Sold by: Arnica
Free Trial
AWS Free Tier
Arnica is a pipelineless Application Security platform that helps developers identify and mitigate risks in real time across Software Composition Analysis (SCA), Static Application Security Testing (SAST), hard coded secrets, Infrastructure as Code (IaC), and more. Arnica integrates directly into your source code management tools (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps) to ensure 100% code coverage, always. Developer native workflows leverage rich chat (Slack, Microsoft Teams etc) and issue management (Jira, ADO Boards etc) integrations to automate much of the application security process for developers. The impact of pipelineless security is a dramatic increase in the volume of security issues addressed and a reduction in the overall effort required to do so.
4.9
Overview
For AppSec teams who need to improve application security, Arnica builds pipelineless solutions and collaborative, developer native workflows that Enable AppSec teams to identify and prioritize the most important risks Surface the right risk to the right owner at the right time Empower development teams to improve code security on push. Unlike other application security posture management (ASPM) companies, Arnica offers code risk, git hardening, SBOM inventories, and secret scanning for free, focusing instead on bringing AppSec teams and developers together to fix vulnerabilities in the right way at the right time in the development process. Achieve 100% Code Coverage and Adoption All code is covered in every branch including feature branches from day one without requiring IDE plugins or manual pipeline configurations. Continuous monitoring of every code push prevents vulnerabilities from ever being merged into production, while ensuring that every developer is covered without having to opt in. Real Time Scanning and Automated Prioritization Identify and mitigate risks in real time with Software Composition Analysis (SCA), Static Application Security Testing (SAST), hard coded secrets, Infrastructure as Code (IaC), licensing, and reputation scanning. Automatically prioritize vulnerabilities using CVSS, EPSS, and KEV scoring, all with fewer false positives and minimal manual effort. Meet Developers Where They Are Developer native workflows enable real time security issue resolution by integrating security directly into the places where developers already work including Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira, Azure DevOps, and source code management platforms. Empower developers to mitigate risks faster with AI driven code suggestions and context rich findings delivered on push. Automatic secret detection and mitigation remove exposed credentials from git history in real time, ensuring a zero new secrets policy while accelerating development velocity. Make an Impact on Security Risks As a result of utilizing real time scanning, developer native workflows, and automated mitigation, 72% of risks sent via ChatOps are addressed before code review, and 92% of risks are addressed before being merged to production. With Arnica, AppSec teams have full visibility into their code, and together with developers make a meaningful impact on security risks. Across Arnica customers 100% of code is scanned for security issues 100% of developers are covered 72% of risks sent via ChatOps are addressed before code review 92% of risks are addressed before being merged to production.
Highlights
- 100% coverage & developer adoption Integrate directly into source code to ensure 100% coverage, always. Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira and more integrations ensure that you engage developers where they work.
- Real time detection Scan every code push in real time, as well as your entire code base daily. Identify and alert developers as they push code to maximize the likelihood of a fix and minimize effort.
- Automated & AI driven mitigation Take effort out of risk mitigation with AI generated code recommendations, automated secret mitigation, and a menu of upgrade paths for SCA vulnerabilities.
Details
Sold by
Categories
Delivery method
Deployed on AWS
New
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
AWS Marketplace now accepts line of credit payments through the PNC Vendor Finance program. This program is available to select AWS customers in the US, excluding NV, NC, ND, TN, & VT.
Pricing
Free trial
Try this product free according to the free trial terms set by the vendor.
Pricing is based on the duration and terms of your contract with the vendor. This entitles you to a specified quantity of use for the contract duration. If you choose not to renew or replace your contract before it ends, access to these entitlements will expire.
Additional AWS infrastructure costs may apply. Use the AWS Pricing Calculator to estimate your infrastructure costs.
Dimension | Description | Cost/12 months |
|---|---|---|
Arnica platform core enterprise tier | Arnica platform core enterprise plan with all states scanners included. Each unit is an contributing identity in the last 90 days to your source code management system. | $600.00 |
Vendor refund policy
For any potential inquiry regarding a potential refund or credits, please reach out to your assigned customer success representative.
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Upon subscribing to this product, you must acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions outlined in the vendor's End User License Agreement (EULA) .
Content disclaimer
Vendors are responsible for their product descriptions and other product content. AWS does not warrant that vendors' product descriptions or other product content are accurate, complete, reliable, current, or error-free.
Delivery details
Software as a Service (SaaS)
SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.
Resources
Vendor resources
Support
Vendor support
Arnica's customer success is provided to all paying customers with no additional cost. Our team will help you onboard and setup the environment to your security requirements. We will provide you with the ability to open a ticket through email (support@arnica.io ), chatbot, or direct communication with your assigned customer success representative. You will have access to Arnica's support portal to view all your open tickets and their status, as well as open new tickets and access our customer knowledge base.
