I use the paid version of the solution in my company to attend meetings. In my company, we have joint meetings in different offices, so we join combinedly through Zoom. My organization has multiple hospitals where managers work, and if we need some information or guidelines, we give them the link to the meeting, and they join it. The meetings on Zoom can go on for more than an hour without any breaks in the video. There is a time frame for the unpaid version. For the paid version, there is no time frame attached to the meetings, making it easy to use.

Everything related to the product is perfect, in my opinion. The video quality and sound quality offered by the product are directly attached to the internet connection that a user has at their place. If you have a good internet connection, the video and sound quality offered by Zoom are great.

Considering the main function of Zoom, it should make the video functioning part a little bit more friendly.

I have been using Zoom for four to five years.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine to ten out of ten.

More than 80 people in my company use the product.

The product is not regularly used for meetings, but it is useful to hold multiple meetings. The product offers an option to schedule a meeting. My company schedules meetings with the help of the product, and if anybody has to attend a meeting that has been scheduled, that person will be notified.

I have used Google Meet, but its video and sound quality were very different from what Zoom offers.

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

During the product's deployment phase, I just download and install it, after which I follow the process to login and use it.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

The solution can be deployed in a couple of minutes. You just have to download and install it.

I can take care of the product's deployment myself.

The value from the use of the product reflects areas like webinars, reviews, meetings, discussions and joint meetings.

The tool's paid version is not that expensive. You need to pay 150 USD per year.

The licensing part of the product is not expensive. I rate the product price as nine out of ten. There is no need to pay any additional costs apart from the normal charges attached to the product.

The product's screen-sharing capabilities are perfect.

I feel like the product is quite user-friendly and offers multiple versions, and I feel the paid version is perfect. The multiple features in the product are very helpful for businesses.

The product's security features are good.

I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

I've been using the solution for different vendor meetings and training.

The most valuable features of Zoom are quick connectivity, screen sharing, and quick response. The solution provides good video and sound quality. The solution's screen-sharing and presentation capabilities are really good. Normally, I use the solution for remote meetings.

The solution’s stability could be improved.

I have been using Zoom for four to five years.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten for stability.

Over 100 users are using the solution in our organization.

I rate the solution’s scalability a nine out of ten.

I have previously used Microsoft Teams and Skype for Business.

The solution’s initial setup is straightforward.

We implemented the solution through an in-house team in two minutes. When you click on the Zoom meeting link, you are redirected to the site, where you can automatically download it. We're using Zoom as a third-party tool, and it's not our main communication tool.

Zoom is easy to use, easy to deploy, and easy to organize meetings and webinars.

I am not paying any licensing costs for the solution.

The solution's security features are effective in protecting our meetings. I would recommend the solution to other users because it is stable, reliable, and easy to use. The solution's user interface is user-friendly and intuitive.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Zoom has better connectivity and the failure ratio is less compared to Webex and GoToWebinar. The base infrastructure is robust. The latency is very good. That is why the tool is pricey. The vendor provides hosting and poll features. Zoom is a complete product. It has a good security layer. Every platform has its own security layer to ensure that the data and broadcast are restricted and relayed to only the registered participants. Anyone can easily handle the solution. It is easy to learn.

The solution is pricier than its competitors.

We have been using Zoom for internal and client calls.

Since we work with clients, we have around 100 to 200 users.

We contacted the support team for some activation with Brevo. We wanted to integrate the Brevo platform with events or webinars. The support structure is good. The team replies within a short duration and tries to answer our queries.

We extensively depend on GoToWebinar and Webex. Zoom is a little costlier than GoToWebinar and Webex. Zoom and Webex have very good security layers. RingCentral has a very good suite including in-house messaging and IP phone call features that enable users to get a private number for their organization.

It would be better if people started with Webex. If we need to do more than 10 to 15 webinars a month, we can choose Zoom. If we have fewer events and one or two webinars in a month, we can choose GoToWebinar or other tools like RingCentral. Zoom is better for the internal purposes of a company. Webex or other platforms are better suited for external clients. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

There is a large energy company that only uses Zoom. When I have meetings with them, they are always called via Zoom. I wouldn't initiate it; I need to have a Zoom account. I don't use many features besides setting up a meeting.

