
Overview
Scanning Modules: SAST, SCA, IAC, Secrets, DAST (optional) Developer Seats: Minimum 10 Repositories: Unlimited Language Support: Full Scanning: All Changes Uptime SLA: 99.50% Data Retention: Unlimited Support: Email, Chat, Helpdesk, & Dedicated account manager Custom Scanning Configuration Insights and Analytics API Access Custom Scanning Engines Fine Grain Access Control Single Sign On VCS Integration: ONLY via Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps
Highlights
- Save Security & Development Teams Time
- Ship Secure Applications Faster
- Empower Developers to Write Secure Code
Details
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
Pricing
Dimension | Description | Cost/12 months |
|---|---|---|
Pro plan without DAST | Annual per 10 users | $5,610.00 |
Pro plan with DAST | Annual per 10 users | $8,610.00 |
Add-on Pro without DAST | Additional user annual | $561.00 |
Add-on Pro with DAST | Additional user annual | $861.00 |
Vendor refund policy
Contact sales@guardrails.io
How can we make this page better?
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Content disclaimer
Delivery details
Software as a Service (SaaS)
SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.
Resources
Vendor resources
Support
Vendor support
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.

Standard contract
Customer reviews
Shifted security left and automated pull request checks to improve code hygiene and collaboration
What is our primary use case?
GuardRails is used primarily to shift security left by automating continuous application across Git repositories, where it automatically scans for vulnerabilities, exposed secrets, and IaC misconfigurations before code is deployed on AWS EKS environments.
GuardRails has been integrated into the VCS workflow, and whenever a developer opens a pull request containing code changes or a new Terraform manifest, GuardRails automatically initiates a silent scan. For example, if a developer accidentally opens AWS and leaves a security group open to public in a Terraform script, GuardRails blocks the PR instantly, which allows the developer to fix it before the code ever triggers the CI/CD pipeline.
GuardRails centralizes security tooling instead of managing separate standalone scanners for secrets, open-source dependencies, and static code analysis, as it acts as a unified orchestrator for all of them.
How has it helped my organization?
GuardRails has positively impacted the organization by fostering a collaborative DevSecOps culture, where developers actively fix security issues as they write code, leading to massive improvements in code hygiene and the DevOps team spending significantly less time reviewing code configuration vulnerabilities after deployment.
Regarding the impact on code hygiene and time saved, a roughly 40% reduction in production vulnerabilities has been achieved.
What is most valuable?
The best features GuardRails offers include in-workflow PR feedback, a consolidated AppSec engine, just-in-time developer training, zero-configuration onboarding, and a single pane of glass dashboard.
The in-workflow PR automated feedback from GuardRails has made the biggest difference for the team, as it completely removes the traditional security bottleneck where developers had to wait for a security team to manually review logs, thus cutting down deployment friction drastically.
What needs improvement?
To improve GuardRails, more granular customization options for exclusions would be beneficial, especially when dealing with legacy codebases where certain non-critical alerts should be ignored without disabling an entire scanning engine. Deeper compliance reports would also be useful.
The scanning engine and VCS integrations are very strong, and most requested improvements are centered on advanced governance controls and rule tuning for massive enterprise environments with unique legacy tech stacks.
Enhanced multi-tenant dashboarding for organizations managing entirely isolated product business units would be highly valuable.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working in the DevOps and cloud infrastructure space for around five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
GuardRails is stable, as the webhook processing and dashboard performance are highly reliable, keeping up with high-velocity deployment lifecycles.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
GuardRails handles scalability as the organization grows quite well, automatically scaling as PRs increase.
The scalability of GuardRails is very good. As new repositories are added and engineering headcount expands, the platform automatically scales its scanning capabilities without lagging PR merge times.
How are customer service and support?
The experience with customer support has been positive, with the technical team being knowledgeable and responsive whenever clarification on custom engine behavior is needed.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, a collection of disparate open-source CLI scanners was used, which were inconsistent and easily bypassed by fast-moving teams, which is why the switch to GuardRails was made.
How was the initial setup?
The experience with GuardRails's pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the setup cost was incredibly straightforward, as the organization was up and running across the entire repository portfolio within a few clicks, and the per-developer seat pricing structure is predictable and very reasonable considering the security gaps it closes.
What was our ROI?
A clear return on investment from GuardRails has been seen, as a single severe secret leak or exposed infrastructure easily saves thousands.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing GuardRails, other options were evaluated, including dedicated standalone platforms like Snyk and SonarQube , but GuardRails was selected because it offered a far more streamlined, unified approach across SAST , SCA , and IaC out of the box without requiring complex individual CI pipeline configuration.
What other advice do I have?
Regarding GuardRails's AI capabilities, its governance and security controls are highly robust, requiring minimal, well-defined, read-only API access to codebases, and the central dashboard provides sufficient visibility into which repositories have high-risk patterns. Adding more advanced role-based access control inside the management panel would be perfect.
The accuracy and reliability of GuardRails's output are impressive, with recommendations being highly practical and reliable. While any static analysis platform will yield occasional false positives on edge case logic, GuardRails filters out a lot of standard noise compared to legacy tools, making its output highly actionable for developers.
The cloud-hosted SaaS deployment of GuardRails is used, which integrates directly with the managed version control system via secure OAuth webhooks.
GuardRails is deployed on AWS as the cloud provider.
GuardRails was purchased directly through a vendor rather than through the AWS Marketplace .
