Sold by: IBM Software
Deployed on AWS
HashiCorp is the leader in multi-cloud infrastructure automation software. The HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management suite enables organizations to adopt consistent workflows to provision, manage, and scale any infrastructure for any application. HashiCorp Terraform and Nomad are broadly adopted by the Global 2000. Enterprise versions of these products provide features that promote collaboration, operations, governance, and multi-data center functionality.
4.3
Overview
The HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management portfolio works together to manage operations at scale. By enforcing identity-based security, centralized control, and automated lifecycles HashiCorp's ILM portfolio can help organizations reduce risks, reduce costs, and increase productivity at scale.
The HashiCorp ILM portfolio consists of two (2) products: Terraform and Nomad
(1) Terraform provides infrastructure automation with infrastructure as code for provisioning, compliance, and management of any infrastructure-public cloud, private data centers, and services. Infrastructure as code allows operators to provision and manage infrastructure the same way application developers build applications.
(2) Nomad brings modern application scheduling to any type of software by allowing organizations to manage containers, binaries, and VMs efficiently by standardizing application orchestration across all environments.
Highlights
- Reduce risk with a central point for compliance & management.
- Reduce costs by eliminating overspending on idle, orphaned, and over-sized resources.
- Increase productivity with a single workflow with 200+ unique infrastructure providers.
Details
New
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Buyer guide
Gain valuable insights from real users who purchased this product, powered by PeerSpot.
Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
AWS Marketplace now accepts line of credit payments through the PNC Vendor Finance program. This program is available to select AWS customers in the US, excluding NV, NC, ND, TN, & VT.
Pricing
Pricing is based on the duration and terms of your contract with the vendor. This entitles you to a specified quantity of use for the contract duration. If you choose not to renew or replace your contract before it ends, access to these entitlements will expire.
Additional AWS infrastructure costs may apply. Use the AWS Pricing Calculator to estimate your infrastructure costs.
Dimension | Description | Cost/12 months |
|---|---|---|
Nomad Client | Nomad Client means any physical or virtual machine with Nomad installed and configured in client mode managed by the Nomad Server Cluster | $1,800.00 |
Terraform Workspace | A workspace is used by Terraform to manage each collection of infrastructure, which contains a configuration file that defines the infrastructure resources to be managed, state data which maps resources defined in the configuration, and variables defining the parameters of the configuration, enabling the management of multiple environments (e.g., development, staging, production) using the same configuration | $996.00 |
Vendor refund policy
All software subscription fees are non-cancellable and non-refundable.
Custom pricing options
Request a private offer to receive a custom quote.
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Upon subscribing to this product, you must acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions outlined in the vendor's End User License Agreement (EULA) .
Content disclaimer
Vendors are responsible for their product descriptions and other product content. AWS does not warrant that vendors' product descriptions or other product content are accurate, complete, reliable, current, or error-free.
Delivery details
Software as a Service (SaaS)
SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.
Resources
Vendor resources
Support
Vendor support
Get the help you need at every stage of your journey. Login to Help Portal https://www.ibm.com/mysupport or Submit a ticket via
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.
Similar products
HashiCorp is the leader in multi-cloud infrastructure automation software. The HashiCorp Security Lifecycle Management suite enables organizations to adopt consistent workflows to secure, any infrastructure for any application. HashiCorp Vault, Boundary, and Consul are broadly adopted by the Global 2000. Enterprise versions of these products provide features that promote collaboration, operations, governance, and multi-data center functionality.
Innovate faster by partnering with HashiCorp Professional Services to solve your toughest infrastructure and security automation challenges. Whether adopting new tools or scaling best practices, our team of change management experts will help you make the complex achievable.
HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) is a fully-managed platform offering HashiCorp products-as-a-service. HCP removes the management overhead associated with deploying and maintaining HashiCorp products so that your teams can focus on developing and deploying applications. HashiCorp Cloud Platform offers a suite of solutions including Terraform, Packer, Nomad, Vault, Radar and Boundary.
The HashiCorp Terraform SPLM Framework is a foundational program of work to enable Infrastructure as Code as the single source of truth for infrastructure management. This program can be tailored to meet your requirements across the 3 stages of IaC maturity.
