BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
3,167 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Effortless Access to Updated Devices, High ROI
What do you like best about the product?
I like BrowserStack's fast access to stable mobile devices that provide live feedback. It's valuable because it means I don't always need the latest updated devices for usage. I see it as a very good value and the best return on investment while working with them. Moving from physical devices to BrowserStack gives me constantly updated devices. The initial setup was quite straightforward.
What do you dislike about the product?
I would prefer a better solution for local usage of one mobile device.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for access to mobile devices, which provides fast access to stable, updated devices with live feedback. It offers a good return on investment as we switched from physical devices for better and newer device access.
Efficient QA Tool, Needs Streamlined Steps
What do you like best about the product?
I like using BrowserStack as it allows me to write QA test cases efficiently. The Generate AI feature automatically plugs the user story and writes all the test cases for me, which is very helpful. I also appreciate the detailed test steps, which assist in writing automation scripts. Additionally, the initial setup was pretty easy.
What do you dislike about the product?
Way too many unnecessary steps in test cases
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps me by providing Generate AI that automatically plugs the user story and writes all test cases for me. The detailed test steps assist in writing automation scripts effectively.
Finally stopped guessing browser-specific bugs
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about this tool is how easy it makes cross browser and cross device testing without needing to maintain my own setup. Having access to real devices and different browser versions in one place save a lot of time, especially when debugging issues that only show up in specific environments. It's also convenient to quickly reproduce user-reported bugs and varify fixed without a lot of extra configuration.
What do you dislike about the product?
The main downside for me is that performance can be inconsistent at times, especially during busy, sessions can feel a bit slow to load or laggy. But overall great experience.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Browserstack solves the problem of testing across multiple browsers, device and operating systems without having to maintain all of that locally. Instead of setting up and updating different environments or keeping physical devices, I can quickly test issue in the exact configuration a user is on. That makes it much easier to catch browser specific bugs early, reproduce reported issue, and verify fixes faster, which ultimately saves time and reduces back-and-forth during development.
Streamlined Testing Across Devices and Browsers
What do you like best about the product?
I really appreciate how BrowserStack solves the problem of collecting multiple browsers and multiple devices all in one place without the hassle of arranging for each one separately. The variety of devices and browser versions available is fantastic, allowing me to test on the latest devices and versions which aren't always available with real devices. The automation feature is a big help, especially since it integrates seamlessly with popular frameworks like Selenium and Playwright. Setting up BrowserStack was quite easy with clearly mentioned steps, and the user experience is easy to navigate.
What do you dislike about the product?
Getting access to BrowserStack took some time at the organizational level.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to test on multiple devices and browsers without needing real devices, solving cost and procurement issues. It centralizes testing, supports automation with Selenium, and offers various browser and device versions, including the latest ones.
Comprehensive Testing with Real SIM and AI Efficiency
What do you like best about the product?
I like everything about BrowserStack, especially its functionality for features like 2FA by providing a real mobile SIM. This is essential for testing apps that require SMS OTP on 4G and 5G networks. The TestManagement tool, which is now AI-driven, is another highlight for me. The generative AI capability significantly reduces our manual test case creation effort, saving us about 60%. BrowserStack's real mobile SIM allows us to register or log in to apps with two-factor or multi-factor authentication, which is extremely helpful for our offshore team that doesn't have physical SIM cards. Also, linking Jira stories to analyze and create well-documented and detailed test cases is impressive.
What do you dislike about the product?
I would be happy to see when it will start supporting the voice enable commands. Also the columns and screens to be shown to the team can be managed by Admin, so that I can control who can access what or not.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack simplifies mobile app testing with tools like appLive and TestManagement, eliminating the need for separate tools. The real mobile SIM supports 2FA testing, and generative AI in TestManagement cuts manual test case efforts by 60%, enhancing efficiency.
Seamless Device Testing with Powerful Debugging
What do you like best about the product?
I like the good debugging features with live device testing and seamless integration that BrowserStack offers. It helps me test iOS apps on real iOS devices live. The network debugging, as well as features like mocking the camera with images and recordings, are good and helpful for testing. The setup is seamless, allowing me to directly upload the app and test it.
What do you dislike about the product?
