2,535 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
We love BrowserStack
What do you like best about the product?
A lot of devices, UI, local testing, AQA integrations.
What do you dislike about the product?
Maybe the price, but not for me. Coz pay my bosses)
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Devices
Good experience with Browser Stack
What do you like best about the product?
The availability of features which are mostly used in daily task as QA.
What do you dislike about the product?
I do not have any dislike points for the application.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I help me to test the applications on various browsers simultaneously.
Great cross browser testing tool
What do you like best about the product?
one of best things about browser stack is its real device capability. It allows testing on real device also ensure accurate results of testing. Browser stack is easy to integrate with automation frameworks like selenium.
What do you dislike about the product?
Browser stack is very powerful tool but price is very high. sometimes. test on real mobile devices experience slight lag.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Browser stack makes testing websites and apps much easier by letting me check how they work on different browser and real devices without needing to buy them. It saves times by allowing automated testing with tools like selenium and cypress. Since it integrates with CI/CD pipelines, i can catch issues early and fix them before deployment.
Worth the money if you can afford
What do you like best about the product?
As a frontend developer, it gives me instant access to all sorts of browsers I will ever need to make sure my product works as expected and I use it a lot for my projects. It is very fast for a cloud-based service and local testing is a breeze as well. Integrates well with Selenium and makes testing very easy and effective for me.
What do you dislike about the product?
I could never find an available machine on the free tier, but could be just me. But I've had prior experience of their paid version so I was happy to pay for it instead of relying on the free tier which is basically a hit or miss.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Browser testing and integrating with automated testing
Solid services for reasonable price
What do you like best about the product?
Most recent device pool
Good documentation
Good documentation
What do you dislike about the product?
Support is not always helpful on the first contact
No way to use custom devices
No way to use custom devices
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Execution of tests across various devices
Only emulator i trust
What do you like best about the product?
Very user friendly and intuitive and when testing different devices i am using an actual device in a remote location.
What do you dislike about the product?
I wish the cost was more economical, but it's definitely better than buying the physical devices.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Letting me test multiple devices manually or with automaton all in one place.
Good idea in principle but slow to react.
What do you like best about the product?
being able to test on multiple devices is great.
What do you dislike about the product?
The speed to load websites and test features on each device is bad. Plus things can get laggy. The experience is that bad, it forced us to stop using the platform as a testing tool.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The problem of testing responsive websites with multiple devices.
We are also able to test a specific device and OS when a user has a reported an issue. For us to be able to replicate the issue on the reported device.
We are also able to test a specific device and OS when a user has a reported an issue. For us to be able to replicate the issue on the reported device.
I like browserstack as its fast and reliable followed by a wide range of devices.
What do you like best about the product?
I like that the same platform offers other areas as well that helps me and my team to deliver quality tasks.
What do you dislike about the product?
I have never used the microphone option and not sure why it requests access from me to use the microphone
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I am using browserstack for cross browser testing and also using teh percy app to work on UI regression testing
The best way to test your website on real devices
What do you like best about the product?
I don't need to own a whole slue of devices to test on them. There are a large amount of device and browser version combinations for those awkward edge-case bugs and it doesn't take long to get up and running.
What do you dislike about the product?
The local tunnel can be a bit tricky to set up sometimes. The ability to connect devtools to the device is unreliable and inconsistent, sometimes it won't connect at all. Testing performance-based issues is tricky as you don't know if the problem lies with your site or the browserstack connection to the device.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I don't have to own a whole slue of devices to test on them.
The testing infrastructure we needed
What do you like best about the product?
The best solution we found to investigate fast on our user feedbacks.
It's really easy to use & to switch from one browser (or OS) to another.
It's really easy to use & to switch from one browser (or OS) to another.
What do you dislike about the product?
It's sometimes a bit slow but it works fine
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
You can test in one second different OS / hardwares without owning them
showing 391 - 400