My main use case for OneLogin is to complete compliance checks, as I use it to detect if there are issues in ISO 27001, SOX, HIPAA, or GDPR.

A few months ago, I had a client that was a hospital for oncologies, and I had to use some AWS services to store data. I needed to check if it was compliant with GDPR.

I also use OneLogin to detect anomalous behaviors in real time.

OneLogin offers several best features that include helping me audit who accessed the system, when, and what they did. It helps me detect anomalous behavior, and it also has a single sign-on that allows me to control these features.

Additionally, OneLogin has Vigilance AI and threat detection, which provides real-time threat detection that protects against credential-based attacks.

OneLogin has positively impacted my organization because it gives me audit logs and compliance, both of which are very important for many of my clients, especially for this oncology hospital.

I think OneLogin is good, but it would be better if it could provide a mobile app that includes specific features, for example, to check logs or compliance.

I have been using OneLogin for around two years.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin's scalability is very easy. I only need to follow a few wizards, and then I can scale up or down at any time I want.

I advise others looking into using OneLogin that it is very easy to use. I can deploy it in minutes, and playing with the functionalities can yield good results.

I believe there is time saved because I can generate reports in seconds or minutes, allowing me to detect all users and their devices. I don't have exact return on investment numbers since I don't manage that account directly, but I think my organization needs fewer employees and saves time.

From what I've heard, pricing is interesting as it's cheaper than other solutions. The setup cost and licensing are also inexpensive because I don't have to spend a lot to access all these functionalities, which would be more expensive with other providers.

I haven't evaluated other options before choosing OneLogin because it was already in use by my client, who explained that they utilized this solution, and I needed to adapt my development around it.

I think the user identity synchronization across directories functionality is very reliable and well-integrated. If I am running modern and cloud-first applications, it's very good, but if I am in a complex hybrid environment, I need to invest a bit more time to configure it.

The integration of phishing-resistant device trust has significantly reduced phishing attacks because I now have all devices registered from my users, requiring users to register new devices and unregister previous ones. I can't control everything, such as users clicking on suspicious emails, but this solution helps mitigate the problem.

I think the solution provides a very user-friendly experience for signing in and authenticating to needed applications. Nowadays, many users are accustomed to logging in with social networks, so they feel familiar with the process through this application.

I have used SmartFactor Authentication to adjust authentication flows in real time based on the risk score associated with the login attempt, and I find it very helpful. I first identify all the users entering the system, then I check all the devices, and then I start creating an entry system without rules, progressively adding more rules as I learn the user behavior.

I have not used the adaptive login flows with Vigilance AI, but I have seen a demo. The challenge I face is that I don't have access to a client that has implemented this. However, I heard it's spectacular because it shows real-time detection of spikes, regular behavior, and suspicious behavior, offering insights on how to control or mitigate risk.

HR-driven identity management plays a special role in streamlining employee identity handling in my organization because it helps identify all users and devices. Nowadays, users can have multiple devices such as smartwatches, iPods, iPads, and more.

My overall review rating for OneLogin is ten out of ten.

OneLogin is primarily used to provide users with a single login for all applications and to manage user access centrally, which helps avoid handling multiple credentials and simplifies access control.

When a new employee joins, a user is created in Active Directory and OneLogin automatically grants them access to the required applications, allowing a user to log in once and access whatever they require. When someone leaves, disabling their account removes access to everything.

The best feature is single sign-on, which is very easy for users, followed by Smart Factor, which is a risk-based multifactor authentication, and automatic user provisioning.

OneLogin has improved usability and navigation in our organization, leading to fewer password-related issues, and users do not forget passwords. The IT team spends less time on support and more on important tasks.

Support tickets have been reduced by 60 to 70 percent since using OneLogin.

Phishing-resistant Device Trust solves the authentication process, which is helping us in a real-time environment and has improved security significantly, even if users click on links, it secures the application.

OneLogin provides a seamless end-user experience, and we are receiving very good and positive responses from end-users. There are no issues with this, as the end-user experience is very smooth, allowing users to log in once and access everything easily without multiple passwords.

Vigilance AI is used to detect unusual user login behavior and automatically apply extra security based on the requirement.

Currently, there is nothing to improve with OneLogin.

OneLogin has been used for more than two years.

OneLogin is a stable solution.

OneLogin is scalable and very easy since it is cloud-based, allowing for adding users and applications without worrying about infrastructure, so there are no issues.

Support for OneLogin is good, and the people are knowledgeable.

I would rate customer support nine out of ten.

The return on investment from OneLogin can be explained through three things: users can be onboarded 70 to 80 percent faster, there are around 50 percent fewer support tickets for the IT team, and there is less manual work for the IT team.

OneLogin is highly recommended, and my advice would be to start with single sign-on and multifactor authentication, plan user roles properly, and then expand. I would rate this review ten out of ten.

As an engineer, I primarily use OneLogin to implement single sign-on and manage authentication for different applications, which has significantly helped us connect Active Directory with cloud apps and control user access. This makes user management easier for both the IT team and end users.

