The main use case for Kore.ai was building a chatbot for one of our insurance clients who required a chatbot to allow agents to directly ask about documents uploaded for verification. The chatbot checks if documents exist at a particular link that contains the personal documents of clients and then sends the status back to users or agents. If the document is present, agents may request to read it and check if certain conditions are fulfilled in the document. This is essentially a document validation agent created using Kore.ai as the front end, coupled with Teams channels for the agents.

Kore.ai helped our team specifically in building the document validation chatbot by serving as the front end of the entire development. Using Kore.ai, we connected with the Teams channel and leveraged features such as API connections and API calls to easily retrieve the status of documents.

The best features Kore.ai offers include a very user-friendly interface, making it easy for agents who are not comfortable with technology to navigate it. This is the main aspect I would highlight.

The user interface of Kore.ai is so user-friendly because it is a no-code platform that provides drag-and-drop tools for building chatbots or agents without needing to write code. Kore.ai also offers excellent connectors with different services, and in our case, we built a microservice that was called directly from Kore.ai through API calls. Additionally, it offers popular application integrations such as SAP, ServiceNow, and Salesforce. These features have significantly improved the customer experience and made it scalable enough to manage millions of interactions, which suits large enterprises.

Kore.ai has positively impacted our organization by reducing error rates from around fifteen to twenty percent to just two to three percent after implementation. This significant reduction in errors means that fraud detection is not negatively impacted. It has also helped reduce the time agents spend on document validation, thereby increasing efficiency and accuracy. These are the main two metrics that have contributed to our success.

In terms of time saved, the accuracy has dramatically increased, with error rates decreasing from fifteen to twenty percent down to two to three percent. We have saved almost two hours of daily work per agent. With more than twenty agents working on this document validation task, we are saving a total of around forty hours per day.

To improve Kore.ai, I suggest focusing on more agentic automation, such as offering MCP kind of features with an orchestration layer for use cases. This would allow us to implement business logic in the orchestration layer. With the ability to build our own MCP servers and plug-and-play with the MCP client, we could have more scalable options for deploying multiple agents on one platform, enabling them to work simultaneously across different use cases.

I have been using Kore.ai for around eight or more months in my previous company, where I worked on a proof of concept for that particular engagement.

Kore.ai is stable.

Kore.ai's scalability is good, and it is indeed scalable.

The customer support for Kore.ai is really good.

Before Kore.ai, we used InteliX, which was one of the vendor products we explored but switched to Kore.ai due to its superior connectors and more affordable licensing compared to InteliX. Additionally, the user experience in Kore.ai is much more user-friendly, unlike the complex user interface of InteliX.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been good. Although I was not directly involved in the pricing discussions, the setup costs and licensing were straightforward, and we received excellent support from the Kore.ai product team. Their training sessions were effective, and we also achieved certifications through mini-projects alongside the training, making the transition and onboarding process quite smooth.

We have seen a return on investment, particularly in full-time equivalent count saved.

We did not evaluate any other options besides InteliX, but we also tried Copilot. Unfortunately, Copilot did not deliver good accuracy during the proof of concept, and its licensing costs were higher than those of Kore.ai, which is why we ultimately chose Kore.ai.

Kore.ai has impressive features, such as effective connectors and a very good user interface. It is a no-code platform where drag-and-drop functionality is sufficient to build logic without needing to write code. It is easy to deploy agents and much more scalable than other tools I have explored so far.

My advice for others considering Kore.ai is that it is really easy to use for beginners. People will quickly learn how to use it and deploy their own use cases. Kore.ai is a good product, and I would rate it an eight out of ten.

I have been using Kore.ai for several months for certification purposes.

My main use case for Kore.ai is a chatbot that I use for customers in the informatics area.

I do not use any other tasks or features in my chatbot beyond this primary use case.

The best features Kore.ai offers are that everything is centralized in an online platform and it is easy to use to build a production-ready chatbot.

The platform is easy to use because everything is very direct for implementation and all is on one page, which means it does not require extensive technical knowledge.

Kore.ai has positively impacted my organization. Although we did not use it for many use cases, we used it for one use case where I noticed significant improvements. It saved a lot of time in implementation. The proof of concept was very fast to implement and easy to develop.

I do not see any need for improvement in Kore.ai, as I found no challenges or missing features.

However, there could be more documentation in the latest versioning of the platform. I found that the previous documentation was outdated.

I have been working in my current field for four years.

