I use Kong Konnect most often as a current gateway. A specific example of how I use Kong Konnect as a current gateway involves onboarding microservices into Kong Konnect where we pass the host map pattern and pass the endpoint in the route path. This is how we are configuring our setup.
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Gateway has secured our APIs and provides low latency with detailed logs and tracing
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The best features Kong Konnect offers include security, scalability, and latency, which is the most important to me.
Security, scalability, and load handling are so valuable for me because we have multiple built-in plugins such as open authentication, authentication, OpenID, and basic authentication.
Our features, such as being able to see all the logs and traces by integrating with multiple third-party applications including Jaeger, are worth mentioning.
Kong Konnect has positively impacted our organization by securing our APIs, which is one of the main concerns for us. Securing our APIs has benefited our organization by improving compliance and reducing incidents.
What needs improvement?
I wish Kong Konnect could improve by having a built-in notification system whenever any APIs get pinged so that we can receive alerts and send them to the developer.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Kong Konnect for about three and a half years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Kong Konnect is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Kong Konnect's scalability is good.
How are customer service and support?
The customer support is good.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I did not previously use a different solution before Kong Konnect.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that licensing is a bit high in comparison.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I did not evaluate other options before choosing Kong Konnect.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to others looking into using Kong Konnect is to go with it. My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. I gave this product a rating of 10.
Kong is an out of the box fully featured and plugin centric easy to use API Gateway
Out of the box it has a lot of plugins centred in security, rate limiting, validations, and much more. It also supports custom plugins.
Kong is also a cloud native product, that works really well in containerized environments such as Kubernetes, and runs really well under load on low resources, such as low CPU and RAM.
Kong also offers an amazing and customizable API Gateway.
We have several customers using OSS, Enterprise and Konnect versions.
Kong is great product for APIM & having potential to become Market Leader
2. We can create out of box custom plugins using Lua, js, python
3. Support Hybrid model
4. Low latency
5. Easy to setup in any cloud gateway like aws,azure,gcp etc
6. Easy to integrate with third party tools like loggly, datadog , prometheus & many more
7. Konnect has recently introduced dedicated cloud gateways, which is fully managed, multi-region API management solution.
2. The developer portal needs to be more mature and should provide more functionality to the developer.