Sign in Agent Mode
Categories
Your Saved List Become a Channel Partner Sell in AWS Marketplace Amazon Web Services Home Help

Reviews from AWS customer

3 AWS reviews

External reviews

289 reviews
from and

External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.


    reviewer2815512

Managed detection has reduced alert noise and has strengthened 24/7 security operations

  • April 09, 2026
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is a 24/7 managed SOC. The native platform provided managed detection and response, along with log and telemetry ingestion capabilities, but my primary focus was on the SOC 24/7 operations.

How has it helped my organization?

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response has impacted my organization positively by helping remove stress and saving time for my team. The whole visibility of the network and the threat intelligence has been valuable. Having a human analyst is probably one of the biggest benefits, as there is somebody present that I can actually communicate with. The fact that it combines all of these things together is one of the major benefits overall.

What is most valuable?

I think the Concierge Security Team is very good. Having a named team is great, and it was an extension of the internal team. Additionally, one of the biggest benefits is the reduction in noise, so I am not being drowned in alerts. I get validated incidents that need my attention. The onboarding is really good as well. It is pretty structured, easy to understand, and guided in terms of working through the data sources, integrations, and baselining. I think it is a very good product and a mature SOC. In terms of return on investment, the way to look at it is that it replaces the need to hire a fully managed operations team, which could cost a lot in terms of salaries.

For a company that does not have the ability or time maturity to run their own SOC, the best features Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response offers are not just features, but network visibility, the Concierge Security Team, threat hunting, and incident response report support. Having that in place and the security of it helps with overall security confidence and posture for the company.

The Concierge team has helped my organization by having that team and security on hand. They only get in touch if something requires attention and do not contact me with every single alert. The benefit is validating those incidents and reducing the overwhelming amount of alerts and incidents that do not necessarily mean anything. A lot of companies are understaffed and unable to handle that amount of threats or false positives. Again, it is quite expensive to have to pay for a team of salaries for an operations team.

I have noticed specific outcomes or metrics from Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response. I manage false positives, have network visibility, and receive guidance during potentially real incidents. The incident response support is commendable, and I would identify those three areas as the most valuable.

What needs improvement?

I cannot think of anything regarding how Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response can be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response for about two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response can handle anything from a small to medium enterprise to mid to large enterprise. I am not certain how that works in terms of pricing or if there is a higher tier based on the amount of staff on the network, but from what I understand and my research during that time, it absolutely does scale.

How are customer service and support?

The customer support for Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is very good, and I have no complaints.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I did not previously use a different solution before Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response.

How was the initial setup?

My experience with Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response pricing, setup cost, and licensing is pretty good. The pricing was fair. The experience is good, and as I mentioned earlier, the onboarding was straightforward, and getting everything set up was guided through the integrations and tuning. It is not instant or at the flick of a switch, but once everything is dialed in, set up, and configured, it runs smoothly overall.

What was our ROI?

I have seen a return on investment with Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response. The benefit comes from the cost of the product compared to hiring a SOC team, which is enormous. Additionally, the time away from business as usual for an analyst to go through all the noisy alerts is very time-consuming, which translates to money. I do not have a metric for what that cost is, but it is there.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before choosing Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response, I did not evaluate other options. I spoke to a few different vendors, but I did not go down the evaluation route. It was highly recommended to me by somebody whose opinion I trusted.

What other advice do I have?

My advice to others looking into using Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is that it is a very good product. In comparison to other products, it is broader across the environment. It has a low operational burden, and overall, it is a very good product. It can definitely help reduce the difficulty of hiring and managing a whole full security operations team. I would rate this product an 8.5 out of 10.

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is a very good product, typically for mid-market to enterprise organizations that do not have a mature SOC. Companies that are smaller do not necessarily need a managed SOC or do not want to build one. I think it is really good for teams that are understaffed but exposed to real threats, and it is a good affordable product.


    Information Technology and Services

Arctic Wolf: A Force Multiplier for Small Security Teams

  • April 01, 2026
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
Arctic Wolf has been a force-multiplier for me and my small security team. I don't have the headcount or coverage that AW provides and we've consolidated several tools into them. It's been really good for us.
What do you dislike about the product?
No dislikes that i can think of. Overall, they have been very responsive and helpful
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
24/7 visibility and security event investigations. Vulnerability scanning and overall security service provider.


    Cameron Powell

Concierge security team has strengthened our law firm’s threat detection and response

  • March 16, 2026
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response at my law firm is that we use it as our main source of alerts and security features, relying on it for logs and other sensors, including physical sensors as well as connecting cloud centers and agents installed on all of our devices of our users.