In my experience, Kore.ai is not stable.

I do not know about Kore.ai's scalability and whether it has met my needs as my project grows or changes.

I did not communicate with Kore.ai customer support, so I have no experience to share.

Before Kore.ai, I used Microsoft, and I did not switch to Kore.ai. However, we also tested Kore.ai because it offered many tools ready to test.

I encountered some minor problems in the setup for the proof of concept, but nothing significant.

My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

I have seen a return on investment from using Kore.ai, as it saved time for the implementation project.

I did not get access to pricing, setup cost, and licensing information because my organization handled that for me in my previous work.

Before choosing Kore.ai, we also tested Amazon AWS, but it was not very effective.

I do not want to add anything else about the features, including integrations or analytics, as there is nothing else that stands out.

My advice to others looking into using Kore.ai is that they can try it because it can be the solution. I would rate this product a 7 out of 10.

Our main use case for Kore.ai is developing four chatbots which are used to serve customers relating to various tax products. We had different tax products in our organization, and our purpose was to provide customers with FAQ answers, obtain their bank details, retrieve their other product details, assist if they would like to order something, connect them to an agent, and answer any kind of query that they have regarding their products or anything tax-related.

One of the main chatbots I built for a co-system tax product allows users to come in and filter based on which product they are using. They can get information about their locators. If they have filed a tax and received some kind of rejection, they can get their information on that. We also had different kinds of forms which the user could fill and submit their information to the back-end team to act on it. Apart from that, they could also connect to a live agent to get any queries sorted which were not handled through the chat agent. We also had a case creation feature that creates a case at the back-end for someone in our team to look into.

Kore.ai has positively impacted my organization by being a big money saver because before having our chatbot, the use case was that every time some of our customers needed help, they used to call a number. During tax season, the wait time on that number would go up to one or two hours, which cost our company a lot of money. Integrating these chatbots helped reduce that wait time significantly. Mostly, people can chat instead of calling, or they don't even need a person to solve their basic queries, which the chatbot can handle. It reduced the calls made to our agents by 50 to 60 percent. That was evident as our team, which started with three or four people for one bot, expanded to around five to six bots, and a lot of new people joined. We received a lot of extra funding to create agents for all the other products and teams we support.

Some of the best features in Kore.ai include that it is a low-code, no-code tool. I have seen a lot of low-code tools that don't give anyone any room to work with if they have a custom use case or something they don't support. Kore.ai is different in that way; even though it is a low-code platform, we can still write our code if we want and override whatever they are trying to do, in case it is ever needed. Apart from that, their Web SDK and BotKit support is very good, as they have all the functionalities, packages, and everything up to date and available for us to use. Also, they have a lot of in-built integrations for live agent connections. So if you want to connect with Salesforce, Genesys, Live Help Now, Telephony, or any of these kinds of back-end services, including ServiceNow, they just have an integration built-in, so you do not need to write it from scratch. But apart from that, they also give the ability to write it from scratch through a custom BotKit if you don't want to go with their features or if something is missing.

Regarding how Kore.ai can be improved, I think agentic AI is booming. Instead of us designing the whole conversation, which feels kind of boring and repetitive, they could move into a different kind of approach where we could write a prompt, and it should create a conversation based on that, in the way that Microsoft Copilot Studio does. So they should move a little more towards the agentic AI approach and start working on and integrating different prompts so we do not need to design conversations. Nowadays, people are used to talking with ChatGPT, which facilitates a human way of conversation, just back and forth. People are not used to seeing a lot of menu buttons, icons, or lists to select things from. Kore.ai does a little bit of that using the agentic nodes and other features they have added, but they should move further in that direction.

The documentation for Kore.ai often poses a challenge because many times when we had issues, we couldn't find anything in the documentation. We either needed to figure it out ourselves through trial and error, or we raised a support ticket. Some of the engineers came and told us that we could do something to solve our problem. It took them two minutes to tell us, but when we asked if there was documentation for this, they mentioned there wasn't. They just knew it because it is some kind of internal knowledge. So if they improve their documentation, it will be beneficial for everyone, as we will not have to raise tickets for any issues.

I have been using Kore.ai for the last four and a half years.

Kore.ai is pretty scalable because when we started, we just had one bot. However, as we expanded to multiple bots with different kinds of BotKits and Web SDKs, we didn't face any issues with scalability. We also have many lower-end bots, so scalability has never been a problem.

