Reviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
159 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Complex Setup and Rising Costs at Scale Despite a Strong Lakehouse Foundation
What do you like best about the product?
its open lakehouse architecture, which lets you query data across multiple sources without moving it.
It also delivers strong performance with built-in query optimization and integrates easily with existing data tools, making analytics faster and simpler.
It also delivers strong performance with built-in query optimization and integrates easily with existing data tools, making analytics faster and simpler.
What do you dislike about the product?
setup and configuration can feel complex, especially for smaller teams without strong data engineering support.
It can also become expensive at scale, particularly when handling large workloads or advanced features.
It can also become expensive at scale, particularly when handling large workloads or advanced features.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
solves the problem of scattered data by letting you access and query data across different storage systems without moving it into one place.
This benefits you by reducing data duplication, lowering costs, and enabling faster, more efficient analytics and decision-making.
This benefits you by reducing data duplication, lowering costs, and enabling faster, more efficient analytics and decision-making.
Efficient and Scalable Lakehouse Platform for Modern Data Analytics
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about IBM watsonx.data is how it lets us query and manage data across multiple sources without needing complex data movement. Its open lakehouse architecture makes it easier to work with structured and unstructured data side by side, which has improved performance and reduced storage duplication for our analytics workloads. The integration with AI and analytics tools also helps teams process large datasets more quickly and generate insights more efficiently.
Another major advantage is its scalability and governance. The platform reliably supports high-volume enterprise data workloads while also providing strong security controls and solid data governance features.
Another major advantage is its scalability and governance. The platform reliably supports high-volume enterprise data workloads while also providing strong security controls and solid data governance features.
What do you dislike about the product?
One area where IBM watsonx.data could improve is the initial setup experience and the learning curve for new users. While the platform is powerful, configuring integrations and optimizing workloads can sometimes require advanced technical knowledge, especially for teams that are new to lakehouse architectures. Clearer onboarding documentation, along with more guided setup workflows, would make adoption smoother and reduce the effort needed to get started.
I also think some UI workflows and monitoring features could be more intuitive. At times, troubleshooting performance issues or managing integrations across different environments takes extra effort than it should. Additionally, pricing and resource consumption can become expensive for large-scale deployments, so more transparent cost-optimization tools and simpler management features would help improve the overall experience.
I also think some UI workflows and monitoring features could be more intuitive. At times, troubleshooting performance issues or managing integrations across different environments takes extra effort than it should. Additionally, pricing and resource consumption can become expensive for large-scale deployments, so more transparent cost-optimization tools and simpler management features would help improve the overall experience.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Before using IBM watsonx.data, we struggled to manage and analyze large volumes of data distributed across multiple systems and cloud environments. Moving data between platforms was time-consuming and costly, and it often introduced delays in our reporting and analytics workflows. We also found it challenging to maintain consistent governance and reliable performance while working with a mix of structured and unstructured data.
With IBM watsonx.data, we can now query data across different sources more efficiently, without unnecessary duplication or migration. This has improved analytics performance, lowered storage and operational costs, and helped our teams reach insights faster to support decision-making. The platform’s scalability, along with its integration with AI and analytics tools, has also boosted productivity by simplifying big data processing and enabling quicker development of data-driven solutions. Overall, it has helped us streamline our data architecture while strengthening governance, flexibility, and operational efficiency.
With IBM watsonx.data, we can now query data across different sources more efficiently, without unnecessary duplication or migration. This has improved analytics performance, lowered storage and operational costs, and helped our teams reach insights faster to support decision-making. The platform’s scalability, along with its integration with AI and analytics tools, has also boosted productivity by simplifying big data processing and enabling quicker development of data-driven solutions. Overall, it has helped us streamline our data architecture while strengthening governance, flexibility, and operational efficiency.
Scalable Platform with Robust Analytics, Needs Setup Improvement
What do you like best about the product?
