Listing Thumbnail

    Aqua Cloud Native Application Protection Platform

     Info
    Deployed on AWS
    Vendor Insights
    Aqua secures every cloud native application on AWS across the entire lifecycle. Protect containers, serverless, Kubernetes, and AI workloads to accelerate innovation and scale securely. Prevent attacks and reduce risk with security enforced from code to cloud to prompt
    4.2

    Overview

    Play video

    Aqua secures every cloud native application everywhere, including AI. The Aqua Platform (CNAPP) delivers full lifecycle security from development to production, enabling organizations to build faster and innovate with confidence. FedRAMP High Authorized, Aqua helps enterprises meet the most rigorous security and compliance standards. By embedding security across the software development lifecycle, Aqua reduces risk and accelerates digital transformation on AWS. Get a Demo: https://www.aquasec.com/demo/ 

    Highlights

    • Unified platform to secure every cloud native application, including containers, serverless, Kubernetes, and AI workloads across AWS, on-premises, and multi-cloud environments
    • Runtime protection to detect threats, block malicious activity, and enforce compliance in production across all cloud native workloads
    • Purpose-built AI workload security to govern LLMs and generative AI applications, detect model abuse, and enforce policy

    Details

    Delivery method

    Deployed on AWS
    New

    Introducing multi-product solutions

    You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.

    Multi-product solutions

    Features and programs

    Vendor Insights

     Info
    Skip the manual risk assessment. Get verified and regularly updated security info on this product with Vendor Insights.
    Security credentials achieved
    (4)

    Buyer guide

    Gain valuable insights from real users who purchased this product, powered by PeerSpot.
    Buyer guide

    Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases

    AWS Marketplace now accepts line of credit payments through the PNC Vendor Finance program. This program is available to select AWS customers in the US, excluding NV, NC, ND, TN, & VT.
    Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases

    Pricing

    Aqua Cloud Native Application Protection Platform

     Info
    Pricing is based on the duration and terms of your contract with the vendor. This entitles you to a specified quantity of use for the contract duration. If you choose not to renew or replace your contract before it ends, access to these entitlements will expire.
    Additional AWS infrastructure costs may apply. Use the AWS Pricing Calculator  to estimate your infrastructure costs.

    12-month contract (3)

     Info
    Dimension
    Description
    Cost/12 months
    Aqua Platform Shift Left
    Standard Plan
    $50,000.00
    Aqua Platform Protect
    Advanced Plan
    $100,000.00
    Aqua Platform Ultimate
    Ultimate Plan
    $150,000.00

    Vendor refund policy

    All software, maintenance and support are provided subject to the terms and conditions of the Aqua Security Inc. License Agreement.

    Custom pricing options

    Request a private offer to receive a custom quote.

    How can we make this page better?

    Tell us how we can improve this page, or report an issue with this product.
    Tell us how we can improve this page, or report an issue with this product.

    Legal

    Vendor terms and conditions

    Upon subscribing to this product, you must acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions outlined in the vendor's End User License Agreement (EULA) .

    Content disclaimer

    Vendors are responsible for their product descriptions and other product content. AWS does not warrant that vendors' product descriptions or other product content are accurate, complete, reliable, current, or error-free.

    Usage information

     Info

    Delivery details

    Software as a Service (SaaS)

    SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.

    Support

    Vendor support

    AWS infrastructure support

    AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.

    Product comparison

     Info
    Updated weekly

    Accolades

     Info
    Top
    10
    In Container Workloads
    Top
    10
    In Monitoring, Application Development
    Top
    25
    In Observability, Software Development

    Customer reviews

     Info
    Sentiment is AI generated from actual customer reviews on AWS and G2
    Reviews
    Functionality
    Ease of use
    Customer service
    Cost effectiveness
    Positive reviews
    Mixed reviews
    Negative reviews