Customer reviews
Aashish Bhandari
Lifecycle policies have improved cost control and governance for collaborative cloud deployments
Reviewed on Oct 12, 2026
Review from a verified AWS customer
What is our primary use case?
We use IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management for Terraform build lifecycle rules. When we need to destroy any resource or prevent destruction of any resource, we use the prevent destroy tag. For ignoring changes for specific attributes, we use the ignore change tag. Action trigger runs custom actions after create, update, and destroy any event. We utilize all of those capabilities. We also utilize Infrastructure as Code.
How has it helped my organization?
We use IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management via Terraform Enterprise to manage complexity and consistency by focusing on what truly matters, such as what our infrastructure is built on, the approvals, the governance, and the reports we need. We regularly check our Terraform plans and Terraform applies to understand what changes will occur and how our global accelerators are being deployed, as those are very crucial for us. We are building a clear operational framework so that before merging anything, we chat with our engineers who worked on those components and understand what we are implementing. We can easily collaborate and understand that these implementations are straightforward with no complexity and consistency issues. We maintain that through cooperation and balance between clear operational frameworks.
For our collaboration framework, version controls are easy to use. Team-based planning is very straightforward through tools like Jira. For IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management context specifically, we emphasize low-friction, well-supported tools. Git is available, project management tools are in place. We have workflows, HashiCorp workflows, which make our tracking super easy. We have documentation and HCP documentation. Developers are provided step-by-step guidance to setting up and using these tools. Collaboration is straightforward here.
Cost optimization is one of the most core benefits of IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management. Preventing repeated creation of resources can increase our budget management. We can prevent those issues by using the prevent block. Improved performance and reliability is one of the most key major points. We can easily do proactive monitoring, regular updates, and plan our maintenance. Security and compliance are important considerations, including hardware, software, network-related, and compliance-related aspects, which we can address to reduce cybersecurity risk using IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management. Better decision-making and collaboration are important parts of how it helps our organization. We use it for operational efficiency in finance operations and uploading our code very easily. Scalability is one of the most important features. Long-term value is there, and the return on investment is better in a lifecycle policy and lifecycle management.
What is most valuable?
The best features in Infrastructure Lifecycle Management include core lifecycle management, where I can easily prevent anything from being destroyed and ignore changes. We can easily plan and provision anything and update anything. We can get to know what is going to be created via a Terraform plan. We can save those plans and share them with anyone. Efficiency, consistency, version control, and collaboration are easy here, and zero downtime is possible because we already know what is going to be created. We can also use tags like create before destroy and prevent destroy to make our implementations safe and supported.
The templates we are using in IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management are excellent. We have roles, UI settings, and layouts. The RBAC rules are in place. This is the best aspect because we can assign roles with specific permissions and specific authority to people. If someone wants to make changes in our repo, we can give them a short-term role. These capabilities are very useful. User management is one of the most important aspects.
What needs improvement?
Enhancements for IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management that I could look out for include improved key capabilities for asset management and a customizable dashboard for visibility. Integration would be great with DevOps tools, VCS, and third-party services. Those enhancements would be beneficial.
For how long have I used the solution?
I recently joined my new company, and we have been managing IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management for a while. I have been using it for the last three to four months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
There are no stability issues. A few issues were present initially, but they were resolved by our own team members. We have an enterprise team who implemented IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management, and they helped us resolve those issues easily.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management is scalable.
How are customer service and support?
The support team is supportive. When I experienced an issue with our integration of GitHub and Terraform, the team helped me within a few hours. The support staff is very good.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
A different ILM I used previously was a basic one called Light and Magic, but it was not a very large solution.
How was the initial setup?
I previously used Pulumi. There were no noticeable changes because I had previously learned and worked on Terraform, but not with Terraform Enterprise. Enterprise was different for me, and the tools they use for IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management were a bit difficult to understand initially, but it was not impossible to understand. I was able to catch up in a few days.
What was our ROI?
