Cursor

What do you like best about the product?

Agent mode handles multi-file changes on a real codebase without losing the thread — it maintains my production Astro + Tailwind blog and its studio tooling. Codebase context is strong; it finds the relevant scripts on its own. It is also good at writing the boring safety code — idempotency guards, dry-run modes, audits — when asked properly.

What do you dislike about the product?

It will happily generate a lot of code fast, so review discipline is on you. It is occasionally confident about repo facts it has not checked, so claims need verifying against the actual files. Usage-based pricing can spike during heavy agent sessions.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

Ongoing development of a production blog and its content tooling as a solo builder. Cursor helped fix a real deployment-loop incident — batched git commits, cooldowns, dry runs — and handles routine feature work, so a one-person operation ships like a small team.

What do you like best about the product?

The best part about Cursor is that, when I’m vibe coding, I can use different AI models depending on what I need. For example, I can put the chat in Ask mode, which means it isn’t coding anything—it just answers my questions and gives explanations. The part I like most is when I switch to MCP and have Cursor AI take control in real time while it codes. That gives really good feedback to the AI, and I don’t need to copy and paste big chunks of data. It’s honestly the best.

What do you dislike about the product?

Overall, the only issue I’ve noticed is that it feels like the credit gets used up too quickly.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

Man, I can code way faster than ever. Having a chat open in the agent window while I code in the other window is honestly the best. Cursor just makes everything feel so handy and smooth. If UX were an app, it would be Cursor—so user-friendly.

What do you like best about the product?

I love that I can ask questions about my own code without having to explain the whole project every time. It helps me understand what’s going on, points me toward the relevant files, and suggests a few different ways to fix issues. The interface feels familiar, and it works smoothly with the terminal and Git integration.

What do you dislike about the product?

I've also seen it suggest changes that look reasonable but don't account for some edge case.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

When I'm debugging an issue or exploring a part of the codebase I haven't touched in a while, I can get an explanation and a starting point much faster. It also makes trying alternative implementations less tedious.

What do you like best about the product?

Awesome and very developer friendly. Love the predictive tab completion.

What do you dislike about the product?

Often responses lags and takes too long but not much to dislike yet.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

AI-powered code editor and has context awareness about code base thereby giving best results on a problem without searching the internet.

What do you like best about the product?

I like how it helps me understand the overall codebase, edit multiple files at the same time, and work within the existing workflows.

What do you dislike about the product?

The edits feel unpredictable, and the cost and usage limits are frustrating. On top of that, it often loses context, which makes the overall experience inconsistent.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

Exploring the new tech and debugging the issues has been a good experience so far. Agent mode helps me write code, especially when I’m working with video coding, and it makes the overall process smoother.

What do you like best about the product?

I like Cursor because it makes coding faster and more efficient with AI assistance built directly into the editor. It helps me understand code, generate solutions, debug issues, and make changes without constantly switching between different tools. I especially appreciate how it understands the context of my project and helps me move from an idea to working code more quickly. The interface feels familiar, and the AI features make everyday development tasks easier and save valuable time.

What do you dislike about the product?

Sometimes Cursor's AI suggestions aren't completely accurate and require manual corrections. It can also use up requests or reach usage limits faster than expected, depending on the plan. For larger projects, the AI may occasionally miss some context or suggest changes that need extra review. Overall, though, the benefits outweigh these drawbacks, and it remains a very useful tool for everyday development.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

Cursor helps me solve coding problems faster by using AI to generate code, explain unfamiliar concepts, debug errors, and improve existing code. It reduces the time I spend on repetitive tasks and searching for solutions, allowing me to focus more on building features and improving my projects. I especially value how it understands my codebase and provides relevant suggestions, making my development workflow more productive and efficient.

What do you like best about the product?

The AI understands my whole project, not just the file I'm working in. I use it daily to build websites and write programmatic SEO scripts, and generating or fixing code is several times faster than doing it by hand.

What do you dislike about the product?

When making bigger changes, the AI can overwrite things it shouldn't, so you have to watch the diffs carefully before accepting them. Also, the plan limits run out quickly with heavy daily use.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

I use Cursor every day to build websites and programmatic SEO scripts. Because the AI understands the whole project, I can generate and fix code several times faster, which lets me ship these projects much sooner.

What do you like best about the product?

A lot of times I know what I want to build, but I don't know exactly how to write the code for it. I don't always need to figure out the syntax or structure, I can explain the feature and let Cursor create a first version. Then I test it and tell it what needs changing... low the easy simple chat interface and all the integrations you could do in it..

What do you dislike about the product?

Sometimes it changes some codes that was working fine... so I always have to careful before giving it a prompt..

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

I use cursor mostly for small tools, website features and little ideas that I need to build but probably wouldn't know how to code properly from scratch. I can explain what I want in normal language, and cursor helps me build exactly that pretty quickly.

What do you like best about the product?

One of the best tools for agentic coding. It not only has its own AI models, like Grok/Composer, but also integrates with other models such as Opus/Sonnet and GPT. Performance is very strong, and I like having both a fast mode and a standard mode depending on what I’m doing. The ROI feels insane for what you get. Having Cursor model usage alongside other model usage also feels superb.

The UI is really cool, with both Agent mode and IDE mode, and it’s easy to switch between them. Support for the tool also seems widely available online, with plenty of tutorials and documentation.

What do you dislike about the product?

The UI looks cool, but at times it can feel a bit too complex. Also, aside from the Cursor models, integration with other models seems limited. For example, other open-source models like GLM 5.3 can be used via an API, but that still lacks native integration.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

For me, the wide variety of tools—like local/cloud agents, automations, and workflows—is really useful. And if a Cursor model is underperforming, I can switch to another model for better reasoning and overall output.

What do you like best about the product?

The intelligence for codebase awareness is my best feature. It can look across files and understand how things are connected, which makes tweaking thing easy, agent mode is also pretty impressive.

What do you dislike about the product?

It can definitely go off track. Sometimes I ask for one change and it starts touching three other things that didn't need changing. And when it makes a wrong assumption, it can keep building on that mistake if you don't catch it early.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

mostly in small stuff that eats up time.. Finding where something is used, understanding old code, fixing errors, changing the same thing across multiple files. cursor just gets me through the boring things faster.