Regarding the use cases for the product, it is used for all documentation purposes and computation purposes.

The complete Office 365 suite is used, and we have recently started using it for designing purposes because Microsoft Designer has launched. It is a great product to have. We also use it for Project Management.

The recent Microsoft 365 integration with Copilot is certainly very useful and effective, specifically for enterprise customers as it provides more than a 5x boost to productivity.

Within this suite, Microsoft Teams is another component that plays a big role. The way Copilot has been integrated into all the suites of the product, including Office suite and collaboration suite, creates a very effective combination that is being productively used within organizations and enterprises.

There is room for improvement to make Office 365 more affordable.

Pricing is the major concern because certain features are also part of some free suites that people are used to using in their daily life, which drives the demand for Office 365. If it would be commercially more viable and affordable for smaller and medium-sized enterprises, their suite would be one of the best suites.

I have been working with Windows for 35 years, which is the same period with Office 365.

The installation is quite easy, rating it 10 out of 10.

The solution is quite stable.

Since it is on-premises, the solution is one of the best and easiest ones, requiring minimal resources for management.

Support for Office 365 deserves nine points out of ten. The support is almost amazing.

From a productivity perspective, it is certainly saving time, but it is not saving money as similar work can be done with other Office suites available outside.

Regarding percentages and calculating ROI, it is difficult to provide specific figures.

To manage and maintain Office 365, deployment depends on the use cases. The complete suite is not needed on every endpoint.

For example, the Project Management suite is necessary only for PMO team members. Otherwise, just the Office suite is sufficient if they are not looking for the Designer component.

The integration with Copilot is a good example of AI integration. It would be beneficial to have open options to use any kind of AI that is available, apart from only being tightly integrated with Microsoft.

The Office suite can be integrated with many applications.

On a scale of one to ten, this solution deserves a rating of nine.

I mostly work with AWS. My team is working on bespoke applications and we're deploying it on AWS Kubernetes, mostly with EKS services. That's my scope at this time.

I have been working with Office 365 for three years. I mainly use Office 365 for collaboration and communication, mostly using SharePoint, MS Teams, and email.

I'm using Office 365 for collaboration and communication. Microsoft Teams is the most useful feature of Office 365 for me.

Microsoft Teams is the most useful feature of Office 365 for me. Since we are using a cloud base, for stability, I can rate it 8, because there are some performance issues and outages I've encountered. From my experience, in my environment, we are using mostly the Microsoft Office suite, MS Word, PowerPoint, and everything.

I think there's more advantage in using Office 365 compared to Google or AWS collaboration tools if you are using Microsoft in your productivity tools, due to the seamless integration. Office 365 does support my remote and hybrid workforce collaboration needs.

Based on my experience as a user, I think we are going into full integration with the Copilot, so hopefully this will improve functionality, but I haven't used it yet. I'm expecting more from the full integration with the Copilot for more automation.

In the future, it would be great to see full integration with the Copilot.

I have been working with Office 365 for three years.

From my user point of view, the initial setup and deployment process for Office 365 is seamless to the users.

Since we are using a cloud base, for stability, I can rate it 8, because there are some performance issues and outages I've encountered.

I think it's scalable, as long as you pay.

I'm not raising support, as it will be handled by another team, not on the user side.

I currently am no longer working with SAP in the past two years, as I moved to another area already, which was about three years ago.

From my user point of view, the initial setup and deployment process for Office 365 is seamless to the users.

I'm not raising support, as it will be handled by another team, not on the user side.

I think Office 365 is more beneficial for medium to enterprise company sizes, while small companies may not find it as beneficial.

For pricing, I think it's fairly priced, I would rate it 8.

I think there's more advantage in using Office 365 compared to Google or AWS collaboration tools if you are using Microsoft in your productivity tools, due to the seamless integration.

I don't want to publish my review on the PeerSpot platform in public, as much as possible. I'm okay with providing only my feedback without any personal details.

For my final points for Office 365, I would rate it an 8.

The main applications including Outlook, Word, Excel, and SharePoint are my daily use cases with Office 365.

A lot of the features help us create more work, but Outlook is most helpful for me because I'm a remote worker, along with Teams.

The main benefit I receive from Office 365 is the ability to work with people remotely, so it's nice to collaborate online and share files that we might be working on together.

Outlook, Word, Excel, and SharePoint are valuable features in Office 365 that I use daily.

Many features help us create more work efficiently, with Outlook being particularly helpful for remote work, alongside Teams.

The ability to work with people remotely, collaborate online, and share files are the main benefits I receive from Office 365.