What is most valuable?

The best features Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response offers include the Concierge Security Team, which is really helpful because they are knowledgeable and aware of our environment, and they are also very much readily available, making it a dependable tool.

My experience with the Concierge Security Team is that they are really reliable and knowledgeable, acting as an arm of our organization, unlike talking to another vendor who has no idea about our environment; they truly partner well and integrate with our systems.

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response has positively impacted my organization by catching many issues, eliminating risks, and preventing compromises; overall, it has been a great security feature.

What needs improvement?

I do not think of any improvements that come to mind for Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response at the moment.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response for nine months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability of Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is great.

How are customer service and support?

Customer support for Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is great.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Over the years, I have used different solutions and different vendors, but Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is definitely the most secure and full force tool that I have found.

What was our ROI?

I cannot speak to specific return on investment metrics, but I can say that Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response has definitely been a helpful tool.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I did not evaluate other options before choosing Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response because that choice was made before I started at Barger Montag, but I have seen others since then.

What other advice do I have?

My advice for others looking into using Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is to make sure that they look into it and investigate all the tools that are available in it, ensuring they utilize everything to the best benefit. I would rate this solution a 9 out of 10.


    reviewer2809512

Security monitoring has improved visibility but still needs faster alerts and clearer insights

  • March 16, 2026
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

I have been using Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response for a couple of years.

My main use case for Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is to manage the network, see all the different factors, security concerns, access points, and be able to get all the different vectors that could be of attack and compare them to each other to see patterns and identify where there might be vulnerabilities.

A quick, specific example of how I have used Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response to identify or respond to a security issue is when we observed that several emails were coming from a certain individual going to several recipients—more than a normal human would do—and the emails appeared as though that email account had gotten compromised. In fact, it had been. We were able to quickly shut that down before the problem got worse.

What is most valuable?

The best features Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response offers include an overall report of your security vulnerability, where the weak points are, where the strong points are, and how you are doing, so you can see if your security settings are on track or if they are off.

I rely on those reports constantly, and I find that they need to work on their format as it seems more of a data dump. They need to use AI and probably other tools to be able to give a clear picture without just spelling out raw data in reports.

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response has positively impacted my organization by giving us an overview of security without having to go to individual ports and do the correlation, as they do the correlation for you. Additionally, if it is in the middle of the night, they have automated authorization to shut things down if they notice something is happening at an inconvenient hour, which is a fantastic help to the company. I cannot think of any specific outcomes or metrics such as how much time my team has saved or any incidents that were prevented thanks to those automated responses, as security is improved, but it is sort of proving a negative.

What needs improvement?

The team felt that we were not happy with the speed and clarity of the alerts in that situation. It seemed to take too long, and there are other cases where it missed that sort of thing, so that was a bit of a letdown.

I do not have anything else to add about my main use case or how Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response fits into my workflow as it seems what happened was we had level one of security from Microsoft, and they recommended we go to level two of security, which means there is more data that Microsoft captures. However, we were thinking that Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response was capturing it without the elevated level, but Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response said that they recommended the elevated level, so it seemed a miscommunication.

I think Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response can be improved by utilizing tools such as AI and other tools to better formulate the data to not just be a data dump but to give better insights into what is going on.

I do not have anything more to add about the needed improvements.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response for a couple of years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is pretty stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability of Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is pretty good, though we have had some issues with the agents where they stopped working, and we had problems where endpoints would not update properly. In those cases, we were not getting proper data from those endpoints, so that has been one of the biggest concerns.

How are customer service and support?

Customer support for Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is pretty good, but you are talking to people on a lower end, and a lot of the questions we have are upper end, so it has to be escalated.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I did not previously use a different solution before Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response, as we used diverse programs. However, Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response was supposed to be a catch-all to consolidate data and give us better metrics, though it has a lot of improvements needed.

What was our ROI?

I think the product needs to be improved and their service needs to be improved before I see a proper return on investment.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I was not in charge of the experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing, as that was the CIO.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before choosing Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response, I did not evaluate other options.

What other advice do I have?

I would add that those are my thoughts regarding the features.

