
Overview

Product video
AppDynamics helps you visualize your entire application environment with our industry-leading Application Performance Monitoring (APM) solution - now that includes support for serverless environments like AWS Lambda.
With AppDynamics Serverless APM For AWS Lambda, you can discover, visualize, and map serverless application environments and dependencies and correlate the performance of those environments with end-user experience and business impact. This helps you solve performance problems much faster and find areas in your end-to-end environment that can be proactively improved.
This lightweight Lambda monitoring implementation reports directly to dedicated AppDynamics-managed serverless reporting endpoints and introduces minimal impact on application performance. Currently available for Lambda functions written in select languages. See the documentation resource link below for technical requirements.
Highlights
- Discover, visualize, and map application environments including serverless components and dependencies
- Automatically baseline system performance as well as business and conversion metrics to rapidly identify anomalies and their impact
- Leverage application insights to correlate application, end-user, and business data to improve SLAs, service adoption, and other performance KPIs
Details
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Buyer guide

Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
Pricing
Dimension | Cost/unit |
|---|---|
PDX - Serverless monitoring for AWS Lambda, requests (per 1000) | $0.001 |
PDX - Serverless monitoring for AWS Lambda, duration (per 1000 s) | $0.004 |
SYD - Serverless monitoring for AWS Lambda, requests (per 1000) | $0.001 |
SYD - Serverless monitoring for AWS Lambda, duration (per 1000 s) | $0.004 |
FRA - Serverless monitoring for AWS Lambda, requests (per 1000) | $0.001 |
FRA - Serverless monitoring for AWS Lambda, duration (per 1000 s) | $0.004 |
Vendor refund policy
By subscribing to this product you agree to terms and conditions outlined in the End User License Agreement referenced below.
How can we make this page better?
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Content disclaimer
Delivery details
Software as a Service (SaaS)
SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.
Resources
Vendor resources
Support
Vendor support
AppDynamics support team that is ready to help no matter what the issue is. Additional documenation is available here for Lambda support - https://docs.appdynamics.com/display/PRO45/Serverless+APM+for+AWS+Lambda
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.


Standard contract
Customer reviews
Real-time observability has transformed our farm operations and now optimizes precision agriculture
What is our primary use case?
I have been using Splunk AppDynamics for almost four to five years now.
My main use case for Splunk AppDynamics was initially a very limited requirement for monitoring the performance of different applications we have, aiming to achieve real-time full stack observability of all platforms and their impact on our business productivity and client requirements. Currently, we are using it widely for innovating agricultural use cases, actively automating our supply chain in agriculture, utilizing IoT sensor networks, and securing our precision farming platforms. These tools handle massive amounts of machine-generated data within the Indian agricultural ecosystem, and Splunk AppDynamics has proven its worth every year.
A specific example of using Splunk AppDynamics in one of our agriculture projects relates to optimizing crop yields and preventing equipment downtime in farm mechanization. Through Splunk Apps, we streamline our extensive sensor networks, which are crucial for precision agriculture. Soil moisture, temperature, and humidity must be regulated, as failure to do so can lead to disastrous outcomes, and Splunk AppDynamics monitors these conditions twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. It aggregates data, tracks environmental conditions, and provides customized insights tailored to specific soil and states, achieving prediction accuracy of approximately ninety-five to ninety-nine percent.
Furthermore, we monitor our digital dashboards and mobile apps for controlling irrigation systems and tracking crop health, which helps ensure compliance with food control environmental regulations mandated by the CAG audit in India, making Splunk AppDynamics truly a savior for our organization.
What is most valuable?
I have additional insights into our main use cases with Splunk AppDynamics. Previously, we lagged in real-time data insights and observability of farmers' applications. Earlier, we experienced reporting and log analytics issues, especially regarding security. However, since implementing Splunk AppDynamics, we are effectively managing farm-level execution with end-to-end operational visibility. There is no lag in data information travel, ensuring seamless data logs from farm to lab. This transparency has fostered client confidence and satisfaction, creating a win-win situation for both users and implementers.
