Sold by
Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF - Tor IP Protection
Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF - Tor IP Protection provides security against Anonymous IP traffic, specifically originating from Tor network, which can be difficult to detect using an ordinary IP Risk Index.
Reviews (5)
Mario Rodríguez Hernández
Managed rules have streamlined deployments and have improved security for internet-facing apps
Reviewed on Jun 18, 2026
Review from a verified AWS customer
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF is to associate it with CloudFront distributions, API Gateway, and application load balancers in the different applications that I deploy on AWS.
A specific example of how I integrate Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF in my applications is that I have associated it with an application that is exposed to the internet, both in API Gateway and in CloudFront, where it provides me with very high security and I do not have to get directly involved in managing the WAF rules, since they are already managed for me by this solution.
What is most valuable?
I consider the best features offered by Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF to be ease of use.
Regarding ease of use, I find it especially simple and intuitive when working with this solution because since it is a Marketplace product, I just purchase it and it already appears as an option within WAF, and those rules are provided to me and I do not have to do anything else; I do not have anything to manage or create.
Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF has positively impacted my organization by improving both security and efficiency when deploying these services without having to manage or create those WAF rules myself.
It has improved efficiency in deployments because I do not need a specific security profile; instead, once I purchase the product, I link those rules to the different CloudFront and ALB and API Gateway, as I mentioned before, and I do not worry about it anymore. I need fewer staff on projects.
What needs improvement?
I would like Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF to continue being improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF for one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I consider Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF to be stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I find the scalability of Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF adapts to the growth of my needs.
How are customer service and support?
My experience with the customer support of Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF has been positive; I have not had to use it.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I used the native AWS ones before Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF and decided to switch because these were more secure.
I used Amazon's native managed rules and I moved to Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF because in forums and from various specialists they indicated that these were of higher quality and provided greater security for applications.
How was the initial setup?
I purchased Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF through the AWS Marketplace.
What was our ROI?
I have seen a return on investment with this solution, particularly in terms of staff reduction.
Since I started using this tool, I estimate that I need one fewer person per project.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with the price, implementation costs, and licensing of this tool was that I did not have any noteworthy problems; everything went smoothly.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF, I evaluated other options such as the managed rules from Fortinet and I chose these because they had a better price.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to other people who are considering using Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF is to analyze the results it can give them, and how it can make their applications more secure and better protected from the internet. I would rate this solution an 8 out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Ayodeji Bayo-Makinde
Granular api security has freed team resources and reduced effort but detection accuracy needs work
Reviewed on Jun 13, 2026
Review from a verified AWS customer
What is our primary use case?
Currently, I use Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF for one of my AWS Load Balancer integrations, placing the managed rules in front of my load balancer as a form of security measure for traffic coming into the application. My application is a public internet-facing application, which is unique about my environment and setup.
What is most valuable?
The feature that stands out to me the most about Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF is the API protection, as many managed WAF rule sets are originally designed around traditional websites, but Cloudbric integrates a dedicated API protection module aimed at REST APIs, GraphQL endpoints, XML validation, and API-specific attacks.
My experience with the API protection module is positive, as I had one implementation for a mobile backend and some FinTech APIs where Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF really worked wonders for that setup, requiring minimal modifications or tweaking.
Another thing I appreciate about Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF is that it does not force me into a monolithic package, allowing for selective deployments where I can choose specific protections such as only malicious IP, thus providing flexibility to control costs and capacity consumption.
Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF has positively impacted my organization by freeing up human resources that would otherwise be dedicated to creating and managing WAF rules, helping me reduce costs as I can streamline WAF rules for some applications and deploy protection in less than an hour instead of days or weeks.
What needs improvement?
