My main use case for OneLogin revolves around application integration and user authentication. I primarily utilize it to implement Single Sign-On across internal and external applications, which significantly simplifies the login process for users.

I use OneLogin for Single Sign-On with an internal project management tool that our team uses alongside a customer relationship management CRM system. Before integrating OneLogin, users had to remember separate login credentials for each application, which was a hassle and often led to frustration. The process has become much smoother with login pages, authentication, and access granted.

The best features OneLogin offers are Single Sign-On, multiple Multi-Factor Authentication, and user provisioning.

Multi-Factor Authentication is generally useful for adding an extra layer of security, which is crucial, especially for the sensitive nature of the data we handle.

OneLogin has had several positive impacts on my organization in several key areas. Single Sign-On and Multi-Factor Authentication have been beneficial. Additionally, the user authentication has been improved remarkably. Before OneLogin, our team was burdened with managing multiple credentials, but now it is much more efficient.

Since implementing OneLogin, I have been seeing a significant reduction in login-related support tickets, approximately a 30% decrease.

I do utilize Smart Factor Authentication with OneLogin. I find it to be a really valuable feature for balancing security and usability.

OneLogin can add more analytics and reporting and integrate with more third-party applications.

I have been working in my current field for a year.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin is a good scalable product.

Until now, it is great. I have not used their customer support.

The initial setup was not that difficult. I have used it, and while it was a bit tricky for some time, it was manageable.

The setup was good and easy. I am still using the free trial, but I will be purchasing it.

Other organizations can use OneLogin, but they can also refer to Okta. I have not used Okta until now, but I am hearing that it is more great than OneLogin.

I am still using OneLogin, so I am still exploring the app and need some more time.

The experience has been smooth and quite positive. My review rating for OneLogin is 8.5 out of 10.

When we have multiple environments for our customers, OneLogin by One Identity helps us create policies based on device, network, and role. For example, when an engineer wants to access the Azure portal via SAML SSO, we provide access according to their role. When they need VPN access via RADIUS or LDAP, we grant access based on network requirements.

The multi-factor authentication feature has helped our company, which is an IT service provider, secure admin and privileged accounts. When our technicians access client systems remotely, we need to provide them with secure and privileged account access. It has improved our compliance by allowing us to meet client requirements for MFA on all sensitive systems, providing safe login from any location or device.

Another feature that we find interesting is the audit logs and reporting, which has helped us track who, where, and how users logged into the system.

Using OneLogin by One Identity has positively impacted our organization. We are able to comply with client compliance requirements and have managed to reduce takeover time risk. Even if a password is stolen, an attacker cannot log in without second-factor authentication, making it more secure.

Since we started using OneLogin by One Identity, we have noticed a decrease in security events, stolen passwords, and non-compliance adherence issues.

It should also include device posture checks and provide risk scoring.

We decided to switch from Okta to OneLogin by One Identity because Okta required heavy on-premises maintenance and frequent patching and had limited MFA options. We could not create adaptive policies, which was the main reason for our switch. OneLogin provides cloud-native SSO, automated provisioning, stronger MFA, and easier multi-tenant management, making it more efficient for an IT-based service company like ours.

Regarding pricing, I do not know much, but I have heard from our sales team that the licensing for OneLogin by One Identity is moderate compared to other vendors.

My advice to others looking into using OneLogin by One Identity is that they should proceed with it. It is cost-efficient and provides more features for the cost compared to other vendors available in the market. It reduces our time to go live, and we have not made any changes to our existing network. OneLogin's heterogeneous support for various security vendors is excellent, and we can reduce our IT support security tickets. I would advise peers planning to purchase this solution to proceed without hesitation. I would rate this product an eight out of ten.

My main use case for OneLogin by One Identity involves single sign-on, multifactor authorization, and role-based access.

For example, we have an email platform called DID Mail where we use single sign-on from OneLogin by One Identity to authenticate our users and use that same authentication on our different platforms such as virtual info and different mail platforms.

The important thing we use about OneLogin by One Identity is role-based access, where our employees sign up and can see a different interface on the same platform according to their roles.

In my opinion, the best feature OneLogin by One Identity offers is the single sign-on feature, which works seamlessly while integrating with any languages, allowing our developers to integrate with most of our platforms easily.

Security is a good aspect of OneLogin by One Identity, and our user experience is also good and mostly positive.

OneLogin by One Identity has positively impacted our organization by improving our user experience. The user experience has improved as it has saved us time, especially because the session-based login is beneficial. A user logs in for the first time and does not have to log in every single time.

OneLogin by One Identity can be improved by implementing good user interfaces or different kinds of user interfaces, which might help our users navigate much faster.

