BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
3,284 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
As a fronted dev, BrowserStack is the one tool I actually enjoy using
What do you like best about the product?
Cross-browser testing used to be the part of my day I dreaded most. Spinning up different environment, checking layouts on Safari vs Chrome vs Edge - it was slow and honestly frustrating. BrowserStack made that whole process feel normal again. I can jump into a real device session in second, catch a CSS bug on iOS Safari that I had never have spotted otherwise, and fix it before it ever hits production. The Live testing feature is what I use most - instant, no setup, just pick a browser and go.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes the session feels a little slow to load especially when I am in a hurry before a deadline. Pricing is on the higher side for individual developer - wish there was a more affordable solo plan.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I used to rely on browser emulators and hope for the best. Now I actually verify my UI on real devices before every release. It's caught layout breaks, font rendering issues, and touch behavior bugs that emulators completely missed. As a fronted developer, that peace of mind is worth a lot.
Easy Access to Thousands of Devices with a Superb Debugging Interface
What do you like best about the product?
Accessibility to thousands of devices without the need of a physical device lab. Additionally, user friendly interface for debugging is superb.
What do you dislike about the product?
Hight cost specially for small teams and occasional time lags.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It is extremely helpful for testing teams without the need of a physical device setup.
User-Friendly Testing with Occasional Slowdowns
What do you like best about the product?
I really appreciate that BrowserStack is a technical-friendly application, and I can use it very easily. It's especially valuable for manual testing, and I can also perform automate testing with it. The apply and automate plugins are so valuable for me. Plus, the initial setup was so easy that I didn't have any complicated experiences with it.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes it's apparent that BrowserStack is slowing down. I don't have specific ideas on how to improve it, but it's a clear issue I’ve experienced.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for manual mobile application testing, and it helps with automate testing using its valuable plugins.
Instant Access for Smooth Cross-Browser Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I like how browserstack provides instant access to real browsers and devices for accurate cross-browser testing. It supports selenium and cypress integration which makes automation smooth. The cloud infrastructure removes the need for local setup and speeds up testing as well.
What do you dislike about the product?
It can get expensive especially for larger teams. Sometimes tests feel a bit slow or laggy on remote devices. Debugging intermittent failures also can be tricky due to network dependency.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solves the problem of testing across multiple browsers and devices without maintaining local setups. It helps me save time ensures better compatibility and catch UI issues early in the development cycle.
BrowserStack Makes Cross-Platform Testing Possible and More Efficient - For Most Cases
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack is a really good shortcut to test webapps or mobile apps on different tech-stacks and platforms. It's certainly efficient to run scans on a simulated environment with various platforms than having to set up indivdual test-setups with physical hardware or even virtual machines too replicated the various OS and frameworks. Especially when the the team works everywhere and not in one office, you can't just have different devices and share them with people who work at home.
What do you dislike about the product?
Since it is simulated, I sometimes would love to have deeper access to debug a problem. BrowserStack does help you find problems, but you can't get to the root of it. Since this IS your environment to test, the consequence is often that you either have to "guess" (via research) what the problem was and trial-and-error a solution or you do have to set up a "real" environment to replicate the issue and get closer to it. So, it's good to identify that there is a problem, but it's not necessarily easy to also fix it.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It allows the product development organization to test our products in different environments rather quickly and efficiently. Therefore, I can rely that the products I'm selling works on various environments - even those who might not be officially supported. In my role, it also helps me to see what my customer sees, when he or she is using a different stack that officially supported. That doesn't mean I can always help - but sometimes it does work. As I mentioned, in general, the flexibility allows for us to streamline our testing (even though performance is sometimes a tidbit laggy - but it's always better than the time needed to get our products onto the "real" hardware) and it integrates nicely into our CI/CD for the development process.
Accurate Cross-Device Testing with BrowserStack’s Real Device Cloud
What do you like best about the product?