We used multiple metrics for measuring ROI, including total lifecycle cost (TLC) and maintenance cost reduction. Avoided cost, reliability index, and environmental impact are also measured. We manage dev, stage, and production environments, and these metrics are tracked across all of them.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We purchased through AWS Marketplace.
What other advice do I have?
I recommend that other companies use IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management for multipurpose AWS builds. You can prevent anything from being destroyed if you want a resource to be critical. You can easily manage your billing because in multipurpose scenarios, we can use resources to build again and again, and we can prevent destruction to reduce AWS costs. For long-term return on investment, it is a better opportunity. Other companies should definitely consider IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management. I gave this product a rating of ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Ritesh Purbey
Hybrid cloud automation has simplified multi-cloud management and supports secure testing workflows
Reviewed on Oct 08, 2026
Review from a verified AWS customer
What is our primary use case?
I have implemented HashiCorp Vault for secret management.
In my opinion, the role of Vault in data security compliance is not much of a concern at this time, as this is just a testing phase where I deployed a couple of environments for different clients. Definitely, maybe in the 2027 to 2028 financial year, I have a compliance audit for that.
In assessing the effectiveness of HashiCorp Consul in managing service networking, I find that we are not frequently using a GUI; we just use a CLI perspective.
I do not use HashiCorp Nomad for workload orchestration at this time.
What is most valuable?
I am mainly using Terraform, and it has helped me manage multi-cloud environments.
What needs improvement?
In my opinion, HashiCorp can be improved because there are a couple of things they need to improve. When we talk about the local providers in Terraform, it is very difficult to use that.
I can give a little more detail on the kind of problems I am facing. When I use a local provider for a hybrid cloud, which is just a local server setup over VMware and other things, it is very difficult to provision the server and write the code.
HashiCorp [Private Offer Only] could do something about it by requiring some recommendation steps.
I do not remember exactly what additional features I would like to see in the next release to make it closer to ten, though code optimization was mentioned.
For how long have I used the solution?
As of now, I have been working with HashiCorp Security Lifecycle Management only using HashiCorp Terraform, which is open-source.
How are customer service and support?
I believe the overall technical support is good, and they should improve response time, first-level support quality, and overall competence.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
In terms of pricing, I find the HashiCorp price a little higher. That needs to be optimized.
What other advice do I have?
I am using version 1 point something of HashiCorp, and I do not exactly remember the version.
I have not been a partner or reseller of HashiCorp; this is just a customer relationship.
From my perspective, I would rate HashiCorp eight out of ten overall.
Ritesh Purbey
Infrastructure provisioning has become faster and remains flexible across cloud environments
Reviewed on Sep 29, 2026
Review from a verified AWS customer
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management is that I am using it under Terraform, where I am provisioning infrastructure over the cloud.
A quick, specific example of how I use IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management for asset class management or provisioning infrastructure for the cloud is that Terraform is very useful to provision infrastructures as per requirement time to time, and when I need to provision infrastructures over the cloud, I can just use Terraform.
How has it helped my organization?
IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management has positively impacted my organization as it has been very beneficial for us for quick provisioning of infrastructure since I have been using it for the last two years.
I have not considered specific improvements in speed, efficiency, or cost savings since using IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management; however, it saves time while creating infrastructure through the particular cloud-based UI, and as compared to that, Terraform gives a fast provisioning of infrastructure.
What is most valuable?
The best features IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management offers include being open source, so everyone is ready to use it if they want, and of course, they have enterprise service as well, which means there are two options available: either you can go with open source or you can go as a SaaS model.
Regarding IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management's AI capabilities, I think its governance and security are good as it compiles governance and security policy without any hurdles.
Regarding IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management's AI capabilities, I think the accuracy and reliability of its output are overall good.
What needs improvement?
I have no comment on how IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management can be improved as of now.
I cannot comment on anything that could be better, even if it is something small, such as documentation, support, or a feature I wish was there.
I feel it is not a perfect ten because, as of now, I am using only the open source version where I have encountered some tricky options, and I still require some AI contribution while creating infrastructures; as of now, it is very hard-coded and involves other manual tasks, which is why I am choosing eight, not ten.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management for the last three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management is stable in my experience.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Regarding the scalability of IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management, I am currently not using it for scalability, as this is a standalone and user-specific client, so scalability is not a part of what I am using as of now.
