External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
One of the best solution for performance testing requirements
What do you like best about the product?
We do use this product regularly before any major release. Very efficient and easy to use solution. Very simplified way you can generate reports and multiple users can easily access it. Multi protocol support is a plus point as other products has more dependency on web/http. It is reliable to predict app scalability, also integrated automation and monitoring tool helps alot. Administrators can implement it without much issue, as it's very easy to integrate.
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing much to dislike. But things can be improved like UI/UX and funtions. Customer support also requires more improvement.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We do manage a large scale infrutracture and it really helps to monitor and manage it's performance. It can predict based on various load parameters which really helps administrators.
- Leave a Comment |
- Mark review as helpful
Great Performance Tool For Higher Virtual Events
What do you like best about the product?
I like the most that we can perform load testing in cloud with unlimited virtual user. As well as we can manualy record and can add other logic as well in script.
What do you dislike about the product?
Its test lab sometimes lag in between the execution. That is hard point to cover in next releases.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We are using LoadRunner tool for performing load testing of our website, due to this tool, we could be able to find lot of issues due to hard load in aws systems.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Other than this, I would not recommend but JMeter tool is growing highly in the market, so it could compete with LoadRunner, but as of now, nothing is better that LoadRunner.
Load runner cloud
What do you like best about the product?
Navigation across different modules and connectivity
What do you dislike about the product?
Data parsing and some issues with flat files
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Enterprise Applications performance
Excellent tools for the Devops pipeline - Testing
What do you like best about the product?
Ease of use, integration, scalability, deployment, delivery
What do you dislike about the product?
there is nothing I dislike in this product
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We have integrated for testing in our DevOps pipeline using Jenkins. We have realized 30% TCO due to the automation
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Definitely, I will recommend this product for Integration in DevOps pipeline
Load testing made easy
What do you like best about the product?
all the scripts and test results are maintained on cloud. it saves the resources.
What do you dislike about the product?
technical challenges for loadrunner on cloud.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
easy access across geographic locations. saves the reource
Recommendations to others considering the product:
try this and you will benefit from this.
Enables us to check response times for applications from locations around the world
We use it to get response times around the world for external applications. We use it on top of our own virtual users for remote site testing. We include it in our scenarios in our performance center and use the results in the LoadRunner analysis tool.
How has it helped my organization?
We can determine response times for our external applications, from most places around the world, for a small fee.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is having load generators in countries where we don’t have access to them.
What needs improvement?
An area for improvement is analytics on why response times are slow from certain countries. Slowness can be caused by the laptop, the connection, the VPN, the internal network, the country's internet, etc.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It has been stable every time I have used it. We don’t put much stress on it since we have our own performance center and load generators.
How was the initial setup?
In terms of integration and configuration of the product in our AWS environment, it is the easiest Micro Focus tool I have ever used.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is very reasonable and the licensing is straightforward.
You decide on the number of virtual users you will need to support multiple runs or for a year and purchase that quality of virtual-user hours. We chose to procure this solution via the AWS Marketplace because of remote site testing and low cost.
What other advice do I have?
showing 1 - 6