In terms of features, Splunk AppDynamics excels in application performance monitoring, competing favorably with platforms like Datadog and New Relic . It stands out for tracking end-to-end user requests across various environments, which previously posed challenges in mapping and fetching data. The usability and navigability are also noteworthy; business users provide positive feedback about the platform's accessibility without needing extensive training. The automated security features have helped protect our significant cloud investment from threats, identifying potential risks and providing remediation options, making it a reliable choice for our organization's needs.
All the features I highlighted are vital, but performance metrics particularly stand out as they aid in troubleshooting processes by allowing us to identify root causes effectively. This capability ensures recurring issues are addressed at their source. Additionally, we now correlate performance metrics with business outcomes, providing clear visualizations. The deployment of Splunk AppDynamics was smooth and quick, successfully integrating into our business processes and standard operating procedures within a fifteen-day period, which we appreciate.
Splunk AppDynamics positively impacts our organization by allowing real-time performance monitoring, enabling us to optimize various business applications and visibly enhance their performance. We realized the extensive market demand for compliance and governance, especially given potential IoT threats we encountered. Splunk AppDynamics helps monitor performance, diagnose root causes, and streamline the use of complex software applications, improving the experience for users who manage different applications. Client satisfaction has also significantly increased as the application functions seamlessly on both web and mobile platforms, mapping the complete user journey. This streamlined approach in our precision farming sector has resulted in substantial cost savings—approximately one to two crore this year—through effective monitoring.
What needs improvement?
Regarding areas for improvement, I have not encountered any significant issues with the features we have tested from Splunk AppDynamics; however, we do believe their twenty-four hour, seven days a week chat support could be enhanced and integrated with phone and email options. The automated chat system often fails to resolve issues promptly in a single interaction, which could improve customer experience and support.
To ensure continued improvement, real-time data insights and performance-related dashboard reporting must strengthen decision-making processes. We have requested an anomaly detection dashboard for identifying potential threats, which is vital but has yet to materialize. Increasing dashboard visibility and analytics would significantly benefit our operations.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Splunk AppDynamics proves stable; we have not experienced any outages or significant issues. While minor downtimes may occur, particularly at night, the app remains reliable and effective, even on weekends.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Its scalability has been impressive, accommodating our organization's growth as we expand digital applications and leverage IoT for supply chain management. Our integration of Splunk AppDynamics aids in generating valuable data insights and allows proactive troubleshooting on a larger scale, enhancing operational effectiveness in agriculture.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support from Splunk AppDynamics is fair but requires enhancements in ticket resolution times. We often encounter long wait times for issue resolution, highlighting a need for improved service efficiency as our business volume grows.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before adopting Splunk AppDynamics, we used Datadog for several years, initially seen as a strong market player. However, the high costs prompted us to search for more affordable solutions, leading us to switch.
How was the initial setup?
The deployment of Splunk AppDynamics was smooth and quick, successfully integrating into our business processes and standard operating procedures within a fifteen-day period, which we appreciate.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
In evaluating options before choosing Splunk AppDynamics, we considered New Relic and tested Datadog. The performance consistency and favorable peer feedback heavily influenced our decision in favor of Splunk AppDynamics.
What other advice do I have?
My advice for those considering Splunk AppDynamics is to actively explore its capabilities. It stands out from other platforms, providing real-time monitoring and significant data insights. I urge organizations, particularly in agriculture, to leverage the potential of Splunk AppDynamics to empower their operations further. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Unified observability has improved incident response and protects our digital user experience
What is our primary use case?
I work for a supply chain SaaS organization, and Blue Yonder is a global supply chain SaaS company that provides supply chain management solutions for global enterprise customers. For handling enterprise-class customers, we definitely need an enterprise-class product rather than an open-source observability or log management solution. That is why we picked Splunk AppDynamics as our strategic observability and log management solution, and the deployment was completed in a couple of weeks with the help of a third-party vendor.
Log management is the primary purpose for which Splunk AppDynamics is used.
We use Splunk AppDynamics' data collection feature, and using the OpenTelemetry standards, we were able to integrate with our existing set of systems for log management, metrics, traces, and everything that is part of the observability solution offering.