How are customer service and support?
I have not contacted customer support for IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management yet; whenever an issue occurs, I try to solve it on my end.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have not previously used a different solution before IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management; as for now, this is the first solution we are looking to use, which is Terraform for provisioning the infrastructure.
What was our ROI?
I have not seen a return on investment with IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management, and I cannot share any relevant metrics such as time saved or money saved.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I have not purchased IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management through the AWS Marketplace yet; as mentioned, I am currently using the open source version.
My experience with IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that I am not using a license; currently, I am using the open-source product.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I have not evaluated any other options before choosing IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management; as I mentioned, this is my first one.
What other advice do I have?
IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management is deployed in a mixed environment in my organization, as I have a public and hybrid cloud; however, I am mainly using Terraform under the public cloud only, not a hybrid one.
The cloud providers I use for my public cloud deployment are both AWS and Azure.
My advice for others looking into using IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management is that it is organization-specific and requirement-specific, such as if they are looking for any tool to adopt or not.
I would rate IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management an eight on a scale of one to ten.
Gardihewagesathira Gardihewa
Infrastructure as code has transformed our platform team productivity and speeds multi-cloud delivery
Reviewed on Sep 27, 2026
Review from a verified AWS customer
What is our primary use case?
I am working in a platform team where we manage an internal developer platform with lots of workloads around AWS EKS and GCP GKE. We use Terraform to provision infrastructure across those cloud setups. Terraform allows us to create infrastructure as code to have a central place where all configurations are stored with all infrastructure setups.
Recently, we had a requirement from a customer, which is a developer team. They needed to deploy an application in a specific, dedicated AWS EKS cluster. We had to create that cluster and configure the networking and all cluster bootstrap modules that we needed to set up. We provisioned the AWS EKS cluster using Terraform and our reusable Terraform modules that we use to provision our infrastructure across the cloud environment.
Since we have specific Terraform modules for each infrastructure setup, we can reuse those modules in our infrastructure repository and provision a cluster within a few minutes rather than rewriting all infrastructure configurations. This is particularly helpful for us as a platform team managing an internal developer platform with many customers.
How has it helped my organization?
Our platform engineers' productivity has improved significantly with the ability to manage all infrastructure as code. We have that code and know what is in our cloud setup rather than logging into the cluster to check it.
Before using Terraform, our team used manual setup to create clusters in AWS using the AWS console, which would extend into two to three sprints for one person to set up all those components. With Terraform and those reusable modules, we were able to minimize it to two to three days with all verifications included.
What is most valuable?
The best features IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management offers include having a central place with reusable templates. Since this is a multi-cluster setup, coordinating a shared change safely is essential. Most of the time, there are infrastructure patterns in a platform, so we need a repeatable way to use them across environments.
Since we manage a separate Terraform modules repository for our configurations with AWS EKS cluster configurations and HashiCorp Vault configurations, if we need to make a change across all clusters, we only need to change that Terraform module itself.
Another benefit is that it can be used not only for a specific cloud setup. We can use it for AWS, GCP, and also for Azure. The multi-cluster, multi-cloud setup capability using Terraform is a good feature.
What needs improvement?
For platform teams, I would appreciate an easier way to manage changes across a large set of accounts and clusters. I would want to see the impact across all targets, review the plans individually, and roll out changes in controlled stages from one place. That would be a good improvement for Terraform for a platform team.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management for around three years. Before working in my current role, I used Terraform since my university life when I was studying at Colombo University for personal projects. My total experience is now three years.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
In our company, since we have a governance body on top, we have no idea where these costs are determined. What we do is use them from the lower setup.
What other advice do I have?
I would say IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management deserves a nine out of ten marks. With the improvement I mentioned for platform teams, that would be really valuable. Apart from that, overall, it definitely deserves this rating.
I have not worked with IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management's AI capabilities and have not explored them yet. Most of the time, we used GitHub Copilot or Codex to generate code for Terraform. My experience with the AI capabilities of Terraform is limited.