There is not much I would improve for Office 365, though fewer updates would be nice.

I probably have many improvements I'd want to see, but nothing specific comes to mind.

I have been working with Office 365 since its adoption when it moved over.

I am not involved in the setup process for Office 365; we just get it deployed, and I don't know what issues the HR side has.

I would rate the stability of Office 365 at around eight out of ten.

I would rate the scalability of Office 365 at ten out of ten.

I haven't contacted tech support from Microsoft personally; I notice really no complaints inside the system.

I have been an Office user for about 20 years, and the last application I used was Lotus Notes.

I am not involved in the setup process for Office 365; we just get it deployed.

The tech team primarily works with the implementation.

I did some research on PeerSpot about comparison between Cornerstone and LinkedIn Learning.

I have been an Office user for about 20 years, and the last application I used was Lotus Notes.

AI integration with Office 365 is currently under test in our organization.

We don't have many app integrations with Office 365, but it's something we're certainly looking at.

My name is Adam Stevenson, and I work for Stantec as a talent development advisor. My email is adam.stevenson@stantec.co.uk.

I am a real user of Microsoft products, not a partner, and I would prefer my opinion about Office 365 to be anonymous on the platform.

I am working with both Cornerstone and LinkedIn Learning because I'm working with HR tools and employee involving solutions, and needed research for a presentation.

I couldn't specify which cloud we are using for the deployment of Office 365.

I would rate Office 365 a 9 out of 10 for all products overall.

I am totally satisfied with the security part of Microsoft for that software.

I use Office 365 to make PowerPoint presentations, Microsoft Word to put together memos, and Excel for building financial models.

The most valuable features with Office 365 are Excel's robustness around financial modeling, which is super helpful for my job.

Office 365 brings a very strong return on investment through time savings and different efficiencies. We would never cut it as it is table stakes - it is necessary to operate in our world. The biggest KPI is functionality, specifically the ability to execute the work that needs to be done.

Office 365 could be improved in areas such as their collaboration functionality. I have used it before, but being able to work on documents in a cloud-connected manner with co-workers simultaneously would be super helpful. This feature is not available in the version we have.

I have approximately 15 years of experience with Office 365.

We haven't used a different collaboration tool before this; we've always had Microsoft. We currently have both Microsoft and Google Suite.

Some main differences between Microsoft and Google Suite are that Google is cloud native, enabling collaboration with people working on documents simultaneously. Google Sheets, compared to Excel, is not as robust. You sacrifice some robustness for sharing functionality. The same applies to PowerPoint versus Google Slides, where PowerPoint is much more powerful. The ability to work with others in a cloud native product is the selling point for Google Suite and represents a real benefit.

I would recommend Office 365 to other businesses due to its robustness and functionality.

We haven't been using AI in Office 365 for document management or data analysis because we don't have Copilot, which is their AI feature. It hasn't been integrated into our work.

My cybersecurity strategy primarily involves using CrowdStrike Falcon as an EDR solution, and currently, we are using it as an EDR. We are in discussion with the CrowdStrike team about having a managed SOC integrated as well.

I am using CrowdStrike Falcon in the online industry.

The most effective feature I find for threat detection is the 24/7 managed monitoring, which is a next-gen antivirus and next-gen Endpoint Detection and Response. In Endpoint Detection and Response, the best part is 24/7, 365 continuous monitoring to the endpoint for identifying any suspicious activity.

It is a next-gen AV which does AI-based behavioral analysis to detect and take action on malware, ransomware, and other threats.

The automated response capabilities in CrowdStrike Falcon perform analysis based on the behavior of the activity. If it finds objectionable content or breaking of sitemaps, it uses an untraditional approach to block it. When suspicious activity occurs, such as detecting a file with a document extension that is self-replicating, the detection happens automatically. In cases of zero-day threats, such files are automatically put in sandbox for extraction and analysis to identify why it is classified as malware.

Falcon's integration capabilities with other tools enhance my security posture because it has a very lightweight agent, and having a unified console gives us complete visibility, including endpoints, servers, containers, and cloud workloads.

To improve CrowdStrike Falcon for the next release, I recommend that they should have a model where it works as an agentless solution. In terms of everything which agent pushes to the server or to the single console, if it could also have a feature where you can have other ports, which is SNMP or your network devices or OT devices, which you can specifically monitor, that would be great.

I have been working with CrowdStrike Falcon for more than 2 years now.

Regarding the setup, in my experience and our team's experience, it is fairly easy to install.