What I like best about BrowserStack is its real device cloud, which allows testing on actual devices instead of emulators, giving more reliable and accurate results. It’s especially helpful for ensuring cross-browser and cross-device compatibility without the hassle of maintaining physical infrastructure. The platform also speeds up development cycles with features like parallel testing, easy CI/CD integration, and built-in debugging tools such as logs, screenshots, and video recordings, making the overall testing process more efficient and scalable.
What do you dislike about the product?
One downside of BrowserStack is that it can be relatively expensive compared to other testing solutions, especially for smaller teams or startups. At times, performance may feel slightly laggy due to network dependency when accessing real devices remotely, which can affect testing speed. Additionally, debugging complex issues can sometimes be limited compared to local environments, and session time limits or queue times during peak usage can slow down workflows.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the problem of ensuring applications work seamlessly across multiple browsers, devices, and operating systems without the need to maintain an in-house device lab. It helps catch compatibility issues early, reduces manual testing effort, and speeds up release cycles through automation and parallel testing. This benefits the business by improving product quality, reducing time-to-market, lowering infrastructure costs, and ensuring a consistent user experience for customers across different platforms.
Real-Time Testing Made Easy with BrowserStack
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack to test websites in real time, and it helps solve the problem of inconsistent websites. I find it beneficial for saving time with faster testing, it's a better bug detector, and it accurately reflects real device performance. Using the LIVE feature helps me interact with the website or app in real time, which I find very effective. Additionally, the setup was pretty easy for me.
What do you dislike about the product?
nothing
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for real-time website testing. It solves the problem of inconsistent websites, saves time with faster testing, is a reliable bug detector, and provides real device accuracy.
Real Device App Testing with a Wide Variety of Models
What do you like best about the product?
Real device app testing. They have a wide variety of device choices and models.
What do you dislike about the product?
Low time limit in trial accounts. Some latest devices unavailable
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Allowing me to test my apps on real world devices and take screenshots and record app behaviour. This is beneficial to mimic real usage on variety of devices and models.
Effortless Testing, High Efficiency
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for web development and testing, and it's definitely worth learning and using. It helps me test my application across multiple browsers and real devices without maintaining physical setups. I like its ease of use and access to real devices, which saves time and makes testing faster and more efficient. It also works well with automation tools and helps in continuous testing, which improves productivity. The setup was easy and quick, with minimal configuration required.
What do you dislike about the product?
Pricing could be more affordable, and sometimes there is a slight lag during testing.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to test my application across multiple browsers and real devices without maintaining physical setups. It's easy to use, provides access to real devices, and integrates well with automation tools for efficient continuous testing.
Makes cross-browser testing way less painful.
What do you like best about the product?
Honestly, the biggest win is not having to manage any physical devices or browser setups. I can just log in and start testing on real devices and different browsers immediately.
In my day-to-day work, I often need to quickly verify features across multiple environments, and Browserstack makes that easy. Running tests in parallel saves a lot of time, and the Selenium integration fits nicely into our existing CI pipeline. Debugging is also easier with session recording and logs- especially when somethings breaks and you need to quickly figure out why.
It’s one of those tools that just removes a lot of friction from the workflow.
In my day-to-day work, I often need to quickly verify features across multiple environments, and Browserstack makes that easy. Running tests in parallel saves a lot of time, and the Selenium integration fits nicely into our existing CI pipeline. Debugging is also easier with session recording and logs- especially when somethings breaks and you need to quickly figure out why.
It’s one of those tools that just removes a lot of friction from the workflow.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes sessions can be a bit slow or laggy, especially during busy times. I have also seen session drop occasionally, which can be annoying if you are in the middle of testing.
Pricing can be a concern too. It’s worth it if you use it properly, but for smaller teams it might feel a bit expensive.
Pricing can be a concern too. It’s worth it if you use it properly, but for smaller teams it might feel a bit expensive.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It basically removes the headache of setting up and maintaining a device lab. We can test faster, catch issues earlier, and release with more confidence.
Overall, it saves time and makes testing much more efficient.
Overall, it saves time and makes testing much more efficient.
showing 31 - 40