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.
Customer reviews
Computer Software
Intuitive Dashboards and AI That Finds Real Issues
Reviewed on Jun 17, 2026
Review provided by G2
What do you like best about the product?
Works well within existing pipelines. The dashboards are intuitive to use. It's is simple for developers to find their findings to address their code issues.
The SLAs per branch is useful when you have many different
development teams. The newer AI capabilities work well to find real issues instead of FUD.
The SLAs per branch is useful when you have many different
development teams. The newer AI capabilities work well to find real issues instead of FUD.
What do you dislike about the product?
While the dashboard is intuitive, management reporting would be useful. The lack of DAST compared to competitors is a small issue.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We can find and resolve coding issues earlier in the SDLC, reducing the cost to fix problems which speaks to the ROI of the product.
Thomas G.
Developer-friendly AppSec with a flexible policy engine
Reviewed on Jun 15, 2026
Review provided by G2
What do you like best about the product?
I deployed Arnica to replace Checkmarx at a previous company, and I have brought it with me to several startups I support since then. I still use it in my current role, in a somewhat different capacity than the full enterprise program I originally ran.
The policy engine was the primary reason we selected it after evaluating multiple products, since none of the other vendors we tested could offer comparable granularity at the time. It deployed fast across GitHub and Azure DevOps through SCM integration, with no CI rework to start getting value, and our first blocking policy was live within 90 days.
We were able to create granular PR policies on severity, EPSS, finding type, direct versus transitive and prod versus dev dependencies, and package reputation, which let us stage enforcement from annotations into blocking and turn rollout into measurable maturity milestones.
It also strengthened our Security Champions program, since we could empower champions to review dismissals for their own teams. Developer experience improved because people handled findings in code they were already changing instead of years of historical debt.
Customer success has been a genuine strength, responsive and willing to help with rollout, and several requests we raised shipped faster than I expected.
The SBOM explorer experience is also something I personally appreciate, I use it regularly to check exposure across the organizations I support whenever another large supply chain attack hits the news.
My use of the AI review features is still early, more proof of concept than a rollout. I feel positive about the direction, since reviewing AI-generated code is a real challenge and having policy enforcement meet it at the source is the right place to solve it.
On cost, it was priced competitively against the other vendors we evaluated and the per-identity model scaled sensibly as the team grew.
The policy engine was the primary reason we selected it after evaluating multiple products, since none of the other vendors we tested could offer comparable granularity at the time. It deployed fast across GitHub and Azure DevOps through SCM integration, with no CI rework to start getting value, and our first blocking policy was live within 90 days.
We were able to create granular PR policies on severity, EPSS, finding type, direct versus transitive and prod versus dev dependencies, and package reputation, which let us stage enforcement from annotations into blocking and turn rollout into measurable maturity milestones.
It also strengthened our Security Champions program, since we could empower champions to review dismissals for their own teams. Developer experience improved because people handled findings in code they were already changing instead of years of historical debt.
Customer success has been a genuine strength, responsive and willing to help with rollout, and several requests we raised shipped faster than I expected.
The SBOM explorer experience is also something I personally appreciate, I use it regularly to check exposure across the organizations I support whenever another large supply chain attack hits the news.
My use of the AI review features is still early, more proof of concept than a rollout. I feel positive about the direction, since reviewing AI-generated code is a real challenge and having policy enforcement meet it at the source is the right place to solve it.
On cost, it was priced competitively against the other vendors we evaluated and the per-identity model scaled sensibly as the team grew.
What do you dislike about the product?
Dashboard and reporting could be smoother, especially for executive or audit reporting, though I did not find it better in Checkmarx, Snyk, or GitHub Advanced Security. The API was accessible and well-documented enough that our vulnerability management aggregation platform built an integration to it, and we separately pulled findings into our own reporting.
We had some early challenges with SAST rule quality for older, non-web languages, C++ in particular, where SAST quality tends to be inconsistent industry-wide. We worked with Arnica on custom rules and coverage has improved since.
No DAST, which was a lower priority given our focus on pre-production risk, but runtime-heavy teams should weigh that.
The per-identity pricing model also made direct comparison against other vendors trickier, since most of them price differently, and it took some work to walk our finance stakeholders through it before a deal could move forward, though we concluded the pricing was fair once we normalized the comparison.
We had some early challenges with SAST rule quality for older, non-web languages, C++ in particular, where SAST quality tends to be inconsistent industry-wide. We worked with Arnica on custom rules and coverage has improved since.
No DAST, which was a lower priority given our focus on pre-production risk, but runtime-heavy teams should weigh that.