I would rate the setup an eight because we have a heterogeneous environment. For Windows, it is very straightforward and easy. For Linux, you need to automate it. If you have a bulk force, then you have to use some CMF or similar solution, which makes it a bit more complex, but overall it is fairly easy.

During these 2 years with CrowdStrike Falcon, I faced challenges, as everybody knows about the CrowdStrike outage. That was one significant issue, as it brought many Windows-related services to a halt due to one bad configuration push from CrowdStrike tracks.

Regarding stability, except for the incidents mentioned, I don't see any issues.

For scalability, it is easy to scale this solution for my company needs, and I would rate it a nine.

More than 7,000 users are working with CrowdStrike Falcon in my company.

Currently, we are 100% covered with CrowdStrike Falcon, but as the user base increases, we will certainly increase the license.

I have contacted CrowdStrike for support regarding the same incident, and my experience was pretty bad. There were people not knowing what was happening, how to mitigate it, or what to do. We were in a bad situation. After a couple of hours, their communication started flowing better, and things started improving.

My impression of the technical support of CrowdStrike, just for that particular instance, is less than four.

I have evaluated other options before working with CrowdStrike, including Carbon Black and SentinelOne.

When comparing CrowdStrike and SentinelOne, I don't see many advantages, but because of one particular problem, we had to give away SentinelOne. Otherwise, all three products are quite comparable.

Overall, it is a user-friendly tool.

CrowdStrike Falcon is definitely an expensive solution.

Since implementing CrowdStrike Falcon, I would say if it is protecting my environment, that fulfills my expectation. So far, I am happy.

For those who would to use CrowdStrike Falcon, I recommend that they need to negotiate hard on commercials because it is not an easy or affordable solution. From a commercial standpoint, they should negotiate hard. Technically, it is not a very difficult tool.

If we had not experienced that outage, I probably would have rated it ten. That incident gave it a very bad name because the support was inadequate. Many people might have decided to move out of CrowdStrike because of that incident.

My total rating for CrowdStrike Falcon is eight.

Some of the use cases I focus on include collaboration, communication, and information sharing as well as project management.

In terms of industries, I focus on health care and manufacturing.

Some of the most valuable features I found with Office 365 include Teams integration with various applications, allowing for the addition of various Teams apps into Teams channels for managing teams and collaboration.

The SharePoint integration has proven beneficial.

SharePoint impacts my project management by providing shared collaborative information where people can refer back to it without having to move the information around; you can just send links instead of needing to download documents all the time.

Currently, Microsoft can improve Office 365 by enhancing the persistence of the user experience from platform to platform and screen to screen, ensuring that wherever you log in, whatever you're doing, everything is still readily accessible and intuitive, as you left it.

I've had experience with Office 365 since it's been released, since its existence.

I rate Office 365 as reliable and stable. I haven't had any significant outages or application errors or failures, so once you put it in service in your enterprise, there's not a whole lot of product issues, mostly user issues.

I really don't go to technical support very often, as we usually handle our own in-house support, but when I've escalated to Microsoft on occasion, they've been very responsive, so I would say they're adequate.

I am familiar with other types of collaboration tools, such as Google platforms, although I haven't used them in a while, so it's come a long way since my last experience.

The main difference between Office 365 and perhaps Google is that Microsoft products are much better integrated across all those platform products.

Setting it up is fairly well thought out for the end-user experience at the moment, especially for the initial engagement. They've developed a lot of on-demand help and training resources for new and casual users, so I believe they've done a good job with it.

The return on investment is always an improvement. If they don't have it, it's a huge improvement going from no collaboration to a collaborative platform, and I think it's a significant improvement due to the many integration options available.

As for the pricing for Microsoft Office 365, it can always be cheaper.

The cost is probably at least in the upper two-thirds range.

I would recommend Office 365 to others.

Office 365 utilizes AI, and while it's just getting started, I think the integration is still in its beginning stages; there's likely to be a whole lot more integration across all the application stack within the next year or so.

Using AI has proven to be a good resource for creating a first draft when we start getting stuff started.

On a scale of 1-10, I rate Office 365 a 10.

I use Windows on my notebook, and I also use Office 365, which includes Word and PowerPoint for documents and presentations.

We store our documents in SharePoint as document storage, but we don't use workflows in SharePoint because we mainly utilize ALM Jira for all our business processes; SharePoint operates mainly as a repository.

It's important to mention that when we are working on big reports, collaboration is key, allowing many people to work on the same document together.

I use both online and offline; some people do heavy editing on the web, but if I am working on big documents, I prefer to do it offline.

When I'm traveling, I definitely download all the documents on my notebook.

