I am a business analyst, so I tend to be implementing Genesys in various businesses.

Genesys offers many improvements across the piece. Generally, all of them improve somehow, especially if you move from legacy solutions. The real-time analytics feature has impacted decision-making by providing visibility to service SLAs and understanding customer journeys. 

Additionally, the integration capabilities are very good because it is API-based and offers prebuilt integrations. The speech analytics and customer sentiment analysis are ongoing projects.

Their WFM product is still pretty immature. Generally, it's good. I can't think of anything off the top of my head that needs improvement without checking further.

I have worked with Genesys on and off for over 20 years.

Genesys is brilliant concerning stability. There have been no problems with scalability, and I have never seen it go down.

The scalability of Genesys is excellent. I have never experienced issues with it.

Genesys support is very good. I have worked with them for implementation, and they have been reliable.

Positive

I have worked with Cisco, Microsoft, Avaya, and Verint.

The deployment process can vary. We started by onboarding business units with simpler requirements first, followed by complex integrations. The setup involves aligning with different partners' methods, typically between nine to 18 months.

The current project has a core team of about fifteen, with additional matrix business users and supplier teams. The number of resources varies across projects.

The realization for Genesys is mid-implementation yet past implementations have shown benefits such as global MI, secure payments, and working remotely.

Genesys' licensing model is flexible, though not the cheapest. Customers have seen benefits with global operations, increased security, and seamless remote working.

Cisco, Microsoft, Avaya, and Verint are solutions I have worked with.

Before adopting Genesys, consider your working model and core stack. Certain features or products might suit specific needs better. 

Overall, I rate Genesys a nine out of ten. I have completed over 50contact center deployments.

We primarily use Genesys Cloud CX for handling customer service operations, where agents receive calls directly through the platform, manage cases, and ensure consistent communication with customers.

It has improved customer interaction by integrating CTI directly into our IT systems.

The integration of CTI within the IT system is a particularly valuable feature.

There is room for improvement in the solution's pricing structure, as it is perceived to be less flexible than other solutions.

I have approximately two to three years of experience working with Genesys Cloud CX.

The stability of the solution is rated highly at nine out of ten, indicating that it's generally reliable.

The solution is considered scalable and receives a rating of seven on a scale of one to ten.

I don't have personal experience with contacting technical support, so I can't comment on that.

Positive

Before Genesys Cloud CX, we were involved in a migration program, and Genesys Cloud CX was the chosen solution to replace the previous system.

The initial setup was not too complex, and the deployment was effectively managed within two sprints, approximately two months.

We used a third-party implementation team to assist with deployment.

Pricing feedback suggests that it is less flexible compared to AWS. Overall it's affordable, as indicated by a pricing rating of four out of ten.

Based on my experience, I would recommend Genesys Cloud CX to others as it effectively performs its intended function.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

We provide solutions to customers in industries such as healthcare, banking, consumer electronics, retail, and even telecom. Initially, we provided on-premises Genesys Engage solutions. 

However, three years ago, we switched to Genesys Cloud CX. Since Engage is approaching its end of life, we are no longer proposing on-premises solutions.

Our customers use it for interactive voice response, calls, chat, SMS, and email. These are the channels where we are providing solutions. Our customers use it for support, sales, and similar purposes.

AI functionality within Genesys Cloud CX actually enhances customer service.

AI functionality is built-in. They have intent-based and knowledge-based AI. That actually satisfies almost 90% of the needs of the customer. But if the clients/user want more, kind of generative AI, things like that, then there are a couple of other third-party systems like Kore.ai or Lex. We can integrate Genesys Cloud CX easily.

Genesys Cloud CX has extensive reporting. The workstays are good, but there are a lot of out-of-the-box reports. I have never seen any extra requests for customization on the reports. Some customers ask for a little bit extra, but mostly reporting requirements are covered within the out-of-the-box reports provided by Genesys.

So, the analytics and the reporting tools in Genesys Cloud CX have impacted the decision-making.

