Sold by: groundcover
Deployed on AWS
Monitor everything you run in the cloud without compromising on cost, granularity, or scale. Zero code instrumentation ; Install in no time.
4
Overview
Groundcover is a cloud-native application monitoring solution that reinvents the domain with eBPF. Built for modern production environments, it enables teams to instantly monitor everything they build and run in the cloud without compromising on cost, granularity, or scale.
Groundcover is a Full-stack Observability for your Cloud, in one place. Tap into all application logs, metrics, traces and Kubernetes events and get full cloud-native observability from infrastructure to application, with one solution.
Start monitoring, everything.
Cover your entire Kubernetes stack instantly with no code changes using the superpowers of eBPF instrumentation.
Zero code instrumentation ; Install in no time.
Groundcover is SOC type-2 and ISO-27001 compliant.
Highlights
- 100% visibility, all the time - Cover your entire Kubernetes stack instantly with no code changes using the superpowers of eBPF instrumentation. Groundcover's eBPF sensor captures Logs, Metrics and Traces with zero code changes.
- Take control of your data, all in-cloud - A unique in-cloud architecture keeps your data private, secured and under your control without ever leaving your cloud environment.
- Reduce costs, scale to new heights - Control your budget and avoid unexpected spikes in cost with a flat, predictable price. No more tough trade-offs about which parts of your production to observe. With transparent per-node pricing you can cover it all, for a fraction of the cost.
Details
Sold by
Categories
Delivery method
Deployed on AWS
New
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Trust Center
Access real-time vendor security and compliance information through their Trust Center powered by Drata or Vanta. Review certifications and security standards before purchase.
Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
AWS Marketplace now accepts line of credit payments through the PNC Vendor Finance program. This program is available to select AWS customers in the US, excluding NV, NC, ND, TN, & VT.
Pricing
Pricing is based on the duration and terms of your contract with the vendor, and additional usage. You pay upfront or in installments according to your contract terms with the vendor. This entitles you to a specified quantity of use for the contract duration. Usage-based pricing is in effect for overages or additional usage not covered in the contract. These charges are applied on top of the contract price. If you choose not to renew or replace your contract before the contract end date, access to your entitlements will expire.
Additional AWS infrastructure costs may apply. Use the AWS Pricing Calculator to estimate your infrastructure costs.
Dimension | Description | Cost/month |
|---|---|---|
Team Plan | Monitor everything in your cloud (Per node) | $20.00 |
Enterprise Plan | Custom packages (contact info@groundcover.com for a private offer) | $99,999.00 |
Dimension | Cost/unit |
|---|---|
On-demand nodes (Per node, averaged over last 30 days) | $20.00 |
Vendor refund policy
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Upon subscribing to this product, you must acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions outlined in the vendor's End User License Agreement (EULA) .
Content disclaimer
Vendors are responsible for their product descriptions and other product content. AWS does not warrant that vendors' product descriptions or other product content are accurate, complete, reliable, current, or error-free.
Delivery details
Software as a Service (SaaS)
SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.
Resources
Vendor resources
Support
Vendor support
Start monitoring everything you build and run in the cloud. Get the latest feature announcements and live support in our Slack community!
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.
Updated weekly
By groundcover
By Dynatrace
Top
10
In Generative AI, Log Analysis
Top
10
In Migration, Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery
Sentiment is AI generated from actual customer reviews on AWS and G2
Functionality
Ease of use
Customer service
Cost effectiveness
Positive reviews
Mixed reviews
Negative reviews
AI generated from product descriptions
eBPF-Based Instrumentation
Captures logs, metrics, and traces from Kubernetes environments without requiring code changes or modifications to applications.
Full-Stack Observability
Provides unified monitoring across infrastructure, application, and Kubernetes layers including logs, metrics, traces, and Kubernetes events in a single platform.
In-Cloud Data Architecture
Maintains data privacy and security by processing and storing observability data within the customer's cloud environment without external data transmission.
Kubernetes Stack Coverage
Delivers complete visibility across entire Kubernetes deployments with instant deployment and zero instrumentation overhead.
Compliance and Security Standards
Meets SOC type-2 and ISO-27001 compliance requirements for security and data handling.
AI-Powered Root Cause Analysis
Automatically investigates alerts and pinpoints root causes with 5x faster analysis capabilities.
Natural Language Query Interface
Enables querying of observability data using conversational natural language to identify issues and receive actionable insights.
Real-Time Anomaly Detection
Detects system anomalies in real-time to prevent incidents before they impact users.
OpenTelemetry Integration
Supports standardized OpenTelemetry integration for unified data collection across logs, metrics, and traces in cloud-native environments including Kubernetes, serverless, and microservices.
Multi-Tiered Storage Architecture
Implements multi-tiered storage and data management capabilities to optimize telemetry costs and achieve 30% to 50% cost savings.
Full-Stack Observability
End-to-end monitoring of AWS applications and infrastructure from code-level insights to end-user tracing with robust configuration options
AI-Powered Root Cause Analysis
Davis AI engine performs precise root cause analysis showing causation and correlation to drive automated remediation and reduce mean time to resolution
AWS Native Integration
Deep integration with 100+ AWS services including EC2, Lambda, ECS, EKS, Fargate, and Amazon Bedrock with out-of-the-box compatibility
Runtime Application Security
Built-in Runtime Application Self-Protection autonomously detects and blocks threats across AWS-hosted applications with real-time vulnerability and threat detection
Generative AI Monitoring
Monitoring, optimization, and security of Generative AI applications, LLMs, and agentic workflows with real-time GenAI cost optimization and hallucination detection
Validated by AWS Marketplace
FedRAMP
GDPR
HIPAA
ISO/IEC 27001
PCI DSS
SOC 2 Type 2
No security profile
-
-
No security profile
Standard contract
No
No
No
Customer reviews
Amir Baum
Monitoring microservices has become streamlined and custom dashboards provide clear bug insights
Reviewed on Jun 14, 2026
Review provided by PeerSpot
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for Groundcover Observability Platform is monitoring Kubernetes clusters and pods, as well as logs from our production product.