I should put my feedback mainly in Jira and Confluence, as these days I'm working around the clock.

With Office 365, I have never encountered issues; my experience is entirely positive.

We use Office 365, and colleagues download everything instantly; it's not about days.

It's very difficult to say how we can add more to our Microsoft experiences, as they are constantly improving and changing; regarding the stability of Microsoft products, I have no complaints.

With regard to Jira, when they implement new functionalities, quite often they deliver a product that is not stable enough; we can see this clearly, as sometimes something is not working, but this is about Jira, not about Office 365.

We are not using integrated Copilot, but our developers use OpenRoute a lot, which serves as a broker to interact with several AIs like ChatGPT and Google Gemini. I also know that some developers are using grounding.

I never think of integrating these technologies with Office because when it comes to programming questions, the developers are not using Word; they work in development environments like Eclipse or IntelliJ IDEA.

I have been working with this technology for approximately 10 years.

With Office 365, I have never encountered issues; my experience is entirely positive.

Regarding the stability of Microsoft products, I have no complaints.

I never contact Microsoft for support; Atlassian support contacts me quite often.

I remember other colleagues contacting Microsoft, but that was mainly about licensing questions, not anything technical.

Sometimes we are not happy with the price of available solutions, but when considering alternatives, such as OpenOffice, there's really nothing to compare. I know the formats of these open applications, but in terms of convenience and functionality, Office 365 is the only option.

In fact, it's not just a leader; Office 365 is the only real option we have now.

You can find us online at Enola-solutions.com.

I use Carmonda for business, along with several other tools.

I would rate it a nine out of ten; the only reason it's not a 10 is that the only comment I have is about the price. The functionality is perfect.

For Office 365, I use it for communication and sharing information with the team, specifically when I have to share big files, so I use Teams because of the limitation in email. For professional communication with customers, we use the email, not chat.

The most valuable features of Office 365, what I appreciate most about using it, is that the interface is very user-friendly and intuitive, especially when they include the Copilot.

The integration with Teams and SharePoint has impacted our project management in an awesome way. We can contact all team members through Teams, and all the information they produce is stored in our SharePoint.

For the Office 365 environment, I believe they have a lot of features already covered, but it just relies on the kind of license that the customer or user has. I don't have any improvements right now.

I have had experience with Office 365 for the last five or six years.

In general, my thoughts on the scalability of this product are that it is very reliable.

I would rate Microsoft support for this product as eight out of ten.

I give it this rating because the protocol is very much the same even when you have an emergency, and you don't have the specific expertise at the first call. They triage the incident, and that's acceptable, but it's not always aligned with the criticality for the business.

We did not use a different solution before Office 365, nor have we ever evaluated other options.

Regarding the setup, it's not a simple process, but it is not the most complex solution in the market. It depends on the kind of implementation that the customer would prefer to have.

Regarding the return on investment for Office 365 for my company, it is very easy to defend the acquisition against the finance team because the product offers many advantages, time saving, quicker responses, accurate information, and security in the information and procedure.

I don't remember the specific product as that would be a long time ago, maybe I was doing research and asking what the specific product would be.

I'm not technically experienced with EDRs, XDRs, and Privileged Access Management tools as I don't work in the technical side of the product. I work more in the commercial side of the business.

I use Teams as an end user, so I don't have any opinion regarding the backend or technical side of Microsoft solutions, including Office 365, Zoom, or other virtual meetings.

I would recommend Office 365 to other businesses because it is easy to use, very friendly, and common in your environment, with most customers using it, so there's no issue with performance.

Overall, I would give Office 365 a nine out of ten.

I use Office 365 daily, but my satisfaction compared with the older version is not very good.

We use Teams for communication, Outlook for email, and the full set from Microsoft Office.

AI with Office 365 is useful for programming, and sometimes for reporting and creating emails, which is easier.

It helps me with my remote or hybrid workforce collaboration, but I prefer the desktop version, not the web.

It's hard to say what features are most valuable. In comparison with the old version, Office 365 is bigger and needs more resources, making it slower than before, so I don't see many benefits.

The automatic updates are problematic because I come to work and find some things different than they were yesterday, which is not a very good idea.

The stability for Office 365 is not very good, as the application sometimes closes without any information; the old version was much more stable.

The scalability can be complicated because it depends on Microsoft's policy for licensing, and it's expandable, but very complicated.

The pricing for Office 365 is higher now because my previous calculation for the box version or standard version with installation and lifetime support was easier and cheaper, and when we use one version for more than three years, it compares unfavorably with Microsoft's license policy.