When I had meetings, I used to take notes or record them, but then someone still had to transcribe everything. Now, I'm fascinated by OtterPilot. It automatically transcribes meetings, summarizes them, and identifies action items. I've been recommending it to everyone I know. It is a tool that you can use during Zoom or Teams calls. It takes real-time notes and then sends a summary and action items to everyone via email. It's been really helpful for about three or four years now.

The most valuable feature for me is the integration with platforms. They're all moving towards providing transcripts, but I want a summary of the key points discussed and the action items, so everyone can quickly understand and follow up on them.

The tool integrates with Microsoft Outlook, but the integration with Teams is better than with Zoom. It's functional but could be tighter.

While Zoom calls are great for talking and chatting, they often lack follow-up on action items and collaboration. Most of the time, it's just talking and listening without much progress. There's a missing piece in these tools. About 90 percent of those calls could be replaced by other tools that focus more on the deliverables that make a real impact rather than just being another wasted meeting. It doesn't improve collaboration.

Screen sharing and chat functionality are helpful for productivity, but they could be improved. Finding the screen-sharing button can be tricky, and the process isn't always easy.

I have been using the product for five years.

I am not impressed with the tool's support. It was a bit chaotic how things were organized. It felt like there was a lack of coordination, even regarding my account or tasks. Eventually, things got done, but it took a while. The organization seemed disjointed, with people unsure of their roles and relying on others to solve problems.

Teams is great because it works well with Microsoft. Webex feels old and outdated compared to newer tools like Slack. It's like it's stuck in the past and doesn't have much of a future. Teams is robust and rock solid because of Microsoft. It's extremely well integrated with everything, and you feel secure using it.

Webex's user interface is not up to par, and it lacks the modern features you find in tools like Slack. While they may add a few functions here and there, Webex doesn't seem to have much of a future compared to Teams or other more advanced tools.

If I were to rank them, Webex would be at the bottom. I'm not impressed with Google Meet either. Then it's Zoom, followed by Huddle and Teams. Teams is at the top because it's robust and integrates well with many things. Huddle is catching up fast and is close behind Teams, in my opinion.

I rate the overall product a six out of ten.

I deal with Zoom as a solution that my company provides to its clients. Basically, my company sells Zoom to clients.

Zoom is a good product, and there are no limitations when you plan to include lots of members. Basically, I haven't directly handled Zoom's consoles and other areas, so I won't be able to tell you all the details regarding the tool. I want to tell you Zoom is a good product for remote meetings and conferences.

In Zoom meetings, video quality is an area of concern where improvements are required.

I have experience with Zoom. My company is a reseller of Zoom.

It is a stable solution.

The scalability of the product depends on the licensing model a user chooses for his company. I am not very experienced with the scalability features of the product.

My company has sold the product to two customers.

In our company, we use Microsoft Teams for our internal and external meetings.

Previously, I used Webex.

The product can be deployed on the cloud. Zoom provides a cloud console, and the user needs to log in to it to activate the licenses. After the licenses are activated, the admin user can create user credentials and passwords for the person who will be the admin, and then it gets shared with that person who can arrange meetings on the tool.

The solution is deployed on the cloud. Deploying the product on an on-premises model may take some time, considering that some hardware devices are involved in the process.

It didn't take much time to deploy the product.

Zoom's ability to allow its users to hold virtual meetings is valuable for our company. It helps to hold a lot of regular meetings with team members who are located outside the company's headquarters. Before the invention of Zoom, employees were forced to come to the office to attend meetings. Zoom saves money by eliminating the need for employees to spend money on travel costs and the costs of holding meetings in the head office.

In terms of reliability, I haven't heard about any recommendations from the clients who use the tool. I think it is better for a regular user of Zoom to speak about the product since only such a person can provide more details regarding whether the tool is good or bad. If you want to know about Zoom from my perspective, I think that I can't give you much information related to the solution.

When I join Zoom meetings, especially the external ones, I feel that the video quality is okay. I rate the tool's video quality a seven and a half out of ten when compared to Webex.

