BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
3,286 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Best-in-Class Location, Browser & OS Simulation for Web App Testing
What do you like best about the product?
The location, browser, and OS simulation is excellent. We use it to test our web application from different geolocations, along with various other settings. It’s also very easy to manage users and assign their roles.
What do you dislike about the product?
For some users, the cost could be a deciding factor, even though the feature list is extensive.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We can simulate the app for many countries and service providers. Our app is used globally by test takers, since we support 250+ countries, autonomous regions, and territories.
BrowserStack Makes Reliable Cross-Browser Testing Fast and Infrastructure-Free
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about BrowserStack is how easy it makes cross-browser testing without needing to maintain any local infrastructure. As a TA working on projects at the University of Limerick, I often need to check how my web applications behave across different browsers and operating systems. With BrowserStack, I can quickly run my automated tests on Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge on different OS versions without setting up multiple machines or virtual environments.
Another thing I appreciate is the reliability of the real device and browser environments. The tests run on actual browsers rather than emulators, which gives me more confidence in the results. I’ve been using it to test some of my work projects and also verify functionality on a few UL-related websites to see how they behave across different browser configurations.
The integration with common automation frameworks is also very helpful. I’ve been able to run automated tests using tools I’m already familiar with, and the dashboard makes it easy to view logs, screenshots, and debugging information when a test fails. Overall, it saves a lot of time and makes cross-browser testing much more practical, especially when working on multiple projects.
Another thing I appreciate is the reliability of the real device and browser environments. The tests run on actual browsers rather than emulators, which gives me more confidence in the results. I’ve been using it to test some of my work projects and also verify functionality on a few UL-related websites to see how they behave across different browser configurations.
The integration with common automation frameworks is also very helpful. I’ve been able to run automated tests using tools I’m already familiar with, and the dashboard makes it easy to view logs, screenshots, and debugging information when a test fails. Overall, it saves a lot of time and makes cross-browser testing much more practical, especially when working on multiple projects.
What do you dislike about the product?
For smaller teams working on different projects, the pricing of some advanced plans might feel a bit high if you need access to more parallel sessions or additional features. That said, for cross-browser testing on real environments without maintaining your own device lab, it still provides a lot of value overall.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps solve the problem of testing web applications across multiple browsers and operating systems without having to maintain different machines or complex local setups. Normally, ensuring compatibility across Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge on various OS versions requires significant infrastructure. BrowserStack provides these environments in the cloud, which makes it much easier to run automated tests and verify that applications behave consistently.
I’ve been using it to test my projects across different browser environments and occasionally check how some UL websites behave on different browsers. It allows me to quickly identify browser-specific issues and confirm that my applications work reliably without needing to set up multiple testing environments myself.
I’ve been using it to test my projects across different browser environments and occasionally check how some UL websites behave on different browsers. It allows me to quickly identify browser-specific issues and confirm that my applications work reliably without needing to set up multiple testing environments myself.
Effortless Browser Testing Across Devices
What do you like best about the product?
I like the ease of spinning up new devices and easily being able to test web development applications across a broad spectrum of applications. It's really valuable to have access to real devices for testing, as it's not easy to get these kinds of devices. Being able to debug and find any kind of bugs and issues on specific devices is also very helpful to me. The initial setup was very easy.
What do you dislike about the product?
For the free tier, it could be more helpful to test on a few more devices and maybe a little bit longer. For the paid one, it could be helpful to manage more devices at the same time.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the problem of testing websites on devices I don't have, making it easy to spin up new devices and test web apps across a broad spectrum.
Effortless UI and Powerful Automation
What do you like best about the product?
I like the UI and options that BrowserStack offers, especially because of its ease of use and clarity. I love using the BrowserStack Automate tool, and it was very easy to set up. IT set it up when I got my computer.
What do you dislike about the product?
I think it's fine but improvements to keep up with current industry changes would be great
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for testing emails and sites. I like its easy-to-use UI and options, especially the BrowserStack Automate tool.
