Overview

Product video
Weights & Biases provides AI developers with the tools needed to build models faster, fine-tune LLMs, and develop GenAI applications with confidence for enterprises of all sizes in any vertical. The company is trusted by over 1,300 customers including more than 30 foundation model builders.
We provide a comprehensive developer platform to productionize AI. W&B Weave helps developers evaluate, monitor, and iterate to deliver LLM-powered applications, and W&B Models enables ML engineers to train, fine-tune, and manage AI models. Weights & Biases brings together all the developer tools you need for AI into a single, unified platform, delivering enterprise-level performance, scaling, governance, and security.
Weights & Biases helps AI teams of all sizes:
- Build system of record for AI
- Run rigorous evaluations of AI applications
- Debug AI applications pre-production and monitor them in production
- Track experiments for reproducibility and governance
- Track lineage for datasets, models, and metadata
- Collect human feedback and annotations
- Create training datasets leveraging production traces
- Share insights interactively with collaborators
- Implement CI/CD for AI models
Highlights
- W&B was created by AI engineers for AI engineers. Our mission is to build the best tools for Artificial Intelligence.
- Weights & Biases is trusted by more than 1M AI practitioners and used by AI leaders including at OpenAI, Cohere, Toyota Research Institute, and others across industries.
- Weights & Biases works seamlessly with any AI framework or existing architecture, whether in the cloud or on your own infrastructure.
Details
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Buyer guide

Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
Pricing
Dimension | Description | Cost/12 months |
|---|---|---|
Annual Single User License for W&B Models | Single user license for 12 months of W&B Models | $4,800.00 |
Annual Commitment for W&B Weave, 10GB | Pricing is dependent on estimated usage of the platform. | $25,000.00 |
The following dimensions are not included in the contract terms, which will be charged based on your usage.
Dimension | Description | Cost/unit |
|---|---|---|
overage | Storage overage | $0.001 |
Vendor refund policy
Non-Refundable. Unless otherwise expressly provided for in this agreement or the applicable Order Form, (i) all fees are based on services purchased and not on actual use; and (ii) all fees paid under this agreement are non-refundable.
How can we make this page better?
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Content disclaimer
Delivery details
Software as a Service (SaaS)
SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.
Resources
Support
Vendor support
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.

Standard contract
Customer reviews
A Reliable Platform for Tracking Machine Learning Experiments
AI Tracing and Evaluation Made Easy
Weights & Biases Makes Experiment Tracking and Run Comparisons Effortless
Easy Experiment Tracking and Smooth PyTorch Lightning Integration
Experiment tracking has transformed model tuning and now supports faster, more informed AI workflows
What is our primary use case?
I use Weights & Biases primarily for experiment tracking, logging metrics such as loss and accuracy, learning rate, and other parameters. It helps in visualizing training progress in real time, particularly for deeper projects involving dataset modeling, CI/CD pipelines, and similar tasks.
I used Weights & Biases in my personal project involving self-generating adversarial networks, where I tracked generator and discriminator losses over time, logged sample outputs, and compared architectures and hyperparameters. Those losses helped me analyze my model to optimize it so that they became negligible or minimal. Weights & Biases provides real-time dashboards, image logging, experiment comparison, and other useful features.
One thing I appreciate about using Weights & Biases is how it fits into the bigger picture of ML workflows. As a developer, I can integrate end-to-end workflow integrations, which include data pipelines to track, model registry to store and manage, and deployment monitoring, so that I can analyze how models are performing, the losses, and the gains. It also supports hyperparameter tuning and model comparisons, including the comparison of losses and gains. In my opinion, it is a research notebook experiment collaboration tool.
Using Weights & Biases gave me the ability for faster development and also saved my time since analyzing the discriminator and generator losses, which would have taken a lot of time if I did it manually, was done very easily with Weights & Biases. The graphs it provided were also very helpful in analyzing the gains and losses and the accuracy of the generator and discriminator model.
What is most valuable?
The best features that Weights & Biases offers include experiment tracking to monitor accuracy, loss, and learning rate in real time, visualizing the training process with dashboards. Additionally, it automates testing of hyperparameter configurations for different models through the hyperparameter feature. Weights & Biases has a model registry to version data, models, prompts, and code, ensuring reproducibility by linking experiments. Weights & Biases also has an integration ecosystem that works seamlessly with frameworks like PyTorch and TensorFlow .
What needs improvement?
Deployment and monitoring stands out as a feature I wish had further improvement. When I used it, it served as a fine-tuned model directly from Weights & Biases, providing automations for CI/CD pipelines and machine learning.
From my perspective, I don't think Weights & Biases needs significant improvement, but areas involving more image tracking and additional integrations with tools like PyTorch or TensorFlow would be beneficial. I would prefer some AI tools to be integrated, such as Vercel or Netlify for deployments, as that would create ease of use for developers.
In terms of Weights & Biases's AI capabilities, I believe improvements can be made regarding governance and security. In the AI world, many organizations struggle with securing their codes effectively, so if Weights & Biases introduced features related to security score levels, it would be helpful in enhancing security and strengthening code in a cohesive manner.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Weights & Biases since last year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Weights & Biases is stable.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before using Weights & Biases, I had only developed in personal projects involving self-generating adversarial networks, where I analyzed the performance of generator and discriminator models along with their gains and losses.
What was our ROI?
I have seen a return on investment in terms of time saved, with improved accuracy, reduced losses, and increased gains.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I only use the free tier of Weights & Biases, and I do not have any information regarding the prices or setup costs for licensing. The free tier is sufficient for developers who are in college, in my opinion.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I only use Weights & Biases and did not evaluate any other options.
What other advice do I have?
I suggest avoiding making the interview too lengthy, as it is meant for review purposes and should not take up thirty minutes to one hour. My overall review rating for Weights & Biases is eight out of ten.