Though I haven't thought about the sound quality offered by Zoom, I feel it is okay.

During multiple conference calls, Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Webex post different limitations in terms of screen sharing and presentation capabilities.

I would recommend that instead of Zoom, others can also use Webex and Microsoft Teams.

I know that nowadays, Zoom is securing their communication in the area of conferencing, specifically video conferencing.

Others can use Zoom if they want to use it.

I rate the tool a seven and a half out of ten.

I use the tool when I need to join calls as a participant, but I don't use it regularly in my day-to-day tasks. I used it for a large-scale meeting a year back.

I find Zoom's sharing features, particularly presenting slides, quite useful. While I'm uncertain if it outperforms Teams in this aspect, I appreciate its functionality. Its breakout room feature is good.

The main issue with Zoom is its adoption in the business world compared to platforms like Teams.

I have been working with the product for five years.

I haven't faced any issues with the tool's stability.

Teams is easier to use because it's seamlessly integrated with Office 365. You can start, join, and invite people to calls from Teams. I'm more used to Teams, so that's what I find convenient. I haven't set up meetings with Zoom myself.

I use the tool's free version.

I use Zoom occasionally for personal reasons, especially for the charity work I do as a director. My company is a large enterprise. I rate it a seven out of ten. Teams is simpler to use because of its integration with Office 365. From a company perspective, that's a big advantage. I like Zoom, but I haven't used it extensively. If there's a new release tomorrow, I'd hope for additional features or improvements to improve it. You need to invest in a good headset to use it.

I like Zoom's breakout session feature. During a conference, you can have a breakout session and place people in different groups, which can later converge back into the same room. I also like the solution's webinar feature. The Zoom webinar allows you to create the different settings you want. You could join in between with your microphone automatically off. It has a feature where you raise your hand to ask a question or make comments.

I cannot integrate Zoom with my Cisco teleconference, which prevents people from the teleconference mode from joining Zoom. I would like to see Zoom integrated with other third-party services.

I have been using Zoom since 2019.

Zoom is a very stable solution.

Zoom is a scalable solution. More than 500 users are using the solution in our organization, and we plan to increase the number of users.

Zoom's initial setup is straightforward. You just download and install the app, which takes five minutes.

After downloading and installing the app, you can set up your meeting schedule whenever you want to start the meeting.

With Zoom, you can communicate easily and have your meetings without any hindrance. You can join in from anywhere, and there are no barriers to your meetings. It saves travel time because people travel long distances to join meetings. The solution also saves costs on flights and accommodation so that people can work from their location and join meetings.

We pay a yearly licensing fee for Zoom, which is expensive in our part of the world. It is because of the instability in our currency. We cannot pay for all of the services in our local currency. That's the only big challenge we have. There's always a variation in the cost because every year we pay higher than the previous year for the support.

Most of the meetings we have in our environment are via Zoom. It works well in terms of the number of users who can join. We are using a subscription-based licensed copy. With Zoom, our meetings are easily conducted and managed. There's been an improvement in Zoom's video quality. Zoom's screen-sharing and presentation capabilities are good.

Zoom's security features are effective in protecting our meetings because it has settings that allow you to admit only those you have invited for the meeting. Nobody can barge into your meeting without your permission. I would recommend Zoom to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

We use Zoom for our daily maintenance since we mainly work online and our team members are in different cities. It helps us hold meetings and collaborate on projects efficiently.

The most valuable features of Zoom for enhanced team collaboration are its high video quality, comprehensive meeting features, and reliable performance. It is also quite user-friendly and the sound quality is good.

While Zoom is an excellent product overall, I would appreciate it if the updates weren't so frequent.

I have been using Zoom for three years.

We have 15 users at our company that use Zoom daily.

Setting up Zoom was straightforward and took almost no time at all. Just downloading the file and following the instructions made it easy. Deployment can be completed in just a couple of minutes, and adding a custom logo is a simple process.

Zoom has provided a positive ROI by saving time and money through remote meetings, eliminating the need for in-person gatherings, and reducing costs associated with travel and office space.

Overall, I would rate Zoom as a ten out of ten. It is reliable, stable, and performs well. I would recommend it to others.

