Sign in
Categories
Migration Mapping Assistant Your Saved List Partners Sell in AWS Marketplace Amazon Web Services Home Help

Micro Focus UFT One

Micro Focus | 15.00

Windows, Windows Server 2016 Base Windows Server 2016 - 64-bit Amazon Machine Image (AMI)

Reviews from AWS Marketplace

0 AWS reviews
  • 5 star
    0
  • 4 star
    0
  • 3 star
    0
  • 2 star
    0
  • 1 star
    0

External reviews

32 reviews
from G2

External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.


    Information Technology and Services

Key word Driven automation using UFT 12.01

  • December 08, 2019
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best?
1)Key word driven framework setup using vb script and excel file for automating application
2)Object repository feature on UFT with smart identification features
2)Imaged based object recognition and virtual object creation.
3)User friendly IDE for writing your code
4)VB script programming used for automation is very easy to start with.
5)Execution without opening UFT using batch file.
6)Various Addin support for different types of application based on technology.
7)Inbuilt worksheet for adding data and using for testing application for data driven testing.
8)Support to API testing
9)User defined object identification
10)Reports are very informative and can be converted to various format.
11)Repository merging feature is very good.
12)HP support team is very helpful in resolving issues
13).NET spy feature is very useful to get in depth property of objects.
14)Support to different browser.
What do you dislike?
1)Cloud based automation triggering to automation suite
2)Support to CI/CD integration
3)Sometime failed to identify silver light object in spite of using silver light add in.
4) Performance is not good for some application and some times get hang and get crashed abruptly.
5)Not supporting object oriented programming languages like Java,C# etc.
6)License is expensive
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
Support to web and desktop application in a single flow
Recommendations to others considering the product:
License cost is bit on the higher side


    Information Technology and Services

Silverlight Windows application automation

  • December 07, 2019
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best?
1)Object repository feature on UFT
2)Imaged based object recognition .
3)Very easy programming language to start automating application.
4)VB script programming used for automation is very user friendly and easy to start with.
5)RO property feature to get run time object properties for validation.
6)Various addin available for different types of application based on technology.
7)Inbuilt worksheet for adding data and using for testing application for data driven testing.
8)Support to API testing
9)User defined object identification
10)Reports are very informative and can be converted to various format.
11)Repository merging feature is very good.
12)Support to xml and xls files for integration
What do you dislike?
1)Not supporting object oriented programming languages like Java,C# etc.
2) Performance is not good for some application and some times get hang and get crashed abruptly.
3)Sometime failed to identify silver light object in spite of using silver light add in.
4)Cloud based automation triggering to automation suite
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
Silverlight application automation which was difficult with other tools was resolved using UFT.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
support to Object oriented programming languages


    Information Technology and Services

The All-In-One Automation tool

  • November 28, 2019
  • Review verified by G2

What do you like best?
I started using UFT when it was a part of HP and started with 11.5 version. The best part about using UFT was the ease and range of things which can be automated with UFT. The initial part of learning UFT is not so hard as you get a record and playback option which will record all your manual intervention with the application under test and will provide you with a script to play which is simple to understand as it uses VB Scripting as a language part. Once you are comfortable with VB Script and recording part you can start writing your own custom codes to achieve the requirements. It supports Web, Windows, Java application which I used during the course in working with UFT.
What do you dislike?
The only thing which I hate the most about UFT is the resource consumption. Normally UFT will work with a 4Gb ram desktop/laptop but i'll recommend you to go with minimum 8Gb configuration else you won't be getting the best of performance from the tool and there are chances that it will crash at some point of time. The next big issue in my opinion is the pricing point which most of the projects cannot afford.
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
Well to be honest in my course of working with UFT we had automated our web application for the client and some of the benefits i would like to include is as below.
1. Use can use this tool either with Angular JS web application without any issue which is sort of drawback for Selenium tool
2. The object repository concept which helps us store webelement/objects property in a common repository and can be shared with team members is a must functionality i look for in any automation tool
3. The last and my favorite is the ease with which you get to work with VBScripting
Recommendations to others considering the product:
If you are not sure whether this is the right tool for you, one can download and use the trial version of 30days.
Rest all is written in multiple blogs/posts about the comparison with different tools but I'll suggest to go with self exploration


    Education Management

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing for Automation testing!

