One area where I have been using OneLogin is when I am working on an application that secures employee data, such as payroll. I usually access that data through OneLogin, which is the main secure database that I regularly use OneLogin to access.

Regarding my main use case with OneLogin, it is clear that when I am working on various applications from my screen, it saves me time by allowing me to log in to multiple applications at once from OneLogin as the main security entry. The other factor is that it is safe and provides a more secure user experience.

OneLogin positively impacts my organization as it serves as the main password management tool, preventing unauthorized access from malware attacks and cyber attacks. That is one of my main uses now.

What I appreciate most about the authentication feature is that it is easy to use and also secure. The most important aspect for me is the security it provides.

OneLogin has significantly impacted our organization, saving costs by reducing the number of employees needed to monitor application performance since you can access many applications from one entity. Working as a single user from anywhere is very beneficial for our enterprise as it promotes efficient growth through saved costs.

The integration of phishing-resistant device trust has made things easier and more secure for users, as it can detect malware attacks and prevent any unauthorized data attacks from fraudulent activities.

I have used Vigilance AI from the login flows, and it is very efficient when it comes to risk behavior detection. It is more secure than manual data connection entries and can detect threats easily compared to human capabilities.

I am open to the needed improvements. If they can work on the network part to ensure that it is more stable throughout, that would be sufficient for me.

I advise others looking into using OneLogin that it is a more secure entry point that can secure your data and password. It simplifies everything regarding security and can lead to cost savings while being very efficient.

I am satisfied at this time and can say that OneLogin is the best when it comes to enterprise security solutions, and I recommend it fully. I gave this review a rating of eight out of ten.

OneLogin serves as my primary platform for centralized identity and access management, particularly for managing user authentication and access to multiple enterprise applications. On a day-to-day basis, I use OneLogin to manage user access and authentication workflows. For example, when a new employee joins, I use the platform to provision their account, assign appropriate roles or groups, and grant access to required applications through single sign-on. This ensures that users can securely access all necessary systems with a single set of credentials.

Similarly, during offboarding, I use OneLogin to quickly revoke access across all connected applications, which helps maintain security and reduce the risk of unauthorized access. I also use it to enforce MFA policies, monitor login activity, and ensure that access controls are aligned with the organization's security requirements.

Beyond the core use cases, OneLogin plays an important role in improving user experience and operational efficiency. I rely on it for centralized visibility into user activity and authentication events, which helps in monitoring access patterns and identifying any unusual behavior. This adds an extra layer of oversight without requiring multiple tools. It also helps streamline application access management, as users can access multiple systems through a single interface, reducing the need for multiple credentials and minimizing password-related issues. Additionally, its integration capabilities allow it to fit seamlessly into the broader IT environment, supporting smoother and efficient workflows and reducing the administrative overhead. Overall, it not only strengthens security but also simplifies the access management process, making daily operations more efficient and manageable.

OneLogin offers a well-rounded set of features, but a few stand out as particularly valuable in day-to-day operations. One of the most important features is single sign-on. It allows users to access multiple applications with a single set of credentials, which significantly improves user experience while maintaining strong security controls. It also reduces password fatigue and lowers the number of access-related support requests.

Another key feature is multi-factor authentication, especially its adaptive or risk-based authentication capabilities. This adds an extra layer of security by requiring additional verification based on login context, helping to prevent unauthorized access without overly impacting usability.

The centralized cloud directory is another standout feature. It acts as a single source of truth for user identities, allowing seamless synchronization across multiple systems and simplifying identity management across both cloud and on-premise environments.

Additionally, OneLogin's extensive integration capabilities are highly beneficial, with a large catalog of pre-integrated applications and support for standards like SAML and OpenID Connect, making it easy to connect with a wide range of enterprise tools and platforms.

OneLogin already offers a strong and well-rounded feature set that effectively addresses the key identity and access management needs. If I were to add anything further, it would be an interest in seeing continued enhancements around advanced automation and intelligent insights, such as more context-aware access recommendations or deeper analytics into user behavior. These kinds of capabilities would further strengthen decision-making and streamline administrative tasks. Additionally, expanding pre-built integrations and templates for a wider range of applications could further simplify deployment and onboarding processes.

Overall, the platform features are comprehensive and continue to evolve, and any future enhancement would primarily serve to build on an already solid foundation, rather than address any major gap.