GuardRails integrates with existing CI/CD tools and workflows by instantly connecting with version control systems like GitHub , GitLab , and Bitbucket via OAuth or app.
GuardRails handles compliance requirements by being audit-ready, tracking, and automatically logging the security result of every commit and pull request, providing auditors with permanent, tamper-proof documentation of continuous code governance, industry framework mapping, proactive cloud safeguard, and data privacy gardening. Its sovereign and air-gapped deployment even offers an on-premise model, allowing highly regulated enterprises to keep all scanning data within their own network boundaries to meet strict data residence laws.
GuardRails supports the team in onboarding new developers and training them on secure coding practices by having zero local setup. It hooks directly into repository layers, so engineers do not have to install any local CLI tools or IDE .
Regarding open-source dependency scanning and vulnerability management, GuardRails provides deep dependency tracking that scans package managers and lock files to automatically uncover security flaws in both direct and deeply nested open-source libraries, including automated SBOM generation, real-time CVE spotting, upgrade guidance, license compliance checks, and monitoring of open-source licensing models in real time to prevent legally problematic copyleft compliance issues from compromising proprietary source.
GuardRails supports collaboration between security and development teams by becoming the unified source of truth that bridges the organizational gap, providing a single platform where the security team sets high-level governance policy and development teams view daily actionable code. This removes the security cop friction and streamlines exception triage with shared responsibility models.
My advice to others looking into using GuardRails is to start by activating it on the most critical repository first, working closely with engineering leads to establish a clear baseline for what counts as a breaking vulnerability, tuning the initial rule set to fit workflows, and then rolling out across the organization. I would rate GuardRails an eight out of ten.
Security checks have shifted left and developers fix vulnerabilities directly in pull requests
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use case for GuardRails is shifting securely left by automating continuous application security testing across our Git repositories. We use it to automatically scan for vulnerabilities, exposed secrets, and infrastructure as code misconfigurations before code ever gets deployed to our AWS EKS environments.
We integrated GuardRails directly into our version control system workflow, and whenever a developer opens a pull request containing code changes or new Terraform manifests, GuardRails automatically initiates a silent scan. For example, if a developer accidentally hard-codes an AWS access key or leaves security configurations wide open to the public in a Terraform script, GuardRails blocks the PR instantly. It leaves an inline comment highlighting the exact vulnerability along with context-relevant remediations and advice, allowing the developer to fix it before the code triggers our CI/CD build pipeline.
What is most valuable?
The best features that GuardRails offers are providing instant inline comments inside pull requests without context switching and bringing SAST , SCA , secret detection, and IAC scanning under a single roof.
The instant inline comments from GuardRails help verify how and where pull requests are arguably the single most effective way to enforce security and code quality checks. Rather than treating security as a final gate that stops production right before release, inline comments seamlessly weave security into the actual writing of code.
GuardRails has allowed us to foster a collaborative DevSecOps culture, and developers now actively fix security issues as they write code. Code hygiene has massively improved, and our DevOps team spends significantly less time reviewing cloud configuration vulnerabilities.
We have achieved roughly a forty percent reduction in production-level vulnerabilities and eliminated accidental credential leaks into our Git history entirely. It also drastically reduced security triage hours for our engineering leadership.
The central dashboard provides sufficient visibility into which repositories have high-risk patterns. Adding more advanced role-based access control inside the management panel would perfect it.
The recommendations from GuardRails are highly practical and reliable, and while any static analysis platform will yield occasional false positives on edge case logic, GuardRails filters out a lot of standard noise compared to legacy tools, making its output highly actionable for developers.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see more advanced granular customization options for rule exclusion in GuardRails, especially when dealing with legacy codebases where you want to ignore certain non-critical alerts without disabling an entire scanning engine. Deeper compliance report maps would also be beneficial.
Overall, the scanning engine and VCS integration are very strong in GuardRails, and most requested improvements are centered around advanced governance controls and rule tuning for massive enterprise environments with unique legacy tech stacks.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working in the field of DevOps and cloud for approximately five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
GuardRails is stable and performs very well as we add new repositories and expand our engineering headcount. The webhook processing and dashboard performance have been highly stable and reliable, keeping up with our high-velocity development cycles.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of GuardRails is excellent, as the platform automatically scales its scanning capabilities without lagging our PR merge times.
How are customer service and support?
Our experience with customer support from GuardRails has been positive, and their technical team is knowledgeable and responsive whenever we need clarification on custom engine behavior.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before using GuardRails, we relied on native, pre-gated, open-source CLI linters and manual code reviews, which were inconsistent and easily bypassed by fast-moving teams.
How was the initial setup?
The setup for GuardRails was incredibly straightforward, and we were up and running across our entire repository portfolio within a few clicks. The per-developer seat pricing structure is predictable and very reasonable considering the security gaps it closes.
What was our ROI?
The ROI was clear immediately with GuardRails. Preventing just a single high-security severity secret leak or exposed infrastructure bug from reaching production easily saves thousands of dollars in cleanup, compliance audit, and potential downtime.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
What other advice do I have?
I advise others looking into using GuardRails to start by activating it on your most critical repository first. Work closely with your engineering leads to establish a clear baseline for what counts as a breaking vulnerability. Tune the initial rule set to fit your workflows and then roll it out organization-wide.
If the organization is trying to scale up its development velocity while ensuring cloud configuration and application code remain secure by default, GuardRails is an excellent choice. I would rate this product an eight out of ten.
GuardRail is awesome
It also helps us with Consistency and quality control as it establishes standards and best practices that ensure consistent quality across products and services.