We sell our application management solutions, and the application's digital user experience in Splunk AppDynamics is really good for our global customers. When an external customer is impacted due to application slowness, my support team or my SRE team can go to Splunk AppDynamics portal where we can drill down into the problems, the SLAs, and the response times using this digital experience feature.
For infrastructure monitoring, we are not using Splunk AppDynamics, but for application monitoring, we are using it. The performance is really good and the product features are really good. We have more than 100-plus applications being monitored using Splunk AppDynamics, and for application performance monitoring, the product features are really good.
What is most valuable?
The team is still evaluating AI-related functionalities in Splunk AppDynamics, but from what I understand from the application owners, they are able to drill down into the application performance impacts during the incidents and they are able to proactively fix the incidents before application portal performance bottlenecks happen.
Splunk AppDynamics did assist me with detecting and protecting against vulnerabilities. It detects the critical vulnerabilities and the legacy things in the larger infrastructure, and it is able to address the critical vulnerabilities in the legacy systems. In that, the product was really useful.
Splunk AppDynamics did help improve my organization's business resilience by reducing the vulnerabilities and the attack surface.
What needs improvement?
For Splunk AppDynamics, the major headache is cost, and the pricing options are not very flexible. The contract negotiations or the pricing options for a multi-year commitment, along with the renewal cost options, are not very flexible.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
In the long run, it is definitely beneficial for an organization like Blue Yonder, because as a supply chain SaaS organization, we are onboarding many customers every quarter, so the infrastructure grows at the backend for the SaaS infrastructure. If the pricing is flexible, we are going to buy more licenses or more quantity.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Internal solutions were developed, but not third-party products prior to adopting Splunk AppDynamics.
How was the initial setup?
The deployment process of Splunk AppDynamics was done by the third-party consulting firm called HCL.
What about the implementation team?
The deployment was completed in a couple of weeks with the help of a third-party vendor. The deployment process of Splunk AppDynamics was done by the third-party consulting firm called HCL.
What other advice do I have?
I rate eight out of ten for the support for Splunk, and for Splunk AppDynamics, I would rate approximately nine for the support our team is getting. I would rate Splunk AppDynamics eight out of ten overall.
End-to-end tracing has reduced incident resolution time and now simplifies cross-service analysis
What is our primary use case?
We have been using Splunk AppDynamics for around one year and one month and started with just APM pieces for our back-end services and, over time, expanded it to cover business transaction and database monitoring.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is the end-to-end transaction tracing, which provides genuine insights by allowing users to follow a single transaction across multiple microservices to pinpoint delays or errors, thereby saving hours during major incidents.
The auto-discovery and application mapping feature automatically maps out our entire application technology, showing service dependencies accurately, saving considerable manual configuration time.
The baseline and anomaly detection feature learns what normal looks like for your app, alerting on deviations beyond static thresholds.
What needs improvement?
A few things genuinely frustrate me about Splunk AppDynamics . First, the UI, while powerful, is dense and not modern compared to products like DataDog or New Relic , requiring a learning curve for new team members. Navigating feels unnecessarily deep, often requiring additional clicks.
Second, the alerting configuration is overly complex. Setting up health roles and policies isn't intuitive, leading to potential alert storms or missed incidents if configured incorrectly.
Lastly, the CPU-based licensing model complicates understanding costs with scaling, necessitating more straightforward processes.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using Splunk AppDynamics for around one year and one month.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
My experience with the application performance monitoring capabilities of Splunk AppDynamics has been largely stable. Issues with Splunk AppDynamics performance itself have been minimal. The agents are very reliable once deployed, running automatically without the need for manual intervention.
How are customer service and support?
We contact technical support when we do the implementation and onboarding of Splunk AppDynamics, as it is part of our enterprise contract. Sessions with the solution engineer helped us in defining the initial architecture and sizing, which was fundamental.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We used DataDog previously, which offered a more extensive collection of frameworks, about seven or so. However, we've switched to Splunk AppDynamics for its straightforwardness, simplifying our processes.
How was the initial setup?
The initial deployment is very straightforward if one reads the documentation correctly. All steps are clearly outlined in the documentation, making the setup hassle-free.
What about the implementation team?