I find that the only drawbacks with Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF are its less market penetration, especially in North America and Europe, resulting in fewer community reviews, published case studies, and a small ecosystem of users, along with less third-party validation and occasional false positives triggered by API payload or JSON bodies.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF for just over a year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF has been fairly stable in my experience.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
In terms of scalability, Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF has been fairly scalable for my use case, working really well.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support for Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF has been quite good, and although I have not had to use it often, the few times I have reached out, they have been satisfactory.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, I was using Imperva and F5 for that particular use case, but I switched to Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF because I did not need the full protection those tools provided; I needed something more flexible.
How was the initial setup?
My experience with Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF's pricing and setup was positive; the setup was fairly straightforward and took less than an hour, and the pricing is very good and flexible, allowing me to choose the parts of WAF protection I want.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I can definitely say that since using Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF, I need fewer employees because those who would have been dedicated to creating and managing WAF rules are now free to pursue higher priorities, leading to reduced cost in human resources.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
The only other option I evaluated before choosing Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF was Fortinet, but it was still too much for what I needed.
What other advice do I have?
I have not had to use the AI capabilities of Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF yet, but from others' feedback, it has been fairly standard performance for the markets.
I have not noticed anything specific regarding the accuracy and reliability of output from Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF since I have not really made use of the AI capabilities, so that is still to be seen on my end.
I did purchase Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF through the AWS Marketplace.
My advice for others looking into using Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF is that if you have a use case for granular WAF rules where you do not need full traditional rule protection, especially for securing APIs, Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF is really effective at API-specific protection. I would rate this product a seven out of ten.
Nguyen
Perfect fit for scanning tor incoming
Reviewed on Apr 14, 2025
Review from a verified AWS customer
Screening Tor traffic is a key security concern for our operations, so we decided it was the right time to add an extra layer to our WAF configuration. When I asked around for a cost-effective yet reliable managed rule set, this one came highly recommended by AI—and it really delivers.
Installation was smooth and straightforward, just a few clicks. We did require some advanced custom settings to ensure smooth operations, and their support team was incredibly helpful, guiding us through the process and even suggesting a few extra options in case we experience traffic spikes.
Pricing is based on region and request volume, which makes it very affordable at the moment. Of course, unexpected situations can arise, but it’s good to know they have flexible offerings ready when needed.
I gave it 4 out of 5 stars only because the advanced settings were a bit confusing at first and I had to reach out for help. But apart from that, everything works flawlessly. Very likely to recommend this to other tech teams.
De Luca
Wish There Was a Bundle for All IP Sets
Reviewed on Mar 31, 2025
Review from a verified AWS customer
I'm already using Anonymous IP and have been pretty happy with the results so far. Recently decided to add the tor Protection as an extra layer since we started seeing more suspicious activity that we assume coming from Tor exit nodes.
Setup was quick and worked well alongside the existing rules. It’s a nice addition if you're looking to tighten access without affecting legit users too much.
One thing I’d love to see is an IP threat bundle—something like a package that includes Anonymous IPs, Tor, and Malicious IPs all in one subscription. It’d be way more convenient than subscribing to each one separately.
Overall, solid rule set for those wanting more control over incoming traffic from anonymized sources.
Lucas M.
Pretty worth it for small business like mine
Reviewed on Mar 14, 2025
Review provided by G2
What do you like best about the product?
The pricing is fair—I only pay what I deserve.
I appreciate the targeted focus on Tor IPs, which adds a charming touch to the service.
Their top tier detection rate looks promising, so I'm willing to give it a shot.
Very easy to integrate into WAF with just few clicks.
Oh and the customer contact was very helpful as well.
So far so good!
I appreciate the targeted focus on Tor IPs, which adds a charming touch to the service.
Their top tier detection rate looks promising, so I'm willing to give it a shot.
Very easy to integrate into WAF with just few clicks.
Oh and the customer contact was very helpful as well.
So far so good!
What do you dislike about the product?
I could not find any at this point.
I hope this fair service continues.
I hope this fair service continues.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
They detect bad IPs from Tor incomming and filter them for me so I do not have to worry about the malicious traffics.