When a user logs in from the office network, they gain direct access to apps without additional steps. However, if the same user logs in from a new device, multifactor authentication is triggered, ensuring smooth access for employees.

I use SmartFactor Authentication to adjust authentication flows in real-time based on the risk score associated with the login attempt. Each login attempt is evaluated in real-time based on several parameters including the user's real-time location, device trustworthiness, IP reputation, and behavior patterns. The risk score determines whether to allow the application, trigger MFA, or enforce strict verification.

I use the adaptive login flow for Vigilance AI, which has greatly impacted our risk detection and control over authentication.

OneLogin provides a smooth single sign-on experience for users, along with SmartFactor improving security and usability while significantly reducing password-related support tickets.

Automation is an additional valuable feature that helps us assign applications to users automatically, reducing manual work for the IT team and making onboarding much faster than previously experienced.

The integration of phishing-resistant device trust offers a strong authentication process, significantly enhancing security by preventing phishing-based attacks. Post-adaptation, it makes authentication easier and faster for employee users compared to traditional multifactor authentication.

Based on my hands-on experience with OneLogin, I do not see any features lacking and it provides a full feature set with no immediate need for improvement.

The one area for enhancement I can suggest is the initial setup, which requires considerable planning to execute the deployment. Otherwise, everything else is excellent and I do not see any improvement needed for OneLogin at this time.

I have been using OneLogin for more than two years.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin is outstanding in terms of scalability and I have not faced any challenges as it is highly scalable, especially for growing organizations and enterprise environments.

The customer support team is strong and effective, assisting in troubleshooting challenges related to single sign-on setup, Active Directory sync-up, and multifactor authentication policies.

I have been using OneLogin from day one and there was not a different solution prior to this.

The initial setup requires considerable planning to execute the deployment. Automation helps us assign applications to users automatically, reducing manual work for the IT team and making onboarding much faster than previously experienced.

I have seen a return on investment with OneLogin in the past few years, evidenced by both time-saving and reduction in challenges.

I have not evaluated other options before choosing OneLogin.

OneLogin is a very excellent solution and I highly recommend considering OneLogin for any environment, as it proves beneficial for single sign-on and multifactor authentication, controlling application access based on real-time user behavior. OneLogin delivers a very good user experience with true single sign-on that minimizes authentication overhead and allows consistent access across applications. I rate OneLogin 10 out of 10.

As a customer of this solution, I mainly use OneLogin for identity and access management. My usual use cases include identity and access management functions like single sign-on (SSO) for internal tools such as Jira, ITSM, and CRM.

The single sign-on feature of OneLogin is the most valuable and useful for me, as it allows one-click access to all apps, eliminating password juggling and frustration while providing centralized access control.

The integration of phishing-resistant device trust in OneLogin significantly enhances my authentication processes with SSO and MFA, improving security with centralized access control.

In my organization, HR-driven identity management plays a vital role in internal tools for user provisioning and de-provisioning via AD and enforcing MFA for security compliance, impacting the entire organization daily.

For external clients, the benefits of customer identity and access management in OneLogin include necessary user authentication, especially given the high-security risks from hackers in India, making features such as SSO and MFA essential for organizational safety.

OneLogin should provide better documentation on configuring policies and roles and ensure that customer support is available 24/7 with experienced staff to improve the complexity of the deployment process.

I believe OneLogin could improve reporting and analytics functionality and also achieve a simpler UI.

I have been working with OneLogin for around 1.5 years to 2 years.

Regarding the stability of OneLogin, I can say it is stable with better uptime and reliability along with strong support responses. OneLogin provides better uptime, reliability, a simpler UI for admins, and better handling for non-SAML apps, contributing to its stability. I rate the stability of OneLogin at 10 out of 9 and do not have any suggestions for changes.

I am happy with the scalability of OneLogin as it currently exists, and as time goes on, they might provide updates to improve the UI.

The technical support person who assisted with the initial setup was experienced, performed well, and understood all the necessary terminologies. I did not contact technical support for any other issues besides the initial setup, as it was complex. I rate the technical support from my experience as 10 out of 10.

Before selecting OneLogin, I only used Okta for about two to three months and did not evaluate other options. I did not evaluate any other options besides Okta before settling with OneLogin.

I participated in the initial setup and deployment of OneLogin because I was a cloud engineer, and it was my responsibility. The initial setup of OneLogin is somewhat complex, requiring time to configure policies, apps, and roles, and it needs an experienced admin since many team members report a steep learning curve.

The setup of security protocols following MFA implementation is managed by the information security team, which I do not directly oversee.

If I evaluate the return on investment (ROI), I would rate OneLogin 10 out of 9 compared to Okta, which I rate 10 out of 7, because OneLogin provides more features, enhanced security features, a simpler UI, and better handling for non-SAML apps.

I find OneLogin to be much cheaper than other products. For instance, I previously used Okta, which is more mature but also pricier, making OneLogin more convenient for mid-size organizations such as mine. I consider the pricing of OneLogin to be competitive since it is cheaper than other products I used, such as Okta, which is beneficial for mid-size organizations.