OneLogin already provides a stronger and comprehensive feature set that meets most identity and access management needs effectively. If I were to suggest any further enhancement, it would be around the continued expansion of intelligent automation and insights, such as more context-aware access recommendations and deeper analytics into user behavior. These additions would further streamline decision-making and enhance proactive security management. Additionally, further expansion in customization and reporting capabilities would allow organizations to tailor insights more closely to their specific operational or business requirements. There is also a potential to enhance the overall user experience by making certain configurations and workflows even more intuitive, especially for new users. That said, these are relatively incremental improvements. The platform is already mature and reliable, and these enhancements would primarily build on an already strong foundation rather than address any critical shortcomings.

OneLogin already delivers a very strong and comprehensive feature set, and most of the enhancements I would suggest are more about building on that solid foundation. One area that could add further value is the continued evolution of intelligent and adaptive capabilities, such as more advanced context-driven access insights and recommendations. Features in some other modern platforms can help organizations make faster, more informed decisions while maintaining strong security controls.

Additionally, further expansion in low-code or no-code configuration options for workflows and integration could make it even easier for teams to customize processes without requiring extensive technical effort. Another enhancement could be more dynamic and customizable user experience, allowing organizations to tailor dashboards and access portals more closely to their specific needs. Overall, these are incremental enhancements that would complement an already robust platform, helping make it even more flexible, intuitive, and aligned with evolving enterprise requirements.

OneLogin is generally stable and reliable for day-to-day operations. The platform consistently handles authentication and single sign-on processes effectively, with most users reporting minimal downtime and steady performance. While there have been occasional service interruptions reported in the industry, these tend to be infrequent rather than a persistent issue. Overall, stability has improved over time with platform enhancements and architectural updates.

OneLogin performs very well in terms of scalability and is designed to support growing and complex environments. The platform uses a modern horizontally scalable architecture, allowing it to handle increased workloads by distributing traffic across multiple systems. It has demonstrated the ability to process over 1 million authentication requests per minute per tenant, which highlights its capacity to support large-scale enterprise environments.

Additionally, its cloud-native design enables organizations to scale users, applications, and integrations without requiring major infrastructure changes. Overall, OneLogin offers strong scalability, making it suitable for organizations that are expanding or managing complex distributed environments easier.

The customer support provided by OneLogin has generally been reliable and helpful, particularly for standard configuration queries and onboarding-related assistance. On the positive side, the support team is often described as responsive and knowledgeable, especially when dealing with common issues or guidance requests. Many users highlight that the support is quick to assist and acts as an extension of the internal team when needed.

Additionally, the availability of customer success programs, documentation, and 24/7 assistance helps ensure that organizations have multiple channels for support and guidance. That said, experiences can vary depending on the complexity and priority of the issue. In some cases, users have noted delays in response times or slower escalations for more complex problems, particularly outside standard support scenarios. Overall, OneLogin customer support is solid and dependable for most use cases.

Prior to implementing OneLogin, we were using a more traditional fragmented identity management approach that relied on multiple tools and manual processes for access control. This created challenges around consistency, efficiency, and centralized visibility. We decided to switch to OneLogin to consolidate identity management into a single platform, improve automation, and enhance both security and user experience.

My advice to organizations considering OneLogin would be to start with a clear understanding of their identity and access management requirements, including the number of users, applications, and level of security needed. It is important to plan the implementation carefully, especially around directory integration, access policies, and application onboarding. OneLogin is designed to be quick to implement and integrate with existing infrastructure, but proper planning ensures you get the maximum value from the start.

OneLogin has delivered clear return on investment after implementation, both in terms of cost savings and operational efficiency. From a measurable standpoint, one of the most noticeable improvements has been a reduction in IT support tickets, particularly those related to password resets. Industry data and real-world implementations show up to a 40 to 50 percent reduction in password-related help desk requests, which can directly lower support workload and costs.

In terms of time savings, automated provisioning and central access have led to significant efficiency gains. Organizations commonly report 80 to 90 percent time savings in user provisioning and de-provisioning tasks, which allows IT teams to focus on higher-value work instead of repetitive administrative activities. There are also tangible financial benefits. For example, reducing password resets alone can result in thousands of dollars saved annually, with some case studies showing savings of $100,000 per year due to the reduced help desk effort and improved productivity.

From a productivity perspective, single sign-on has minimized login friction, allowing employees to access applications faster and reducing downtime caused by login issues. Additionally, IT teams benefit from reduced manual workload, sometimes equivalent to saving the effort of a full-time support resource, while also improving response times on the more critical tasks. These combined improvements make the platform not only cost-effective but also a strong contributor to operational efficiency and security.

Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing, my experience has been generally positive. The pricing structure is competitive and aligned with the enterprise-grade features, and it scales based on organizational needs. The initial setup cost and effort can vary depending on the complexity of the environment and integrations, but once implemented, the platform provides strong long-term value. Licensing is typically flexible and scalable, allowing organizations to expand usage as needed. Overall, while there is an upfront investment, the return in terms of efficiency, security, and ease of management makes it a worthwhile investment.

Before finalizing our decision, we did evaluate other identity and access management solutions, including Okta, Microsoft Azure Directory, and Ping Identity. Each of these platforms offers strong capabilities, but OneLogin stood out in its balance of ease of use, integration capabilities, and overall value. It aligned well with our requirements for centralized access management, scalability, and efficient deployment, which ultimately led to our decision.

Organizations should take advantage of OneLogin's extensive integration ecosystem, which includes thousands of pre-integrated applications. This makes it easier to centralize access management and reduce complexity across systems. Providing proper training and internal documentation is also important. While the platform is intuitive, fully understanding its capabilities such as adaptive authentication and policy controls can help organizations make the most of OneLogin.

From a security perspective, OneLogin ensures that endpoint access is consistently protected, even when the devices are not connected to the network. This reduces the risk of unauthorized access in scenarios such as lost or stolen devices or offline login attempts, where traditional network-based controls may not apply. It also strengthens the overall authentication framework by extending protection beyond application-level access to the device level itself, ensuring that only verified users can access corporate systems from the outset. I rate this product a 9 out of 10.

My main use case for OneLogin is to centralize identity and access control.

For example, when any employee changes their roles, we update their role in OneLogin, and access to the old application is removed immediately while new application access is assigned automatically.

This process makes things easier and faster for our organization.

The best features OneLogin offers are the centralized access control and the seamless authentication through SSO, which allows users to log in once and access everything, making it very useful and the best feature.

My experience with the single sign-on feature is that it was very easy to integrate with other third-party applications, especially standard SaaS integrations, requiring little effort to customize the applications. We have integrated it with SAML, and once it is configured, users authenticate once and get all the access.

OneLogin has positively impacted our organization. The positive impacts include faster user access, which really improves efficiency, and it also reduces the IT support workload, meaning that our IT team spends less time on repetitive support tasks.

We have seen almost a 50 to 60% reduction in IT support tickets, making the task much easier.

We use the single sign-on capability in OneLogin, and it provides a very smooth and low friction experience. Users sign in once and access through OneLogin web portal to any integrated app, eliminating the need to remember multiple usernames and passwords.

The integration of phishing-resistant device trust impacts our authentication processes by relying on device trust validation and methods through biometrics and FIDO2 security keys, granting access only if the user's identity plus the trusted device are present.

Adaptive login flows with Vigilance AI are really useful features of OneLogin, making the authentication much more risk-aware and dynamic by providing a real-time risk score.

My impression of OneLogin's ability to provide a seamless end-user experience for signing in and authenticating to needed applications is very positive, as it is very smooth with an excellent user experience.

OneLogin delivers a very smooth and consistent user-friendly experience, leading to a very positive impression.

OneLogin can be improved by enhancing the reporting and analytic interface; apart from this, everything is perfect.

In reporting, the user graphic path could be generated so that we can check the specific applications each user has accessed in some GUI, and this type of reporting could be improved for better visibility.

I have been using OneLogin for more than four years.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin's scalability is excellent, and it is a very scalable solution.

Customer support is very useful and very supportive.

I would rate the customer support a 10 out of 10.

We have not switched from a different solution; we started using OneLogin from the beginning.

I had a very positive experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for OneLogin, as it provides great value for what it delivers.

We have seen a good return on investment, typically providing great time savings and reducing issues with password resetting and logging.

We are a partner with this vendor.

We have seen a good return on investment, typically providing great time savings and reducing issues with password resetting and logging.

I had a very positive experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for OneLogin, as it provides great value for what it delivers.

We have not evaluated other options before choosing OneLogin.

My advice to others looking into using OneLogin is to plan properly, go for the POC, check what features you need in your environment, and start integration with core technologies such as Microsoft; going for this solution will really be helpful. I would rate this product overall as a 9 out of 10.

My main use case for OneLogin at the university is that it helps me access the institutional email with a single sign-on. This makes it easier to access the virtual classroom, the digital library, and other platforms that the university provides.