I use IBM watsonx.data to centralize and manage both structured and unstructured data in a unified lakehouse for analytics and AI workloads. I like its ability to combine the flexibility of a data lake with the performance of a data warehouse in a single platform. It helps me access, process, and analyze data across hybrid environments to generate faster insights and support data-driven decisions. It also offers strong query optimization and supports open data formats, making it easy to scale analytics across hybrid environments. Additionally, it integrates well with BI tools for visualization, helping turn processed data into actionable insights. Transitioning to IBM watsonx.data helped me gain more flexibility and scalability, handle growing data volumes more efficiently while reducing costs, and support modern analytics and AI workloads.
What do you dislike about the product?
The setup and initial configuration can be a bit complex, especially for teams new to lakehouse architectures. Additionally, improving documentation, UI intuitiveness, and integration with some third-party tools would make the overall experience smoother. The initial setup was moderately complex and required some familiarity with data architecture and cloud environments. While the documentation helps, the process can be time-consuming, especially when configuring integrations and optimizing performance for specific workloads.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use IBM watsonx.data to centralize data in a unified lakehouse for analytics, solving the challenge of managing large data volumes by unifying lakes and warehouses. It improves query performance and reduces costs with efficient data access and workload optimization.
Flexible Lakehouse Platform with Good Performance and Scalability
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about IBM watsonx.data is how it brings together a lakehouse approach without making things overly complicated. It feels flexible enough to handle both structured and unstructured data, and the performance with query engines is quite solid, especially when working with large datasets.
What do you dislike about the product?
Initial setup can feel a bit complex, especially for new users. Also, performance tuning and cost optimization sometimes require extra effort compared to more mature, plug-and-play platforms.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It helps consolidate data from multiple sources into one platform, reducing silos and improving data accessibility. This makes analysis faster and more reliable, which ultimately supports better decision-making and reduces overall data management costs.
Flexible Integration, Complex Learning Curve
What do you like best about the product?
I like that IBM watsonx.data allows us to access data from multiple sources and can run on cloud and hybrid environments. I also appreciate its open and flexible architecture. It helps me connect data across sources and manage it effectively.
What do you dislike about the product?
The initial learning can be complex for beginners, could be made simple with instruction steps. Fix AWS S3, need more stable and plug and play connectors. The setup was not instant, it was somewhat complex.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use IBM watsonx.data to search and organize data. It lets me connect data across sources and manage it effectively.
Scalable Data Management with IBM watsonx.data
What do you like best about the product?
I use IBM watsonx.data as a unified data platform to manage, access, and analyze large volumes of structured and unstructured data. I like its ability to unify data across multiple sources without requiring heavy data movement, which makes it easier to access and analyze data efficiently while maintaining performance. I also appreciate the scalability and flexibility it offers for handling large and diverse datasets. The platform supports both analytics and AI workloads in a structured way. Its data governance capabilities help ensure data reliability and security, enabling more efficient and data-driven decision-making. The initial setup was relatively smooth with proper planning and guidance, providing a structured setup process that made it easier to configure core components and connect data sources.
What do you dislike about the product?
IBM watsonx.data is a strong and scalable platform overall. Some advanced features may require initial familiarity to fully utilize, so a bit of onboarding or guidance can be helpful. Additionally, having more simplified out-of-the-box configurations for certain use cases could further enhance ease of use. Overall, these are minor areas, and the platform continues to evolve with improvements that enhance usability and performance.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use IBM watsonx.data to unify and manage large volumes of data across systems without needing to move it, reducing silos and improving efficiency. It supports data-driven decision-making and analytics, enabling AI applications with scalable, reliable data.
Streamlines Data Management with Robust Features
What do you like best about the product?
I like how IBM watsonx.data simplifies the process of working with distributed data, allowing me to query it in a unified way and making my workflow much smoother. I really appreciate the performance aspect, as handling large datasets feels much faster and more efficient compared to traditional data warehouse setups I've used before. The flexibility is another benefit; it works well with different data formats and integrates nicely with existing tools, so I didn't have to completely change my workflow. I find the query engine based on Presto/Trino very helpful because I can run SQL directly on data sitting in different sources without moving it first. The data virtualization capability is quite useful for creating a unified view across multiple datasets, and the open table format support, like Iceberg, is a big plus for managing large datasets reliably. The governance features also stand out, as they make managing access controls and ensuring proper data usage straightforward. Overall, these features reduce a lot of manual effort and let me focus more on building useful data models and insights rather than handling infrastructure.
