OneLogin Workforce Identity

My main use case for OneLogin  is app aggregation and SSO . I use OneLogin  for app aggregation, which is utilized for a single point of access, so it is used in facilitation of SSO .

My main use case fits into my team's workflow as it reduces the work, decreases the time required, and increases the flexibility of the team.

The best features OneLogin offers in my experience are password vaulting and one-click termination to prevent unauthorized access.

Password vaulting and one-click termination have made it safer for our team, as passwords can be saved in a vault that is secured safely and one-click termination helps us remove dormant accounts, making these features very helpful for us.

OneLogin has positively impacted our organization by increasing security features and making our security wall more robust as well as preventing unauthorized access from dormant accounts, making our system safer than ever before.

OneLogin is a robust platform, but there is scope for improvement as there are some glitches, connectivity glitches, and some outages that need to be improved. The outages and glitches cause a hindrance in our work and lead to time wastage.

I have been using OneLogin for the last one year.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin is scalable according to our organization's needs, so it is quite scalable.

Customer support is good, but it needs some improvement.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good, as the pricing was not very expensive and it is manageable.

I have not evaluated other options before choosing OneLogin, as it was the first one I decided to demo, and I selected it on the first attempt only.

The features that are valuable about OneLogin are the ones I mentioned. I have noticed specific outcomes since using OneLogin, such as reduced incidents of password hacking and threats from various hackers.

User identity synchronization across directories is a good feature that I use, and it helps me identify which user has been given access to what. The user experience of OneLogin is very good, as it provides a seamless experience, although sometimes there are lags. Overall, it is a seamless experience.

HR-driven identity management plays a very important role, as whenever HR assigns a new employee a user ID, I use OneLogin for that, making it very useful and safer for us. I have saved time with this software.

OneLogin is good, value-for-money software that needs improvement on some glitches, but overall, it is a value-for-money solution. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate OneLogin an eight because of the benefits that OneLogin provides.

OneLogin  by One Identity serves the purpose of SSO , which we used in partnership with Kaseya. I forgot the original name of the program, but we used it because it stored all of our devices and client information. This allowed us to avoid having anyone share passwords.

I used SmartFactor Authentication to adjust the flow in real time depending on the risk score associated with login attempts. My phone functioned almost as a key. I appreciated the ability to get access codes, which was particularly useful when I was away from my computer and needed to access the system through the client portal using codes generated specifically for me.

The integration of phishing-resistant device trust makes the authentication processes stronger and safer because of the complexity it uses. It relies solely on your data, which makes it harder for someone to hack into because it used multiple layers of authentication through one portal.

With the SSO  feature, it was easy to integrate with third-party authentication providers.

The best features of OneLogin  include the ability to save passwords so I could have access to them, and it would create complicated passwords for me. This saved me from having to remember a lot of passwords and gave me a safe place to store them. It made logging into whatever system I needed easy, and I could retrieve data quickly while keeping the flow of my process moving.

It simplifies a lot because even though we were an MSP, we had one primary directory that we used, but we also used a secondary directory. Google was used primarily for single sign-ins to our email accounts, but we also had Microsoft sign-ins. Using OneLogin simplified that completely. We did not have to worry about trying to use different passwords or usernames to get into accounts on either directory. We could just sign in and have access to everything.

OneLogin already has flexibility and can be customized to whatever the user wants, so I am not entirely certain how to address areas for improvement in that regard.

The areas that do have room for improvement include a learning curve. I did not have any issues learning the software myself. Frequent training updates on product releases would be beneficial. This could include self-paced or scheduled options for learning about new features instead of having to figure them out independently.

I have used OneLogin by One Identity for two years at my previous employer.

Regarding stability, I would not say there are downtime, bugs, or glitches. I did not have any of my clients report any issues.

OneLogin is absolutely a scalable solution.

I would rate the vendor support that One Identity provides a ten out of ten.

The deployment of OneLogin is extremely easy. Once you send it to the machine and give the user their credentials to sign up and set everything up, they are ready to go.

Our relationship with the vendor was that we were an MSP.

With OneLogin, I am not aware of the pricing because I was not exposed to that information. Even for the clients that we recommended it to, they received a discounted price based on how many users they were signing up. I could not give an honest answer regarding the setup costs.

In comparison with other solutions or vendors on the market, OneLogin is one of my favorite ones. With me, it ranks right up there with Microsoft and Google because many companies are using them to streamline their device logins and use them as a one-stop shop for single sign-on for everything.

My impression of OneLogin providing a seamless end-user experience for signing in and authenticating is positive because I never had any issues or glitches. Even when we were learning how to use the software, it was straightforward and extremely simple. Programming it for clients was the same. OneLogin was one of the SSOs that I would recommend because it was the easiest to use.