Not found
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to test iOS apps on real iOS devices live. It provides good debugging with live device testing and seamless integration, including network debugging, mock camera features, and easy app uploads.
Powerful Device Cloud That Improves Test Coverage and Speed
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack’s real-device access, reliable automation execution, and excellent debugging insights make it extremely valuable for both manual and automated testing.
What do you dislike about the product?
The main drawbacks are pricing for smaller teams and occasional device unavailability or session queues during peak usage.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the problem of limited device and browser coverage by providing instant access to real devices and environments without the need to maintain physical hardware. This benefits me by enabling faster, more reliable manual and automated testing, reducing environment-related defects, and allowing our team to scale test execution through parallel runs while saving time and maintenance effort.
Effortless Accessibility Testing with Clear, Actionable Reports
What do you like best about the product?
The automatic scans give quick feedback on common accessibility issues like missing labels, color contrast problems, and ARIA misuse. I like that accessibility checks can be run directly on real browsers and devices instead of just static pages or local tools. The issue reports are easy to understand, they clearly explain what’s wrong and why it matters, which helps during discussions with developers.
Being able to combine accessibility checks with manual testing in BrowserStack Live is extremely useful. I can inspect screen reader behavior and keyboard navigation in the same session. It fits well into our CI flow, allowing us to catch accessibility regressions early
Being able to combine accessibility checks with manual testing in BrowserStack Live is extremely useful. I can inspect screen reader behavior and keyboard navigation in the same session. It fits well into our CI flow, allowing us to catch accessibility regressions early
What do you dislike about the product?
1. Automated scans don’t catch everything, some issues still require careful manual validation.
2. Reports can get repetitive if the same issue appears across multiple pages.
3. Custom components sometimes need manual interpretation because the tool flags them generically.
4. Deeper guidance on fixing complex ARIA issues would make the reports even better.
2. Reports can get repetitive if the same issue appears across multiple pages.
3. Custom components sometimes need manual interpretation because the tool flags them generically.
4. Deeper guidance on fixing complex ARIA issues would make the reports even better.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Catches common WCAG violations early in development, not just during final audits. Reduces manual effort by automating baseline accessibility checks across multiple browsers. Helps QA and developers share a common understanding of accessibility issues using clear reports. Prevents regressions by integrating accessibility tests into CI pipelines. Saves time during release cycles by reducing last-minute accessibility fixes.
Real Device Testing Made Easy
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack helped me test websites with the feel of a real device. We can't have multiple devices with many versions physically, which I have found here. It is very easy to use, and as a fresher, I really found it helpful to get the chance to know multiple versions and
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes it takes time to load, and also when I change location and try to test it loads slowly, and I become unable to understand if there is any issue in the application on the specific location, so u can improve the functionality of location change, and there are more Android devices you should add for testing because many users are using them
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helped to understand different types of versions and devices, as we can't have multiple devices with us with so many versions, so BrowserStack has given me that
Essential Platform for Reliable Cross-Browser Testing
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack is surprising platform for cross-browser and cross-device testing. It offers real devices and browsers, ensuring accurate results that match real-world conditions. The interface is intuitive, integrations with frameworks like Selenium and Appium are seamless, and the customer support is responsive and knowledgeable. It has significantly reduced our testing time while improving coverage and quality. Highly recommended for project seeking for reliable, scalable testing solutions.
What do you dislike about the product?
Connectivity problems: Occasional disconnections during live testing.
Performance issues: Sessions can lag, freeze, or load slowly, especially on iOS and automation tests.
High pricing: Expensive plans with limited flexibility; no pay-as-you-go options.
Connectivity problems: Occasional disconnections during live testing.
Performance issues: Sessions can lag, freeze, or load slowly, especially on iOS and automation tests.
High pricing: Expensive plans with limited flexibility; no pay-as-you-go options.
Connectivity problems: Occasional disconnections during live testing.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It provides a robust platform for cross-browser and cross-device testing, making it easy to ensure compatibility across environments. The integration with test management tools streamlines workflows, allowing teams to organize, execute, and track tests efficiently. Additionally, the documentation is comprehensive and well-structured, which helps in quick onboarding and troubleshooting. Overall, BrowserStack enhances productivity and confidence in delivering quality software.
showing 601 - 610