    Overview

     Info
    AI generated from product descriptions
    Multi-Workload Security Coverage
    Unified platform securing containers, serverless, Kubernetes, and AI workloads across AWS, on-premises, and multi-cloud environments
    Runtime Threat Detection and Enforcement
    Runtime protection to detect threats, block malicious activity, and enforce compliance in production across all cloud native workloads
    AI and LLM Security Governance
    Purpose-built AI workload security to govern large language models and generative AI applications with model abuse detection and policy enforcement
    Full Lifecycle Security
    Security coverage across the entire software development lifecycle from code development through production deployment
    Compliance and Authorization Standards
    FedRAMP High authorization enabling compliance with rigorous security and regulatory standards
    Agentless Cloud Security Architecture
    Agentless-first approach using patented SideScanning technology that provides deep visibility into cloud environments without requiring agent deployment
    Risk Prioritization and Attack Path Analysis
    Granular risk scoring applied to each alert with capability to identify and correlate seemingly unrelated issues into dangerous attack paths
    Unified Cloud Security Platform
    Single platform consolidating multiple security functions including CSPM, CWPP, CIEM, DSPM, Container security, and API security
    CI/CD Integration for Application Security
    Seamless integration into CI/CD process to secure applications from code to cloud deployment
    AI-Powered Investigation and Remediation
    Generative AI capabilities for simplified security investigations and accelerated remediation workflows
    Offensive Security Engine
    Simulates external exploits to produce Verified Exploit Paths for prioritizing exposures that are reachable by outside attackers and reducing cloud attack surface.
    Cloud Security Posture Management
    Continuously monitors and manages security of AWS configurations to prevent public exposure and ensure compliance.
    Secrets Scanning
    Identifies more than 750 types of secrets across public and private repositories.
    Cloud Infrastructure Entitlements Management
    Detects and manages excessive or unused permissions to mitigate the risk of privilege escalation.
    Real-Time Malware Detection
    Detects malware including zero-days in milliseconds with scanning performed directly in cloud environment for object storage services like Amazon S3 and file storage services.

    Security credentials

     Info
    Validated by AWS Marketplace
    FedRAMP
    GDPR
    HIPAA
    ISO/IEC 27001
    PCI DSS
    SOC 2 Type 2
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    No security profile

    Contract

     Info
    Standard contract
    No
    No
    No

    Customer reviews

    Ratings and reviews

     Info
    4.2
    66 ratings
    5 star
    4 star
    3 star
    2 star
    1 star
    53%
    36%
    8%
    3%
    0%
    7 AWS reviews
    |
    59 external reviews
    External reviews are from G2  and PeerSpot .
    Akash Das Barman

    Integrated security into our DevOps workflow and has improved container risk visibility

    Reviewed on Jul 18, 2026
    Review from a verified AWS customer

    What is our primary use case?

    My main use case for Aqua Cloud Security Platform  is securing our cloud native applications, especially container and Kubernetes  environments. We primarily use it for vulnerability scanning, identifying security risks, monitoring runtime activities, and ensuring that workloads follow our security policies. For example, when we deploy container images, we use Aqua Cloud Security Platform  to scan them for vulnerabilities and misconfigurations before they go into production. It helps us identify potential risks early, prioritize critical issues, and take corrective actions before they impact the environment. We also use its runtime monitoring capabilities to detect any unusual behavior in running workloads.

    What is most valuable?

    What I appreciate most about Aqua Cloud Security Platform is that it provides a centralized view of our cloud security posture and helps us manage security across different cloud native environments. Aqua Cloud Security Platform gives us good visibility into vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and runtime risks. The features I find most valuable are its container and Kubernetes  security capabilities, vulnerability scanning, runtime protection, and the ability to integrate security into the DevOps lifecycle. I also appreciate that it helps prioritize risks instead of just showing a long list of vulnerabilities, which makes it easier for the team to focus on the most important issues first.

    Aquq Cloud Security Platform helps us integrate security earlier into our DevOps workflow by bringing security checks into the development and deployment process. Instead of finding issues after applications are deployed, we can identify vulnerabilities and misconfigurations during the build and testing stages. For example, when developers create container images, Aqua Cloud Security Platform can scan those images as part of the CI/CD pipeline and highlight vulnerabilities or policy violations before the image moves to production. This allows developers and security teams to collaborate better and fix issues earlier in the lifecycle.

    One of the biggest improvements we have noticed is that security teams and development teams can collaborate better because security checks are integrated into the workflow. Before using Aqua Cloud Security Platform, managing security across cloud native environments required more manual effort in our case. We used to do it manually. However, with Aqua Cloud Security Platform, we have better visibility into vulnerabilities, container security issues, and runtime risks. Aqua Cloud Security Platform has given us significantly more capability, and the workflow is substantially better than the previous products we have used.