The advice I would give to others looking into using Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is to make sure you have your own metrics and match them against what Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is doing to see if it is an effective solution for what you are trying to do. I rate Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response a seven on a scale of one to ten because of security incidents falling through and their lack of properly formatting the data.


    reviewer2808996

Continuous monitoring has improved audit readiness and streamlined vulnerability reporting

  • March 13, 2026
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response involves conducting audits to manage the security posture at the customer. I injected Arctic Wolf tools into all of the devices at the network to see what vulnerabilities existed, and then, once I remediated those vulnerabilities based on the results that I saw in Arctic Wolf, I would do another scan with that tool and see that the posture was improved for reporting purposes.

There was a time when Arctic Wolf helped me identify a vulnerability by highlighting some weak ciphers enabled on some of our servers, so we disabled those ciphers and then did a rescan.

I have also used Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response not just for detection and response, but for email security awareness campaigns, which were really helpful in stopping that attack vector.

What is most valuable?

The best features Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response offers include providing an up-to-date view of the vulnerabilities that exist in the network.

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response has positively impacted our organization by allowing us to have professional reports that we could present to auditors when they came, so that we could maintain the business with those customers.

The measurable improvements we noticed included automating the process of having all of those vulnerabilities presented to us consistently so that we could fix them, and having meetings.

What needs improvement?

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response can be improved because the deployment was rather involved; the initial deployment was very lengthy, and there were many things to account for when we had to implement it initially, so making that process easier would be an improvement.

The ease of deployment is not completely there, and the administration on the dashboard is not extremely intuitive; it could be simpler for administration.

For how long have I used the solution?

I used Arctic Wolf Detection and Response for about three years.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

At one of my previous roles, we used Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response for about three years.

What other advice do I have?

I advise others looking into using Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response to leverage Arctic Wolf support team for deployment because it can be involved, and to take advantage of the tutorials that team gives for administering the product for the exact features you need. Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response has many features, and it can get complicated, so you should narrow down exactly the use cases you have for it and focus on those during the onboarding trainings. I would rate this product an 8 out of 10.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)


    reviewer2808117

Managed detection has reduced alert noise and staff needs but has created many false positives

  • March 10, 2026
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is detecting and responding to security threats. My job involves responding to the alerts that Arctic Wolf detects and managing their risks by either hardening and patching devices and endpoints, or by responding to an alert, investigating, and remediating incidents.

A recent situation where I used Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response to respond to a threat involved an alert indicating that a user's account may have been breached. I was able to investigate and confirm what was occurring after an incident where a user had multiple sign-in failures and eventually a malicious user was able to access their account.

Once I received the alert from Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response, the first thing I did to investigate and remediate the situation was to validate the alert by examining the logs and confirming the sign-in logs in Entra ID to determine that the user was indeed breached and that the malicious user was able to guess that user's password. After that confirmation, I immediately contained the user by disabling the account, resetting their password, and ensuring MFA was enabled.

What is most valuable?

I would say Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response functions as our SOC SIEM solution. They handle a lot of the triaging and early detection of incidents, and I respond to them, so it has been effective.

The best features that Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response offers are that it is very hands-off. They handle much of the initial detection and response, which can be very helpful for a small team, allowing them to focus on other tasks without being overwhelmed with numerous incident alerts and noise.

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response reduces alert noise and helps my team focus because they are the first ones to review these incident logs and determine if something requires escalation to me. Instead of having to examine all these various logs coming in, they ingest and review them, then determine if escalation is needed. Another benefit is that if they identify something that appears to be a significant risk, they have the ability to step in and block, contain, or act on that alert, which saves me time and helps when issues arise.

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response has had a positive impact on my organization because it has reduced the number of people needed to review these logs, which reduces our overhead. This frees up time for my internal IT users to focus on other things since this service handles much of the initial investigation work and log reviews, saving us considerable time and allowing us to focus on more important tasks.

What needs improvement?

The aspects I do not favor about Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response are that their detection generates a lot of false positives, and their concierge team is not always the best, leading to considerable back and forth which can be frustrating when submitting a ticket to have something resolved.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response for approximately two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

In my experience, Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability of Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is good for a small to mid-sized company.

How are customer service and support?

Customer support for Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is acceptable; it is not the best, but it is not the worst.

My advice for others considering Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response would be to exercise care with its setup and to be aware that their concierge team is not always the best.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response, we had something similar called Talus, but we switched because we needed something better as our team was growing, our infrastructure was expanding, and our company was developing.

What was our ROI?

I cannot provide exact numbers concerning return on investment, but I can confirm it has definitely reduced the need for additional staff.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is that the pricing seemed to be fairly competitive compared to what was available, and they offered us a favorable entry price.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before choosing Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response, we did evaluate other options including Microsoft Sentinel and CrowdStrike, but I do not have complete details to provide.


    reviewer2807772

Security monitoring has protected our infrastructure and supports 24x7 compliance reporting

  • March 07, 2026
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is protecting our overall IT infrastructure with a SOC and a guard dog for our house, so to speak, to protect all our IT assets at the edge.