They can mainly improve their support, as they have a high response time. Decreasing it would be beneficial.

I have been using OneLogin by One Identity for about five to eight months.

OneLogin by One Identity is mostly stable.

OneLogin by One Identity's scalability is mainly automatic, so we do not have to do much. We just contact the vendor to inform them about our number of users if it increases drastically.

Our developers typically handle the integration process with the help of the support team, which is very fast and they get assistance whenever they face challenges.

Customer support is fast, but they sometimes have a high response time, such as five to ten hours, which can be problematic.

Previously, I used CyberArk Identity, and we switched because of the pricing. The main reason for switching was the pricing and the complexity of their admin user interface.

We have seen a return on investment as we have saved a lot of money, approximately ten to twelve percent, compared to our earlier use of a different identity platform such as CyberArk, which was costly.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is good, but it sometimes gets expensive when the number of users increases.

Before choosing OneLogin by One Identity, we evaluated other options including Okta and different platforms, but we found that OneLogin by One Identity is overall better than Okta.

My advice to others looking into using OneLogin by One Identity is that if you need better security, user interface, and a faster user experience, it is the way to go, although the support system lacks at times.

They can improve their support and reduce the price. I would rate this product an eight out of ten.

Our goal was to eliminate our on-site Active Directory and legacy Windows infrastructure since we operate solely on Macs. We considered two options: one that precisely aligned with our needs, and another that functioned more like a public solution. Ultimately, I chose OneLogin due to its enterprise-grade features and the professionalism of its representatives. It provided a seamless transition to the cloud, consolidating all our access needs onto a single platform.

Since implementing OneLogin, managing user accounts has become significantly streamlined. We no longer need to create and delete four separate accounts for each new user – a major advantage for an international school like ours, where student and staff turnover can be dramatic. In August, we might see 50 new students, while 30 may leave in October. Managing individual accounts across every platform was time-consuming, hindering our ability to improve workflows and automate processes. OneLogin simplifies this task, making user management faster, easier, and significantly more productive.

Many users forget their passwords, especially after an extended break like a three-day weekend. This leads to frequent password resets in less tech-savvy organizations. To simplify this process, we rely on OneLogin. With a single password reset, users can regain access to all their applications, making it significantly easier for them. Initially, there was some resistance from IT staff, but the convenience of one password won them over. Now, with macOS's desktop Single Sign-On, we're leveraging OneLogin even further. We use it to authenticate users to the radio server, lab machines, and shared workstations, and the upcoming Mac desktop SSO will streamline direct logins to individual Macs as well.

OneLogin provides a single pane of glass for most of our needs. It functions like a dashboard, giving me all the key metrics I need to see, such as the number of logins attempted and the number of failures. This allows me to quickly identify trends, like increased failures during holidays, and understand the reason behind them. Additionally, OneLogin offers the potential to integrate more frequently used apps and generate valuable reports. While it doesn't provide complete visibility due to the inherent privacy features of Macs, it covers the majority of our login activity. For deeper insights and troubleshooting Mac-specific login issues, I do need to utilize the Mac management tools directly.

The single pane of access management facilitates collaboration between IT and security, even when, as in my case, those roles are combined. The granular control allows us to tailor user access to the system's functionalities based on the specific needs and workloads of both IT and security personnel, enabling the creation of different user groups with varying levels of access.

OneLogin has saved us a tremendous amount of time, especially in account management. Creating and deleting accounts no longer eats up half my day. I used to spend countless hours on the phone and manually handling these tasks, but now it's a breeze. The workload has drastically reduced, and the process is incredibly streamlined. I simply create a user, and everything else takes care of itself automatically, from licensing to configuration. It's that simple!

During the COVID pandemic, we had a surge in remote workers. Provisioning accounts for essential tools like Teams became cumbersome. To streamline the process, we started to implement automation for Office 365 through OneLogin. This automatically created accounts in Azure, eliminating the need for manual account creation. Onboarding new users into various applications became quick and efficient. Instead of assigning licenses individually, a single organizational setup granted licenses to all 650 users instantly. This streamlined approach saved us considerable time and effort.

As a non-profit organization, our focus isn't on generating or saving money for ourselves. However, in terms of regular expenditures, including capital expenditures, we've seen significant cost reductions since switching to OneLogin. This is primarily due to eliminating our former Windows infrastructure, including legacy servers and associated maintenance requirements. We no longer need to hold spare parts on-site or staff a large IT department to manage and operate these systems. Overall, OneLogin has contributed to substantial year-over-year savings within our budget.