    What needs improvement?

    Aqua Cloud Security Platform is a strong solution for cloud native security, but there are always areas where it can be improved. One area would be making the user experience even more intuitive, especially for new users who are getting started with the platform. Simplifying  some configurations and providing more guided recommendations would help teams onboard faster. New users may find it a little difficult in the earlier stages, but when they become accustomed to it, it will be easier for them to operate.

    Aqua Cloud Security Platform already provides good documentation and support resources, but expanding real-world examples, best practice guides, and troubleshooting scenarios would make it even easier for teams to get maximum value from the platform. From a feature perspective, having more automated recommendations and deeper integrations with a wider range of cloud native tools could further improve the user experience. Additionally, making some advanced features easier to configure would help organizations adopt the platform more quickly.

    A few additional improvements could make the experience even better. One area would be further simplifying the user interface and making advanced configurations easier for new users. More guided workflows, recommendations, and automated remediation suggestions would help teams get value from the platform faster. I would also appreciate seeing continued improvements in integrations with more cloud native tools and better customization options for dashboards and reporting. More detailed real-world examples and best practice documentation would also help users during implementation.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using Aqua Cloud Security Platform for almost one year.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Aqua Cloud Security Platform is quite stable. Currently, it is performing its work properly and maintaining stability.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    The scalability is good. Aqua Cloud Security Platform is feature-rich. There can be a learning curve for new users, as some dashboards and policies take time to understand, but it has good scalability.

    How are customer service and support?

    We have approached customer support a few times, and the customer support has been quite good during our experience with Aqua Cloud Security Platform. Whenever we had questions or needed assistance with configurations, troubleshooting, or understanding certain features, the support team was responsive and helpful. They provided clear guidance and helped us resolve issues efficiently. Overall, the support experience has been positive, and having knowledgeable assistance available made the adoption process smoother.

    If I had to rate customer support on a scale of one to ten, I would rate it around eight out of ten. The support team has been responsive and knowledgeable, especially when we needed help with implementation, troubleshooting, or understanding specific features. There is always some room for improvement, such as faster resolution for more complex issues, but overall the support experience has been positive throughout our one year of using the platform.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    Before Aqua Cloud Security Platform, we used other security tools for monitoring vulnerabilities and managing parts of our cloud security environment. However, we were looking for a more comprehensive cloud native security solution that could provide better visibility across containers, Kubernetes workloads, and our overall cloud environment. We decided to move to Aqua Cloud Security Platform because it offered a more integrated approach, combining vulnerability management, runtime protection, container security, and DevSecOps  capabilities in a single platform. Aqua Cloud Security Platform has given us significantly more capability, and the workflow is substantially better than the previous products we have used.

    How was the initial setup?

    My experience with Aqua Cloud Security Platform pricing and licensing has been generally positive. The pricing is aligned with the value it provides, considering the level of visibility, vulnerability management, and cloud native security capabilities it offers. The initial setup required some planning, especially around understanding our environment, configuring policies, and integrating it with our cloud and DevOps workflows. However, once the platform was configured properly, day-to-day management became much easier.

    What was our ROI?

    According to metrics, we have seen a positive return on investment from using Aqua Cloud Security Platform, mainly through improved efficiency, better visibility, and reduced manual security efforts. One of the biggest benefits has been saving time during vulnerability assessment and cloud security monitoring. Previously, our teams had to spend more time manually reviewing security issues across different workloads, but Aqua Cloud Security Platform has helped centralize the process and prioritize the most important risks. We have noticed improvements in areas such as faster vulnerability identification, quicker remediation decisions, and better collaboration between security and development teams. The value has come from reducing manual effort, improving our security response process, and helping us manage cloud security more proactively with the same team resources.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    Before choosing Aqua Cloud Security Platform, we evaluated a few other cloud security solutions. Some of the solutions we considered included Prism Cloud, Wiz , and Sysdig Secure . We compared them based on factors such as security coverage, ease of integration with our cloud environment, container and Kubernetes security capabilities, visibility, and overall fit with our DevSecOps  workflow. We selected Aqua Cloud Security Platform because it provided the combination of features we were looking for, especially around container security, runtime protection, and securing cloud native workloads.

