OneLogin Workforce Identity

My main use case for OneLogin  is managing all admin tasks related to OneLogin , which includes SSO  integration, mapping, and role creations.

A specific example of an SSO  integration is the SSO integration with the SAML or OIDC protocol with third-party and internal applications.

I handle the mapping feature, which is helpful for Google Groups data syncing via mapping to OneLogin role. We manage it ourselves, allowing us to bulk upload and bulk remove users in the Google Group, including roles and access review and user reconciliation processes.

The best feature of OneLogin is the mapping feature, which stands out as the most beneficial. The mapping works better in OneLogin, allowing me to sync users from Google Group to OneLogin role, which is crucial for role access for end users and new service requests.

Regarding security purposes, OneLogin's syncing process is sometimes effective, helping with MFA for end users, allowing them to authenticate against the security policy we have set up in the console. OneLogin Protect application aids our end users with valid authentication and authorization processes, which is the best feature.

We have the option to set up MFA for the applications, allowing us to manage end user access, and different types of MFA are already set up. OneLogin provides SmartFactor Authentication, known as OneLogin Protect, allowing users to enable notifications and log in to the portal after entering their password without needing to enter a one-time OTP that resets every thirty minutes, thus enhancing the user experience.

The integration of phishing-resistant device trust impacts our authentication processes positively regarding security questions and passwords integrated with OneLogin.

OneLogin should improve directory sync and the group option, as they can bring role-based access control management within groups. Currently, OneLogin only offers groups for security purposes or policies, and adding this feature would position them better against competitors.

OneLogin should improve their support timing and overall support services.

I rate OneLogin a seven because it is good overall, though some features are lacking, notably support, which is often inadequate. When we require immediate assistance, they are not responsive, causing production delays. They should also enhance their role-based access control with groups and improve their directory sync process.

I have been using OneLogin for three to three and a half years.

OneLogin is approximately seventy percent stable.

OneLogin is scalable and remains stable whether we have large or small applications.

Customer support is very poor.

My previous solution usage depends on the device count. If we have seventy percent Mac systems, I would choose Jamf. If we have fifty percent Windows systems along with others, I would suggest Microsoft Entra or Okta based on the device distribution.

I have not seen a return on investment with OneLogin.

As compared to other products, OneLogin is quite costly. I would not suggest it, as for the same price point, we could opt for Entra ID. If we compare features with other products such as Entra ID and Okta, they provide better products and support.

We evaluated options such as Jamf and focused primarily on Jamf rather than Okta.

My advice for others considering OneLogin is that it depends on the device type and number in the company. For seventy percent Mac systems, I would prefer Jamf, and for a fifty-fifty mix of Mac and Windows systems, Microsoft Entra or Okta would be better.

Regarding additional thoughts on OneLogin, I would reiterate the need for improvements in support and the introduction of RBAC features in the product.

I have provided a review rating of seven for OneLogin.

My main use cases for OneLogin  are the single sign-on feature, multifactor authentication, and the user provisioning feature that we are using in our organization in real-world scenarios.

We use user provisioning when a new employee joins the organization. OneLogin  has made the onboarding process easy and streamlined it significantly through our HR system. Regarding single sign-on, we use it for multiple applications, including project management tools, communication platforms, and development tools.

We are using OneLogin primarily for the sign-on functionality.

The best features OneLogin offers are multifactor authentication, single sign-on, and directory synchronization.

The directory synchronization feature for my organization integrates with existing systems. It integrates with another directory system service such as Active Directory and automates the addition of new users or updates to existing ones.

The customizable access policies that OneLogin offers are crucial for our organization. OneLogin has positively impacted my organization by increasing efficiency in user onboarding. The multifactor authentication has enhanced our user experience, as users are no longer using the forgot password option every time. With multifactor authentication, users only need to authenticate once, and with single sign-on, they only need to authenticate one time and then can access other applications.

My impression of the user identity synchronization across directories functionality is that it has made things easier for us. When a user is updated in our primary directory, the synchronization automatically updates the corresponding records in other directories as well. This has reduced the manual workload for our IT team.

I would suggest that the user interface could be improved. Everything else is good, including customer support, and dashboard customization would be a great addition.

I do not have any additional improvements needed with OneLogin that I have not already mentioned.

I have been using OneLogin for around a month.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin scales with us for our growing startup.

I did not previously use a different solution before OneLogin.

We are using SmartFactor Authentication, but right now I cannot provide a review on it because we are still configuring it. The integration of phishing-resistant devices has made a significant impact on authentication processes, but I will say we need more time to justify it fully. We are still implementing it and need more time.

I have seen a return on investment so far, and time has been saved on our side. The automation workflow that we are using has removed the manual workflow that we were using, and the time required has been reduced.

Before choosing OneLogin, I evaluated other options such as Okta.

OneLogin is a great platform with minimal improvements needed. I rate OneLogin a nine out of ten. I chose nine for my rating because the user interface could be improved to a ten out of ten. Every other feature, such as single sign-on and multifactor authentication, is excellent. My advice to others looking to use OneLogin is that it is a good platform that you can confidently use. Just be sure to read the documentation correctly before using it. I found this interview valuable.

OneLogin  is our main identity and access management tool. We use Active Roles for user provisioning, which allows us to delegate the provisioning to other people. OneLogin  manages user access permissions and includes creating mailboxes.

OneLogin's best features are the whole package, which includes the combination of the integration with Active Directory, user provisioning, and the graphical user interface. OneLogin has positively impacted our organization by saving us money because we automated a lot of things with One Identity.

OneLogin could be improved with more add-ins for integration with Entra ID and Exchange Online . I would appreciate more options to add to One Identity, such as Entra ID provisioning and Exchange Online  mailboxes directly, and maybe integration with Graph.