Customer support is okay, I guess. We get what we want from them whenever there is an issue or something. But sometimes when we had issues, it was delayed a lot. We had to reach out to their support team, and while they tried to suggest solutions, they didn't always work. Eventually, after a few calls, they involved some engineers who could actually fix our issues. Sometimes it was bad, but I can say around 60 to 70 percent of the time, it was good. We got the support we needed.

I didn't have a previous solution because we have been on Kore.ai from the start.

I have seen a return on investment with Kore.ai, as it definitely has saved time. We previously only had a helpline where one agent could only attend to one customer at a time. But now, because it is chat, one agent can handle up to three or four chat sessions at the same time for different employees. That is certainly an improvement. Additionally, our chatbot solves a lot of users' problems on its own, meaning it doesn't even necessitate a live agent or person sometimes. This represents a direct time saving for agents to focus on more complex issues.

Before choosing Kore.ai, I know they evaluated other options, but that happened before I joined the team, so I was not part of those conversations. I know they considered Google's solution, which I forgot the name of, and also Yellow.ai and Google Dialogflow, but ultimately they went with Kore.ai.

One of the unique or unexpected things regarding our main use case for Kore.ai is that I have seen a lot of our teams just use the basic default template that they have. But because our company had a design system, we had to rewrite the whole Web SDK code and design it according to ourselves.

Apart from that, we also had to make a lot of changes in the back end to support a live agent because our live agent handles up to 20,000 to 30,000 users on a daily basis. We had to increase capacity and ensure everything was worthwhile so it did not fail while users are currently there, especially during the tax season.

My basic advice for others considering Kore.ai is that they are adding a lot of new features. They have integrated agentic nodes, switched to the XO 11 platform, and introduced GenAI features. It is beneficial to look into these developments and keep up with whatever is happening. Don't get stuck in old ways of making bots. They are introducing a lot of new features; some are good, some are not, but eventually, everyone should try those features and move towards the new agentic platform. I would rate this solution a 7 out of 10.

We created a chatbot using Kore.ai that integrates the AI services it allows. For the travel insurance system, I created a chatbot where we read insurance policies using our AI system that we integrated into it, or we recommend insurance options. This serves as a user interface where people can type their questions to the chatbot, such as their age, income, or the type of insurance they want, including travel, car, or health insurance. The main focus we explored was reading insurance policies and providing AI suggestions on what users can do with these insurance policies. It simplifies how people read insurance policies by allowing them to upload it to our chatbot, and Kore.ai processes it in such a way that it prompts questions such as "Give me a question that would define how much money you can get from your insurance when you get into an accident or about life insurance." It tells users which part of the document pertains to how much they can receive and other factors. Users can also summarize the document as a whole, including the provider, details, and other specialized features that Kore.ai offers for insurance options.

Kore.ai positively impacted our organization through integration with Power BI for reporting, such as user numbers and automation. We observed how it integrated with our data analyst side, allowing us to automate reports. Kore.ai's main benefit was identifying the chatbot's potential to integrate into our processes and help us land more projects in the future. Although our industry has not extensively adopted it yet, it provided a clear pitch of how it could enhance operations, helping users navigate without relying on outdated documentation, providing summaries, and interactive queries.

Kore.ai was straightforward once we got to know it. Since it was new technology for us at the time, it took some learning because our team of four did not have any experience initially with Kore.ai. We only had experience with Microsoft Copilot chatbot or something similar. The first time we experienced this, it was great because the interface was drag and drop, and we could review the documentation. There was a learning curve, but it took us about a week to get started, and then we proceeded to create systems that read insurance policies using Kore.ai's AI system. By the second week, we were also recommending to our customers how they would approach their existing or non-existing insurance policies. Kore.ai helped us integrate a lot through documentation and trial and error, making it straightforward to integrate overall, resulting in a very good experience for first-timers.

Something that stood out to me was Kore.ai helping us integrate many other applications. The bot builder showed a similar feature with API integrations, proving we are not limited to interacting solely within the application. We can use API calls during development, integrating our API with OpenAI ChatGPT LLM. For example, we utilized a post request to send data to Power BI and sent emails to test the user experience for the chatbot's logs. There is much we can do with API definitions, allowing us to define several APIs that process information for us. I enjoy developing with Kore.ai because it enables integration with many tools.