    What other advice do I have?

    My advice would be to first clearly understand your organization's cloud security requirements and then evaluate how Aqua Cloud Security Platform fits into your environment. Aqua Cloud Security Platform is a powerful platform with many security capabilities. Spending time on proper configuration, policy setup, and team training will help you get the maximum value from it. I would also recommend starting with the areas that are most critical for your organizations, such as container security, vulnerability management, or runtime protection, and then expanding usage as the team becomes more familiar with the platform. I would rate this product eight out of ten overall.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Hybrid Cloud

    If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

    Sudheer Kumar

    Unified cloud-native security has improved compliance and now needs simpler deployment and AI insight

    Reviewed on Jul 04, 2026
    Review from a verified AWS customer

    What is our primary use case?

    I used Aqua Cloud Security Platform  for container image scanning, runtime threat detection, infrastructure as code scanning, and software supply chain security.

    I used it for container image scanning registries for our Azure  cloud environment and AWS  ECR as well. So it was for Azure Container Registry  scanning and Amazon ECR  scanning.

    For Kubernetes  security, I think it is a good feature, including RBAC analysis, privileged containers, host path detection, and pod security. And on the CSPM side as well.

    Mostly, I used it for container scanning and our CI/CD pipeline scanning. So mostly, on the CSPM side.

    We deployed it in a hybrid environment. We also have both AWS  cloud and Azure  cloud. So it is a hybrid deployment.

    What is most valuable?

    The best features I can identify are container image scanning, Kubernetes  security, runtime protection, CSPM, infrastructure as code security, and supply chain security as well.

    Not specifically cost saving, but from the security side, we completed our compliance standards, and in our CI/CD pipeline, we set up our security gates between the planning, build, and code phases.

    What needs improvement?

    I think Aqua Cloud Security Platform  has a good, strong platform, but there are still other areas. For example, if we compare it with Prisma Cloud or Wiz , I can see that with the initial deployment, in the deployment phase, they need to create a more user-friendly interface. Also, the cloud context visualization is an area for improvement. Aqua Cloud Security Platform is focusing heavily on workloads and runtime security, but it offers less intuitive visualization of cloud relationships compared to Wiz  and Prisma Cloud.

    I think for the licensing part and AI-driven prioritization, this needs improvement. While Aqua Cloud Security Platform prioritizes findings using CVSS and policy context, if we compare it with Wiz and Prisma Cloud, they are increasingly using AI-driven risk scoring that incorporates exploitability, identity exposure, internet reachability, and business context.

    Regarding AI-driven activities, I think there is still a need for them to think about, or implement, or enhance their LLM models so they can prioritize the CVSS or policy context scoring based on AI-driven methodologies.

    I think the licensing complexity and agent dependency are areas for improvement. Many runtime protection capabilities rely on deploying Aqua enforcers and Aqua agents. So, organizations that prefer completely agentless security for operational simplicity may find this less attractive than platforms like Wiz or Orca Security , which emphasize agentless assessment for many use cases. Also, the licensing can become difficult to estimate for large environments with many clusters, workloads, and cloud accounts, making cost forecasting less straightforward than for some competitors.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I used Aqua Cloud Security Platform in my previous job for around three years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Aqua Cloud Security Platform is stable as of now.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Platform scalability is fantastic and its enterprise solution is really amazing.

    How are customer service and support?

    Customer support is acceptable. Sometimes we receive a complaint from our L3 or L2 engineers that they are not getting proper on-time support, but overall, it is acceptable.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    Previously, we were using multiple tools for scanning: container image scanning, Kubernetes security, runtime security, CSPM and on the IAC side. We were using multiple scanning tools for that. Then we found one single solution, which is Aqua Cloud Security Platform. So it really added value for our organization.

    We were previously using a lot of open-source tools. Open-source tools have their limitations and there is no vendor support. Then we did a lot of analysis with multiple paid solutions and came to know that Aqua Cloud Security Platform is the best from our environment's perspective.

    How was the initial setup?