A specific example of how I used Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response in practice is that I sold that service to a small to medium-sized company so that they could protect credit card and PCI for their customers, ensuring they were compliant on a SOC level and could meet insurance requirements.

At the time that I was selling this particular service, my main use case for Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response was that it was number one in the market, and while there have been other players that have come into the market, Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response was easy to implement, easy for my end client to understand, and was considered a good value.

What is most valuable?

The best features Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response offers are difficult to specify.

The features of Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response are correct, particularly that they use 24/7 response with generally three different agents to monitor your environment, ensuring the workload gets spread out while having someone monitoring your environment 24/7.

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response has positively impacted my organization and my clients' organizations by becoming a standard to meet insurance requirements or overall protection environments within an IT infrastructure, leading to growing sales for the company as I see it becoming a standard within the industry very soon at almost all levels.

What needs improvement?

I think Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response can be improved by addressing the high turnover with employees at the company, which made it hard to find a point person within the company to move transactions forward.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response for two years at one of my previous roles, where I was a value-added reseller for Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is considered one of the leaders in the stability segment.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

From my understanding, the scalability of Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is almost unlimited.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I did not previously use a different solution; I was selling Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response.

What was our ROI?

Regarding return on investment, I find it to be a case-by-case situation depending on deployment with Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response seemed to be fair market value for the service.

What other advice do I have?

The specific outcomes I noticed from using Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response include that the end user responsible for the monitoring on the company's side was happy that all the reports got into one particular pane of glass.

I would advise others looking into using Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response that it should be worth considering when reviewing any budget or criteria for a SOC.

I would rate this product an 8 overall.


    reviewer2783439

Improved incident triage and security visibility have reduced panic but console navigation needs refinement

  • February 06, 2026
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is as an EDR solution. I use Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response on my EC2 instances.

What is most valuable?

The best features Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response offers include a really good console that makes it easy to spot many issues.

The console helps my team day-to-day by speeding up investigations. It is very easy to navigate through and find out why certain traces are happening.

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response has positively impacted my organization by making us feel much safer in terms of security. When any issues arise, I know that I have something as an EDR tool to rely on. It also helps us with security questionnaires by making it easier for my team to answer common questions about what I use for EDR solutions and what I use for my CSPM module.

What needs improvement?

I do not see any point of criticism so far regarding Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response. The three points off are due to the menu being hard to use when trying to get to specific locations.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response for eight months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is very stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I have not come across scalability issues yet, but so far it seems to be good even with 190 servers.

How are customer service and support?

The customer support for Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is very good. They have been very quick and respond within six to eight hours.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

This is the first time I have onboarded an EDR solution.

How was the initial setup?

I had no issues with pricing, setup cost, or licensing. Everything was smooth, and the salesmen were really easy to work with.

What was our ROI?

I have seen a return on investment, definitely saving about 20% of time in triaging security incidents, which has led to much less panic. I have also saved money in terms of the cost of security incident payouts.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I had no issues with pricing, setup cost, or licensing. Everything was smooth, and the salesmen were really easy to work with.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before choosing Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response, I evaluated one other option: CrowdStrike.

What other advice do I have?

My advice to others looking into using Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is to definitely go for it, as it is a good solution, especially if you do not have an EDR solution in place yet. I would rate this product a 7 out of 10.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)


    Food & Beverages

Low Cost, Excellent Value

  • January 27, 2026
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
Low cost and an excellent value. Very responsive to any event
What do you dislike about the product?
Can't say a lot about dislikes, Arctic Wolf is a great product.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
They help us monitor our cybersecurity across the entire company


    Jenine M.

Effortless Log Management and Monitoring with Built-In Parsers

  • January 08, 2026
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
It includes an MSP and takes away the need for me to manually monitor, configure and deal with building things out on my own. A lot of the logs they already have parsers built for - which means i don't have to build them out on my own - and they have a team that is always monitoring which allows me more time to do the other things that i need to do.
What do you dislike about the product?
When i need custom things built - it is very difficult as I am not able ot build out custom items to support things that may be specific to my company needs and I do lose that complete control over my logs to create custom parsers if I connect logs from a system that they may not have something built out fully for yet.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
we have a very small team - so it solves the issue of only having one person for the SOC team to help monitor and alert to incidents