I have been using OneLogin for about 10 years.

OneLogin seems stable to me. There are sometimes CPU usage peaks when certain scripts perform, but overall, it is stable.

I do not manage OneLogin's scalability, as another department handles this.

I have not had any experiences with customer support, but one of my colleagues did, and he was quite satisfied.

Before OneLogin, we did not have any other solution; there were just manual scripts.

I did not handle the pricing, setup cost, and licensing aspects, as they were managed by another department.

I think we evaluated other options before choosing OneLogin, but that was before my time.

OneLogin is nice and easy to use. I would rate OneLogin an eight out of ten because nothing is a ten for me; everything can be improved, and this is quite acceptable. More integration with other solutions, especially Entra ID, would contribute to a higher rating. Based on my experience, the user identity synchronization across directories functionality in OneLogin is acceptable. Regarding OneLogin providing a smooth experience for end users when they are signing in and accessing applications, end users are not really logging in through One Identity, but One Identity provides them all the necessary groups to log into their applications, so they do not notice anything. The experience is smooth. My advice to others looking into using OneLogin is to get skilled people who can work with OneLogin and who can script. My overall rating for OneLogin is eight out of ten.

My main use case for OneLogin  is enhancing system security by storing all passwords and system credentials in one place. OneLogin  integrates with different tools, such as Google Workspace  and other active directory systems, and I have been using it mostly for the purpose of enhancing security.

For example, in enhancing security in my organization using OneLogin, I enable single sign-on, which helps me improve security. OneLogin also supports multi-factor authentication, allowing me to use a strong authenticator to improve my login credentials for other software.

What I think is important about my main use case for OneLogin is that it can accommodate many integrations on a single platform, which allows me to manage all the credentials of my activities without delay or loss. It helps detect weak passwords and enhances the security system.

One of the best features that stands out for me in OneLogin is the integration feature.

What makes the integration feature so valuable for me is that OneLogin integrates with multiple cloud tools we use in security and accessing our information, such as Google Workspace , where I can collect all my information and credentials in one single place and it enhances the security of Google Workspace while enabling smooth running and effective management of the tool.

The first benefit I can point to is the improved security of the system credentials. Another importance is that it supports multi-factor authentication, which helps prevent information from being accessed by hackers. It saves time as all credentials are found in one single place, allowing users to manage them easily and prevent losing them.

Under the improvements for OneLogin, I want to talk about the customer care support team, which should be more responsive and ideally available 24/7, because there are times when we need help with small issues and they are not available. Because the product transfers smoothly, I do not see anything else that needs to be improved.

I have been using OneLogin for one year and a half.

OneLogin is very stable.

OneLogin's scalability fits my organization's needs because it gets updated with new features that are important.

The customer support is good, but the challenge is that it is not 24/7, so I often have to wait for assistance.

Formerly, I did not use any other solution before OneLogin; I was just using a similar solution called Bitwarden  to manage credentials.

Before choosing OneLogin, I evaluated other options starting with second factor authenticators, but they were not powerful enough compared to OneLogin, which provides a single tool with complex features that enhance security.

For buyers looking into using OneLogin, I assure them that it is advantageous software as it improves security, enhances system security, and maintains the workflow of information. I rate this product a 9 out of 10.

I have been using OneLogin  for about a month, and it has been a valuable experience as I have seen it integrate with our existing system and enhance our overall security posture. One of our main use cases is streamlining user access across multiple applications, and the Single Sign-On  feature has been a game-changer for us. It simplifies the login process for users, allowing them to access various applications with just one set of credentials. Additionally, we are leveraging Multi-Factor Authentication to add an extra layer of security, which has been crucial given the sensitive nature of the data we handle.

Integrating OneLogin  with our existing systems was an interesting process. We primarily focused on a few applications that our users access frequently, including project management tools, internal communication platforms, and customer relationship management systems.

One of the standout features of OneLogin for us is definitely user provisioning and de-provisioning. It has made onboarding and offboarding processes much smoother.

The features I would highlight include directory sync, customization options, and Multi-Factor Authentication. First and foremost, the Single Sign-On  feature has truly transformed how our team interacts with various applications. By allowing users to log in with just one set of credentials, we have seen a noticeable reduction in password fatigue. This not only boosts productivity but also minimizes the frustration that comes with remembering numerous passwords. I remember a time when our team was constantly juggling passwords, and it was a source of stress. Now, with SSO, the workflow is much smoother. Multi-Factor Authentication has also enhanced our security posture.

Since implementing OneLogin, the reduction in password requests has been notable, with the Single Sign-On feature driving approximately a 70% reduction in those requests. The seamless end-user experience for signing in and authenticating on applications with OneLogin is remarkable. An end user can access multiple applications with just one set of credentials, which not only saves time but also minimizes the frustration that often comes with handling multiple passwords.

The user experience of OneLogin can be improved. The user interface and the integration with third-party applications could use some work, as could enhancing the reporting and analytical features.

I think customer service can be improved along with the user interface and integration.

I have been using OneLogin for about a month.

OneLogin is stable for us.

OneLogin is a scalable solution for our organization, and we have been able to see new user growth.

We have not used customer support much until now, but when a problem arose, we contacted them and they were responsive and helpful. They were taking a bit more time than ideal.

We have not used any other solution before OneLogin. The company is still in development mode, so OneLogin is our first tool.

We have saved time with OneLogin, and we are still using it as we continue configuring and determining how useful it is.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was quite good.

Before choosing OneLogin, I evaluated Okta as an alternate solution.

My advice for others looking into using OneLogin is that it is a good product. I recommend using the free trial so that you can explore all of its features before purchasing the full version. I would rate this product an 8 out of 10.