Deployment would take, on average, hours depending upon how many we were deploying to. However, it was typically hours at most, depending upon other software because we would just put it in our software stack, and when deploying the software out to the computers to set up, it would just be part of that package.

We had a team of two hundred specialists working with OneLogin.

Our clients varied in size, with many of them having employees between two hundred fifty to five hundred, and then some on the smaller side with a team of fifty.

OneLogin does require some maintenance, including updates, upkeeping, and patching to ensure there are no glitches since people are constantly trying to find ways to get in or duplicate access. We did constantly monitor, patch, and update as part of our routine for our clients so they would not have to worry about it.

It is easy to maintain OneLogin. We never had any issues where patches or other updates did not take or caused more issues for the client.

We have not fully used the adaptive login flows with Vigilance AI, as I think some clients were not comfortable using that feature. We are testing it and pushing for them to do it, but we have not gotten them to do it as of yet. They still prefer to rely on the tried and true method.

We do not have HR-driven identity management with OneLogin. The HR team is separate, so I am not quite sure what software they use for that purpose.

My advice for others looking to implement OneLogin is that I would definitely recommend it, especially if they are looking for a simplified way of integrating and creating a single sign-on. I give this solution an overall rating of ten out of ten.

I did not use OneLogin  in a customer phase. My company wanted me to learn about it because I recently joined the company. I used it for about one month for training. I took the trainings with some trainers from OneLogin  and then applied the total course of OneLogin and received certification. I have not used it in a customer phase yet. It depends on the project I am assigned to, but until now I have not used it in a real-life scenario.

The most valuable thing about OneLogin is the user interface. It is very simple and very clear for users to understand, and not only technical persons can work with it. Non-technical persons can also use it because the user interface is very simple and we did not have to write a lot of lines of code while making any configurations. It is one of my favorite SSO  tools that I trained on. I have used other SSO  tools as well, but OneLogin is one of my favorite tools I trained with.

From what I studied, I did not face any issues with OneLogin. However, if there were multiple documentations about the technical points and what each tab on the GUI is used for, it would be very helpful for others who want to learn, because I did not find a lot of resources about it on the internet. I used the admin essential document and tried to learn from the videos which were in the course itself. The course was very good, but I need more information and more documented parts because the course is not available for all users to learn from. Users just need to be assigned to the course before they are able to access the content. Many of my colleagues at work, when they learned that I took the certification for using OneLogin, want to learn but they were not assigned to the course itself to learn from. If there were any available documentation related to the product, I think it would be a very useful resource.

If there were some pictures from the GUI in the documentation part to illustrate where things are and what they are in the GUI, it would be helpful. The steps are in the documentation, but if we support the steps with pictures from the GUI, it will be more interactive for users.

I used OneLogin for about one month for training.

I did not face any stability issues while trying to log in to OneLogin.

OneLogin is a good scalable solution and there are no problems with it while using it.

I tried to use another tool in SSO and used one of them in my real project. I took training about both of them at the same time. However, I found that OneLogin's user interface is simpler than the other one. Although the admin essentials document does not have all the information about OneLogin, it was very useful for me and it has the steps for doing the technical parts. The steps were very clear and it has steps for every point in OneLogin when you want to make something. If you continue the documentation for all the product well, I think it will be perfect. The other tool's documentation was very difficult and very confusing for me. I preferred the OneLogin documentation.

OneLogin is easier than other tools. For me it was very easy. When I took the headlines from the instructor, then I returned to the documentation and watched the videos. It was very easy for me. I took the certification in less than one month because I had other jobs to do while studying.

I joined the technical discussions and worked on the technical part only. I did not join in the business discussion or go into the licensing and other details.

I would give OneLogin a rating of nine out of ten.

I was the super administrator for the test account regarding OneLogin  use cases. I set up an organization, established some departments, and assigned policies to each department to check OneLogin 's capability.

OneLogin is easy to use and manage, which is one of the best features.

It offers Single Sign-On , and OneLogin authentication application works with Single Sign-On  and multifactor authentication both activated.

It is very easy to integrate with third-party authentication providers through the Single Sign-On feature. There are a few steps to follow, and OneLogin has shared documentation on the process. You have to visit the application directory, click on a new application, set up its logo and metadata, authentication, encrypted codes, and then the application starts authenticating and Single Sign-On starts working.

There are many downsides. OneLogin is designed for small businesses, not for big enterprises, which is why it has limited features. It does not have those features that enterprises request or would like to have from OneLogin. It is not that scalable because it is intended for smaller businesses. It does not have the functionality to add multiple enterprise-level applications. Although OneLogin has many applications available, I cannot add multiple enterprise-level applications and advanced features to OneLogin setup screen.