For anyone using HashiCorp Terraform, I would suggest using reusable templates and Terraform modules to minimize code repeatability.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
reviewer2890770
Infrastructure as code has standardized multi-environment provisioning and reduces manual work
Reviewed on Sep 26, 2026
Review provided by PeerSpot
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management is infrastructure provisioning and lifecycle management using Terraform. Day-to-day, I use it to provision cloud resources through reusable modules, manage infrastructure changes through version-controlled code, and keep deployments consistent across development, testing, and production environments.
One thing I would add about our main use case is that it gives us better control and visibility over infrastructure changes. It fits well into our CI/CD process, so provisioning and updates are more repeatable, while approvals and version history help reduce the risk of manual changes.
What is most valuable?
The best features I found most useful in IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management are reusable Terraform modules, infrastructure as code with version control, and automated provisioning across environments. I also appreciate the plan and apply workflow because we can review infrastructure changes before deployment and maintain a clear history of what changed.
I rely most on the infrastructure as code feature because it gives us a consistent way to manage infrastructure through version-controlled configuration. It also makes changes easier to preview, reproduce, and roll back compared with making changes manually in the cloud console.
One thing I wish I had understood earlier regarding the features is the importance of designing Terraform modules and state management properly from the beginning. I also find the integration with CI/CD and policy controls valuable because it helps us enforce standards without adding too much manual work.
IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management has mainly improved consistency and reduced the time needed to provision and update infrastructure. We have also seen fewer configuration issues because changes go through a standardized version control process instead of being handled manually.
What needs improvement?
One area for improvement in IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management would be making the initial setup and learning curve simpler, especially around Terraform state, modules, and workspace management. Better built-in guidance and troubleshooting for common configuration or deployment errors would make onboarding easier for new team members.
The documentation is generally useful, but some advanced topics can take time to piece together, especially when troubleshooting integrations or complex Terraform configurations. More end-to-end examples and clearer troubleshooting guidance would make the experience easier, particularly for teams adopting it for the first time.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management for a little over a year now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management has been quite stable for day-to-day infrastructure provisioning and management in our experience. We have had occasional issues with the configuration or integrations, but the platform itself has been reliable enough for our regular development and production workflows.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability with IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management has been good in our experience. As we added more environments and cloud resources, we could reuse existing modules and workflows rather than redesigning setup. Scaling mainly involved configuration and capacity adjustments.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support for IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management has been generally good, especially for product-specific or technical issues. For more complex Terraform or integration problems, I sometimes rely on documentation and community resources as well, since those can provide more detailed troubleshooting examples.
I would rate the customer support for IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management eight out of ten. The response has generally been helpful for product-related issues, although more detailed guidance for complex integrations and troubleshooting would make it stronger.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management, I relied more on manual cloud console provisioning and some custom scripts for infrastructure setup. I moved to HashiCorp because I needed a more standardized, version-controlled approach that could scale across multiple environments.
How was the initial setup?
The pricing for IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management was reasonable for the value I received, although the overall cost depends on the deployment model, usage, and the specific HashiCorp capabilities licensed. Setup was fairly manageable, but I did spend some initial effort on architecture, integrations, and establishing Terraform standards.
What was our ROI?
I have seen a positive ROI mainly through time savings rather than reducing headcount. As a rough estimate, infrastructure provisioning and routine changes take thirty to forty percent less effort, which frees up teams to focus more on higher-value engineering work.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I looked at a few alternatives before choosing IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management, mainly AWS CloudFormation, Azure Resource Manager, and compared them around multi-cloud support, ease of managing infrastructure as code, reusable components, teamwork flow, and integration with our existing CI/CD processes.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend to others looking into IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management that they define their infrastructure standards, module structure, and state management approach before rolling it out widely. Also, start with a few repeatable use cases, integrate it with your CI/CD pipeline, and gradually expand once the team is comfortable with Terraform.
Overall, IBM HashiCorp Infrastructure Lifecycle Management has been a practical solution for standardizing infrastructure management and reducing manual provisioning work. The main thing I would emphasize is to invest time upfront in module design, state management, and governance, because that makes the platform much easier to scale later. I would rate this solution eight out of ten overall.