Moreover, it is easy for a beginner to learn to use Genesys Cloud CX.

Genesys Cloud CX has very good training material and training – instructor-led training, self-paced training, and documentation – things are very organized and helpful. 

The learning curve for any beginner should not exceed four to eight weeks max. Then, he would be able to start working with Genesys Cloud CX. The same goes with Amazon Connect. They also have very good training material, which is very self-explanatory. So if I compare the training, learning parts, and ease of use, Genesys Cloud CX is good.  

The best thing about Genesys Cloud CX is that it's designed specifically for contact centers and offers robust reporting capabilities. 

It also has a great marketplace for integrations with different third-party applications like Salesforce, Zendesk, and HubSpot. 

I appreciate how easy it is to integrate with Genesys and utilize its out-of-the-box AI features. 

Deployment and customization are also easy and straightforward.

Furthermore, I like the intelligent routing in Genesys Cloud CX, along with the flexibility between skill-based and queue-based routing.

These are valuable, contact-center-focused features. Finally, if the customer is already using AWS and has applications there, Genesys Cloud CX integrates easily with the AWS ecosystem.

Pricing is the biggest criterion for improvement. If I compare the pricing between Amazon Connect and Genesys Cloud CX, there is a huge difference. 

But if a customer is more contact-centered and wants a very niche solution for a contact center, Genesys is obviously leading here. 

I've been using Genesys for around 18 years, initially on-premises solutions. My focus recently has been using Genesys Cloud CX to provide solutions for our customers.

It's quite stable. I've faced downtimes but most of the time it's quite a stable product.

We have around four to five clients working with this solution. 

There are multiple points – like during deployments or integrations – where we usually have some queries or need guidance from Genesys support.

The technical support is excellent. They are upfront. Also, it depends on the client. The larger the client, the company likely has better support.  

Positive

The pricing is a bit expensive.

The price is worth it because it is worth it to use Genesys Cloud CX because of its multiple features. The reporting on Alteryx is leading. Their flexibility for complex routing is leading. 

Genesys's integration points with third-party applications are good. So, there are a couple of points where it is worth investing in Genesys Cloud CX. 

If the customer is not in the AWS ecosystem or their applications are not in that ecosystem – if they want a total contact center-oriented solution – then Genesys Cloud CX would be the preference, despite there being a huge investment to get the better solution.

My advice would depend on various factors/requirements: call volume, chat volume, and how big a customer support system you want to implement. Based on that, whether it's a small, medium, or large size, Genesys Cloud CX supports everything. But we have to check the ROI part as well. 

If you're just implementing it for five agents and are spending a huge amount on Genesys Cloud CX, it might not be beneficial. If you have very simple requirements for call routing and basic reporting, then I would suggest going for cheaper solutions, like Amazon Connect or Five9.

But if you want a very contact center-centric solution where you have a medium to large contact center, with complex routing, heavy reporting, and workforce management – a lot of factors come into the consolidation – then Genesys Cloud CX would be the preferred solution where you will get the ROI on the solution.

Based on the level of flexibility, overall features, and functionalities, I would rate Genesys Cloud CX somewhere around nine out of ten, with ten being the best. 

We use the solution for workforce management and quality assessments for recordings. 

The most valuable features include being an omnichannel solution with customer journey insights, full reporting, and continuous updates based on consumer feedback through their portal.

The tool's pricing could be more flexible, and there should be clearer indications of consumption and fair usage policies.

I have been using Genesys Cloud CX for twelve years.

I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten, with a 100 percent uptime in all regions within the cloud for the last year.

The tool's scalability is phenomenal. 

In the South African region, customer service response time may be influenced by the small percentage of customers, leading to longer wait times for change requirements.

Positive

Setup is straightforward with a rapid deployment methodology, but customization can add complexity.

I rate Genesys Cloud CX's pricing a one out of ten. 

I rate the tool an eight out of ten.