We use it for all these virtual meetings – mainly official, predominantly official. Maybe at times, it could be for personal reasons also, but more than 95% of the time, I use it for work purposes only.

We are a team located across various locations. Not in the same geographic location. We are distributed.

And it's not possible to physically travel and meet people.

Sometimes it's simply not possible. But Zoom has helped us tremendously in collaborating with each other and getting our work done. Without Zoom, it would have been very, very difficult.

The breakout rooms feature is also helpful. For example, I have a meeting attended by hundreds of people and want to create subgroups. I typically use it for different role-play scenarios during training if we are trying to conduct some training on presentation skills.

So there's a large group, which is initially trained by an instructor. Then you get instructions that the room will be split into smaller breakout rooms. I'll give you a topic, and you'll practice in these smaller groups. That's one way I use it.

So it's like a simulation of a real brainstorming session I'd have in a physical space.

There are many valuable features. Security is one – you can lock Zoom meetings when you find that all the participants have joined so that there are no intruders.

You can put anyone in a waiting room to make sure you know who is trying to join, and then you can let them in. There's a breakout room feature, which is fantastic.

And, the common features like sharing content and stuff like that. Overall, it is a very user-friendly product.

The video quality of the free version might not be as good as the enterprise edition, but that's fair since it's free. It would be nice if Zoom improved that. But, I'm not expecting the best quality video when I'm using it for free.

I currently use it. I use the latest version.

I've never experienced any instability. It's always been stable for me. Unless there's an issue with my own internet connectivity, Zoom runs smoothly.

The video quality is good since it depends on your internet connection. If you have a decent connection, there are no problems with video quality.

I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten.

That's one more thing I wanted to highlight – Zoom is extremely scalable. Performance never dips.

I've attended Zoom meetings with more than 200 people all across the globe, and there's no issue. The performance remains great.

Everybody in my company uses it. Zoom is the primary medium of communication for virtual meetings in our organization. Microsoft Teams is also available, but it's not popular. Zoom is the standard unless someone specifically requests Teams for compatibility with a client.

I have also used Microsoft Teams. Even in my company, nobody uses it unless we specifically need to for compatibility with a customer.

Zoom is better than Microsoft Teams in terms of user experience and ease of use.

We switched to Zoom for two reasons:

• First, the user experience in Zoom is the best among all the virtual meeting platforms I've used.
• Second, it's the standard in our organization. For official purposes, it's the preferred method, and even for personal calls, I choose Zoom.

I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with one being difficult and ten being easy.

There's basically no setup. If you want to install the app, you can. If you don't want to install it, you can just start using it right from your browser.

It can be on-premises or cloud-based. And the third option is that you don't install it at all – we can start accessing it from the browser. So you have complete flexibility. It's not really restricted to a particular deployment option.

So it's a matter of minutes to either deploy or start working within the browser. It's really quick and easy.

If you want to install it, it can take a few minutes. If you choose not to install, you can start using it right from your browser immediately.

For personal use, I use the free version of Zoom, so I haven't paid anything.

I've used Zoom for official purposes within my organization and for chatting with friends using the free version.

I've used other virtual platforms like Webex, Teams, and Skype, and Zoom definitely stands out. So, I found the things that were lacking in other products present in Zoom.

I would recommend it for the following reasons:

1. If you're looking for a scalable solution, go for Zoom. It offers the same level of performance regardless of the number of participants. I've personally experienced it with up to around 300 participants.
2. Zoom is extremely user-friendly and easy to pick up.
3. Plus, you have complete flexibility – use it in your browser, install the desktop app, or use the mobile app.

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Our primary use case for Zoom is for conducting meetings and attending virtual learning sessions.

The platform's most valuable features are collaborative video call and chat functionality.

The product's interface needs enhancement.

We have been using Zoom for many years.

It is a stable product. I rate it a ten out of ten.

The platform is capable of handling around many hundred users.

We used Microsoft Teams before.

Zoom is easy to install.

I implement the product myself. It's mostly an automated installation process.

We have to pay for the product's license.

I recommend stable, easy to use, and reliable. It has efficient security features as well. I rate it a nine out of ten.