  • November 25, 2019
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best?
It has best Grafical User interface and it is very easily understandable , It has lot of feature like Record and Play back . It can be used for mobile applications and main frame applications and so much of options are available
What do you dislike?
It is very expensive and it takes so much of time to load.
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
We used this Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing for automation purposes and we write script for the automations and used to execute the scripts and Ideal for automation of all the web applications.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
I recommend this tool because it is best tool in the market for the automation purposes but it is very expensive. It has lots of features like Record and play ! etc


    Information Technology and Services

Best Rider for Testers

  • October 19, 2019
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best?
1.techie friendly,
2.very efficient,
3.have solution for complex things
4.integration part is minimal(test managing tools)
5.easy to setup(made one-click setup)
6.comes with vb script.
7.great in performance.
8.meets any kind of application
What do you dislike?
1.still they can optimize the things in a lot of places.
2. The add-ins part is a bit awful.
3.need to make any lighter version
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
good at regression, the integration part
Recommendations to others considering the product:
as the product is costly but it will not disappoint you.


    Information Technology and Services

Automated functional Testing made Easier - UFT

  • September 27, 2019
  • Review verified by G2

What do you like best?
1.With a simple record and playback approach , UFT develops regression and functional test cases.
2.Both technical and non technical users can use UFT.
3.It works only multiple interfaces like SAP , Web, Silverlight , Mobile , Oracle etc. based on the interfaces selected by user.
4.It can be integrated with test management tools like HP ALM, Test Director , Winrunner etc.
5.Enables test reporting for analysis.
6.Allows easy maintenance of test cases.
7.Excellent object identification mechanism.
8.Supports XML.
What do you dislike?
1.Cost of QTP is high.
2.Cannot run multiple instances- Does not support multithreading.
3.Performance is slow compared to selenium - Takes loads of RAM and CPU
4.All Addins are not free of cost . Few addins need to be purchased - Java, Oracle, Siebel
5.Supports limited versions of browsers
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
1.We are using UFT for functional testing where we follow a data driven aproach in automating SAP applications.
2.We use UFT not only for SAP but also for Web applications.
3.It uses VB script and not very high level programming language , making scripting easier
Recommendations to others considering the product:
On the whole , UFT is a good tool to incorporate into any project.
Since all kinds of frameworks can be worked with , this tool serves its purpose


    Pranjal S.

Automation testers heaven

  • September 15, 2019
  • Review verified by G2

What do you like best?
UFT or QTP is a tool which is in the market from quite a long time now, and Micro focus has improved it a lot lately. Best ting about the tool is
- You get complete testing tools package, you don't need to run behind bunch of tools to perform your end to end testing
- Dedicated support team, which is quite frankly very effective
- Developers forum usually gives most of the answers in short span of time
- Ease of use, and easy to understand the VB scripting makes it available to wide range of people
- You can perform GUI, API and Web testing, and provides bunch of tools to facilitate testing tasks
- Huge developer base, hence easy for any company to adopt the tool
What do you dislike?
-Since UFT has everything integrated in one tool, it become very heavy application
-Only supports VB scripting (and Java script through code injection)
- Costly license
-Limited to windows based OS
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
-We can automate any windows based application, be it GUI, API or Web
-It helps to reduce automation creation and execution time
-It can make modular the framework using action and Function/, which helps to reuse of the code and also make the framework easy to understand.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
If looking for an easy automation tool which can be implemented and executed easily then this the tool you are looking for, only ting need to be analyse is the cost effectiveness since the tools license is bit costly