We did extra investigation on Kore.ai's bot builder. One standout feature includes digital forms, digital views, and the task definition. We created around six tasks, including reading the document itself, which is straightforward. The dialogue tasks can be called from the APIs from the bot's interface. We refined tasks such as recommending travel insurance by diving into them with an intuitive drag and drop interface that provides excellent visibility into the flow. We also tried knowledge AI, which is beneficial for answering user queries although it was not the main focus of our project. We leveraged many features of Kore.ai, including natural language processing, and even though we ended up using an external API, it has good integration potential, especially with generative AI and LLMs facilitating various integrations.

Another feature I found valuable was the deployment channels we used, such as the web client. We integrated it directly into a website, which was significant help. We plugged in the URL and HTML code, managing domain access through whitelisting. It worked exceptionally well, and I was impressed by how easy it was to integrate the chatbot into our services. I have high expectations if we integrate it into platforms such as Telegram or Instagram, and I genuinely enjoyed setting up the web and mobile client.

I see opportunities for improvement, especially regarding integrations. It is positive that there are many channels, including Facebook Messenger and enterprise platforms such as Zoom or Slack, yet I think more could be done in chatbot deployment integrations. I am looking for further advancements between generative AI structures, allowing different LLMs to be utilized, and enhancing the intuitive interface. I believe an interface showing a sub-workflow could be valuable, as cluttered screens may hinder usability in complex industry flows, allowing a dialogue within a dialogue feature.

Regarding documentation, I believe it is sufficient, although there is space to improve the interface's appearance. Kore.ai's bot builder presents a vast white screen with build and deploy options, while the cluttered sidebar can be overwhelming upon expansion. Enhancements in presenting facts and utilizing white space would significantly improve user navigation.

The two points I deduct relate to the integrations, which were not as extensive as I initially expected. However, integrating using API calls in the bot builder is positive, and there is a need for better compatibility with other integrations. For instance, the knowledge base limits the capability if using an external LLM or vector database. While there is a small talk feature, it feels more gimmicky, focusing on predetermined responses rather than providing genuine chatbot interaction.

I have been using Kore.ai for only a few months at our organization. This was a feasibility project in which we were supposed to deploy our product. Our project at that time was a travel insurance system, and we had been developing the system for about half a year. We showed our product for evaluation to stakeholders.

Kore.ai shows impressive uptime, and we have not encountered any downtime during development. All four of us can access the development environment without issues, contributing to an overall great experience.

This is not a robust part of our production systems yet, but during our trials, we operate on the public cloud. We presented our proof of concept to stakeholders to demonstrate its potential. They are now discussing how to transition it to a private setup, but I am not privy to those details.

We have not reached out to customer support since we have not experienced any problems, which indicates good reliability.

Before choosing Kore.ai, we used Microsoft Copilot's chatbot, a virtual agent, among other options such as Azure AI Studio, as we have Microsoft integrations. We wanted to explore Kore.ai due to its intuitive use, clean interface, and great integration potential. After presenting Kore.ai, our higher-ups were pleased and are exploring integration, as we faced few issues with Microsoft's Copilot agents, but their lack of AI-interactive responses did not meet our needs, making Kore.ai a significant upgrade.

Kore.ai's bot builder is hosted on its own self-service SaaS platform. It is not dependent on any public cloud provider; we navigate inside the bot builder and deploy using their software, which handles all user interface matters. To deploy the bot on the web client, we went directly to the Deploy tab, configured our whitelisting for the website, and it functioned perfectly without needing to privatize our infrastructure.

This setup is not currently part of our production, so I can only relay feedback from our higher-ups regarding Kore.ai's potential to replace Microsoft's agents. They are looking into integration possibilities, so while I do not have specific numbers, the general sentiment is positive, suggesting substantial future investment.

My advice for potential Kore.ai users is to thoroughly read the documentation and follow tutorials while exploring the environment. It is an excellent tool for integrating chatbots into systems and has an intuitive interface that is easy to navigate, boasting high potential for usage in larger companies. I would rate this product an eight out of ten.

I used Kore.ai to make dashboards, widget creation, and I tagged some columns. I wanted to create dashboards to get all the details for policy, specifically to understand who are the legacy policy users and who are the Guidewire policy users.

The widget in our system was for the policy product. In that product, users were not able to see on a page how many users logged in today, whether a legacy person or Guidewire user logged in, or what changes or modifications they made. I created dashboard widgets so that legacy users and Guidewire users could track the changes they made in their policies.

I used Kore.ai for this purpose. Before that, I migrated from Kore.ai 10 to 11. I trained the model by adding utterances as training data and achieved almost 97% accuracy. After that, I started working on widget creation.

