![Hyperglance: Up to 500 Resources [Pay as you go] logo](https://d7umqicpi7263.cloudfront.net/img/product/db2ff6a7-a409-4199-b22c-9cf5c1f6e10e.png)
Hyperglance: Up to 500 Resources [Pay as you go]
Visual mapping has improved how our team understands and manages complex cloud dependencies
What is our primary use case?
My primary use case of Hyperglance is to get a clear view of our cloud infrastructure in one place. It helps visualize cloud resources, understand how different components are connected, and identify potential issues or areas that need attention. Having everything organized in a single view makes it easier to monitor the environment and manage resources more efficiently. I also use it to check resource dependencies and spot unused or misconfigured resources that might increase cloud costs. The visual diagrams are especially helpful when troubleshooting issues because I can quickly understand how different services are connected without checking each resource manually.
How has it helped my organization?
Hyperglance has made it easier to understand and manage our cloud infrastructure by bringing resource information and connections into one visual view. One specific use case is reviewing our AWS environment to see how EC2 instances, VPCs, subnets, and security groups are connected. This helps us trace dependencies when investigating connectivity issues and identify resources that may need configuration changes. It also saves time compared with manually checking each resource in the AWS console. Overall, Hyperglance provides a clearer picture of our cloud setup and helps us make better-informed decisions about resource management and infrastructure optimization.
What is most valuable?
The features I find most valuable in Hyperglance are cloud infrastructure visualization, resource dependency mapping, and the ability to view multiple AWS resources in one place. For example, when investigating a connectivity issue between an EC2 instance and other services, the visual map helps me understand how the instance, VPC subnet, and security groups are connected. This makes it easier to trace dependencies and identify configurations that may need further investigation. As a result, we can narrow down potential causes more quickly, reduce manual cross-checking in the AWS console, and make troubleshooting more organized. Overall, Hyperglance gives us a clear picture of our cloud environment and helps us make better-informed infrastructure management decisions.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see more detailed filtering options for large AWS environments, especially when searching for specific EC2 instances, security groups, or network dependencies. It would also be helpful to have clear alerts for misconfigured resources, and more actionable reports and customizable dashboards would make it easier to share findings with the team and track infrastructure issues over time.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used the solution for two years.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before using Hyperglance, I mainly relied on the AWS management console to review cloud resources and understand their connections. Hyperglance offers a more visual way to explore infrastructure dependencies, making it easier to get an overview of the environment without manually checking each resource.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I recommend Hyperglance to small and mid-size teams that need better visibility into their AWS infrastructure. Before buying, check whether the 500 resource plan fits your needs and compare the cost with your budget. If you manage a growing cloud environment, review the upgrade pricing to avoid unexpected expenses later.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We considered using the native AWS management console and AWS configure to understand our cloud resources and their relationships. Hyperglance stood out for its visual infrastructure mapping, which makes it easier to see resource dependencies and get an overall view of the cloud environment.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, Hyperglance is worth considering for teams that want a clear visual understanding of their cloud infrastructure. I find resource mapping and dependency visibility particularly useful for troubleshooting and managing AWS environments. I would recommend taking advantage of the available trial or demo before purchasing to make sure the features and 500-resource limit fit your team's needs.
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Hyperglance Makes Cloud Infrastructure Visualization Effortless
Automated client cloud maps have cut onboarding time and make cost and compliance tracking accurate
What is our primary use case?
We use it primarily for mapping out new client cloud architectures during onboarding and tracking untagged, unused, or oversized AWS/Azure resources to control their monthly cloud spend.
How has it helped my organization?
It significantly cut down our onboarding time for new client accounts. Instead of our team leads spending days manually digging through AWS and Azure consoles to document what is running, we get an auto-generated map right away.
It also helped us catch idle resources that were running up client costs unnecessarily, making our FinOps reporting much more accurate.
What is most valuable?
The automated architecture mapping combined with the cost and compliance overlays. Being able to see resource relationships visually while simultaneously spotting security misconfigurations or unattached storage saves a lot of back-and-forth during client audits.
What needs improvement?
The UI can still feel a bit cluttered and sluggish when client accounts approach the resource limit, so better default filtering out of the box would help.
Custom reporting rules could also be more intuitive to set up without needing as much trial and error.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for about 1.5 years.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We were mostly relying on manual Lucidchart diagrams and native AWS/Azure billing dashboards.
Keeping diagrams up to date manually was impossible as client setups changed, so we switched to Hyperglance for automated, real-time mapping.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The Up to 500 Resources tier runs around $900 a month, which might feel a bit steep for smaller teams.
However, since they price based on your resource count rather than taking a percentage of your total cloud bill, the costs stay predictable.
If your team actively uses it to find unattached volumes and idle instances across client accounts, the tool easily pays for itself.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated CloudZero and Flexera. CloudZero is solid for cost tracking, but we really needed the automated architecture diagramming to help with client onboarding.
Flexera was another option, but it felt a bit too heavy and complex to deploy for our specific BPO use case.
What other advice do I have?
Take your time during the initial setup. If you plug it into a massive, messy cloud account without configuring your filters first, the auto-generated diagrams will be overwhelming to read.
Spend a few days dialing in the filters and custom reporting rules, and it will save your operations team hours of manual work every month.
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Clear Visibility, Steeper Learning Curve.
Beyond visibility, it helps with cost control — its cost optimization insights help identify and terminate unused resources, contributing to cloud cost savings — and with security/compliance, since it runs real-time scanning and automated compliance monitoring to surface misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and excessive IAM access