BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
3,167 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Amazing Bug Creation with Screenshot/video Recording feature and Next Gen-AI tools integrations
What do you like best about the product?
Screenshot or video recording and creating directly a Jira/other platform bugs directly is an amazing feature, which helps skipping any other recording tool to be used and exact device and other details are shared therein the story.
What do you dislike about the product?
Camera type screens don't work for mobile testing, we can find a way-out so that it can be completely tested.
Also, if there is a device based testing where phone sends data to web or vice-versa, such multiple device testing, if supported would help testing IoT based projects.
Also, if there is a device based testing where phone sends data to web or vice-versa, such multiple device testing, if supported would help testing IoT based projects.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It had always been a great tool, now with the advent of AI tools I am able to write Test Cases using even a Zeplin design.
BrowserStack Speeds Up Test Development and Boosts Productivity
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack helps speed up the test development process and enhances productivity with its diverse range of tools.
What do you dislike about the product?
It’s quite expensive for a small company, and it’s also not as fast as I expected.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack is useful in automating mobile app testing
Cross-Platform Testing Simplified, Needs Smoother Scrolling
What do you like best about the product?
I like how BrowserStack helps in achieving cross-platform, cross-browser, and cross-device testing. It supports testing responsiveness on multiple mobile devices and different browsers, which really helps a lot.
What do you dislike about the product?
The scrolling on mobile devices is not smooth and needs improvement.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to test the responsiveness on multiple mobile devices and different browsers, achieving cross-platform, cross-browser, and cross-device testing.
Real-Time Dashboard and Seamless Integration That Delivers
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about BrowserStack is the real-time dashboard and the seamless integration it provides. Everything feels smooth and well connected, which makes it easier to stay on top of what’s happening as I work.
What do you dislike about the product?
Debugging flaky tests can be challenging, and the logs can sometimes be noisy and harder to analyze.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack addresses the issue of scattered test visibility by offering a real-time dashboard and centralized test reports. This makes it easy for team members to access, review, and stay aligned on results in one place.
Device Simulators Make Testing Easy
What do you like best about the product?
Being able to use the devices Simulators
What do you dislike about the product?
Feel like its a bit too costly but I get it.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Its helps me to use multiple devices for my testing.
Great Features, But Real-Device Mobile Automation Costs Are Too High
What do you like best about the product?
Lots of useful and highly accurate results that we are getting.
What do you dislike about the product?
The cost is very high. Running mobile app automation checks on a real device is also really expensive.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Mobile app automation on real device
All-in-One QA Solution That Truly Streamlines Our Work
What do you like best about the product?
The all-in-one solution for QAs because it really streamlines our work
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes I feel that when testing native manually it feels unnatural, but I believe its normal
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I can do a lot in less time and its actually saving me time to think quality in a different level
Great Low-Code Automation & Cross-Browser Testing, but Sales Outreach Is Pushy
What do you like best about the product?
Low Code no code automation and cross browser testing
What do you dislike about the product?
Get pestered a lot by sales team to purchase more
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Being bale to test across modern browsers without the need to invest in a device that you will frequently replace
Easy, Reliable Cross-Browser Testing with a Huge Range of Real Devices
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack makes cross-browser and cross-device testing very easy without needing physical devices. I like the wide range of real browsers and devices it provides, which helps catch UI and compatibility issues early. The platform is simple to use, reliable, and saves a lot of setup time for testing across different environments. Live testing and debugging feel smooth and efficient.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes the sessions can feel slightly slow, especially when testing on older devices or during peak usage hours. Pricing can also be a bit high for small teams. In a few cases, browser or device sessions disconnect unexpectedly, which can interrupt testing and require restarting the session.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the problem of testing applications across multiple browsers, operating systems, and devices without needing to maintain physical hardware. It helps identify browser-specific and device-specific issues early in the development cycle, which reduces production bugs. This saves significant time and effort for the QA team and improves overall software quality by ensuring a consistent user experience across platforms.
Eliminating Test Noise, Using Test Observability to Stabilize Playwright Suites
What do you like best about the product?
Test Observability features is a standout, providing a high level view of our playwright build health that standard logs just can't match. I love the Flaky test detection shown in my dashboard, which helps us isolate unstable tests before they pollute and CI/CD pipeline result. The ability to see failure categories and durations at a glance allows my team to priority is based on real impact. And it has turned our road test data into actionable insights for the entire engineering team.
What do you dislike about the product?
I have noticed that the dashboard can occasionally leg when loading very high volume build histories with thousands of individual test cases. And lastly the price for high parallelism observability can become quite steep as you scale.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack has solved our problem of "noisy" test results where it was difficult to distinguish between genuine regressions and environment related flakiness. By utilizing the failure categorization seen in my screenshot we have reduced our to be investigated queue by nearly 40%. This has directly benefited our release velocity as developer can now trust the build status without seconds guessing every failure.
showing 531 - 540