What do you dislike about the product?
It's solid overall, but there are a few areas that could definitely be better. One challenge is the initial learning curve. If you're new to the ecosystem, it takes some time to understand how everything fits together, especially with concepts like data virtualization and open table formats. Performance is generally good, but for very complex queries or heavily concurrent workloads, it can sometimes need extra tuning to get the best results. It’s not always “plug and play” in those scenarios. The UI and overall user experience could also be more intuitive. Some workflows feel a bit clunky, and finding certain settings or configurations isn’t always straightforward. Integration is good, but not always seamless with every external tool—sometimes you need additional setup or workarounds depending on your stack. Lastly, documentation is decent but could be more practical and example-driven. Having more real-world use cases and clearer guides would make onboarding much smoother.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use IBM watsonx.data to centralize scattered data for easy access and analytics, saving time on data prep and improving performance for large datasets. It simplifies governance and control, letting me focus more on analysis rather than data wrangling.
Powerful Platform with Complex Setup
What do you like best about the product?
I use IBM watsonx.data primarily because of its ability to provide a unified access layer to data across multiple sources without the need for heavy data movement. I like the flexibility it offers with multiple query engines, which optimizes both performance and cost for different workloads. The data virtualization feature is valuable as it allows me to access data across different sources without moving it, saving time and reducing duplication. I also find the governance and metadata management features important as they provide better control, data lineage, and trust in the data used for analytics and AI.
What do you dislike about the product?
Some areas of IBM watsonx.data could definitely be improved. The initial setup and configuration can be a bit complex, especially when integrating multiple data sources and engines. Also, performance tuning and troubleshooting can sometimes require deeper expertise, and the UI/UX isn’t always very intuitive, which makes it slightly harder for new users to get comfortable quickly. The main challenge during setup was the complexity of integrating multiple data sources and query engines— it often requires a lot of manual configuration, handling credentials, and understanding how different components interact. Getting everything (like storage, compute engines, and access policies) aligned correctly can take time, especially without clear step-by-step guidance.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use IBM watsonx.data to eliminate data silos, enabling unified data access across sources without heavy data movement. It enhances performance and governance, making it easier to prepare reliable, analytics-ready data for BI and AI use cases.
Robust Data Security with a Learning Curve
What do you like best about the product?
I use IBM watsonx.data as a central data platform, which is great for storing, accessing, and analyzing data, especially in data engineering and AI-related tasks. I find the built-in governance and security features very helpful; they give me confidence that the data is well-managed and secure. The access control feature is particularly useful as it allows me to decide who can view or modify specific data, reducing the risk of data misuse. I also appreciate the data lineage and tracking capabilities, as they help me understand where the data is coming from and how it is being transformed—this is very useful when debugging issues or validating data for reports. Furthermore, the data quality and governance policies ensure that the data I use is reliable and consistent across different datasets, which is crucial for analytics and decision-making.
What do you dislike about the product?
IBM watsonx.data is powerful, but it has a learning curve, and the initial setup can be complex. It would also benefit from better documentation, a more intuitive UI, and simpler performance tuning.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use IBM watsonx.data to solve data silos, cost, performance, and complexity issues, streamlining data engineering and analytics.
Powerful Analytics, Steep Learning Curve
What do you like best about the product?
I like IBM watsonx.data for its ability to analyze a large scale of data and unify data from multiple sources into a single platform. It's flexible, scalable, and works well for both analytics and AI use cases. The fast delivery of queries and overall performance are impressive. It saves me time by avoiding the need to manage separate systems, making everything accessible in one place. This efficiency helps me get insights quickly.
What do you dislike about the product?
The initial setup of IBM watsonx.data was not very easy. I had to go through a lot of documentation, and setting up was moderately complex. It required some time to understand the architecture and configurations, especially during integrations. The initial learning curve is high, and it feels a bit complex initially.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use IBM watsonx.data to manage and analyze large datasets, unify data from multiple sources, support analytics and AI insights, and improve workflow efficiency with fast query performance.
showing 1 - 10