Technical support, part of our enterprise contract, assisted us during the implementation and onboarding of Splunk AppDynamics. We had sessions with a solution engineer for initial architecture and sizing, which was beneficial.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Pricing for Splunk AppDynamics is higher, attributed to the additional features it offers over other tools. While the cost is significant given we have around 120 services, it remains manageable and offers the value we're seeking.
What other advice do I have?
Regarding the effectiveness of the features like auto-discovery and mapping, they visualize your application ecosystem. This feature is very useful to us because we don't have to do the manual effort. Using this feature has saved us around 20 to 30% of time. We don't need many people in the environment. If you have four to five people to handle that feature for 400 or 500 products, then we need only one to two people. Thus, it is resource-efficient and saves time.
We use AI-powered features in Splunk AppDynamics such as anomaly detection and root cause analysis. We have Splunk AppDynamics plus Splunk integration apps which eliminate the need for manual checks.
Using the APM , there are features in Splunk AppDynamics which allow for easy troubleshooting of code-level issues, removing the need for manual interventions.
Regarding the downsides of Splunk AppDynamics, we did not have major dislikes; most features are well-appreciated.
Splunk AppDynamics is a solution we recommend to our customers and vendors if they're within Splunk ecosystem, as it saves time and leverages the ecosystem's features.
Our overall review rating for Splunk AppDynamics is 9 out of 10.
Monitoring has improved banking app performance and now quickly identifies transaction bottlenecks
What is our primary use case?
In the financial sector, banks primarily use Splunk AppDynamics for monitoring their digital apps, such as mobile banking and internet banking applications. These client-facing applications are the primary usage of this tool.
The main use case with Splunk AppDynamics is infrastructure monitoring. End user monitoring is also considered, but infrastructure is the main component.
What is most valuable?
The main benefit is that for application performance, sometimes banks face issues related to databases or performance problems. Splunk AppDynamics helps them identify the root cause. Sometimes external calls going to services such as NADRA in Pakistan or other verification services face delays in getting responses from their side. These types of issues are easily identified, and they can pinpoint where the problem lies.
AI-based features were checked in Splunk AppDynamics. The feature is helpful, but unfortunately, the financial sector is not using the full feature cloud version. Mostly deployment is on-premises.
End-user monitoring (EUM) is another area that customers are normally interested in, and it is very helpful.
Saving time is definitely the main point with Splunk AppDynamics for quickly resolving problems. Whenever they are facing an issue, they quickly identify the root cause and can proceed with fixing it. Sometimes if performance issues arise, they can pinpoint where the problem is. These things help with better performance and customer experience is actually better. This definitely helps them to get more financial benefits. If the users and customers are comfortable and happy with the banking apps, they are more loyal to that particular bank. Everyone now, almost all banks, are looking for APM tools. Initially, three or four years back, people were not considering this tool as one of the essential components for their infrastructure, but now everyone is looking for these types of tools.
What needs improvement?
In terms of improvement potential for Splunk AppDynamics, there is one point that competitors are exploiting, which is the smart agent type of thing. Dynatrace is saying they have a single agent for all types of applications, which is easy to deploy. Splunk AppDynamics still requires different agents for different applications. Splunk AppDynamics has added the feature of the smart agent, but it is not very effective, as my engineers informed. They still need different agents and community-based agents to manage the different applications. Another challenge we are facing is that for some legacy applications, such as those customized applications developed by customers or their local software partners that are built on C++ or other languages, we face issues in monitoring these applications because we don't have any agent. In some cases, we lose deals just because we are not able to monitor the application developed in C++. These types of support should be there in Splunk AppDynamics.