BrowserStack Makes Cross-Browser Testing Fast, Easy, and Reliable
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack makes cross-browser and cross-device testing extremely easy without needing to maintain physical devices or complex virtual machine setups. The platform provides access to a wide range of real browsers and operating systems, which helps ensure that applications behave consistently across environments. The interface is intuitive, the setup is straightforward, and integrations with automation tools like Selenium and CI/CD pipelines work smoothly. It significantly speeds up debugging and improves confidence before releasing to production.
What do you dislike about the product?
While BrowserStack is very powerful, the platform can occasionally feel slower when running tests on remote devices compared to local environments. Session startup time and network latency can sometimes impact productivity when running many tests. Additionally, pricing can be relatively high for smaller teams, especially when scaling automation sessions.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the challenge of testing applications across multiple browsers, devices, and operating systems without maintaining a large in-house device lab. For development teams, this reduces infrastructure costs and eliminates the overhead of managing different environments. It helps catch browser-specific issues early in the development cycle, which improves software quality and reduces production bugs. For our workflow, it enables faster release cycles and allows the QA and development teams to collaborate more efficiently.
Real Devices That Make Troubleshooting Easy with BrowserStack
What do you like best about the product?
This is truly a hardware device, not a simulator or emulator. Whenever I run into a device-specific issue, BrowserStack is the first—and usually the last—place I go to troubleshoot it.
What do you dislike about the product?
If I had to point to one drawback, I’d say performance is the only downside I’ve experienced when using BrowserStack.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
In my experience, the issues I run into are typically iOS-specific “quirks.”
Effortless Testing with Complete Device Coverage
What do you like best about the product?
I like BrowserStack because of the vast number of devices it gives me access to. It's really easy to get new versions for testing, and the automation it provides is great. It ensures that my product works properly across all devices and allows me to do testing very quickly. I also found the initial setup to be very easy, with no issues at all.
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing comes to mind.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I find BrowserStack makes it convenient to test quickly, iterate, and launch products faster. It ensures my product works properly across all devices, allowing quick testing with automation.
Efficient Mobile App Testing with Room for Improvement
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for mobile apps testing and automation. I like that it helps with device fragmentation by providing a variety of devices with different OS combinations. The parallel testing and testing queues are beneficial. I appreciate the APP-LIVE feature, as it allows me to test crash fixes on specific devices with specific OS versions. App Automate is another feature I value for running automation on a daily basis across a wide range of devices. The initial setup was good, with easy-to-understand documentation.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometime devices get timeout and don't start smoothly which is one of the major issues I see.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves device fragmentation by providing access to various devices and OS combinations, enabling parallel testing. APP-LIVE helps test crash fixes on specific devices, while App Automate runs daily automation across a wide range of devices.
Plenty of Devices and Versions for Thorough Testing
What do you like best about the product?
It has a lot of devices and versions to test on
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes the logs are not very clear and it feels quite unorganized
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Its solving UI Test automation and testing on Android devices (I'm an iOS dev and dont have an Android to test the app developed by the Android team)
BrowserStack: A QA Game-Changer with Seamless Device Access
What do you like best about the product?
I really like the AI integration in BrowserStack. The way they implemented it is genuinely useful, speeding up the process and sometimes suggesting or identifying problems that we might not have identified ourselves. I also appreciate the ease of accessing all kinds of devices and emulating not just their screen resolution but also different specificities. With device simulation, we now automate much more, covering whichever device the user has, thanks to BrowserStack. Additionally, being a cloud-based software, the setup was completely hassle-free.
What do you dislike about the product?
The software is developing quite fast and taking into account user feedback. No issues at this point.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack reduces the need for extensive QA staff and device maintenance, helps us find edge cases, speeds up processes with AI integration, and allows easy access to a variety of devices for testing.
showing 511 - 520