    The main trend is for deployment complexity, so we still have to use multiple resources for that. But after deploying it in the CI/CD pipeline, it enhances our CI/CD or automation capability for the organization. So the DevSecOps  capacity or DevSecOps  integration is good. And the supply chain security is also fantastic. Container security, Kubernetes security, runtime protection, everything is fantastic.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    I think the licensing part and the cost part are as per the market standard, but it again depends on your budget and what services you are looking for. So, overall, it is good. Not too high, not too low. It is easy for organizations.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    We went through Wiz, Prisma, and Orca  as well.

    What other advice do I have?

    My advice would be that if someone is looking for runtime protection, Kubernetes security, container security, IAC security, and supply chain security for their organization, then I think Aqua Cloud Security Platform is fantastic. But if they are looking for agentless assessment, attack path analysis, and ease of deployment, then they can look at other vendors. I would rate this product seven out of ten.

    DeepakReddy

    Cloud-native security has unified container protection and now automates vulnerability checks

    Reviewed on Jun 27, 2026
    Review from a verified AWS customer

    What is our primary use case?

    Aqua Cloud Security Platform  secures our containers, Kubernetes  clusters, and container images. We regularly run container image scanning, SAST  scans, and vulnerability management and software supply chain security scans. We also use it for secret detection, rotation of secret keys, and compliance monitoring.

    Aqua helps with secret detection by scanning our GitHub  or GitLab  repositories to check whether there are any passwords or sensitive data present. If it detects them, we remove them or take action around them.

    How has it helped my organization?

    Aqua Cloud Security Platform  has positively impacted our organization by improving our tooling usage.

    It has positively impacted us by reducing twenty to thirty percent of our manual vulnerability checks.

    We see a return on investment in terms of time saved, with around twenty-five to thirty percent of our time saved as we no longer need to search for vulnerabilities manually. We can now see all vulnerabilities on one dashboard.

    What is most valuable?

    Aqua Cloud Security Platform is perfect for us because it has container image scanning, real-time protection, Kubernetes  security, and inbuilt cloud security. It is an all-in-one tool.

    The best feature of Aqua Cloud Security Platform is the Kubernetes security, which secures admission controllers, runtime policies, namespace protection, and RBAC and pod security. It helps manage all these aspects effectively with this cloud-native security tool.

    We use admission controllers, and this Aqua cloud-native solution has inbuilt admission controllers and Kubernetes operators that help secure our Kubernetes pods, deployments, and services. This is particularly beneficial for us, especially because other solutions operating in the same space do not match the accuracy and operational capability. The scans and benchmarking are also very good.

    Other notable features I found in Aqua Cloud Security Platform include multiple integrations with tools such as Docker , AWS , Azure , Google Cloud , GitHub , GitLab , Jenkins , Azure DevOps , Bitbucket , Terraform , and Jfrog. There are hundreds of integrations available. It also has multiple deployment options such as hybrid cloud, multi-cloud, or on-premise, and includes SAST  with all security tooling inbuilt, making it a comprehensive tool.

    The dashboard shows all the important information we were missing in our previous tool.

    What needs improvement?

    Improvements could be made to Aqua Cloud Security Platform.

    I am considering some specific features that Aqua could include for better functionality.

    The UI needs some improvement as it is somewhat overwhelming, and the licensing can be expensive at scale. The AI output of Aqua Cloud Security Platform is good, but I believe it can be improved. We received alerts about vulnerabilities in our dashboard, particularly related to a database call issue. The AI identified a problem with a Postgres snapshot, which turned out to be accurate, but it could be enhanced by including specific details about what has gone wrong.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using Aqua Cloud Security Platform for around a year.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Aqua Cloud Security Platform is stable based on my experience.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    It can handle increasing workloads easily.

    How are customer service and support?

    The customer support has been responsive and knowledgeable, especially regarding deployment questions and policy tuning.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    We previously used a security tool built into our company, which had many issues, mainly only supporting AWS  and Docker , without Kubernetes or other cloud providers. That is why we switched to Aqua Cloud Security Platform, an all-in-one solution.

    How was the initial setup?

    We purchased Aqua Cloud Security Platform from the AWS Marketplace .

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    My experience with Aqua Cloud Security Platform's pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been good.