    Utilities

Micro Focus UFT

  • July 16, 2019
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best?
UFT supports VB scripting and it has wide support for automating many different UIs and applications. It all comes with different plugins. Record and play is the very easy and simple method to use with UFT but usually we use the recording option at the base level and integrate that code with our automation framework. It has very good integration with Mocro Focus ALM and so the test and defect management are very easy.It can also integrate with GIT for version control.
What do you dislike?
UFT always requires some framework to be developed which sometimes makes it more complex. It supports only VB Scripting and so there are many limitations in coding. The object repository management is also not that good. UFT sometimes hang or show many issues in normal use.
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
End to end test automation for SAP and its integrated systems. UFT is very helpful in multi software environment especially with ERP solutions like SAP. It can also use for API testing.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Very useful tool for end to end test automation of ERP solutions like SAP, Oracle etc.


    Patrícia P.

Excellent tool in automation!

  • April 29, 2019
  • Review verified by G2

What do you like best?
I have been working with this tool, for more than 1 year, to automate test cases of various management applications of a reputed company. The range of compatible applications is surprendent and quite useful. UFT provides add-ins so you can implement tests for various technologies such as SAP, WEB, Windows applications, console, among others.
The tool is very simple and easy to interact with. Although I did not have previous experience, I easily learned how to use it.
In each solution created (known as test) we can create actions, with its own set of input parameters - data passed by the user to be used in the test. Within the test, there may be several actions and these can be easily organized and ordered among themselves.
If there are actions that are common to several tests, these can be invoked as external actions and thus, it is not necessary to repeat the source code that has been implemented previously, making the process simpler and faster.
In addition, you can create libraries where there can be multiple functions that are called within each test.
UFT also provides the "record" option that automatically generates the source code for the execution of the test, such as the action of clicking a certain button: objects are automatically stored in the repository and the code indicating the button click is generated.
Another feature is the reports generated at the end of each test. They accurately indicate all the steps in the test and whether they were successful or not.
What do you dislike?
Despite its great potential, this tool consumes a huge amout of resources. Even with a good processor, RAM and SSD, running tests with more than 3 add-ins makes the machine too slow and difficult to work with.
During the use, I came across a major limitation that even the support team couldn't help me: massive export of tests (solutions). The client had to move the tests from one location to another within their server. In order to do this, we use the "export" functionality of UFT, which forces us to open each test and select this option and specify the destination folder. By doing this, all links and references to external libraries and actions ceased to function. The only solution was to open each test and fix the various connections, for a total of 5000 tests! This tool is suitable for large companies, however, it is little prepared to massive changes of items, which is a serious problem in large companies.
The licenses of this tool are very expensive, which limits the small and medium companies to use it.
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
The UFT allows you to create a set of tests. Each test execute a specific test case, with routines of a set of actions, to be executed in several technologies used in the management and exercise of activity of several companies, like SAP, Windows applications, Web, among others.
It is possible to run these tests automatically, with various inputs and thus, test the applications used in companies daily, to verify and validate if they behave as expected. It is a way of validating that the whole process of company management is fully functional.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
It is an excellent tool, but you need a good machine to use it.
Care should be taken to change the location of the implementations.


    Nelson P.

The best test automation tool but it should be more efficient

  • April 24, 2019
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best?
Micro Focus UFT is a very good software for test automation because it handles different types of software, is simple to use and It's easily integrated with ALM and Jenkins. The record works really good and most of the time, is very useful. For test scenarios that require multiple executions with different data for each execution Micro Focus UFT is the best choice.
What do you dislike?
The license is too expensive. It should be able to use other programming languages instead of only VBScript. It's not efficient, I am using Micro Focus UFT on a reasonable good laptop with an Intel i7 8Gen, 16Gb of ram and most of the time it runs slow when executing tests.
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
I am using Micro Focus UFT to test an API with putty by SSH. UFT is very useful because it is probably the only one that can pick up the coordinates of a putty session with the Record option and this turns my work much more easier.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
It's one of the best products for test automation in the market. If you are looking for a product that has a really good support this is the product that you are looking for.