I used OneLogin authentication to adjust authentication flows in real-time depending on the risk score to set up the IPOU. It was very simple, but it lacked enterprise-level features like push notification, which makes authentication very easy and seamless. It has only basic features, such as code running, and I have to look at the code and authenticate.

This is also a concern for end-users. Every time they have to sign in, they will need to open their smartphone, open OneLogin authentication application, copy the code, and enter it into the laptop screen to authenticate.

I have been working in my current field for around three and a half to four years.

During the trial period, which was for thirty days, I never faced any downtime. OneLogin was up and running every time I tried to log in and use the application in the web portal.

There are many downsides. OneLogin is designed for small businesses, not for big enterprises, which is why it has limited features. It does not have those features that enterprises request or would like to have from OneLogin. It is not that scalable because it is intended for smaller businesses. It does not have the functionality to add multiple enterprise-level applications. Although OneLogin has many applications available, I cannot add multiple enterprise-level applications and advanced features to OneLogin setup screen.

I did not feel the need to contact technical support. Everything was straightforward. Everything went well, and I never felt a need to contact them.

OneLogin initial deployment was straightforward.

It did not take long to set up OneLogin, but if you have a set of policies to implement, it obviously takes time to set up organizational units, integrate directories, and set up all policies per department. It takes time on every application you set up in your organization, but it was not difficult and did not take much of my time.

Since that was a test environment, I was the only one to set up OneLogin administration. I could have allowed some other users as administrators to help me out, but I was the only one who set it up and everything went smoothly.

I have used many alternatives in the market, and the best one is Okta.

Okta is a huge enterprise-level application. It provides Single Sign-On, provides integration with enterprise-level applications, and also those applications which do not have Single Sign-On capabilities using web authentication system. So it has much more than OneLogin.

If I am looking for a solution for small or mid-businesses on a scale of one to ten, I would rate OneLogin seven and a half to eight and a half. My overall rating for this product is eight.

OneLogin  is used for signing protocol, signing applications, and single sign-on for multiple users across Office 365 , Salesforce , and some AWS  users.

The best feature of OneLogin  is that it is easy to integrate. We found that it integrated seamlessly with our Office 365  and Salesforce , making it the best feature.

Beyond integration, we receive monitoring, but I feel that integration is significantly better than other identity tools when compared to Okta and Azure AD .

My impression of OneLogin is that it is smooth when providing a seamless user experience for signing in and authenticating applications. We do not have to use multiple user IDs and passwords, as we have created one set of users, making it very smooth and efficient to manage user privileges.

My impressions of the Identity Synchronization across directories functionality in OneLogin is that it is seamless and syncs every identity seamlessly.

The areas for improvement in OneLogin include better analytics since we do not have very end-to-end visualization of user access logs. Additionally, policy customization needs improvement as we cannot assign specific policies to specific customers. The admin dashboard is cleaner but can be improved, and from my point of view, it is not as user-friendly compared to others such as Okta and Azure AD .

In my comparison of OneLogin with other solutions and vendors, I state that it provides us smooth integration, as it integrates easily, but it lacks deeper end-to-end analytics and broader integration support, which Okta previously provided. Okta also offers deeper analytics and its admin dashboard is cleaner, but the user-friendliness and integration are smoother with OneLogin.

I do not rate it a ten because from the policy perspective, there needs to be improvement. We cannot give fine-grained access to users, and the policy is not mature enough.

We have recently moved from Okta to OneLogin by One Identity approximately eight to nine months ago.

I give OneLogin a stability rating of eight point five.

I rate scalability for OneLogin as a ten.

For support, I give it a ten because we have not had to initiate any support beyond the initial integration. Once again, I rate support a ten.

The advantages of customer identity and access management in OneLogin for external clients include cutting costs since we were using Okta before, along with providing a seamless user experience. When deploying Okta, we faced multiple issues with logging and user synchronization as users did not sync to multiple identities.

OneLogin is easy to maintain, and since it has not been that long since it was deployed, approximately nine months, we have not had to perform any maintenance on OneLogin.

We are the customers of OneLogin, and we have integrated this product.

When considering the pricing of OneLogin, I find it to be cost-efficient, especially when comparing it heavily with Okta, which is much more expensive.

OneLogin was purchased through a direct purchase via the marketplace, rather than through the AWS Marketplace .

OneLogin has not had Vigilance AI or adaptive login flows enabled because of compliance audits. I do not have complete knowledge of HR's role in managing employee identities. As a technical engineer, I have deployed and maintained the solution, but regarding HR, I do not have the complete picture of how they integrate since it is a separate HR team.

My advice to others looking into OneLogin is that if they want a solution that can easily integrate with their current infrastructure, then I would advise them to consider OneLogin because it integrates easily with multiple solutions and logins. My overall review rating for OneLogin is nine out of ten.