Reviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
12 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Apollo is an excellent tool for testing queries, mutations, and subscriptions in real-time
What do you like best about the product?
As someone who has used apollographql.com, there are several aspects that I really appreciate about the platform. One of the things I like best is the comprehensive documentation they provide. The documentation is well-structured, easy to navigate, and covers a wide range of topics related to GraphQL and Apollo. Whether you're a beginner or an experienced developer, you can find everything you need to get started or dive deeper into GraphQL.
What do you dislike about the product?
Complexity for Simple Projects: If you're working on a relatively simple project with limited data requirements, the comprehensive features provided by Apollo Client and the entire Apollo ecosystem might feel like overkill. The additional layers and abstractions introduced by Apollo Client could potentially add unnecessary complexity, making the development process feel more involved than necessary for simpler use cases.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
When it comes to developer productivity, apollographql.com is a real game-changer! Let me tell you, their documentation is like a treasure trove of knowledge. It's so comprehensive, you won't get lost in a maze of confusion. They've got clear guidelines, examples, and even best practices that make working with GraphQL and Apollo a breeze. And guess what? They've got this snazzy GraphQL Playground that lets you test your queries, mutations, and subscriptions with a few clicks. No need to fuss with extra tools! It's like having a playground where you can experiment like a kid with a cool new toy.
Great start, a lot of work to maintain cache
What do you like best about the product?
Very fast page loading, developer-friendly, the idea of having a client cache is awesome
What do you dislike about the product?
Many operations are so hard to achieve, that it is easier to simply empty the cache, making concessions on the user experience. Many operations could be handled automatically or made easier to handle by the developer.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
User experience is awesome
showing 11 - 12