The per-identity pricing model also made direct comparison against other vendors trickier, since most of them price differently, and it took some work to walk our finance stakeholders through it before a deal could move forward, though we concluded the pricing was fair once we normalized the comparison.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The goal was to get more traction from existing application security coverage across SCA, SAST, secrets detection, and SBOM, without slowing engineering down on GitHub and Azure DevOps. In a previous deployment we selected it because we were not seeing consistent, organization-wide reduction in findings, largely because of how findings were delivered, and we wanted a tool that would let us run a focused, prioritized reduction process.
Delivering findings at the SCM layer meant developers mostly dealt with issues in the code they were actively changing rather than a backlog of historical debt they had no context for, which is what finally moved the needle on reduction.
The policy engine flexibility gave us a concrete way to prioritize in a common way across our other product security programs, since we could place emphasis on issues with demonstrated impact that came through bug bounty and red team work, and further tie that back to how Security Champions reviewed and drove remediation on their teams. That pulled four programs into a shared product security effort with a common incentive.
The other ongoing benefit is supply-chain visibility, when a major dependency compromise hits the news, I can check exposure across the organizations I support quickly.
Delivering findings at the SCM layer meant developers mostly dealt with issues in the code they were actively changing rather than a backlog of historical debt they had no context for, which is what finally moved the needle on reduction.
The policy engine flexibility gave us a concrete way to prioritize in a common way across our other product security programs, since we could place emphasis on issues with demonstrated impact that came through bug bounty and red team work, and further tie that back to how Security Champions reviewed and drove remediation on their teams. That pulled four programs into a shared product security effort with a common incentive.
The other ongoing benefit is supply-chain visibility, when a major dependency compromise hits the news, I can check exposure across the organizations I support quickly.
Information Technology and Services
Great Security Coverage at a Reasonable Price
Reviewed on Jun 03, 2026
Review provided by G2
What do you like best about the product?
ou quickly understand the security posture of your codebase and can maintain continuous oversight while delegating day-to-day security responsibilities to contributing developers.
What do you dislike about the product?
The user interface can be confusing. For example, I couldn't easily find the option to remove a monitored repository.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Nowadays, as hybrid code developed by both humans and AI agents is rapidly created and deployed, security risks are increasing exponentially. I needed a budget-sensitive tool that could help me mitigate those risks.
Financial Services
Intuitive and flexible
Reviewed on Aug 26, 2024
Review provided by G2
What do you like best about the product?
Easy setup and administration was my favorite part. It had what we needed, but took a fraction of the time to set up.
What do you dislike about the product?
It can be tedious logging in multiple times throughout the day, but Short login sessions are generally more secure.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Arnica assists us with vulnerability detection (SAST and SCA), and it's prioritization to make meaningful strides in remediation.
Robert V.
Security Professionals operate on the concepts of Need to Know &Least Privileged Access.
Reviewed on Mar 15, 2023
Review provided by G2
What do you like best about the product?
Development and Security are often at odds when granting elevated privileges to source code repositories. A security team asking developers to prove they need elevated privileges causes the "Trust Me" conversation, where developers argue that they should be trusted to have complete control of the source code.
Adopting Zero Trust strategies is helping to remediate over-provisioning in many systems, but source code repositories remain a source of contention. Arnica allows Security teams to discover elevated privileges that have been granted but rarely if ever, used.
With Arnica, Need to Know & Least-Privileged Access metrics are always available without input from developers.
Removing unused, elevated privileges effectively reduces the attack surface and associated risk to intellectual property.
Remediation of discovered overprovisioning is simple and easily documented for change control.
Adopting Zero Trust strategies is helping to remediate over-provisioning in many systems, but source code repositories remain a source of contention. Arnica allows Security teams to discover elevated privileges that have been granted but rarely if ever, used.
With Arnica, Need to Know & Least-Privileged Access metrics are always available without input from developers.
Removing unused, elevated privileges effectively reduces the attack surface and associated risk to intellectual property.
Remediation of discovered overprovisioning is simple and easily documented for change control.
What do you dislike about the product?
The complete feature set in Arnica is only available to GitHub Enterprise organizations. Smaller teams not ready to move to GitHub enterprise will not have the full set of protections.
However, discovering and mitigating risk in source code repositories at any level improves overall risk in any software firm.
However, discovering and mitigating risk in source code repositories at any level improves overall risk in any software firm.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Securing source code in Agle software firms requires visibility into the privileges granted to the Organization. Repositories are often misclassified as public or "open source" when the proprietary nature of the project is not fully understood. Individuals with unnecessary elevated privileges can expose intellectual property by facilitating collaboration inappropriately.
Arnica gives firms visibility, analysis, reporting and remediation capabilities on GitHub. Securing the organization without removing privileges that are necessary for the appropriate individuals.
Arnica gives firms visibility, analysis, reporting and remediation capabilities on GitHub. Securing the organization without removing privileges that are necessary for the appropriate individuals.