From a functionality standpoint, Splunk AppDynamics is good. There may be some improvements required, especially for dashboarding. People are also using Elastic or Grafana for dashboarding, and they find their dashboarding more appropriate in displaying information in reporting or dashboarding. Splunk AppDynamics can focus on enhancing reporting and dashboarding. They could enhance or integrate with Grafana or any other reporting tools. One customer required historical reporting the way other network monitoring tools provide it in PDF format. They have a historical report that they can generate and present to their management. However, in Splunk AppDynamics, the approach is different. If someone wants historical data, the dashboard is dynamic, so they can identify the time slot, and it is the same dashboard that they got. If they go back to historical data, the same dashboard generates the report, taking a snapshot of that dashboard. There is no detailed reporting in PDF or Excel format as other tools provide. This is another area that requires improvement. The reporting should be detailed in PDF format; right now it is the same interface that the customer is getting on the dashboard.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Splunk AppDynamics for three to four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability of Splunk AppDynamics as an 8.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
For the ability to scale and expand with Splunk AppDynamics, I would rate it 7 or 8. Sometimes customers face resource issues because they have to enhance their infrastructure as local logs and local storage fill up quickly, so they have to clean up.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support for Splunk AppDynamics is fine, so I rate it 10. We are not facing any issues.
How was the initial setup?
Initially, the setup process for Splunk AppDynamics is complex, and teams are facing some challenges in the initial setup. However, now that the team is used to it, it does not look very complex. Splunk AppDynamics can focus on making it smoother.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
The main competitors on the market for Splunk AppDynamics are Dynatrace and Elastic.
Still, I think Splunk AppDynamics is better, but slowly and gradually over this last year, I can see that Dynatrace is also gaining penetration in this market. Maybe worldwide, they are also progressing because with every customer now, we are actually facing competition with Dynatrace. Out of four to five customer bases, they are able to get one deal if we are competing in five. Still, we are getting more deals, but they are starting to penetrate into this market.
What other advice do I have?
The features that Splunk AppDynamics is providing are really helpful, but in the Pakistani market especially, it is a costly proposition for the customer. Customers are using third-party tools for security, and Splunk AppDynamics is not very popular here for security.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Monitoring has improved proactive issue detection but agent management still needs simplification
What is our primary use case?
I am currently supporting Blue Yonder, where I implemented the Splunk AppDynamics solution for EY, Ernst & Young, and now I'm working with international companies, as you may be aware of Blue Yonder. I'm implementing Splunk AppDynamics for Blue Yonder, which has a variety of logistics and supply chain management applications to monitor, serving around 500 plus clients.
What is most valuable?
Predominantly, for this current project, we are using Application Performance Monitoring in Splunk AppDynamics, mainly for the Java instrumentations, as our application is completely based on Java, which helps to identify business transactions, bottlenecks, and also monitor database performance using custom queries.
I find the anomaly detection feature in Splunk AppDynamics quite good, as it was introduced about a year back, and we had enabled it.
Infrastructure monitoring in Splunk AppDynamics is really helping as it allows us to understand overall application performance and any bottlenecks, especially when we implement the machine agent alongside Application Performance Monitoring .
The main benefits from Splunk AppDynamics for my end users, mainly the application team, are that it helps identify bottlenecks proactively and allows for configuration of proper health rules to address issues before they affect customers.
What needs improvement?
I see that the main challenge with Splunk AppDynamics is the management of multiple agents, as installing several agents on a server is a significant hurdle we still face.
Functionality-wise, I would like to see more cognitive solutions in Splunk AppDynamics, ideally with a single agent that can implement policies and provide predictive insights regarding application performance degradation during peak times.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Splunk AppDynamics for almost five to six years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate the stability of Splunk AppDynamics an eight, as I have not faced many stability issues with the product.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Regarding scalability, I would also rate it an eight, as I have not encountered significant performance issues, especially being in a stable SaaS environment.
How are customer service and support?
With our premium support contract for Splunk AppDynamics, we are very satisfied, receiving consistent support including bi-weekly calls with customer success managers and product specialists.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Currently, people are leaning toward Dynatrace , possibly due to its AI capabilities such as the Davis feature, which offer a single agent concept that is easier to implement and maintain.
How was the initial setup?
For Splunk AppDynamics, the initial setup process I've encountered has been simple since I only increased the scope of what was already established four years ago, and while there is a challenge with multiple agent solutions, the product is generally beneficial.
What about the implementation team?
We purchase Splunk AppDynamics through our vendor, HCL Technologies, as they handle all sales instead of direct from the vendor.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
In my opinion, the main competitor to Splunk AppDynamics in the market is Dynatrace .