Reviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
96 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Nastel Navigator initial experience
What do you like best about the product?
The Navigator tool is extremely powerful and provides great granularity of control for users. For admins it makes it very easy to manage these. I have not found any other tools which provide this level of access control.
What do you dislike about the product?
It would be better if the separate components could be made more like a "black box" as sometimes it feels like one needs knowledge of the specific components to debug and use it.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Navigator gives our users visibility to the systems that they lacked previously. Instead of having to contact the support teams they now have the ability to check for themselves the status of their apps. This means faster self-diagnosis for them and also frees up the support teams for other tasks.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Nastel as a company has a long pedigree and I have always found them to be responsive and helpful.
Nastel review
What do you like best about the product?
The agents are stable.
The product brings end user the ability to control the object related to his project.
The product brings end user the ability to control the object related to his project.
What do you dislike about the product?
Many bugs took long time to be fixed in the past.
We were not able to use Navigator for Chrome from more than a year.
We cannot delegate alert development into the final client beacause of its complexity.
We were not able to use Navigator for Chrome from more than a year.
We cannot delegate alert development into the final client beacause of its complexity.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Fast checks on QMgr errors.
Quick checks for DLQ error codes.
Event monitoring is great, however, being able to store just 1000 events is many times to low.
Quick checks for DLQ error codes.
Event monitoring is great, however, being able to store just 1000 events is many times to low.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Nastel will do the job for monitoring and will bring all its user an extense view of their infra.
The best tool for your middleware monitoring
What do you like best about the product?
Complete solution for your middleware monitoring. for MQ they are the best.
What do you dislike about the product?
Their presence in the market and branding is not sufficient
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Middleware issues, queue monitoring, root cause isolation.
Nastel/MeshIQ excellent company
What do you like best about the product?
The support team and TAM are quick to respond. Nastel also seeks customer input when looking to implement new features.
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing to really to dislike as they are attentive to the customers needs.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We have a better and more scalable/supportable tool for threshold monitoring on queues. Starting to get metrics over time for troubleshooting and capacity planning.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
While we currently only use it for monitoring the MQ environment, it is the best tool we have found. Recent updates have enhanced the product (AutoPilot).
Functionality
What do you like best about the product?
Cloud migration support for the most common cloud services.
What do you dislike about the product?
The end user interface is a little old fashioned
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Migration of servers and VMs to the cloud
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Try to understanding all features to get the best benefit of your invest
A new way ahead for MQs
What do you like best about the product?
- Auto diagnosis of MQ.
- Auto monitoring of MQs.
- Nastel AutoPilot MQSpeedtest .
- The messages are not lost and the error queue is not necessarily configured
- Auto monitoring of MQs.
- Nastel AutoPilot MQSpeedtest .
- The messages are not lost and the error queue is not necessarily configured
What do you dislike about the product?
- The performance gets bit low due to auto-monitoring.
- Some messages gets delivered twice
- The encryption techniques can be enhanced
- Some messages gets delivered twice
- The encryption techniques can be enhanced
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
-We use it as a replacement to Anypoint MQ .
- We create order events to be sent from source systems to Salesforce to be better aligned
- We create order events to be sent from source systems to Salesforce to be better aligned
Recommendations to others considering the product:
- Its a good alternative of Dell Boomi , Anypoint MQ just with few more enhanements
showing 91 - 96