In general, Office 365 is good, but I feel that it is becoming more of a huge software with many functions that are preferred at this time; after a few years, nobody knows what this technology was.

I have been working with Office 365 for three years.

The setup process for Office 365 is easy because we have predefined mirrors of the installation system allowing us to complete installation at once, including the operating system, application, and Office 365. This is by our configuration, but normal installation is a problem for me because we use both Czech language version and English version, and I have preinstalled assistance for every language. It's huge and selects a lot of resources from the computer, which is not very good.

The stability for Office 365 is not very good, as the application sometimes closes without any information; the old version was much more stable.

The scalability can be complicated because it depends on Microsoft's policy for licensing, and it's expandable, but very complicated.

We don't use direct technical support from Microsoft because it was very complicated; the most useful solutions for us come from Google or other things, not directly from Microsoft.

We use the old system from Infor, the XPPS and Xpert.

I'm not using M3; it's an enterprise system for automotive mostly based on IBM iSeries 400 computers, not Windows system, and we have used it for more than 20 years. We were satisfied, but the systems become obsolete in the last years, so we are looking for new possibilities.

The setup process for Office 365 is easy because we have predefined mirrors of the installation system allowing us to complete installation at once, including the operating system, application, and Office 365. This is by our configuration, but normal installation is a problem for me because we use both Czech language version and English version, and I have preinstalled assistance for every language. It's huge and selects a lot of resources from the computer, which is not very good.

I am using AI technology with Office 365; this is a separate team that is growing and learning more and more about all technologies such as Microsoft Copilot, and it's improving every day.

It's integrated with my system because it's an old ERP system, so that's also the point where we are looking for new functionality.

The pricing for Office 365 is higher now because my previous calculation for the box version or standard version with installation and lifetime support was easier and cheaper, and when we use one version for more than three years, it compares unfavorably with Microsoft's license policy.

As Microsoft Office becomes the most used standard, it's necessary to use it even if maybe other solutions could be easier and cheaper for implementation.

I don't have any additional features I would like to see in Office right now.

For the current version of Office 365, I rate it 2.5 out of 5; it's not bad, but there are many points for improvement.

I am just a Microsoft user, not a partner.

It would be fine for my opinion about Office to be with my name as personal feedback without my company name or contact details, just my personal name.

The features of Office 365 that have significantly enhanced my workflow productivity include Excel, which is a very good product that helps assist me with my work.

There are approximately 3,000 people using Office 365 in my organization.

As a user of Office 365, I find it to be a common Office suite that we can use for documentation, spreadsheets, and presentations to other customers.

The areas of Office 365 that have room for improvement include PowerPoint, which I think needs significant improvement or should be removed. I don't know much about OneNote, and I don't find it useful. As for Access, people use it, but it's not widely adopted. Teams is in its early stages and requires substantial improvements, though it's making progress. I particularly dislike PowerPoint, though I acknowledge others may have different opinions.

I have about 3 years of experience working with Office 365 specifically, but I've been using Office for approximately 20 years.

It is deployed both on cloud and on premises.

When rating the stability of Office 365, seven is probably reasonably good. I use Excel extensively, so sometimes it has issues because I overuse it, but based on that, it's around six or seven.

When rating the scalability of Office 365, I would need a definition of scalability when discussing an Office suite in this case.

I have never used technical support from Microsoft in 20-30 years.

Regarding their message board support, I think it's extremely poor. While I haven't contacted them directly, searching for solutions on the internet reveals that answers are very simple, minimal, and not very helpful.

Their actual direct contact support might be better, but I cannot verify this as I have never specifically contacted Microsoft.

A long time ago, I was a volume seller, but now I'm just a user of Microsoft solutions.

Regarding the initial setup of Office 365, I can't fully evaluate it because I've been using Office for so many years that Office 365 didn't seem significantly different. I use many languages and sometimes need to download packages for each language, but I experienced absolutely no issues, making it a reasonably easy solution to install.

I did not face any challenges while integrating Office 365 with other tools.

I swapped the computer and the performance improved, but that has nothing to do with Office 365 itself.

When I purchased Office 365 myself, it was somewhat expensive. Recently it increased in price by approximately 20 percent, and I'm not sure if this increase is justified as I don't see any explicit features that are helpful.

There should be more options to not use PowerPoint or Access so that people who just consider using Word or Excel would have better options.

I might be using Horizon in the next couple of months, though I'm not sure. I have extensive experience with Office 365. If organizations need it, I would recommend it, as Excel is a very good program and Word is quite a good program.

I rate Office 365 a 6 out of 10.