OneLogin's ease of use is a game-changer. No need for a dedicated team – a single person can manage everything effortlessly. It streamlines account creation across diverse systems, a godsend for small teams like ours. Back then, we were just two; now, we're four. Setting up accounts for 600 students across seven or eight platforms used to be a slog. But with OneLogin, it's a breeze. Just configure a few connectors and bam, everything hums along smoothly.

Simplicity is the most valuable part of OneLogin. It is easy to use. The documentation is well done and the integration with other applications is simple.

While I initially used OneLogin's desktop feature to extend SSO, I discontinued it two years ago due to limitations. Firstly, the feature lacked day-one support for new macOS versions, forcing me to postpone system updates until OneLogin released a compatible update. Additionally, our adoption of Jump Pro for mobile device management necessitated the use of their native Jump Connect product for broader access management, rendering the OneLogin desktop feature redundant.

We're using Meraki, and even though the OneLogin integration works fine, it doesn't pass one specific tag that Meraki just ignores. I've been back and forth with both Meraki and OneLogin support trying to figure it out, but they keep blaming each other.

We have been using OneLogin for almost four years.

I would rate the stability of OneLogin a ten out of ten. We are in the EU region and we have not had any stability problems the entire time we have been using it.

OneLogin is cloud-based and super easy to scale and streamline. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten.

Since implementing OneLogin, I have only required technical support four times. The solution is well documented and we can find answers ourselves for the most part, but for the times I have used their support, they have been good.

Our OneLogin account manager, along with a couple of their technicians, assisted us with the initial setup. We handled the basic configuration ourselves to our specifications. However, for some specific use cases and unique requirements that necessitated process automation, we enlisted their expertise. I also have a good understanding of the custom connectors, and we're comfortable managing those on our own. After that initial collaboration, I didn't require much further assistance. The remaining configuration steps are well-documented and straightforward.

After approval and the initial calls, the deployment took less than 24 hours to complete.

The deployment involved one person from our organization and two people from OneLogin.

We've seen a significant return on investment in terms of the time OneLogin has saved us. It has streamlined our workflow, making it much simpler and more efficient. This allows us to focus on other projects and priorities, knowing that OneLogin is handling account deletion and suspension automatically. By automatically suspending or deleting accounts when users are removed, OneLogin helps us maintain top-notch security and stay within our security margins.

OneLogin's pricing, from the perspective of the education sector, seems quite reasonable for the value it delivers. While we secured a favorable deal at implementation, I'm unsure if their pricing structure has changed since then. Fortunately, our long-term license ensures price stability, as our recent three-year renewal at the same cost confirms. I understand, however, that pricing for more traditional businesses or large enterprises might differ.

We also considered JumpCloud, as it offered some Mac management features alongside its core functionality. However, compared to OneLogin, the solution was still in its early stages of development.

I'd rate OneLogin by One Identity an eight out of ten. It wasn't on my radar before I joined this organization, but I championed its implementation, and even looking back five years later, I stand by that decision. It's a major time-saver and convenience enhancer for everyone here. The workflow is intuitive and accessible and rarely requires support intervention for basic tasks, which makes us all much more efficient.

OneLogin is deployed in one location. We are a K12 school with everything from young kids to high school students. It is one building with multiple divisions with 650 users. We have two people in IT with full access to OneLogin and two people with limited access to reset passwords.

Maintenance is minimal. Our main responsibility is to ensure application tokens like those for Office remain authenticated. Otherwise, provisioning will halt. This is solely on us; OneLogin isn't responsible for token management. Last year's dashboard update was primarily aesthetic. While the new interface is attractive, it offers minimal functionality. It simply displays the main provisioning screen, which fulfills their basic requirement. Essentially, OneLogin's end is covered, leaving the onus of maintaining app connections squarely on us.

While I recommend OneLogin, it's essential to proceed with caution. Make sure it aligns with your specific needs. Due to its extensive feature set and constant updates, OneLogin can be overwhelming, especially for users who lack a clear vision of their desired outcomes. Simpler, more limited products might be better suited for such scenarios, as they avoid information overload while offering focused functionality.

The solution allows the user to search logs based on a specific time. It is the main feature.

The tool must be made more robust.

I have been using the solution for two to three years.

The product is scalable.

The solution requires maintenance. One person is enough to maintain it.

The price of the product is okay.

The adoption rate of the solution in our organization is good. There are no big challenges. I restrict access to just one interface. We only use one application. There’s no interaction between the product and other applications in the environment.

In one year, the product has helped to free up almost a month’s time for our IT team. The solution works okay. There was no problem with the user experience when working remotely. The solution has helped our organization to save money.

We use one account for managing the systems. We improve law enforcement using the application. The legal department requires some information from this application, and we provide it to them. I maintain the servers. I work in DevOps.

Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.