The best feature I have worked on is widget creation. I went through the entire chatbot workflow to create it, so I have a good understanding of that part. I appreciate the process of adding tags and fetching data by creating a dashboard.

For the admin side, they will get an audit that shows who logged in—legacy or Guidewire users—and what modifications they made. This helps them by seeing that dashboard rather than viewing each policy individually.

It impacted my organization by helping us move into being AI-native. Our organization is proving themselves that they are AI-native, and it helped a lot to show other clients that we have worked in AI.

I have worked only for six months on Kore.ai. While working on it, I haven't seen any area that needs improvement because I need to explore more in voice chat. I don't think there may be any improvement needed for that part as of my knowledge.

I want to work on voice AI chat, but I have not yet been involved in that. For that project, I was working on widget creation, training the model, and migrating from Kore.ai 10 to 11. Then I moved to a different project, so I couldn't explore that. This is a regret for me. In the future, if I get an opportunity with Kore.ai, I will definitely work on voice AI chat.

I have used Kore.ai for six months.

Kore.ai is stable.

Kore.ai is a scalable product. I think they can add more features, but right now I'm unable to recall something specific for improvement. Definitely, it's a scalable product.

The customer support was good. We connected two or three times and received full support from the customer support team.

I haven't switched to any other solution. I got Kore.ai first and worked on that only. It is a good product.

It is definitely a money saver and time saver.

I haven't evaluated other tools. Kore.ai was the first one, so our organization went with it.

For the process of adding tags and fetching data for dashboards on the admin side, admins will get an audit that shows who logged in—legacy or Guidewire users—and what modifications they made. This will help them by seeing that dashboard rather than viewing each policy individually.

I give a nine for the customer support. I will recommend Kore.ai to others. If anyone is looking for tools similar to Kore.ai, I will definitely recommend it. I will recommend it to someone if they are having issues or problems with other tools. I definitely want to explore more of this product. I gave this review a rating of seven.

My main use case for Kore.ai was creating an outbound calling generative AI-powered chatbot, which is useful for insurance and healthcare companies.

Kore.ai is a low-code platform, and you do not necessarily have to be an expert in artificial intelligence or generative AI to use this platform. However, if you have that experience, it will be a valuable add-on. The main advantage is that it has almost every kind of plugin available to use, whether for live agents or if you want to use it as a call center. You have real-time capabilities and the most useful plugins available, with almost every kind of model available with configurations. We can configure the ML models and train them. The platform is very user-friendly with explanatory features and a great UI.

One significant feature is the live testing platform with Kore.ai. When you are creating a workflow, you have an interactive, real-time testing platform that reflects every change you make. This makes it easy to debug errors or add new features. Additionally, Kore.ai has many different tools and platforms that cater to different needs, whether for a call center, normal workflow, or machine learning workflow, which is really useful.

Because of Kore.ai, it was much easier than creating something manually. A low-code platform always helps, and when that platform has this much capability, it provides far more value than manual development. It was particularly helpful for our team that we could create a POC and get that project into production. Kore.ai helped our team build a generative AI outbound calling chatbot, and it truly helped our customers.

If you have a hospital with a thousand employees in a call center, you might consider outsourcing. However, with Kore.ai's outbound calling capabilities, you can eliminate the outsourcing part. You do not need a thousand call center employees. You can accomplish this through automation with just one or two employees if people need to switch to agents. This represented a significant cost reduction.

Kore.ai can be improved by enhancing their documentation, which is currently a bit disorganized. They should include detailed videos or workshops. There are not many videos or community resources available, so adding more would be beneficial.

Integrations with real-time models with Kore.ai would be great. Advanced models like Claude or Anthropic models would be valuable additions.

Regarding the rating of 8 instead of 10, the missing comprehensive documentation, tutorial videos, workshops, and community services are factors that reduced the score. Additionally, the unavailability of real-time advanced models from Anthropic or Grok also contributed to deducting one point.

I have been using Kore.ai for nearly one and a half years.

Kore.ai's scalability is pretty much scalable both vertically and horizontally.

The customer support is top-notch, and they respond promptly. I have been in direct contact with the team, and they typically reply with respect.

We used different solutions, including manual calling.