I use Groundcover Observability Platform with my Kubernetes clusters primarily when we encounter bugs in our microservices, and we monitor the logs in Groundcover for this purpose. We also use dashboards to check the performance of the pods.
Groundcover Observability Platform is deployed in my organization within our cluster, and all our microservices are connected to Groundcover so we can view the logs there. Currently, we are using the new Agent Mode, which has helped us create custom dashboards for our product.
What is most valuable?
The best features Groundcover Observability Platform offers include the Agent Mode, which is beneficial for creating customized dashboards, and the logs and monitoring capabilities.
The Agent Mode and custom dashboards feature stands out to me due to the ease of use and how effectively it functions.
Groundcover Observability Platform has impacted my organization positively as it is the primary way we use observability in our company, so it has a significant impact. The positive impact mainly includes tracking bugs, which is straightforward in Groundcover Observability Platform.
What needs improvement?
I cannot think of something specific regarding improvements for Groundcover Observability Platform as it is quite effective, especially compared to my previous experience with a Rapid7 platform, which was considerably worse.
I think it would be beneficial to see the body and content of API calls in the traces as a possible improvement.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working in my current field for about five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Groundcover Observability Platform is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of Groundcover Observability Platform is very good. We add microservices frequently, and we have not experienced any downtime.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before choosing Groundcover Observability Platform, we previously used Rapid7. The decision to switch was an organizational decision, but I am not aware of the specific reason.
How was the initial setup?
I am not certain whether we purchased Groundcover Observability Platform through the Azure Marketplace since I was not the person who purchased the application, as I am a developer.
What was our ROI?
I have seen a return on investment with regard to bug tracking and monitoring.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is outside my field of expertise.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I did not evaluate other options before choosing Groundcover Observability Platform, as this decision was outside my field and I did not make that choice.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to others considering Groundcover Observability Platform is that I would recommend a monitoring application for everyone. It is simply a matter of becoming accustomed to it, and Groundcover Observability Platform is quite easy to adapt to. I would recommend it. I gave this review a rating of eight.
reviewer2711826
Quick deployment and continuous updates enhance user satisfaction
Reviewed on May 28, 2025
Review from a verified AWS customer
What is our primary use case?
My main use cases for Groundcover Observability Platform are as a monitoring tool for debugging and monitoring. I use it to review logs, check traces of API calls, and monitor servers. We use Kubernetes , so the monitoring includes ports and the cluster itself, CPU, memory, and all related metrics.
What is most valuable?
The features of Groundcover Observability Platform that I appreciate most include an anomaly monitor, which I haven't had much chance to use yet. They check regular logs or traces of your service when it's live, and if they detect an anomaly, such as a service producing ten errors when it usually doesn't, they flag it for investigation and deeper insight.
Another notable example with Groundcover Observability Platform is its simple search and query syntax for logs. While this isn't unique to Groundcover specifically, it's really important as our previous vendor had a very difficult-to-use navigation syntax.
What needs improvement?
I recently visited their booth and reported a bug, which they demonstrated and logged. They assured me it would be fixed by tomorrow.
Regarding future versions of Groundcover Observability Platform, they deploy new versions every Monday through rolling updates. I think we need to work on our side to better fit Groundcover, as we have situations where it's difficult to connect between different places over an entire API call, but that's our responsibility, not theirs.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Groundcover Observability Platform for a year and a few months.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
Though I haven't deployed Groundcover Observability Platform myself, being primarily a user, the transition to it during my time was quick and efficient. Everyone involved was very pleased. The migration went very smoothly, and we were able to deprecate the old product rather quickly.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would assess the stability and reliability of Groundcover Observability Platform as an eight out of ten. While I haven't experienced issues personally, I am aware they occasionally encounter some challenges.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Groundcover Observability Platform scales effectively with our organization's growth. We add new environments and everything works great. It scales perfectly, though we have only been using it for a year and a few months, which is a relatively small amount of time.
How are customer service and support?
I have interacted with Groundcover Observability Platform's customer support. While I personally haven't needed them often, I know others who communicate with them regularly. They are very responsive. When I reported a bug, they immediately showed interest, called someone, and got it prioritized.
I would rate Groundcover Observability Platform's customer service as a ten out of ten based on my personal experience. It was perfect.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We switched to Groundcover Observability Platform primarily because of the difficult query syntax in our previous solution. It was really annoying and tough to handle, taking considerable time to debug calls, logs, and traces. We chose Groundcover for their business model as they don't charge based on log storage, and they provide the infrastructure. It's advantageous for us pricing-wise. Additionally, from a security perspective, the data stays in-house, which wasn't the case with our previous tool.
What other advice do I have?
These issues with Groundcover Observability Platform are quick to fix. We have an SRE person at the company who works with them closely and uses Groundcover constantly. He creates amazing graphs, monitoring, and dashboards that work great. Overall, I would rate Groundcover Observability Platform eight out of ten, as I never give tens so companies know they still need to maintain their momentum.