A specific example of how OneLogin has made it easier for me to access these platforms in my academic day-to-day is that sometimes since I have multiple passwords for each resource that the university gives me, I might forget them. With OneLogin I just log in once with everything already saved, and it makes it easier and saves me time.

I find it really great that I no longer have to remember all the passwords to access the resources. Instead, with a single click or a single login I can access everything.

I consider the best features that OneLogin offers to be the single sign-on feature, which provides me with unified access to cloud applications and reduces how complex the sign-in process is.

I found integrating single sign-on with the different university platforms to be very easy.

OneLogin can also integrate with directories. For example, it integrates with Google Workspace, and that helps me since I use Google Workspace.

OneLogin has had a positive impact on my academic experience by helping me reduce the time spent on authentication. I estimate that I save around five to six minutes using OneLogin, and I have noticed other concrete improvements in my day-to-day academic life.

I think OneLogin could improve by providing more features that make everything more unified.

I have been using OneLogin for just three months.

I consider OneLogin to be a stable solution.

I think OneLogin's scalability is good because it helps organizations accelerate their journey to the cloud. This includes migrating workloads and building cloud-native processes.

OneLogin does indeed adapt easily if the number of users or services increases.

I have not had any issues with OneLogin, so I have not used customer service or technical support.

Before using OneLogin, I did not use another tool for access management.

I perceive the benefits of identity and access management for external clients in OneLogin to be very important, for example, in the work and employability aspect, to connect with different software that might exist that gives you access.

I do not know about the pricing, implementation cost, and OneLogin licenses because that is handled by the university, but the implementation is quick.

I have noticed a lot of time saved as a return on investment.

I do not know about the pricing, implementation cost, and OneLogin licenses because that is handled by the university, but the implementation is quick.

I did not evaluate other options before choosing OneLogin.

I really appreciate OneLogin's capability to offer a smooth end-user experience when logging in and authenticating into the needed applications. It allows doing multiple tasks more quickly.

I have not used the single sign-on feature to integrate external applications other than the university's because I have only limited myself to using it for the university.

My advice to other people who are considering using OneLogin is that they really should use it because it is a very complete tool. It saves you a lot of time, and especially in the university environment that is important. With OneLogin you can create and delete accounts automatically, since they synchronize with the student information system, for example. It can also synchronize with the tools you use academically.

I think OneLogin is a very complete and pleasant platform that is easy to use. I would rate this review an eight out of ten.

OneLogin is primarily used for privileged access to applications. OneLogin enables access to applications without needing to use a single sign-on, as it connects seamlessly between systems.

For the end user, the experience with OneLogin is transparent. Previously, users had to log in to Office and then log in again to another application such as Monday. When synchronizing or running OneLogin together with those applications, the user only needs to be redirected to OneLogin by the application itself, and with that single sign-on they can then connect to other applications.

OneLogin offers the ability to update role permissions, which makes the task easier when disabling a user or changing their role or lowering their privileges. This is straightforward to manage from the same console.

OneLogin offers dynamic MFA, where the platform can decide, based on user behavior, whether or not to ask for MFA. This helps significantly. Additionally, intelligent flows, known as Smart Flows, help create highly customized authentication flows all from within OneLogin itself.

Another relevant feature of OneLogin is role assignment, which allows us not only to create the user in the final application, but also for OneLogin to assign the roles, groups, and permissions of those apps, attributed or associated with Active Directory.

OneLogin helps improve security posture. We base ourselves on ISO 27001, and they require us to have controls for secure access control, which OneLogin has helped us with. Another benefit is user productivity, because users do not have to enter multiple passwords in different applications to access them. One password is sufficient, and if OneLogin detects that the user is benign or not malicious, it makes it easier for them to access the other applications. There was also a reduction in support tickets. Although initially there were quite a few as a result of the tool's implementation, the reduction became clear as users fully learned how to use the tool, so there are no issues from that point of view.

OneLogin could benefit from additional dynamic security enhancement. The solution itself can decide whether or not to require MFA from users based on the user's behavior, where they are connecting from, their IP, what device, and what time. It allows us to identify and automatically trigger an MFA flow or simply deny access due to the dynamic risk that the user may present.

In terms of OneLogin, integrations or the integration list could be improved. There are applications that perhaps do not use the REST API, so providing the ease of being able to integrate more applications would be beneficial.

OneLogin has been used for approximately a year and a half.

The idea of implementing OneLogin was also to keep users under control and also to protect the applications they access with OneLogin by protecting them from the identity side. Though exact figures are not available, this impact can be described as positive for our organization.