For my project or workflow, I collaborated directly with the Kore.ai team. It was an intra-team project, and it was really useful that their UI was very well-designed so that you do not necessarily have to go to the documentation to find anything. You can look at the name of the icons and understand what they do. For my workflow, I had to connect this with a live call center system. There were plugins that helped me dial and call real customers. The plugins available were really good and useful.

As I mentioned, if you have a call center for 1,000 people, you can reduce that to two.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is comparatively lower than other companies and tools available.

We evaluated other options like Emma and Elsa, as well as other platforms, Python-based automations, and n8n-based automations.

Really refine your use case, gather your requirements, and talk with the team to confirm if that is something possible before proceeding. I rated this solution an 8 out of 10.

My main use case for Kore.ai is to design chatbots for customers in the aviation domain.

I have developed one chatbot where we take reviews from customers, specifically customer satisfaction reviews from the airlines domain. Customers use our airlines and we measure the satisfaction rate from our services. We have developed the chatbot to review customer feedback.

I have used Kore.ai in multiple ways. I have developed a chatbot designed for HR, allowing HR to provide all information related to company policies and company information. Employees can ask about leave and company policies. New users can also get information about the company. We have developed an HR chatbot.

Kore.ai offers multiple support and services, including API integration, webhook integration, and multiple channels. These features allow you to integrate and use them very easily, and the documentation provided is excellent so you can reference it.

The most valuable features in my day-to-day work are API integration and channel integration. I have mostly used the web channels.

Kore.ai has impacted my organization positively by providing substantial support related to design and implementation. You can build your own logic and implement it using languages, such as Node. It provides a positive approach where you can design and implement your requirements.

Since using Kore.ai, I have seen multiple improvements. I have used multiple platforms, including LivePerson and LUIS, and Kore.ai provides considerable support for implementation. You can design your own layout very easily, integrate that, and easily integrate with multiple channels and webhooks. It is easy to deploy, and it can track any errors that occur, making it a good way to start with and easy to learn.

I have already seen Kore.ai implement the LLM, and I think there could be improvements with a few cloning properties. For example, if we can integrate with multiple channels, I suggest the ability to use cloning properties in scenarios involving a customer satisfaction chatbot where, based on the requirement and multilingual abilities, we can use human-behavior characteristics where a human can pause and talk.

I choose 7.5 out of 10 for Kore.ai because a few things already need to be improved, one of which I have mentioned. Kore.ai is continually improving their product day by day, but a few things are still missing, particularly related to performance speed.

I have been working in my current field for almost four or more years.

I do not find anything challenging with Kore.ai, as I am mostly using the straightforward approach to implement my own requirements and address problems. Therefore, I do not require any add-on features.

In terms of integration with existing systems or third-party tools, I have faced challenges a few times, but mostly I have used straightforward methods to integrate channels easily. My role is basically to integrate multiple channels very easily, as Kore.ai provides most channels in their own marketplace and categories.

I have a direct relationship with Kore.ai team and we have a direct connection with them, not through any marketplace.

Since using Kore.ai, I have seen multiple improvements. I have used multiple platforms, including LivePerson and LUIS, and Kore.ai provides considerable support for implementation. You can design your own layout very easily, integrate that, and easily integrate with multiple channels and webhooks. It is easy to deploy, and it can track any errors that occur, making it a good way to start with and easy to learn.

New users can easily get started with Kore.ai by using it from the marketplace, as there are multiple marketplace applications that we have already designed and implemented.

I am a partner with Kore.ai, as my company has a business relationship with this vendor beyond just being a customer.

Kore.ai is deployed in my organization as a private cloud, and we can use it for our own employees.

I have designed, implemented, and developed 25 or more chatbots on it, and one of my chatbots is also placed on the marketplace in Kore.ai. I am also receiving compensation from Kore.ai, so I view everything positively.

Since using Kore.ai, I have seen multiple improvements. I have used multiple platforms, including LivePerson and LUIS, and Kore.ai provides considerable support for implementation.

I would advise that Kore.ai is very useful for developing and designing chatbots for any related field, as things automate very easily using the channel integration and API calling.

I find the documentation and resources provided by Kore.ai to be very useful. I have used them extensively, and they are very helpful, with proper examples and good clarification.

I receive updates or new features from Kore.ai in my email since we have connected with Kore.ai directly. Each time, I receive an email, and I go to my platform to update it there.

The community support or user forums for Kore.ai are very useful. Sometimes, when I face an issue, I go to the forum to ask a question, and they answer very easily and respond in a short timeframe.

I rate this review a 7.5 out of 10.