    The license and setup costs have been reasonable, though a challenge arises when deploying the entire application in our own cloud, as we must manage everything from scratch. The customer support has also been very cooperative.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    We evaluated various options, including Snyk  and Splunk, as well as other tools such as Trivy . We found Aqua Cloud Security Platform to be the best choice among all alternatives.

    What other advice do I have?

    The AI output of Aqua Cloud Security Platform is good, but I believe it can be improved. We received alerts about vulnerabilities in our dashboard, particularly related to a database call issue. The AI identified a problem with a Postgres snapshot, which turned out to be accurate, but it could be enhanced by including specific details about what has gone wrong.

    Aqua Cloud Security Platform needs some improvement in the UI, which is somewhat overwhelming, and the licensing can be expensive at scale. I gave this product a rating of eight.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Public Cloud

    If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

    Amazon Web Services (AWS)
    Sudheer Kumar

    Cloud-native security has strengthened our pipeline and now needs better dashboards and AI risk views

    Reviewed on Jun 20, 2026
    Review from a verified AWS customer

    What is our primary use case?

    Aqua Cloud Security Platform  is primarily used for cloud-native applications, focusing on cloud identity and entitlement management and vulnerability management for containers, Kubernetes , and ISC, along with secret detection and DevSecOps .

    A recent project with Aqua Cloud Security Platform  addressed a security challenge related to container and Kubernetes  security using runtime protection. Examples include container escape attempts, privilege escalations, reverse shell executions, malicious process wrapping, and crypto mining, which involved using Aqua runtime controls to scan the entire CNAPP .

    Kubernetes security is a key focus, where Aqua provides capabilities for network segmentation, pod security controls, and service account monitoring, often stronger than Microsoft Defender for Cloud  and more mature than Orca .

    What is most valuable?

    The best features found in Aqua Cloud Security Platform include capabilities at the domain-wise level, which include CWPP , secret detection, runtime protection, Kubernetes security, vulnerability management, and CSPM.

    Aqua Cloud Security Platform positively impacted my organization by allowing deployment from code to cloud in the entire CI/CD pipeline, with excellent capabilities and recent AI application security that is useful in the DevSecOps  platform.

    Multi-cloud support with AWS , Azure , GCP , and software supply chain security with SBOM generation and CI/CD pipeline scanning are unique aspects that set Aqua Cloud Security Platform apart.

    What needs improvement?

    When compared to modern platforms like Wiz  and CrowdStrike, the user interface of Aqua Cloud Security Platform feels more engineer-focused than executive-friendly, requiring improvement in user interfaces for CISO preferences.

    Currently, there is a move towards agent-based solutions, and Aqua Cloud Security Platform lacks visibility on the agent side. Wiz  and Orca  have changed the market with agentless scanning, while Aqua Cloud Security Platform still relies on deeper runtime agents, inviting operational overhead compared to other vendors.

    Risk prioritization in security graphs is a point where Aqua Cloud Security Platform is less mature than Wiz, which excels at identifying critical vulnerabilities as a single attack path.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using Aqua Cloud Security Platform for around four years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Aqua Cloud Security Platform is stable, providing good capabilities and service.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Aqua Cloud Security Platform's scalability is good, providing better services compared to DevSecOps when compared to CrowdStrike and Orca.

    How are customer service and support?

    The customer support for Aqua Cloud Security Platform is excellent, available 24/7, and provides better solutions for any issues raised through tickets.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I did not previously use a different solution; we were using earlier open-source solutions only. We wanted to go with a paid solution to provide good capability that we can rely on.

    What was our ROI?

    I have seen a return on investment with Aqua Cloud Security Platform as it provides good capabilities. It is generally used for the DevSecOps pipeline to scan the entire SAST , DAST, or ISC, performing excellently in that area.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    Compared to other vendors, Aqua Cloud Security Platform's pricing is good or lesser. The pricing part is acceptable, and ease of use, as well as DevSecOps integration, is excellent.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    Before choosing Aqua Cloud Security Platform, I evaluated other options including CrowdStrike and Orca.

    What other advice do I have?

    My advice for others looking into using Aqua Cloud Security Platform is that for container security, Kubernetes security, runtime protection, supply chain, or overall CNAPP , if someone wants to use it at a lesser price, this product provides good capabilities. They can proceed with this product; however, for dashboard and executive reporting, if that is specifically what you are looking for, you may want to consider other products.