While I do use SmartFactor authentication, my role focuses on security authentication, and it may be my colleagues who utilize it more, as I have not directly used that feature. I confirm that I have not used SmartFactor authentication. I personally do not use the user identity synchronization across directories functionality. I did not encounter any issues during that process. I did not understand the impact of enforcing MFA at the desktop level, regardless of online or offline status. After implementing MFA, I have not seen any impact on my security protocols. I have experienced no issues after implementing MFA in OneLogin, as it effectively secures my system. I give this review an overall rating of 10.

We use it to deliver single sign-on services for both our company employees and our customers.

The main advantage is its ease of use for everyday users. Additionally, it simplifies user access management by offering a centralized platform for overseeing user accounts and third-party applications, which greatly benefits my team.

The adoption rate of OneLogin within our organization is at 100% since it's mandatory for everyone to use. During the rollout phase, there was unanimous approval and no resistance from any team members.

It serves as a vital tool for access management across our organization by offering a centralized platform. While we don't directly manage user accounts within OneLogin, they are synced from our Active Directory. Therefore, OneLogin primarily functions as a single interface for administering applications that utilize it for authentication.

OneLogin has been instrumental in freeing up time for our IT team to focus on other tasks. Previously, when onboarding a new user, we had to manually create accounts in multiple applications. However, with OneLogin, we create the account in our Active Directory, which automatically syncs to OneLogin and creates accounts in other applications. Similarly, when offboarding a user, we disable the account in OneLogin, and access to all other resources is automatically revoked. This streamlined process has significantly reduced the time required to manage user accounts. Previously, manual account creation across various platforms would take at least half an hour, whereas now it's down to just five or ten minutes.

It has empowered us to effectively manage an expanding user base and an increasing number of applications, all with a smaller IT team.

The implementation of OneLogin didn't significantly impact our user experience while working remotely. We adopted OneLogin during the transition to a remote work environment at the onset of the pandemic.

It contributed to cost savings for our organization by streamlining time-sensitive processes and boosting productivity, particularly for our IT staff. While we may not have a precise quantification in terms of monetary value, the time saved allows our team to focus on other tasks. As a relatively small organization, we don't require a dedicated Identity Manager, and OneLogin effectively serves our needs in this regard.

During my evaluation of various products, one standout feature of OneLogin that impressed me was their mobile app for authentication through push notifications. Unlike traditional methods involving rotating codes, the OneLogin app simplifies the process by sending a push notification asking if the login attempt is legitimate. If confirmed, the login proceeds seamlessly.
The primary benefit is its user-friendly interface, making it particularly accessible for non-technical users.

One aspect I particularly appreciate is their exceptional customer support whenever I've needed assistance. Their sales team has also been highly responsive and helpful in connecting me with necessary resources, although we haven't faced any major challenges.

There was a minor outage a few months ago that caused some inconvenience. OneLogin offers a Virtual LDAP feature that we utilize, although it differs slightly from traditional LDAP servers. While it hasn't caused significant issues, improvements in its functionality would likely lead to wider implementation within our organization.

We have been working with it for three years.

In terms of stability, there was a downtime incident that impacted all of OneLogin's customers a few months ago, which was frustrating as it occurred during prime business hours and lasted for a couple of hours. Fortunately, the impact on us wasn't severe because our applications are configured in a way that once users sign in and authenticate through OneLogin, they typically don't need to go through OneLogin on a daily basis to access those apps again. As a result, many of our users may not have even noticed the downtime.

OneLogin has the capability to scale infinitely, although our organization's needs are quite basic. We haven't been utilizing a vast array of features or configuring hundreds of applications with it. Therefore, I don't anticipate encountering any limitations with the services that OneLogin can provide us.

I've found that when I open a support case, I typically receive a response within a few hours, and the support team has consistently provided prompt assistance. Even when investigating issues like examining internal logs for failures, they've been able to help me swiftly. I would rate it ten out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup process is quite straightforward. Any issues I encountered were promptly resolved with the help of the support team.

I managed the deployment independently and had it operational within a day or two, although some configuration and feature familiarization took about a month from starting the trial to getting the quote approved for purchase. In terms of maintenance, whenever an application changes or a new one is added, we configure it within OneLogin. So far, we haven't experienced any issues such as applications failing or directory syncing problems due to configuration changes.

While I wish OneLogin's pricing was more affordable, their licensing model, which is based on per user, is acceptable. We renew it annually.

Before deciding on OneLogin, I evaluated JumpCloud and Okta. However, I found that the features in JumpCloud weren't as developed as those in OneLogin. Additionally, my experience with Okta's sales team was less than satisfactory in terms of configuring a trial and support. In contrast, the sales representatives at OneLogin were highly proactive and went above and beyond to assist us and earn our business.

For new users, I would recommend having someone knowledgeable about their internal directory and authentication systems. It's crucial to ensure that their systems are well-maintained and free from technical debt or complexity. The effectiveness of their OneLogin implementation will ultimately depend on the quality of their internal directory setup. Overall, I would rate it ten out of ten.