I still work with SentinelOne Singularity Complete as well. I am partnered with SentinelOne.
I absolutely use SentinelOne Singularity Complete's Ranger functionality. It is awesome to get a quick grasp on shadow IT, to know what you really have in your environment and what you perhaps do not even know about, what is covered, and what is not covered. The quick rollout feature or the deployment feature via Ranger is differentiated. In my opinion, when you see a device not having SentinelOne Singularity Complete in the Ranger overview, that indicates an issue with the process. You can use the band-aid by quickly deploying it, but in my opinion, that is a band-aid and you need to look at the process first.
It is hard to put into numbers how much SentinelOne Singularity Complete has helped reduce alerts. If it was just a percentage, I would have to say 90% and above. SentinelOne Singularity Complete correlates alerts. If something is happening in the same general incident, it is added to that incident rather than being a new alert. I remember being in the rollout for a larger client and they had another solution still in place at the time. They were running simultaneously for a while. In their old solution, they got hundreds and hundreds of alerts for a single occurrence, 99% of which were false positives. In SentinelOne Singularity Complete, we had a single notification, a single alert, making it much easier to quickly work through and finish.
Regarding my false positive rate reduction, I would say roughly 80%.
SentinelOne Singularity Complete absolutely saves time for me and my clients.
In numbers, I would say 80%. It is a lot of automation, and you can trust in the product to pretty much work. After you have set it up, you can essentially leave it running until you get an alert. That can mean you can leave it alone for a couple of weeks, and that is completely fine.
I would say roughly 70% for how much it has helped reduce my mean time to respond. Getting the alert is only half the benefit. Being able to quickly get all the information you need and then make an appropriate decision is simplified so much. Going back to the topic of XDR, because you can integrate pretty much any data you want into the console. You do not have to have 20 different tabs open. You can have SentinelOne Singularity Complete open and that is it. You can have all the information right there, even within the threat page itself. That simplifies things so much.
So 70% for detection and 70% for response.
Regarding Purple AI, data privacy and security when utilizing AI are important, and it meets my requirements and needs. Every time I interact with someone who is not from Germany, it is always the topic of data security and privacy for Germans. I think Germans are a bit different on that topic. Purple really does meet all the criteria for that. There has never been a single complaint.
With Purple AI, I would assess the capabilities in providing synthesized threat intelligence or contextual insight at six to seven out of 10. There is room for improvement. In a lot of cases, it might just be seeing issues where there potentially are none. If you look at a single event, for example, it may give you the information that this might be threat-related, but when you look into the data, it might also not be. Generally, it does perform really well and if there is something definitely malicious in an event, it will tell you. There is room for improvement.
SentinelOne Singularity Complete helps streamline threat investigations by making it so easy. It is actually unbelievable. Anyone can get started. For example, I recently introduced a new apprentice to the threat hunting capabilities via Purple AI, and that same day he was able to use it because the barrier to entry is so low. You do not need to learn a new query language. You do not need to learn the syntax. You can get right to it and get started.
In my thoughts on pricing for SentinelOne Singularity Complete, it is cost-efficient, definitely. Being pretty much solely on the technical side, I am a bit removed from that.
I would compare SentinelOne Singularity Complete favorably with other solutions or other vendors. It is easy to set up. It is easy to administrate. As with all solutions, you do need to put some effort into the initial deployment. That is going back to the whole beauty of it. It is easy. It takes a workload away from your team. You do not need to worry about so many things after you have it deployed.
My clients have mainly deployed SentinelOne Singularity Complete in the cloud, on-premises, and hybrid models.
I deploy SentinelOne Singularity Complete for myself and for my clients using the cloud for the console, but the agents on all the endpoints.
It is super easy to maintain SentinelOne Singularity Complete. When there is a new agent version, I do ring testing, for example, I do an internal deployment first before I roll it out to my clients. New versions come out every couple months. Beyond that, if there is an arising issue, if a client starts using new software, that also may come up if there are issues in interoperability with SentinelOne. In banking software for example, that is a common thing. Beyond that, it is super easy to maintain.
My advice to those looking into SentinelOne Singularity Complete is to do a proof of concept. Do a small-scale deployment across all your departments. See how it performs and see if there are any issues.