    Aqua Cloud Security Platform's AI capabilities provide good governance and security primarily through risk prioritization, although compared to Wiz, Prisma Cloud, and Orca, it is less competitive at the moment. In terms of supply chain securities, Aqua Cloud Security Platform is paramount in comparison to other vendors.

    When it comes to the accuracy and reliability of Aqua Cloud Security Platform's AI capabilities, more work on the AI security side is required. A responsible AI part is missing, making it less valuable.

    I rated this product a seven out of ten.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Hybrid Cloud

    If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

    Mark Rausch

    Daily cloud posture checks have reduced compliance risk but still need faster, smoother interface

    Reviewed on Jun 16, 2026
    Review provided by PeerSpot

    What is our primary use case?

    My main use case for Aqua Cloud Security Platform  is to check mostly cloud security posture management.

    A specific example of how I check cloud security posture with Aqua Cloud Security Platform  is that we were basically tasked with making sure to do daily checks to ensure there were no critical vulnerabilities or anything within the environment itself of our client. If there was, we found any new vulnerabilities or CVEs that popped up and notified the client, then looked through their environment to see if anything was found.

    That covers my main use case with Aqua Cloud Security Platform.

    What is most valuable?

    The best features Aqua Cloud Security Platform offers include a good way for checking vulnerabilities within the cloud of our client's cloud infrastructure.

    Regarding how Aqua Cloud Security Platform helps with checking vulnerabilities, they had some vulnerability dashboards for going into each vulnerability that was found in order to find out which specific cloud assets were impacted. Mostly it was for the cloud security posture management side of things.

    Aqua Cloud Security Platform has positively impacted my organization by helping with decreasing the number of compliancy issues with the company that we were working on. We used it to help them figure out what CVEs or cloud security posture management issues that they should be taking care of first and helped show which issues were most concerning and work our way through the most critical ones.

    Prioritizing those issues with Aqua Cloud Security Platform certainly helped reduce the risks that they were impacting their environment. It helps save a little bit of time for determining which aspects the client needed to focus on first before moving on to lower priority tasks.

    What needs improvement?

    Regarding the features of Aqua Cloud Security Platform, the GUI itself would sometimes be a little slow, but other than that, I liked everything else.

    Regarding how Aqua Cloud Security Platform can be improved, I wish it had better application speeds and responsiveness. When I used it on the client that I had a few years ago, we ran into some issues where it would not load properly. Those issues might have been fixed by now.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using Aqua Cloud Security Platform for roughly a year, give or take. This was back when I was working at IBM. We were using it for one of our clients.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    When I used Aqua Cloud Security Platform several years ago, it was fairly reliable with some stability issues.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Aqua Cloud Security Platform did not seem to have any issues with scaling. That being said, when we were working for our client, there was not really a whole lot of growth. There was a little bit but not a large amount, but it did seem to work fine.

    How are customer service and support?

    I believe I only had one or two tickets open with customer support while I was working on Aqua Cloud Security Platform and everything seemed fine and quick.

    On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the customer support for Aqua Cloud Security Platform a ten out of ten.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I did not use any previous solution with this client. I am pretty sure this client always had Aqua security.

    What was our ROI?

    There was definitely some time saved with Aqua Cloud Security Platform. The ability to quickly go through and find out what needed to be done allowed us to quickly put reports together to present to the client.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    I did not evaluate any other options for this client. It was just for Aqua Cloud Security Platform.

    What other advice do I have?

    I rate Aqua Cloud Security Platform a seven out of ten.

    I chose a seven for Aqua Cloud Security Platform because it is very useful. It allows us to be very convenient. However, there were some issues such as the responsiveness of the GUI and some glitches a few times.

    When I had used Aqua Cloud Security Platform last, they did not really have much in the way of AI capabilities, but it really did have some good governance and security features.

    I never really had to do much with the AI capabilities of Aqua Cloud Security Platform. I never really messed with it as I had used it several years ago.

    I would advise others looking into using Aqua Cloud Security Platform to check around at other platforms as well and compare to see what your needs are compared to what everything else offers.

    I do not have any additional thoughts about Aqua Cloud Security Platform before we wrap up.

    View all reviews